Court of Appeal of Tanzania

This is the highest level in the justice delivery system in Tanzania. The Court of Appeal draws its mandate from Article 117(1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. The Court hears appeals  on both point of law and facts for cases originating from the High Court of Tanzania and Magistrates with extended jurisdiction in exercise of their original jurisdiction or appellate and revisional jurisdiction over matters originating in the District Land and Housing Tribunals, District Courts and Courts of Resident Magistrate. The Court also hears similar appeals  from quasi judicial bodies of status equivalent to that of the High Court. It  further hears appeals  on point of law against the decision of the High Court in  matters originating from Primary Courts. The Court of Appeal also exercises jurisdiction on appeals originating from the High Court of Zanzibar except for constitutional issues arising from the interpretation of the Constitution of Zanzibar and matters arising from the Kadhi Court.

Physical address
26 Kivukoni Road Building P.O. Box 9004, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
910 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 910 judgments found.

910 judgments
December 2022
Appeal on charge variance and chain‑of‑custody in unlawful possession of government trophy; conviction upheld, fine increased.
  • Criminal procedure — compliance with section 231(1)(a) & (b) CPA — Omission to issue seizure receipt under section 38(3) CPA and failure to record addressing accused not fatal absent prejudice
  • Evidence — Chain of custody and admissibility of exhibits — Documentary and oral proof of chain of custody — seizure and handing‑over forms sufficient for items not easily tampered with. Burden under s.100(3) shifts to accused to prove lawfulness on balance of probabilities
  • Wildlife offences — Identification and valuation of wildlife trophies — Unlawful possession of government trophies: requirement of credible expert identification and proof beyond reasonable doubt — Competent certifying officer under s 114(3) of the Wildlife Conservation Act
28 December 2022
Cautioned statement and chemist report expunged, but mother's and medical evidence sustained the conviction for unnatural offence.
  • Criminal law — admissibility and reading of documentary exhibits
    • — accused’s right to know contents
    • — conviction without victim testimony where victim of tender age
  • Criminal law — Admissibility of cautioned statements — compliance with four‑hour rule
  • Criminal law — Appellate jurisdiction
    • — new grounds not raised in first appellate court only entertained if point of law
    • — weight of concurrent findings and medical corroboration
  • Criminal law — Unnatural offence against a child
22 December 2022
DLHT had jurisdiction and the alleged sale was not proved; appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Land disputes
    • — Evidence — primary (original)
    • — Jurisdiction of District Land and Housing Tribunal — pecuniary limits
    • — Proof of sale of land — burden on purchaser to prove transfer on balance of probabilities
22 December 2022
A power of attorney is confined to its express terms and is revoked by the principal’s sale or notice, with written contracts prevailing over oral denial.
  • Civil procedure — succession of judges in partly heard trial
  • Evidence — Written contract
  • Land law — Power of Attorney — scope and effect
    • — Agent limited to the powers expressly conferred
    • — cannot execute or extend lease absent express authority
  • Land law — Power of Attorney — scope and proof of revocation
    • — registration not required to be effective between parties
    • — Revocation effective upon donor's inconsistent conduct or notice to the donee
21 December 2022
Refusal of leave by the High Court must be challenged by a fresh Court of Appeal application, not by revision.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Appellate procedure — leave to appeal
    • — limitation — Distinction between a decision that an action is time-barred and a refusal of leave on merits
    • — Revision — Appropriateness of revisional jurisdiction to challenge refusal of leave to appeal
20 December 2022
Applicant failed to prove good cause for extending time to file appeal records; alleged third‑party illness was uncorroborated.
  • Appellate practice — extension of time — Whether unsubstantiated assertions of important points of law or material irregularity justify extension of time — Points of law must be prima facie arguable to support extension
  • Civil procedure — Rule 10 (extension of time for delay upon good cause) — Good cause — discretionary inquiry requiring factual proof — Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules r.10
  • Evidence — Assertions about third‑party conduct require affidavit corroboration from material persons — Third‑party illness or conduct relied on in affidavit must be sworn to or corroborated by that person — Corroboration requirement / hearsay concern
19 December 2022
The applicant's stay application was struck out for being filed after the 14‑day period under Rule 11(4).
  • Civil procedure
    • — Stay of execution — time for application runs from date of decree or date of awareness — Rule 11(4) Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
    • — extension of time — Late filing of respondent's affidavit does not justify entertaining a time‑barred application
19 December 2022
Variance between charge particulars and evidence, plus credibility issues, rendered conviction unsafe and was quashed.
  • Criminal law — variance between charge particulars and evidence — duty to amend charge under section 234(1) CPA
    • — appellate power to evaluate defence where lower courts omitted to do so
    • — credibility of child witness and corroboration
    • — fundamental irregularity not curable under section 388 CPA
19 December 2022
Failure to administer oath to a key witness vitiated evidence, reversing judgment founded on that testimony.
  • Company law — Transfer of shares — validity of board meetings and compliance with Articles and Companies Act where transfer is challenged — Articles of Association and Table A to the Companies Act
  • Evidence
    • — Administration of oath/affirmation — Failure to administer oath or affirmation to witnesses — Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act ss 3 and 4(a)
    • — Expert/forensic report — disowned reports and effect on civil proceedings — Admissibility and weight of forensic/expert reports
15 December 2022
The appellant had no duty to request avalisation; as holder in due course it recovered the bill value less set-off.
  • Banking law — Bills of exchange
    • — Avalisation
      • — Duty of bank to request avalisation
    • — Distinction between sight and time bills
    • — Holder in due course rights preserved despite alleged failure to request avalisation
      • — Set-off against account credits
    • — Interest on decretal sums
15 December 2022
Time for appeal excludes period to obtain certified judgment/decree, but unexplained remaining delay bars extension.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — discretion to grant extension
  • Civil procedure — Order XXXIX Rule 1(1) CPC
    • — copies of proceedings are not automatically necessary for lodging an appeal
    • — memorandum of appeal to be accompanied by decree and, unless dispensed with, judgment
  • Limitation law — Limitation of actions — Appeals — computation of the 45‑day time limit
15 December 2022
Alleged illegality apparent on the record can justify extension of time despite counsel’s negligence or unexplained delay.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time
    • — Alleged illegality as sufficient cause — Rule 10 Court of Appeal Rules
    • — negligence of counsel — Negligence of counsel not ordinarily a sufficient cause
13 December 2022
Prisoner granted extension to seek review after court found delay accounted for and an arguable manifest-error ground.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — Lyamuya guidelines — Accounting for delay by incarcerated applicants
  • Criminal procedure — Review application — Permissible grounds: manifest error on face of record — Requirement of an arguable case
8 December 2022
Applicant's extension of time dismissed for failing to plead and prove good cause in the supporting affidavit.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Defective notice of motion for extension of time — Affidavit cannot substitute for grounds in the notice — Concession by respondent cannot confer jurisdiction or cure procedural defect
    • — Extension of time (rule 10) — Requirement to plead and prove good cause in supporting affidavit — Court of Appeal Rules, Rule 10
  • Evidence — Affidavit evidence — Written submissions cannot substitute for factual averments in affidavit
8 December 2022
Applicant failed to show good cause for extension; alleged illegality not apparent and prospects of success insufficient.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — procedural missteps, wrong forum and relitigation do not justify extension — prospects of success alone insufficient
8 December 2022
Applicant granted 30 days to apply for certificate on points of law; delay treated as technical and justified.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — application for certificate on point of law
8 December 2022
Failure to deliver a ruling on admissibility of crucial CCTV evidence led to quashing and remittal of CMA and High Court proceedings.
  • Civil procedure — Quashing and remittal — Quashing proceedings and remitting record where crucial ruling was not delivered — Appellate Jurisdiction Act s 4(2)
  • Labour law — Evidence — admissibility of electronic/bank documents and formal requirements — Ruling on admissibility must be delivered before proceeding
8 December 2022
Extension of time to file revision denied where revision cannot lie against interlocutory High Court orders.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Revision — Availability of revision against interlocutory orders — Appellate Jurisdiction Act s 5(2)(d)
    • — extension of time — Application for extension to file revision — Rule 10 Court of Appeal Rules
8 December 2022
Trial court lacked jurisdiction without endorsed DPP consent/certificate; convictions quashed and appellants ordered released.
  • Civil procedure — remedy — Fatehali Manji principle — retrial versus release where retrial risks prejudice by allowing prosecution to fill gaps
  • Criminal law — Charge consistency
  • Criminal procedure — Jurisdiction — DPP certificate and consent
  • Evidence
    • — documentary exhibits not read after tendering — inadmissible and cannot support conviction
    • — obligation to administer oath — unsworn witness evidence is unlawful
8 December 2022
Conviction quashed where identification was unreliable and cautioned statement uncertified under section 57(3) CPA.
  • Criminal law
    • — Identification and corroboration — Failure to call neighbours who were alleged recipients of earliest identification diminishes reliability
    • — Visual identification — night-time identification by torchlight — Sufficiency of opportunity and reliability
  • Criminal procedure — Cautioned statement — Mandatory certification under section 57(3) CPA — Mis‑certification renders statement inadmissible
8 December 2022
Court of Appeal struck out extension application for failing to obtain a prior High Court refusal as required by the rules.
  • Civil procedure — Court of appeal rules — procedural prerequisite for extension of time applications
    • — costs waived
    • — requirement of prior High Court refusal ('first bite')
    • — sua sponte striking out
8 December 2022
Extension of time refused where applicant failed to account for inordinate delay in filing a second‑bite leave application.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — Second‑bite applications
    • — accounting for delay
    • — Good cause
    • — Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules r 45A(1)(b)
8 December 2022
Extension application struck out because the supporting affidavit lacked required deponents' signatures and proof of assertions.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Evidence — submissions from the bar not substituting sworn evidence — Documentary proof required (eg, death certificates)
    • — Extension of time to appeal — Affidavit formalities — verification clause, signature and date
    • — Notice of motion — Incompetency and striking out for procedural defects — Defective supporting affidavit renders application incurably defective and struck out
8 December 2022
Applicant failed to show good cause for extension to file revision; alternative remedies available; application dismissed.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Civil revision — High Court’s revisional jurisdiction under Magistrates' Courts' Act to correct jurisdictional error, illegality or material irregularity — Illegality must be apparent on the face of the record to justify extension
    • — execution objections — where property is wrongly attached remedy is objection proceedings under Order XXI r.57
    • — extension of time — Whether sufficient cause shown to extend time to file revision — Rule 10 Court of Appeal Rules
8 December 2022
Section 56 LIA allows non‑advocate personal representatives in labour proceedings; deciding merits without hearing parties is a nullity.
  • Civil procedure — Right to be heard — court may not decide suo motu issues affecting parties without hearing — audi alteram partem
  • Labour law — notice of representation (Rule 43(1)/s.56) — Representation by personal representative — Section 56 Labour Institutions Act
8 December 2022
Extension refused where alleged illegality was not apparent on the record and a 33-month delay remained unexplained.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time
  • Civil procedure — inordinate delay and inadequate medical evidence
    • — refusal of extension
    • — reliance on Lyamuya and Ngao authorities
8 December 2022
The appellant’s conviction was quashed because identification evidence was unreliable without a proper identification parade.
  • Criminal law
    • — Criminal appeal — second appeal — interference with concurrent findings only where misdirection or misapprehension of evidence shown
    • — Evidence — visual identification — Requirement that visual identification evidence be watertight before convicting — Waziri Amani principle
  • Criminal procedure — identification parade
8 December 2022
8 December 2022
Applicant failed to show good cause or account for delay to extend time for filing a review; application dismissed.
  • Criminal procedure
    • — Extension of time — Good cause — Requirement to account for each day of delay and demonstrate diligence
    • — Review applications — Applicant must indicate ground(s) under Rule 66(1) when seeking extension — Time limit under Rule 66(3)
8 December 2022
Illegality apparent on the record justified granting extension of time to file a notice of appeal; 30 days granted.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Delay — applicant’s duty to explain each day — Illegality on the face of the record may excuse unexplained delay
    • — Extension of time to appeal — illegality of impugned decision as sufficient ground for extension — Lyamuya principles
  • Land law — Land appeal — Limitation period for appeals from DLHT
8 December 2022
A second‑bite extension application filed after the 14‑day limit under rule 45A(1)(c) is time‑barred and struck out.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Unopposed application — Court’s duty to enforce procedural time limits
    • — extension of time — Second-bite application — Fourteen‑day limitation (Rule 45A(1)(c))
    • — jurisdiction — Time limitation goes to jurisdiction — Incompetent proceedings to be struck out
8 December 2022
Appellant's rape conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove penetration and positive identification.
  • Criminal law — Identification by recognition
    • — appellate review where lower courts misapprehend evidence
    • — duty to call material witnesses and adverse inference
    • — reliability and contradictions
  • Criminal law — Rape
8 December 2022
Extension of time granted to serve review application; avoiding service via registered mobile may be treated as service.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — Good cause assessed by Lyamuya factors — Service of process by telephone/mobile — Rebuttable presumption of service where party avoids service via mobile number registered under BVR
8 December 2022
Extension of time granted where appeal was prosecuted and determined at the instance of a deceased respondent, amounting to prima facie illegality.
  • Civil procedure — Extension of time to apply for review
  • Civil procedure — illegality as sufficient cause
    • — appeal prosecuted and determined at instance of a deceased person
    • — Court’s inherent powers to proceed ex parte and depart from abatement rule where administrator fails to comply with joinder order
    • — denial of right to be heard (lack of service)
    • — reliance on Principal Secretary v Devram Vallambhia
    • — requirement that illegality be apparent on face of record
8 December 2022
Applicant failed to prove illegality or sickness sufficient to justify extension of time; application dismissed with costs.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Appeal out of time — Refiling period and jurisdiction — Illegality must be apparent on the face of the record
    • — extension of time — Illegality as good cause
  • Evidence — affidavits — Requirement to account for and explain all periods of delay
8 December 2022
Inadequate summing up and improperly relied cautioned statements rendered the trial a nullity; convictions quashed and sentences set aside.
  • Criminal law — Criminal appeal
    • — cautioned statements not admitted at main trial cannot be relied upon
    • — certificate of seizure/mobile phone evidence expunged
    • — inadequate summing up to assessors
    • — retrial not ordered where remaining evidence is weak
    • — summing up omissions (malice, actus reus, confessions)
    • — trial without proper assessors’ participation is nullity
8 December 2022
Conviction for rape of an eight‑year‑old upheld where age, penetration and victim's account were credibly proved.
  • Criminal law
    • — concurrent findings — appellate interference
    • — defence of impotence — credibility and lack of corroboration
    • — delay in reporting — threats and inducements as plausible explanation
    • — Rape — proof of age and penetration — PF3 and birth certificate corroboration
7 December 2022
Extension of time granted where applicant proved excusable delays and justified reasons; affidavit inferences tolerated.
  • Appellate practice — extension of time — Criteria for extension: length of delay, reasons, prospects of success and prejudice — Rule 10
  • Civil procedure — Overriding objective — Substantive justice over procedural technicalities — Rule 3A(1)
  • Evidence — affidavits — inadmissible conclusions and legal argument to be expunged
7 December 2022
First appellate court’s failure to analyse defence evidence did not prevent Court of Appeal affirming the appellant's convictions.
  • Criminal law — Appellate Jurisdiction Act s4(2) — Court of Appeal stepping into the shoes of first appellate court
  • Criminal law — appellate review — duty of first appellate court to re-evaluate and analyse both prosecution and defence evidence
  • Criminal law — Evidence
    • — sufficiency and corroboration
    • — unexplained proceeds as evidence of fraud
  • Criminal law — Offences — fraudulent appropriation of power, malicious damage to property, personation of public officer, obtaining money by false pretence
7 December 2022
Failure to administer oaths and to sign witness evidence at the CMA vitiated the arbitration and required rehearing.
  • Civil procedure — authenticity of record — Presiding officer to append signature after recording witness evidence — Omission vitiates proceedings
  • Labour law — Revision of CMA arbitration award — Quashing arbitral award and remitting for rehearing de novo before another arbitrator
  • Labour law — arbitration procedure
    • — Administration of oath/affirmation to witnesses
    • — Mediation and Arbitration Rules r 25(1)
7 December 2022
Confession corroborated by parental and medical evidence can sustain a rape conviction even if the child’s testimony is excluded.
  • Criminal law
    • — admissibility and weight of cautioned statements — Voluntariness and failure to object at trial
    • — statutory rape: proof of penetration and age — Proof of victim's age and penetration as essential ingredients — Medical and parental corroboration (PF3)
  • Evidence — Evidence act, s.127(2) — Non‑compliance requires exclusion of evidence
7 December 2022
Inadequate summing up to assessors caused a miscarriage of justice, prompting nullification and a retrial order.
  • Criminal law
    • — Remedy for inadequate summing up — Nullification, quashing conviction and retrial where assessors' opinions prejudiced
    • — Trial with assessors — Summing up to assessors on vital points of law
7 December 2022
Concurrent findings of credibility, medical evidence and unobjected cautioned statement upheld conviction for rape of a nine-year-old.
  • Criminal law — Cautioned statements — admissibility
  • Criminal law — Rape — proof of age and penetration
  • Criminal law — second appeal
    • — deference to concurrent findings of credibility
    • — relevance of victim's school class in rape of a child
7 December 2022
Failure to read amended charge and reliance on extraneous, uncorroborated evidence vitiated the trial; conviction quashed and appellant released.
  • Appellate practice — Appellate jurisdiction
    • — Exercise of revisional powers under s.4(2) AJA to nullify proceedings and quash conviction
    • — retrial withheld where prosecution evidence is weak
  • Criminal procedure
    • — Amendment of charge — Mandatory requirement to read amended charge to accused — Failure vitiates trial and denies fair trial
    • — summing up to assessors — Importation of extraneous matters not supported by evidence may improperly influence assessors and vitiate trial
  • Evidence — Doctrine of last known person
    • — Requires corroboration
    • — time lapse between last sighting and discovery can weaken inference of guilt
7 December 2022
Applicant failed to account for each day of delay; extension of time refused and costs awarded to respondent.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — duty to account for each day of delay — Virtual proceedings do not excuse failure to aver material facts
7 December 2022
A purported transfer of mineral rights is void where not all registered co-owners consent, so proceedings based on it are a nullity.
  • Civil procedure — Validity of contract — Proceedings founded on a void contract are nullities — Order VII r.11 Civil Procedure Code
  • Contract law — capacity to contract — actual and apparent authority to bind an organisation — Nemo dat quod non habet
  • Mining law — transfer/assignment of mineral rights — consent of all licence holders required for disposition — Section 9(1) Mining Act
7 December 2022
Unsworn analyst testimony and broken chain of custody rendered the prosecution's narcotics evidence insufficient; convictions quashed.
  • Criminal law — Trafficking in narcotic drugs — Requirement of sworn evidence by government analyst and consequences of unsworn testimony
  • Criminal procedure — Requirement to examine witnesses on oath or affirmation (section 198(1) CPA) — Failure to administer oath vitiates proceedings
  • Evidence — chain of custody — Seizure, custody, transfer and analysis — Breaks in chain undermine exhibit authenticity and admissibility
7 December 2022
Omission of trial magistrate's signature on recorded evidence renders proceedings null, requiring retrial de novo.
  • Criminal procedure — Appellate revisional powers — proceedings nullified, judgments quashed and retrial ordered de novo
7 December 2022
Failure to administer oath to CMA witnesses vitiated both arbitration and revision proceedings, requiring a retrial before another arbitrator.
  • Labour law — Arbitration — Commission for Mediation and Arbitration
7 December 2022
Registered certificate of title prevails over unregistered transfer; unpleaded rent claims fail and appellant bears the evidential burden.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Evidence — burden of proof on claimant
    • — pleadings bind parties — unpleaded relief cannot be granted
  • Land law
    • — certificate of title conclusive — unregistered deed cannot alter registered title
    • — Co-ownership — tenants in common — shares as per title
6 December 2022