Mza Rtc Trading Company Limited vs Export Trading Company Limited (Civil Application No. 12 of 2015) [2016] TZCA 12 (27 October 2016)






(Application from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania, (Commercial Division) at Mwanza)

(Makaramba, J.)

dated the 1st day of April, 2014 in

Commercial Appeal No. 1 of 2014



25th & 27th October, 2016


This application for extension of time is taken out under Rules 10 and 47 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules) for filing a notice of intention to appeal to this Court against the decision of the High Court (Commercial Division) in Commercial Appeal No. 1 of 2014.

Apparently this is not the first attempt. The applicant had earlier on lodged a notice of appeal to challenge that decision, which was struck down by this Court after it was convinced that the applicant had failed to institute the appeal within the prescribed time. Again in Civil Application No. 15 of 2014 the applicant applied for extension of time to apply for leave, which was also dismissed.

The notice of motion is supported by the affidavit of CHAMA A. MATATA. We find paragraphs 5 and 6 of the affidavit crucial, but paragraphs 7 and 8 even more crucial for determination of the present matter. In paragraph 7 the applicant avers that his earlier attempt to apply for leave to appeal to this Court was dismissed by the High Court (Commercial Division) on 14th November, 2014. In the next paragraph 8, the applicant proposes what he considers to be “significant points of law for determination by the Court. The two issues may be paraphrased as; first, the burden of proof in a case of sale of goods; and two whether the High Court (Commercial Division) has jurisdiction to entertain appeals from Courts of Resident Magistrate.

The respondent did not file any affidavit in reply, but both parties proceeded to file written submissions to assist the Court in the determination of the application. At the hearing of the application, Mr. Chama Matata learned counsel appeared for the applicant, and Mr. Constantine Mutalemwa learned counsel appeared for the respondent.

They jointly agreed to adopt their respective written submissions in support of their positions.

In his written submission, Mr. Matata submitted that the issues of burden of proof in sales of goods, and the jurisdiction of the High Court (Commercial Division) were crucial for determination by the Court and constitute good grounds for extension of time. He relied on the PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND NATIONAL SERVICE v. DEVRAM VALAMBHIA (1992) TLR 186, and RICHARD JULIUS RUKAMBURA v. ISSACK NTWA MWAKAJILA, MZA Civil Application No. 3 of 2004 (unreported).

But Mr. Mutalemwa, learned counsel for the respondent, would hear none of this. He submitted in his written submission that the Court lacked jurisdiction to extend time for filing a notice of appeal, under Rule 10 after the same had been refused by the High Court under section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act Cap. 141 R.E. 2002. He went on to submit that once extension of time to file a notice of appeal is refused by the High Court, the applicant does not enjoy the privileges of a second bite, so to speak, as in the case of leave to appeal. In short, the learned counsel was of the view that this Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the application and cited several decisions of this Court to support his view; which includes MKUNAZINI SHIPPING ENTERPRISES & MKUNAZINI GENERAL TRADER vs. SAID KHAMIS HAMID, ZNZ Civil Application No. 05 of 2012, ALOYCE MSELE vs. CONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORPORATION, Civil Application No. 1(B) of 2009 (both unreported. He thus prayed that the application be dismissed as it was misconceived.

But, he went on, if I were minded to consider it, it was his view that the alleged issues of law were not significant. For instance, he argued, the issue of burden of proof could be resolved and was resolved on the basis of section 115 of the Evidence Act. It was not therefore a point of law worth taking to the Court to warrant extension of time. He cited the very decision relied upon by the applicant; that is: LYAMUYA CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF YOUNG WOMEN’s CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF TANZANIA, Civil Application No. 2 of 2010 (unreported).

As regards, the jurisdiction of the High Court (Commercial Division) in civil appeals from subordinate Courts, Mr. Mutalemwa relied on the High Court Registries Rules, 2005 which established the Commercial Division of the High Court as amended by GN. 427 of 2005 which confers on the Division both original and appellate jurisdiction over cases of a commercial significance. Therefore parties who had cases of commercial significance in subordinate courts had an option to appeal to the ordinary registry or the Commercial Division of the High Court. So, he concluded, the question of the High Court (Commercial Division) jurisdiction is now well settled, and need not justify an extension of time to be taken to the Court. He therefore prayed that the application be dismissed for want of merit.

The points raised by Mr. Mutalemwa that this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application have already been dealt with by sister Mjasiri, JA, who first sat to hear the application. It was posed as a preliminary objection. In her considered ruling, my sister learned justice, dismissed the said preliminary objection with costs, and ordered that the application for extension of time be set down for hearing on merit. I have no jurisdiction to revise and overrule that decision. So, I will ignore the first part of Mr. Mutalemwa’s argument and assume that I have jurisdiction to hear this application.

An application for extension of time for the doing of any act authorized by the Rules, under Rule 10 of the Rules, is on exercise in judicial discretion. Citing BLACK’s LAW DICTIONARY (6th ed.) in MWITA s/o MHERE AND IBRAHIM MHERE v R (2005) TLR 107 this Court observed that:

“judicial discretion is the exercise of judgment by a judge or court based on what is fair, under the circumstances and guided by the rules and principles of law the Court has to demonstrate however briefly, how that discretion has been exercised to reach, the decision it takes.”

Case law has established that before the Court exercises its discretion under Rule 10 it must have sufficient material before it to account for the delay. The applicant must also show diligence in prosecuting the intended action. And true, time could also be extended if the Court feels that there is a point of law of sufficient importance, such as the illegality of the impugned decision. (See THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND NATIONAL SERVICE vs. DEVRAM VALAMBHIA (1992) TLR. 387 SHANTI vs. HINDOCHIE AND OTHERS (1973) EA 207, VIP ENGINEERING AND MARKETING LTD. AND OTHERS v. CITIBANK (T) LTD, (Consolidated Civil References Nos. 6, 7 and 8 of 2006 (unreported)).

In the present case, with regard to the delay, I would note that the application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was dismissed by the High Court (Songoro, J.) on 30/3/2015. This was done under section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act. With respect, since a notice of appeal is a creature of the Rules, specifically, Rule 83(1) I think this Court can also extend time for filing it under Rule 10. Under Rule 83(1) a notice of appeal may be lodged within 30 days.

As the application in this case was dismissed on 30/3/2015, the applicant was legitimately expected to account for the delay between that date and 13/4/2015 when he lodged the present application. There is no such material in the affidavit. So two weeks have not been accounted for.

The other reason advocated for extension of time is that the legality of the impugned decision, derived from lack of jurisdiction and misdirection on the point of burden of proof. I agree with Mr. Mutalemwa, that there is little merit in this ground. As I said in LYAMUYA CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD’s case, not every point of law will necessarily carry the day in an application for extension of time. The point of law must be of such significance as to warrant the attention of the Court of Appeal. The question of the High Court (Commercial Division)’s appellate jurisdiction is well set out in rule 5 of the High Court Registries Rules. I don’t think this Court would sit to strike down that rule. The question of burden of proof is one that shifts according to the circumstances of each case. Section 115 of the Evidence Act cited by Mr. Mutalemwa is well placed.

So, for all the above reasons I conclude that the applicant has failed to convince me that he deserves any extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The application therefore fails and is dismissed with costs.

DATED at MWANZA this 25th day of October, 2016.



I certify that this is a true copy of the original.




▲ To the top

Documents citing this one 61

Judgment 61
1. Bharya Engineering & Contracting Co. Ltd vs Hamoud Ahmed Nassor (Civil Application No. 342 of 2017) [2018] TZCA 339 (10 September 2018) 6 citations
2. Tanzania Cigarette Public Ltd Co. vs Nancy Mathew Kombe (Revs Appl No. 421 of 2022) [2023] TZHCLD 1138 (28 February 2023) 5 citations
3. the Registered Trustees of Redeemed Assemblies of God in Tanzania (tag) vs Obed Heziron Sichembe and Another (Misc. Land Application 82 of 2020) [2021] TZHC 2846 (22 April 2021) 5 citations
4. Ally forodha & 1673 Others vs The Permanent Secretary Ministry of Finance and Attorney General (Misc. Application No. 421 of 2022) [2022] TZHCLD 1096 (12 December 2022) 3 citations
5. Tauka Theodory Ferdinand vs Eva Zakayo Mwita & Others (Civil Reference No. 16 of 2017) [2022] TZCA 113 (14 March 2022) 3 citations
6. Marian Boys High School vs Rugaimukamu Rwekengo (Revs Appl No. 44 of 2022) [2022] TZHCLD 803 (12 August 2022) 2 citations
7. Belias Bunini vs Akiba Commercial Bank Plc (Misc. Application No. 78 of 2021) [2021] TZHCLD 378 (17 September 2021) 1 citation
8. Emma Health Centre and Pills and Addam Memorial Company Limited vs Neema Lewis Mdoe and 6 Others (Revision Application No. 129 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1387 (11 August 2023) 1 citation
9. Magnus K. Laurean vs Tanzania Breweries Limited (Misc. Labour Application No. 103 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1277 (24 May 2023) 1 citation
10. Salehe Hassan Mjinja vs Vocational Education Training Authority (veta) (Misc. Application No. 302 of 2022) [2022] TZHCLD 964 (31 October 2022) 1 citation
11. ABB Limited vs Stella Mandogo (Miscellaneous Application No. 249 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1420 (27 September 2023)
12. Abduel Emmanuel vs Medicins Sans Frontiers (Miscellaneous Application No. 27831 of 2023) [2024] TZHCLD 11 (19 February 2024)
13. Amina Chechele vs Rombo Green View Hotel (Miscellaneous Application No. 257 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1463 (19 October 2023)
14. Amiri Salehe Mwamba vs Barclays Bank Ltd and 4 Others (Misc. Land Application 593 of 2020) [2021] TZHCLandD 6728 (30 July 2021)
15. Association of Local Authorities of Tanzania vs Cleophas Mbishi Manyangu (Misc. Application No. 7 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1166 (14 March 2023)
16. Athumani Kungubaya & 428 Others vs Tanzania Telecommunications Co. Limited & Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 176 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1390 (11 August 2023)
17. Augustino Kabalula & 5 Others vs Morogoro Plastic Limited & Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 70 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1392 (14 August 2023)
18. Ayoub M. Mwedimage vs China-tanzania Security Company Limited (Revision No. 409 of 2020) [2021] TZHCLD 499 (1 November 2021)
19. Crown Secondary School vs Rauce Kisonga (Miscellaneous Application No. 149 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1389 (11 August 2023)
20. Dolin Investment Company Ltd vs Benny Raymond Mndolw (Misc. Application No. 39 of 2021) [2021] TZHCLD 376 (13 September 2021)
21. Duncani Shilly Nkya and Another vs Oysterbay Hospital Co.Ltd (Misc. Land Application 534 of 2020) [2021] TZHCLandD 316 (2 July 2021)
22. Edward Lawrence Mmbaga vs Fmj Hardware Limited (Misc. Application 63 of 2023) [2023] TZHC 1249 (27 April 2023)
23. Ernest Mtokoma vs Azania Bank Limited (Miscellaneous Application No. 203 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1400 (22 August 2023)
24. Evarist Mushi vs Edward Peter Chuwa (Land Appeal 45 of 2021) [2022] TZHC 12457 (16 August 2022)
25. Ezekiel O. Nyamu vs The Governing Board of The College of Business of Education (Misc. Application 42 of 2023) [2023] TZHC 1247 (28 April 2023)
26. Global Publishers and General Enterprises Ltd vs Luqman Maloto (Miscellaneous Application No. 3004 of 2024) [2024] TZHCLD 64 (7 May 2024)
27. Global Publishers and General Enterprises Ltd vs Luqman Maloto [2024] TZHCLD 63 (7 May 2024)
28. Gozbert Kamuhabwa v. Joanes Njunwa Audax (PC Civil Appeal 52 of 2022) [2023] TZHC 20912 (11 September 2023)
29. Hamson Hamson Ghikas vs. Gladness Laurent Shao (Matrimonial Appeal No 7 of 2022) [2023] TZCA 17593 (2 August 2023)
30. Idd Muhunzi vs Tanzania Cigarette Public Co. (Misc. Application No. 565 of 2020) [2022] TZHCLD 31 (11 February 2022)
31. Iron & Steel Ltd vs Martina Kumalija & 117 Others (Misc. Application No. 428 of 2022) [2022] TZHCLD 1097 (2 December 2022)
32. John P. Kahulo vs Mr. Diper Mahendra Patel (Revision Application No. 532 of 2019) [2021] TZHCLD 467 (13 October 2021)
33. Joseph Roman Selasini vs James Francis Mbatia (Misc Civil Application 541 of 2022) [2023] TZHC 19540 (10 February 2023)
34. Joseph Roman Selasini vs James Francis Mbatia (Misc. Civil Application 541 of 2022) [2022] TZHC 15582 (10 February 2022)
35. Joyce Mapunda and 7 Others vs Kioo Limited (Misc. Application No. 331 of 2020) [2021] TZHCLD 380 (10 September 2021)
36. Kera Komeyo Makeseni and 8 others vs Kilimanjaro Regional Comissioner and Another (Misc. Civil Cause No. 2 of 2023) [2023] TZHC 21592 (5 October 2023)
37. Ledger Hotels & Resorts (Plaza Bahari Beach) vs Zebediya W. Chikoya (Misc. Labour Application No. 119 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1325 (13 June 2023)
38. Mabula Beatus Lushinge vs Conviva Technologies Ltd (Misc. Application No. 460 of 2022) [2023] TZHCLD 1134 (17 February 2023)
39. Mariam Magumbo vs Athumani Salum Mbegu (Land Case 627 of 2021) [2022] TZHCLandD 773 (31 March 2022)
40. Mbalimbali Lodges & Camps Limited vs Timothy Mwita (Application for Revision No. 549 of 2020) [2022] TZHCLD 137 (14 March 2022)
41. Mustaquim Murtaza Darugar v Magreth John Mbombo (Misc. Land Application No.379 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLandD 17155 (23 November 2023)
42. Nexia S. J. Tanzania vs Suzan Furaha Lugoe (Revision Application No. 116 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1379 (19 July 2023)
43. Novatus Williams Mkwama vs Tughe (Misc. Labour Application No. 2 of 2022) [2023] TZHC 20571 (31 August 2023)
44. Novatus Williams Mkwama vs Tughe [2022] TZHC 17235 (31 August 2022)
45. Omary Bakari Liyanga & 2 Others vs Msajili wa Vyama vya Wafanyakazi na Waajiri & 2 Others (Miscellaneous Labour Application No. 87 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1322 (15 June 2023)
46. Quality Group Ltd vs National Microfinance Bank (NMB Bank) PLC & Another (Misc. Application 77 of 2022) [2022] TZHCComD 202 (29 July 2022)
47. Ramadhani Athumani Bofu and Another vs Lake Cement Limited (Revision Application No. 363 of 2020) [2021] TZHCLD 513 (18 November 2021)
48. Ramadhani Myonga and Another vs Ismail Juma Saidi (Misc. Civil Application 247 of 2020) [2021] TZHC 4238 (29 July 2021)
49. Rogath M Mkaku vs Tanzania Breweries Limited (Revision No. 133 of 2021) [2022] TZHCLD 594 (2 June 2022)
50. Saafa Plastic Ltd vs Yona Onesmo & 70 Others (Misc. Application No. 226 of 2022) [2022] TZHCLD 798 (19 August 2022)
51. Said Sobo & 66 Others vs Al Naeem Enterprises Ltd (Misc. Application No. 8 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLD 1133 (28 February 2023)
52. Salima Ally Mkalia vs Lipa kisyo Mwambembati & 2 Others (Misc.Land Application No.208 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLandD 16794 (17 August 2023)
53. Segorena P. Kiwango & 2 Others vs Daniel Materu & Another (Land Revision 40 of 2021) [2022] TZHCLandD 12381 (30 September 2022)
54. Segorina P. Kiwango and 2 Others vs Daniel Materu and Another (Misc. Land Application 535 of 2020) [2021] TZHCLandD 425 (30 August 2021)
55. Serengeti Breweries Limited vs Jerome Bosha Ng'itu (Revision No. 662 of 2018) [2021] TZHCLD 387 (10 September 2021)
56. Star Media(T) Ltd & Another v Gideon Willam Shirima (Misc.Land Application No.502 of 2023) [2023] TZHCLandD 17093 (3 November 2023)
57. Tetrem Network of School Limited vs Mohamed Nkya (Misc. Application No. 19 of 2021) [2021] TZHCLD 429 (13 October 2021)
58. Tetrem Network of School Limited vs Mohamed Nkya (Misc. Application No. 19 of 2021) [2021] TZHCLD 478 (13 October 2021)
59. The Registered Trustees of St Benedict's Ndanda Referral Hospital vs Mathayo Malaika & 43 Others (Labour Revision No.9 of 2022) [2023] TZHC 23096 (31 October 2023)
60. The Registered Trustees of Tanzania Islamic vs Ramadhan Seif (Revision Application No. 138 of 2024) [2024] TZHCLD 50 (5 April 2024)
61. Wema Mtengwa vs Tanzania Railways Corporation & Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 27567 of 2023) [2024] TZHCLD 32 (26 February 2024)