Tanzania
Government Leaseholds (Conversion to Rights of Occupancy) Act
Chapter 367
- Published in Tanzania Government Gazette
- Commenced on 1 April 1970
- [This is the version of this document at 31 July 2002.]
- [Note: This legislation was revised and consolidated as at 31 July 2002 and 30 November 2019 by the Attorney General's Office, in compliance with the Laws Revision Act No. 7 of 1994, the Revised Laws and Annual Revision Act (Chapter 356 (R.L.)), and the Interpretation of Laws and General Clauses Act No. 30 of 1972. All subsequent amendments have been researched and applied by Laws.Africa for TANZLII.]
1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the Government Leaseholds (Conversion to Rights of Occupancy) Act.2. Interpretation
3. Conversion of Government leasehold into right of occupancy
4. Interests other than Government leases
5. Premiums, rents, fees and other terms and conditions
6. Appeals
7. Powers of Minister
8. President's power to make orders for removal of difficulties
Where, in the opinion of the President, any difficulty exists in or in relation to the administration of this Act, he may, by order published in the Gazette, make such provision as, in his opinion, is necessary or expedient for effecting the removal of such difficulty.9. Regulations
The Minister may make regulations—10. Cap. 393 shall cease to apply where Government leasehold converted to right of occupancy
Where, by virtue of the provisions of this Act, a Government lease is converted to a right of occupancy, the provisions of the Freehold Titles (Conversion) and Government Leases Act shall, with effect from the appointed day, cease to have effect in relation to, or apply to, the land comprised in such Government lease.History of this document
31 December 2023
Chapter 367
Revised Laws 2023
Consolidation
31 July 2002 this version
Chapter 367
Revised Laws 2002
Consolidation
01 April 1970
Commenced
Cited documents 2
Documents citing this one 10
Judgment
6|
Occupation of village (public) land without village-council approval does not confer title; public land cannot be acquired by adverse possession.
Village land — allocation and management vested in village council/assembly upon registration; occupation without approval does not confer title; public land not acquisable by adverse possession (Law of Limitation Act s.38); evidential burden — non-testifying plaintiffs dismissed; environmental protection — permanent activities within 60 metres of river banks prohibited (Environmental Management Act s.57); failure to tender village bye-laws/land-use plan undermines claim to formal reservation.
|
|
Rectification of a land register was quashed for denial of the right to be heard and for involving probate issues without proper procedure.
* Land law – Rectification of land register under s.99 LRA – procedural safeguards and right to be heard; * Service of notice – postal address and effectiveness; * Interaction between Registrar of Titles, Commissioner for Lands and Minister – influence versus jurisdiction; * Effect on bona fide purchaser – s.99(2) protections; * Probate-linked land disputes – necessity of probate/court directives before rectification.
|
|
Court found a 2014–2024 village land use plan existed and grazing land was trespassed, but procedural defects rendered the plan unenforceable.
Land law — Village Land Use Plan (VLUP) validity; requirement for village council participation under Village Land Act and Land Use Planning Act; VLUP passed by Village Assembly but procedurally defective; public (village) land not acquirable by adverse possession; trespass by farmers onto grazing land; limits on WDC/RC powers to nullify VLUP; remedies — refusal to enforce a procedurally defective VLUP and decline to award eviction or compensation.
|
|
Appellant failed to prove village land ownership; village council approval required and adverse possession of public land disallowed.
* Land law – Village land allocation – transfers/allocations require Village Council approval; individual allocations void without council consent.
* Evidence – Burden of proof in civil land claims; claimant must prove ownership; onus may shift but remains with claimant initially.
* Public/village land – adverse possession does not confer title (Law of Limitation Act s.38).
* Civil procedure – appellate re-hearing; evaluation of weight and credibility of witnesses.
* Jurisdiction – Land Tribunal’s monetary threshold and competence to hear the dispute.
|
|
Allocation to purchasers was unlawful because the plot remained estate land under the plaintiff’s administration.
Land law – administration of estate – validity of letters of administration – conversion of colonial certificate to right of occupancy – unlawful allocation by Commissioner for Lands – purchaser’s duty to investigate and proof of good faith acquisition.
|
|
Tegemeo Paulo vs Nyarukongogo Village Council (Land Appeal 49 of 2021) [2022] TZHC 3099 (9 May 2022)
Appellant failed to prove purchase of eight acres; adverse possession cannot vest title in public land; appeal dismissed.
Land law – proof of title: written sale agreement silent on acreage; parol evidence inadmissible (s.101 Evidence Act). Adverse possession: public land not acquisible by adverse possession (s.38 Law of Limitation Act). Civil procedure: extension of time to file defence—irregularity not reversible unless miscarriage of justice (s.45 Land Disputes Courts Act). Credibility and weight of evidence – appellate deference to tribunal findings.
|
Government Notice
2Subsidiary legislation
|
Title
|
|
|---|---|
| Government Notice 82 of 1970 | |
| Government Notice 81 of 1970 |