|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| October 1986 |
|
|
Court upheld murder conviction, rejecting provocation defence and finding circumstantial evidence established malice aforethought.
Criminal law – murder v. manslaughter – sudden provocation – availability and proof of provocation
Evidence – weight of cautioned and extra‑judicial statements and witness credibility. Circumstantial evidence – premeditation inferred from enticement, preparatory acts and concealment. Criminal procedure – assessors’ direction on burden and standard of proof; omission held harmless
|
30 October 1986 |
|
Provocation defence rejected; circumstantial and statement evidence established intent, appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – murder – elements of intent – circumstantial evidence and conduct before and after killing indicating premeditation. Criminal procedure – admissibility and weight of cautioned and extra-judicial statements
Evidence – credibility of witnesses and confessions to third parties. Summing-up – duty to direct assessors on burden and standard of proof in criminal and circumstantial-evidence cases; harmless error doctrine
|
30 October 1986 |
|
Jurisdiction previously decided on appeal is res judicata; village-sanctioned land sale in possession upheld and appeal allowed with costs.
Civil procedure – Res judicata – issue of jurisdiction previously decided on appeal cannot be reopened in same suit.* Administrative/land law – Customary/village land – requirement of village council approval for transfers; effect of transaction witnessed and sanctioned by village authorities and ward secretary.* Possession and title – purchaser in occupation who seeks survey/title cannot be deprived by later allocation from District Land Office.
|
30 October 1986 |
|
An unapproved sale in a registered village is void; a validly registered certificate of occupancy defeats unregistered informal interests.
Land law – Registered certificate of occupancy – effect of first registration and indefeasibility (Cap.334 s.33(1)(b)); sale in a registered village – need for Village Council approval under Directions made under Villages and Ujamaa Villages Act (1975) – disposition without approval void; planning area status – relationship between native/customary occupancy and statutory right of occupancy; damages for delay – necessity to prove readiness, willingness and ability to build.
|
30 October 1986 |
|
Land Law - Right of occupancy granted over land held under customary law - Whether the right of occupancy extinguishes the title held under customary law
Land Law - Land held under customary law - Area declared a planning area - Whether holder of land under customary law is automatically rendered a squatter
Land Law - Disposition of land held under the Villages and Ujamaa Villages Act, 1975 -Approval of disposition by the village council not obtained - Disposition void
Villages and Ujamaa Villages Act, 1975 - Disposition of land under the control of a village -Approval of disposition by village council necessaiy
Villages and Ujamaa Villages Act, 1975 - Disposition of land under the control of a village -Approval of disposition given by the H Branch CCM chairman and ward secretary - Whether approval given by Village Council
Damages - The Rightful owner of land could not build on it because of a trespasser- No evidence that owner was ready, willing and able to build - Only nominal damages awardable
|
30 October 1986 |
|
Murder conviction reduced to manslaughter where death resulted from injuries sustained in a fight and sudden provocation.
Criminal law – murder v. manslaughter – provocation and heat of passion (ss. 201–202 Penal Code); contributory causes of death (s.203(e)); credibility where prosecution fails to call an available eyewitness; multiplicity of head wounds and medical evidence.
|
20 October 1986 |
|
Where contribution to death is established but malice aforethought is doubtful, murder conviction may be reduced to manslaughter and sentence reduced.
Criminal law – Homicide – Causation and contributory causes (s.203(e) Penal Code); mens rea – malice aforethought for murder; reduction of murder to manslaughter where intent to kill is not proved; evidential value of medical reports and absence of weapon exhibit.
|
20 October 1986 |
|
Court upheld appellants' murder convictions based on reliable eyewitness identification and corroborative post-offence conduct.
Criminal law – murder – eyewitness identification – credibility of interested witness (relative) – effect of ambient noise – joint liability – post-offence concealment as corroborative evidence.
|
12 October 1986 |
|
A trial judge's misidentification of a witness and resulting factual error vitiated an ex parte judgment, which was set aside.
Civil procedure – substituted service – sufficiency of proof of service and conflicting affidavits on notice of summons. Civil procedure – ex parte judgment – setting aside where defendant alleges non-service. Appellate review – material error of fact and misidentification of witnesses vitiating credibility findings and ruling
|
9 October 1986 |
|
Trial judge’s factual mistake vitiates substituted-service ex parte judgment; judgment set aside and defendant granted leave to defend.
- Civil procedure – substituted service – validity of service by affixing notice to defendant’s dwelling – effect on ex parte judgment.- Civil procedure – applications to set aside ex parte judgments – role of contradictory affidavits and need for viva voce evidence to resolve credibility.- Appellate review – material error of fact by trial judge (mistaken identity/false finding that party testified) vitiates ruling and warrants setting aside judgment.
|
9 October 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed: confession, dying statements and multiple stab wounds upheld murder conviction, provocation rejected.
Criminal law – murder – extra-judicial confession – dying declaration – admission to arresting officer – provocation not established – malice inferred from multiple stab wounds and force.
|
8 October 1986 |
|
Confession, dying declarations and post-mortem evidence proved murder; a lone verbal remark did not constitute legal provocation.
Criminal law – Murder – Extra-judicial statement/confession – admissibility and weight where no objection made at trial. Criminal law – Dying declaration – admissibility and corroborative value. Criminal law – Provocation – what constitutes legal provocation; single verbal remark insufficient. Criminal law – Inference of malice from weapon, multiple stab wounds and post-mortem evidence
Appeal – Sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction for murder; appeal dismissed
|
8 October 1986 |
|
Extra-judicial confession, dying declaration and medical evidence upheld; alleged words did not constitute legal provocation; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – murder – extra-judicial confession – admissibility and weight of confession; dying declaration corroboration; post-mortem evidence (multiple stab wounds, cut liver, haemorrhage); provocation – whether words amounted to legal provocation; inference of malice from weapon, number of wounds and force used.
|
8 October 1986 |
|
Murder conviction upheld: confession and dying declarations credible; alleged taunt did not amount to legal provocation.
Criminal law – confession – admissibility and weight of extra-judicial statement to a Justice of the Peace; Evidence – dying declaration – credibility and corroboration; Criminal law – provocation – words “your time is gone” not legal provocation; Evidence – inference of malice from multiple, forceful stab wounds.
|
8 October 1986 |
|
Failure to file the mandatory memorandum under Rule 65(5) leads to dismissal; concurrent factual findings upheld.
Criminal appeal – procedural compliance – Rule 65(5) Court of Appeal Rules – failure to file memorandum of appeal – dismissal; appellate review – deference to concurrent findings of fact supported by credible evidence.
|
8 October 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed under Rule 65(5) for failure to file a memorandum; lower courts' concurrent findings supported by credible evidence.
Criminal procedure – appeal – non‑compliance with Court of Appeal Rules (Rule 65(5)) – failure to file memorandum of appeal – dismissal. Appellate review – concurrent findings of fact – credibility and cogent evidence – appeal lacking prospect of success. Appellate practice – court may consider merits in passing despite procedural dismissal
|
8 October 1986 |
|
Sudden bill-hook attack and extrajudicial admission established malice aforethought; appeal against murder conviction dismissed.
Criminal law – Murder – Malice aforethought established by extrajudicial confession, nature of weapon and injuries, and suddenness of attack. Criminal law – Provocation – Suspicions and prior disputes remote in time and insufficient to reduce offence to manslaughter. Criminal law – Intoxication – Evidence of drinking without proof of incapacity does not negate mens rea
|
7 October 1986 |
|
Extra-judicial admission, eyewitnesses and the lethal nature of the blow established malice aforethought; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Murder – Malice aforethought established by nature of weapon, fatal blow and extra-judicial admission
Provocation – Past, groundless suspicion months earlier does not amount to legal provocation
Intoxication – Mere consumption of liquor without evidence of incapacity does not negate intent
Evidence – Eyewitness identification and extra-judicial confession carry decisive weight in establishing guilt
|
7 October 1986 |
|
Confessions to several persons, corroborated by post-mortem strangulation findings, upheld a murder conviction despite retraction.
Criminal law – Confession – Retraction – Need for corroboration where confession retracted; Post-mortem evidence – Strangulation with ligature as corroboration of confession; Sufficiency of evidence – appellate review of trial court’s credibility findings.
|
7 October 1986 |
|
Retraction of an extra‑judicial confession does not preclude conviction where independent confessions and post‑mortem evidence corroborate murder.
Criminal law – confession and corroboration – retracted extra‑judicial confession – corroboration by independent witness admissions and post‑mortem evidence (strangulation) – weight of unsworn statement.
|
7 October 1986 |
|
Confession corroborated by other evidence established malice; unsworn in‑court account was insufficient—appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Murder – confession to a Justice of the Peace and admissions to police – corroboration by injuries and witnesses – inconsistency of unsworn in‑court statement – malice aforethought; no provocation.
|
7 October 1986 |
|
A confession to a Justice of the Peace and corroborating evidence established deliberate murder; provocation not proven.
Criminal law – Murder – Confession to Justice of the Peace – weight and reliability of confession and corroborating statements; Criminal procedure – Unsigned/unsworn in‑court statement – credibility when inconsistent with prior statements; Homicide – provocation and malice aforethought – whether evidence supports reduction of charge; Evidence – death by cut wound to neck established despite decomposition.
|
7 October 1986 |