|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| June 1986 |
|
|
A third‑appeal cannot overturn concurrent factual findings that land is clan land; new, unpleaded issues are inadmissible.
Clan land – characterization of land as clan land – finding of fact by trial and appellate courts; Third appeal – limits on re‑examining concurrent findings of fact; Procedural law – issues not raised or evidenced in lower courts inadmissible on appeal; Redemption order – purchaser entitled to compensation for improvements; liability of sellers to refund purchase money.
|
30 June 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed for unsafe identification, unreliable post‑mortem and improper admission of an alleged voluntary police statement.
Criminal procedure — Evidence — Admissibility of cautioned/police statements — voluntariness and requirement of trial within a trial. Evidence Act s.27(2) — burden on prosecution to prove voluntariness. Forensic evidence — post‑mortem reliability — need for examiner's evidence and laboratory analysis to establish cause of death. Identification — single witness evidence — inconsistencies and requirement for corroboration. Dying declaration — weight limited where inconsistent with witness testimony and unreliable corroboration.
|
29 June 1986 |
|
Belated retraction of a voluntarily made extrajudicial confession does not warrant exclusion if independently corroborated.
Criminal law — Extrajudicial confession — Admissibility and voluntariness — Belated retraction and failure to object at tendering — Corroboration by independent evidence — No requirement for trial-within-a-trial in these circumstances.
|
28 June 1986 |
|
Late retraction and torture claim did not vitiate a voluntary, corroborated extra‑judicial confession; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Admissibility of extra‑judicial confession – Voluntariness – Late retraction and torture allegation – Requirement for corroboration and effect of late objection.
|
28 June 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed where circumstantial proof failed to exclude other hypotheses and key exhibits were unproduced.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – sufficiency and requirement to exclude reasonable hypotheses; Exhibits – failure to produce physical exhibits weakens prosecution case; Witness statements – inconsistencies and peripheral untruths cannot corroborate circumstantial charge; Medical evidence – delayed examination undermines injury comparisons; Standard for prima facie case in circumstantial murder trials.
|
27 June 1986 |
|
Conviction based on weak circumstantial evidence and unproduced exhibits was unsafe and was quashed.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Requirement that such evidence exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence before convicting. Evidence – Failure to produce physical exhibits at trial undermines probative value. Evidence – Inconsistent or peripheral statements by accused are not reliable corroboration. Evidence – Lay observations of alleged injuries require timely medical support to be probative.
|
27 June 1986 |
|
A retracted confession was held voluntary and credible; conviction upheld despite lack of independent corroboration.
Criminal law – admissibility of confession – voluntariness – whether made under torture or intolerable pressure. Evidence – retracted confession – reliability and truthfulness – when an uncorroborated confession may ground conviction. Murder – sufficiency of circumstances (motive, injuries, weapons, medical evidence) to support confession-based conviction.
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and unexplained possession supported convictions; second appeal limited to points of law, so appeals dismissed.
Criminal law – store breaking and stealing – circumstantial evidence – possession of recently stolen goods and unexplained cash – inference of participation and receipt of proceeds. Appeal – second appeal – scope limited to points of law; factual complaints not entertainable.
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Appellate court reduced a manslaughter sentence after finding trial judge misdirected himself and procedural lapse was curable.
Criminal law – manslaughter v. murder – appellate review of trial judge's characterization of facts as bordering on intentional killing. Voluntary intoxication – effect on culpability and classification of homicide. Criminal procedure – plea-taking irregularity; curative power of Rule 108 (Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules). Sentence review – reduction where trial judge misdirected and accused already in custody.
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Court reduced manslaughter sentence to five years, finding trial misdirection and procedural irregularity curable under Rule 108.
Criminal law – Manslaughter versus murder – sentencing – intoxication as mitigating circumstance; misdirection by trial judge on 'borderline' intentional killing (s200 Penal Code). Criminal procedure – Plea-taking – failure to take plea to lesser offence before prosecution adducing facts – curable irregularity under Rule 108 (Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules). Sentencing – interference and reduction where misdirection may have produced excessive punishment and pre-conviction custody credit.
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Appellate court reduced an excessive 15-year sentence on a young first offender to immediate release.
Criminal law — Manslaughter; Sentencing — Excessive sentence; Youth and first offender status as mitigating factors; Failure of sentencing court to give reasons — appellate interference; Reduction to time served.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Appellate court reduced an excessive 15-year sentence, ordering immediate release given appellant's youth and first-offender status.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Excessive sentence – Youth and first offender status as mitigating factors – Trial judge's duty to give reasons – Appropriate appellate reduction to effect immediate release.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Convictions quashed where key witnesses were suspect and evidence was uncorroborated and improperly bolstered by an inadmissible statement.
Criminal law – Murder – Conviction based on uncorroborated evidence of witnesses who were themselves suspects – requirement of corroboration. Evidence – Admissibility – Exculpatory statement of a co-accused not amounting to confession and inadmissible to support convictions where maker did not testify. Trial procedure – Improper reliance on inadmissible evidence and failure to properly assess witness credibility renders conviction unsafe.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Court allowed out‑of‑time appeal where court‑appointed defence counsel on a dock brief failed to file the automatic appeal.
Criminal procedure — extension of time under Rule 8 — sufficient reason required. Dock brief representation — failure of court‑appointed counsel to lodge automatic appeal may justify extension. Appellate jurisdiction — Court of Appeal may entertain out‑of‑time application under s.10 and Rule 44 without prior High Court consideration. Evidence — admissibility of confession as a potentially determinative appellate issue.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction unsafe due to improper admission of cautionary statement, unreliable medical proof and inconsistent identification.
Criminal law – admissibility of cautionary statements – requirement of trial-within-a-trial to determine voluntariness under s.27(2) Evidence Act. Criminal law – identification evidence – inconsistencies and need for corroboration of sole identifying witness. Criminal law – medical evidence – inadequacy of post-mortem report in absence of examiner's evidence and laboratory analysis; proof of cause of death.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Murder conviction quashed; manslaughter substituted where no evidence defendants knew deceased was pregnant.
Criminal law – Murder v. manslaughter – mens rea (malice aforethought) – inference of knowledge of pregnancy – absence of evidence to attribute knowledge – substitution of conviction and sentencing.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
The appellants' murder convictions were quashed for lack of proven malice; manslaughter convictions and three-year sentences substituted.
Criminal law – Murder v. manslaughter – malice aforethought – requirement of proof of accused's knowledge of facts relied on to establish malice. Evidence – post-mortem findings and limits of inference about accused's knowledge. Appeal – substitution of conviction and sentence where original conviction unsustainable.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed: eyewitness credibility upheld and non-production of knife not fatal to murder conviction.
Criminal law — Murder — Credibility of eyewitnesses; Failure to produce weapon — adverse inference; Sufficiency of evidence on appeal.
|
24 June 1986 |
|
Appeal against murder conviction dismissed on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite non‑production of the knife.
Criminal law – Murder – reliance on eyewitness evidence; Non‑production of alleged weapon – whether adverse inference or fatal to prosecution; Assessment of credibility and sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction.
|
24 June 1986 |
|
Eyewitness credibility and inconsistencies in the appellant's unsworn statement upheld a murder conviction despite procedural irregularities.
Criminal law – murder – evaluation of eyewitness evidence and malice aforethought. Criminal procedure – unsworn statement – probative value and contradictions with earlier statements. Trial practice – role and timing of assessors’ questions; requirement to call medical witness for post‑mortem (s.291 Criminal Procedure Act); identification of deceased.
|
24 June 1986 |
|
Inconsistent unsworn defence failed to dispel credible eyewitness evidence; conviction for murder upheld despite procedural irregularities.
Criminal law – Murder – Eyewitness identification and post‑mortem evidence – consistency of contemporaneous statements with later unsworn statement. Evidence – Unsigned/unsworn statements as afterthoughts – their weight against credible eyewitness testimony. Criminal procedure – Assessors’ role and timing of questions; Section 291 Criminal Procedure Act – requirement concerning medical witnesses; importance of formal identification of deceased.
|
24 June 1986 |
|
Convictions unsafe where prosecution witnesses were former suspects and trial relied on an inadmissible co‑accused statement.
Criminal law – Conviction safety – Reliance on witnesses who were former suspects – Need for corroboration; Evidence – Inadmissible statement of co-accused – Trial judge’s reliance on excluded evidence renders conviction unsafe.
|
23 June 1986 |
|
Appellate court upheld murder conviction, rejecting accident and provocation defences based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence.
Criminal law – Murder – conviction based on eyewitness and medical evidence; credibility findings upheld on appeal. Defences – Accident – whether deceased accidentally impaled himself; defence rejected as implausible. Defences – Provocation – absence of evidence of provocation or presence of alleged provoker at scene. Appeal – appellate review of trial judge's credibility findings; no basis to disturb conviction.
|
20 June 1986 |
|
Second appeal incompetent without a point of law; conviction upheld on credible identification and eyewitness evidence.
Criminal law – Robbery – Eyewitness identification – Concurrent factual findings – Second appeal – Requirement to raise a point of law for competence of appeal.
|
20 June 1986 |
|
Court upheld conviction where familiar eyewitnesses in bright light reliably identified the appellant; alibi rejected.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Visual identification by familiar witnesses in bright light – reliability and sufficiency to convict. Criminal law – Alibi – assessment of credibility and whether alibi raises reasonable doubt. Evidence – motive and medical evidence corroborating prosecution case. Appellate review – deference to trial judge’s credibility findings.
|
19 June 1986 |
|
Court upheld murder convictions based on reliable eyewitness identification and a confessed admission during a nighttime robbery.
Criminal law – murder during robbery – reliability of identification evidence (visual and voice) – confession to a village official – appellate review of factual findings.
|
19 June 1986 |
|
Second appeal upholds bank clerk's convictions; familiar-witness handwriting identification sufficient without expert.
Criminal law – theft by servant – unauthorized withdrawals from bank account using duplicate passbook. Evidence – handwriting identification – testimony by witnesses familiar with accused’s handwriting sufficient; expert not required as a matter of law. Appeal – second appeal – appellate court will not overturn concurrent findings of fact supported by credible evidence.
|
19 June 1986 |
|
Murder conviction quashed where death, identity of remains and circumstantial proof were insufficient.
Criminal law — Murder — Proof of death and identity of remains — Forensic analysis and chain of custody of organs/bone fragments — Reliance on circumstantial evidence — Reasonable doubt.
|
18 June 1986 |
|
A second appeal lacking a point of law fails where concurrent factual findings are supported and the defence is uncorroborated.
Criminal law – Stealing by public servant (ss. 270 & 265 Penal Code); Appeal – second appeal must raise a point of law (s.5(7) Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1979); Evidence – failure to call or identify a material witness and failure to put defence to prosecution; Concurrent findings of fact – weight and finality.
|
16 June 1986 |
|
An uncorroborated dying declaration identifying attackers at night is unsafe where visibility and corroborative evidence are not established.
Criminal law – dying declaration – reliance on uncorroborated dying declaration for conviction; identification at night – risk of mistaken identification; corroboration – importance of physical evidence to support dying declarations.
|
16 June 1986 |
|
High Court conducting a trial on appeal without records and calling witnesses is a nullity; appeal restored for rehearing.
Appeal procedure – Improper conduct of appeal by trial de novo – High Court judge calling witnesses on own motion – Proceedings and judgment held a nullity – Appeal restored for proper hearing.
|
5 June 1986 |
|
Court upheld murder conviction where eyewitness identification was reliable and alibi was disbelieved due to implausibility and prior lies.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Reliability of eyewitness identification at night by torchlight – Sufficiency to convict. Criminal law – Alibi – Assessment and rejection where alibi is improbable and contradicted by prior lies. Evidence – Effect of inconsistent statements to police on credibility.
|
1 June 1986 |