Court of Appeal of Tanzania

This is the highest level in the justice delivery system in Tanzania. The Court of Appeal draws its mandate from Article 117(1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. The Court hears appeals  on both point of law and facts for cases originating from the High Court of Tanzania and Magistrates with extended jurisdiction in exercise of their original jurisdiction or appellate and revisional jurisdiction over matters originating in the District Land and Housing Tribunals, District Courts and Courts of Resident Magistrate. The Court also hears similar appeals  from quasi judicial bodies of status equivalent to that of the High Court. It  further hears appeals  on point of law against the decision of the High Court in  matters originating from Primary Courts. The Court of Appeal also exercises jurisdiction on appeals originating from the High Court of Zanzibar except for constitutional issues arising from the interpretation of the Constitution of Zanzibar and matters arising from the Kadhi Court.

Physical address
26 Kivukoni Road Building P.O. Box 9004, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
548 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 548 judgments found.

548 judgments
August 2020
Credible child-victim evidence, corroborated by an eyewitness and medical examination, upheld a rape conviction despite PF3 expungement and time omission.
  • Criminal law
    • — Charge particulars — omission of time not fatal where evidence establishes circumstances
    • — Evidence Act s.127(7) — child/victim evidence can sustain conviction if credible
    • — Expungement of exhibit (PF3) for procedural defect — court may rely on other credible evidence
    • — identification — recognition by a village resident and contemporaneous discovery
    • — sexual offences — Rape — Victim’s evidence and corroboration
18 August 2020
Failure to consider defence justified appellate reassessment; conviction upheld and 30‑year sentence substituted by life imprisonment.
  • Criminal law
    • — Evidence Act s.143 — no fixed number of witnesses
    • — second appeal — appellate intervention where lower courts omitted to consider defence
    • — Sexual offences involving children — victim's evidence corroborated by medical and supporting witnesses can suffice to prove penetration and non-consent
18 August 2020
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove recent possession and High Court judgment was a nullity.
  • Criminal law — Armed robbery
    • — chain of custody of exhibits
    • — recent possession doctrine
    • — sufficiency of identification and proof of ownership
  • Criminal law — duty to call available independent witnesses (petrol attendants)
    • — adverse inference
    • — defects in seizure documentation
    • — revisional powers
18 August 2020
Appeal dismissed: confessions and corroborative circumstantial evidence sustained a murder conviction despite expunged autopsy and sketch map.
  • Criminal law — Murder — admissibility of post‑mortem reports (s291 CPA) — mandatory right to inform accused to call report's author
  • Criminal procedure — admissibility of cautioned statement — Recording beyond statutory four‑hour period — Prolonged investigation as exception and voluntariness
  • Evidence
    • — corroborating confessions and recovery of body — Identification of decomposed body and weight of family witnesses
    • — identification and circumstantial evidence — Last person seen with deceased
17 August 2020
Victim’s testimony and medical corroboration upheld rape conviction; child witness must promise to tell the truth under s127(2).
  • Criminal law — sexual offences against a child — reliance on victim’s testimony and medical (PF3) corroboration
  • Criminal procedure — Defence of alibi — defence of alibi (s.194(4) CPA)
  • Evidence — Child witness (tender age) — promise to tell truth under s127
17 August 2020
Non-compliance with s.231(1) CPA vitiates trial; convictions quashed and appellant released where prejudice shown.
  • Appellate practice — nullity of proceedings — Court may nullify proceedings and set aside sentence under s4(2) Appellate Jurisdiction Act — Appellate Jurisdiction Act s.4(2)
  • Criminal procedure
    • — Criminal Procedure Act s.192(3) — Omission may be curable under s.388 CPA
    • — right to be informed of right of defence under s.231(1)(a) CPA — Failure to inform accused of right to give evidence and call witnesses — Proceedings nullified
17 August 2020
A conviction based on a charge citing a non-existent statutory provision is incurably defective and void.
  • Criminal law — Charge — Citation of non-existent statutory provision — ss 132 and 135(a)(ii) CPA
  • Criminal procedure — Defective charge — Citing non-existent statutory provision — s 388(1) CPA, s 4(2) AJA
14 August 2020
Alleged illegality in an impugned decision can justify extension of time to appeal despite unproven illness.
  • Civil procedure — Extension of time
    • — Illegality as ground for extension — Rule 10, Court of Appeal Rules
    • — Insufficient evidence of illness as a ground for extension — Requirement for medical proof
13 August 2020
Convictions quashed for lack of proof of night-time burglary and improperly tendered evidence.
  • Criminal law — Burglary — requirement that breaking be committed at night
  • Criminal procedure
    • — Exhibits — requirement that exhibits be tendered by witnesses
    • — Preliminary hearing — Mandatory reading and explanation of memorandum of undisputed matters (s.192(3) CPA)
13 August 2020
Reported
Appeal dismissed; conviction and fine affirmed, unaffirmed witness evidence expunged, sentence reduced to 20 years.
  • Criminal law — Narcotics trafficking
    • — chain of custody
    • — cocaine hydrochloride as form of cocaine
    • — oral evidence sufficing where paper trail absent
    • — particulars of information
    • — sentence reduced to statutory minimum
    • — unaffirmed witness evidence expunged
12 August 2020
Applicants failed to show good cause for extension; proceedings are necessary for revision and alleged illegality was not apparent on the record.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time
  • Civil procedure — Revision
    • — Good cause
    • — necessary record includes High Court proceedings
12 August 2020
Strike-out refused where delay resulted from court registry's failure to furnish appeal documents; respondent granted costs.
  • Civil procedure — strike out of notice of appeal — application under rule 89(2) — whether appeal abandoned for inordinate delay
10 August 2020
Reported
An application for revision is not maintainable where a party has a pending notice of appeal; the notice is not automatically withdrawn.
  • Administrative law — Revision
    • — Attorney General’s power to protect public interest acknowledged but procedural propriety requires joinder in appeal
    • — notice of appeal not automatically withdrawn
    • — pending notice of appeal bars parallel revision
7 August 2020
Reported
Failure to give each accused opportunity to object and to cross‑examine vitiated trial; convictions quashed and retrial ordered.
  • Criminal law — Fair trial — right to cross‑examination and right to be heard — Natural justice and Article 13(6)(a) — Proceedings vitiated; retrial ordered
7 August 2020
Conviction quashed where improperly admitted exhibits and lack of corroboration rendered the prosecution's case unsafe.
  • Criminal law — sexual offences against a child — sufficiency of evidence and requirement for corroboration of young child’s testimony — Need to scrutinise reliability and corroboration
  • Criminal procedure — defective charge sheet — Omission of penalty provision curable under section 388 Criminal Procedure Act — Appellate revision increasing sentence requires hearing under s29(b)(i) MCA
  • Evidence — PF3 admissibility — PF3 and caution statement
    • — irregular admission leads to expungement
    • — Procedural requirements
7 August 2020
Reported
Appeal dismissed; evidence and chain of custody upheld, sentence valid but must run from date of conviction.
  • Criminal law — Drug offences — Trafficking — Interpretation of statutory definition: modes of trafficking constitute methods not distinct offences
  • Evidence — Cautioned statement — admissible where defence counsel consented after consultation
  • Evidence — Expert evidence — Chemist’s report and sampling for weight
    • — no prescribed format required
    • — sampling permissible
  • Evidence — seizure and chain of custody
    • — delayed labelling at ADU acceptable
    • — Emergency search at airport
  • Evidence — Statements of unavailable witness
7 August 2020
Notice of appeal struck out for failure to institute appeal within prescribed time without good cause.
  • Civil procedure — Appeals
    • — Striking out notice of appeal for failure to take essential steps to prosecute appeal — Application under Rule 89(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules
    • — Time limit for instituting appeal — Proviso to Rule 90(1) excluding time for preparation/delivery of record and requirement to show compliance
7 August 2020
Conviction and death sentence quashed where trial Judge failed to consider defence and prosecution evidence contained fatal contradictions.
  • Criminal law — evaluation of evidence — appellate re-appraisal
    • — contradictions in prosecution witnesses
    • — duty to objectively consider defence evidence
  • Criminal law — failure to call crucial witness (deceased's wife) — adverse inference
  • Criminal law — unsafe conviction — quashing of conviction and setting aside of death sentence
7 August 2020
Reported
Appeal dismissed: conviction for trafficking upheld; cautioned statement and chain of custody held properly proved.
  • Criminal law — Narcotic trafficking
    • — admissibility of cautioned statement
    • — chain of custody (oral proof sufficient where no tampering shown)
    • — statutory minimum sentence
    • — tendering of exhibits
    • — variance in accused’s names not fatal to identity
      • — Certificate of Value
5 August 2020
Reported
Court of Appeal quashed High Court’s wholesale annulment of section 148(5), holding non‑bailable provisions saved by Article 30(2).
  • Constitutional law — Bail
5 August 2020
A defective charge omitting the victim’s essential age element vitiated the trial and led to quashed conviction.
  • Criminal law — Rape of child — variance between particulars of offence and evidence — Victim's age as essential element must be stated
  • Criminal procedure
    • — charge particulars and curative power under section 388 CPA — Defective charge curable where accused informed of nature of offence — Section 388 Criminal Procedure Act (curability of defects)
    • — nullity of proceedings — Trial, conviction and sentence by a court without jurisdiction — Conviction and sentence quashed and appellate proceedings nullified
5 August 2020
Claim of unlawful imprisonment dismissed as time-barred; High Court wrongly extended statutory limitation.
  • Limitation law — Limitation of actions — Tort — cause of action accrues on date of imprisonment
    • — Civil Procedure Code s.95 (inherent jurisdiction) cannot be used to extend statutory limitation
    • — Court of Appeal revisional jurisdiction under AJA s.4(2) to quash proceedings and set aside judgment
    • — item 6 Schedule to the Law of Limitation Act (3-year period)
5 August 2020
District Court lacked jurisdiction over economic offence counts; trial was nullity, convictions quashed and appellants released.
  • Criminal law
    • — Jurisdiction — Economic offences — Defective consent and certificate under EOCCA
    • — Procedure — Trial without Director of Public Prosecutions' consent under s.26(1) — Mandatory requirement — Proceedings quashed
5 August 2020
Reported
Applicant improperly sought revision instead of seeking leave to appeal an execution order for civil imprisonment.
  • Civil procedure — Execution — Arrest and detention as civil prisoner — Appealability and Appellate Jurisdiction Act s 5(1)(b)(viii) and s 5(1)(c)
  • Appellate practice — Revisionary jurisdiction — Limits where right of appeal exists — Appeal with leave; revisional jurisdiction only in exceptional circumstances
5 August 2020
Revision against an interlocutory striking-out Ruling was incompetent under s.5(2)(d) AJA and the application was struck out with costs.
  • Appellate practice
    • — abuse of court process — impermissible revision applications
    • — Appellate jurisdiction — interlocutory orders
    • — Record completeness — omission of skeleton arguments
    • — Summary suits — leave to appear and defend — interlocutory striking-out
5 August 2020
Charge irregularities curable where particulars and evidence eliminate prejudice; conviction for rape of a 69‑year‑old upheld.
  • Criminal law
    • — concurrent findings of fact — appellate interference unwarranted where evidence is credible
    • — Delay in arrest — short delay where accused fled not fatal
    • — Evidence Act s.143 — no fixed number of witnesses required
    • — Rape — Charge irregularity (wrong subsection and omission on consent) — Curable
5 August 2020
Conviction for robbery unsafe where prosecution failed to identify the stolen phone or prove ownership beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Criminal law — Robbery with violence — burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt — Identification of stolen property — Generalized description insufficient to sustain conviction
4 August 2020
July 2020
High Court erred in deciding a suo motu jurisdictional issue without hearing parties; its decisions were quashed and remitted for rehearing.
  • Appellate practice — Appellate jurisdiction
    • — Decision taken without hearing is nullity
    • — Remittal for rehearing by different panel
    • — Revision
30 July 2020
Conviction for armed robbery quashed where prosecution failed to prove theft and exhibits were not properly identified.
  • Criminal law
    • — Admissibility — PF3 expunged where not read out in court
    • — Armed robbery — ingredients of offence
30 July 2020
Review refused: misconceived separate application for additional evidence must be sought under Rule 36(1)(b) at appeal hearing.
  • Civil procedure
    • — additional evidence on appeal — Leave to adduce additional evidence in pending appeal — Rule 36(1)(b) versus Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules
    • — Review of Court of Appeal decision — Manifest error on the face of the record — Rule 66(1)(a) AJA
29 July 2020
Delay in recording cautioned/EJS statements excused by investigatory conveyance; confession leading to discovery and corroborated evidence upheld convictions.
  • Criminal procedure — cautioned statements
    • — prescribed four‑hour limit
    • — trial‑within‑trial required on voluntariness objections but unlawfully admitted confession may be relied on if it led to discovery and is corroborated
  • Criminal procedure — extra‑judicial statements before Justices of the Peace
    • — circumstantial evidence and confessions may establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt
    • — reasonableness of timing
29 July 2020
Court dismissed appeal, holding identification and emergency seizure lawful despite the trial judge’s defective written judgment.
  • Criminal law — Armed robbery — written judgment requirements
  • Criminal law — Identification of accused — aids and prior acquaintance
  • Criminal law — Search and seizure
    • — chain of custody of exhibits
    • — emergency searches
    • — proof beyond reasonable doubt
    • — recent possession doctrine
29 July 2020
Conviction quashed because courts failed to consider the defence; retrial refused due to prosecution’s material gaps, appellant ordered released.
  • Criminal law — Unnatural offence — Right to be heard — Revision — Retrial refused where prosecution’s case has material gaps (failure to prove victim's age; inconsistent eyewitness)
28 July 2020
Conviction quashed where alleged admission lacked clarity and independent evidence failed to connect appellant to the killing.
  • Criminal law
    • — Admissions — caution in accepting oral admissions
    • — Circumstantial evidence — Last‑seen doctrine
    • — Murder- Provocation — requirement of sudden and grave provocation
24 July 2020
Court found the house on Plot 16; respondent was a trespasser; appellant awarded TZS15M, eviction and injunction.
  • Civil procedure — Procedure — use of additional evidence via locus in quo under Court of Appeal Rules to resolve factual dispute
  • Civil procedure — Remedies
    • — costs
    • — eviction and perpetual injunction
  • Land law
    • — possession and title — buyer in possession — trespass actionable per se despite honest mistake
    • — Trespass to land — disputed location of property — locus in quo visit and certified survey plan establishing location (Plot No.16)
  • Tort — Award of general damages (tshs 15,000,000)
24 July 2020
Child-victim’s consistent evidence, corroborated by parental observation, established rape; procedural and defence complaints were dismissed, appeal dismissed.
  • Criminal law — Rape — Evidence of child victim of tender years can suffice for conviction — Corroboration by parent’s observation — Second appeal will not entertain grounds not raised in the first appellate court
24 July 2020
A notice of appeal naming a party not in the original suit is fatal and renders the appeal incompetent.
  • Civil procedure — Amendment
  • Civil procedure — Appeal competence
    • — Right to appeal limited to parties to the original suit
    • — substitution without court order is invalid
  • Civil procedure — Notice of appeal — Identity of parties — A notice naming a legal entity different from the party in the trial court is fatal
  • Civil procedure — remedy — Incompetent appeal struck out with costs
23 July 2020
Conviction quashed where material eyewitness contradictions and an improperly handled co‑accused statement rendered the trial unsafe.
  • Criminal law — Robbery with violence — Use of label 'armed robbery' — Defect curable under Criminal Procedure Act s 388(1)
  • Criminal procedure — Visual identification — reliability at well-lit scene
  • Evidence — Cautioned statement — irregular admission and requirement to read out in court
23 July 2020
Notice of appeal struck out for failure to serve and to obtain proceedings within prescribed times.
  • Civil procedure — Appeal — striking out notice of appeal
  • Labour law — Labour matter — no order as to costs
23 July 2020
Court grants 30‑day extension to file review, finding apparent illegality on face of record concerning judgment, sentence and joinder.
  • Criminal procedure — Extension of time
    • — effect on judgment and sentence
    • — illegality apparent on the face of the record as sufficient reason
    • — joinder of appellant who withdrew appeal and completed sentence
23 July 2020
Application for extension refused: ignorance of procedure and unexplained delay do not justify condonation.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — good cause — applicant’s ignorance of procedure not good cause — duty to account for every day of delay
21 July 2020
Failure to consider the respondent's reinstatement claim vitiated the High Court's judgment, requiring remittal.
  • Labour law — unfair termination — duty of trial court to consider pleaded reliefs — appellate court cannot decide issues omitted by lower court — remittal required
17 July 2020
Reported
The respondent did not breach the loan agreement; the applicant failed to prove short payment or losses.
  • Commercial law — Commercial court procedure
    • — burden of proof where foreign‑currency disbursements and alleged conversion shortfalls are asserted
    • — construction
    • — document format and expungement of non‑compliant submissions
    • — insufficiency of oral evidence without documentary proof to support counterclaim for payments or damages
    • — rule on timing of witness statements
16 July 2020
Extension of time granted because alleged lack of High Court jurisdiction constitutes sufficient illegality despite inadequate explanation for delay.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — Allegation of illegality (lack of jurisdiction/pecuniary jurisdiction) can constitute sufficient reason for extension — Conditional grant requiring service within 14 days
15 July 2020
Applicant granted extension to file review due to alleged illegality despite not fully accounting for a short delay.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — whether applicant accounted for delay — error apparent on the face of the record/illegality as sufficient reason
15 July 2020
Reported
Section 13A PCA does not permit confiscation after an acquittal or an abated appeal; plain meaning governs.
  • Criminal law
    • — Forfeiture — Scope of s 13A PCA — Whether it covers death after acquittal or during appeal
    • — Statutory interpretation — Purposive vs literal approach — When purposive interpretation is inappropriate if statute is clear
  • Criminal procedure — Forfeiture/confiscation — Effect of confiscation on acquittal and abated appeals — Whether confiscation amounts to setting aside an acquittal
14 July 2020
Appeal struck out as time-barred because a second certificate of delay was invalid where the first remained unwithdrawn.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Appeal competence — Certificates of delay — Validity of second certificate where first not withdrawn — Registrar's power to issue certificate of delay
    • — Appeal time limits — Whether an appeal filed months after certification of judgment is time-barred due to lack of diligence in procuring certified copies — Appeal struck out as time-barred
14 July 2020
First appellant's conviction on visual identification upheld; second appellant's conviction quashed for unsafe identification and procedural defects.
  • Criminal law — Identification parade — proper conduct and reading of parade reports required
  • Criminal law — Section 289(1) CPA
    • — Defective charge heading curable under s.388 CPA if particulars disclose offence
    • — notice requirement applies to High Court committal/trial procedure, not subordinate courts
  • Criminal law — Visual identification
13 July 2020
Court dismissed review: no patent error or denial of hearing; sale set aside for execution irregularities, refund ordered.
  • Appellate practice — Appellate procedure — Review jurisdiction — error apparent on face of record
  • Appellate practice — Consequential relief — refund order following nullification of sale
  • Appellate practice — Execution law
    • — Falsification of court records
    • — Order XXI CPC, validity of attachment and sale
  • Appellate practice — right to be heard — sufficiency of oral and written submissions
  • Appellate practice — Suo motu revision — scope and powers to call documents
9 July 2020
Court expunged improperly recorded cautioned statement and post-mortem; upheld circumstantial evidence to convict first appellant, acquitted second appellant.
  • Criminal law — Evidence
    • — Admissibility of cautioned statements — Time limits for recording and inadmissibility if recorded outside statutory period (section 50 CPA)
    • — Admissibility of post‑mortem report — Post‑mortem report must be formally tendered and admitted before reliance by the court
    • — accomplice evidence — A self‑exculpatory statement by an accomplice requires independent corroboration in material particulars
7 July 2020