Court of Appeal of Tanzania

This is the highest level in the justice delivery system in Tanzania. The Court of Appeal draws its mandate from Article 117(1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. The Court hears appeals  on both point of law and facts for cases originating from the High Court of Tanzania and Magistrates with extended jurisdiction in exercise of their original jurisdiction or appellate and revisional jurisdiction over matters originating in the District Land and Housing Tribunals, District Courts and Courts of Resident Magistrate. The Court also hears similar appeals  from quasi judicial bodies of status equivalent to that of the High Court. It  further hears appeals  on point of law against the decision of the High Court in  matters originating from Primary Courts. The Court of Appeal also exercises jurisdiction on appeals originating from the High Court of Zanzibar except for constitutional issues arising from the interpretation of the Constitution of Zanzibar and matters arising from the Kadhi Court.

Physical address
26 Kivukoni Road Building P.O. Box 9004, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
15 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
15 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
July 1985
Identification corroborated by recovered clothing and an incriminating prison letter warranted dismissal of the appellant's appeal.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – sufficiency and reliability where observation occurred at dusk and corroborated by recovery of clothing. Criminal law – Admissibility and probative value of a letter from custody – use to rebut alibi and show fabrication. Criminal appeal – assessment of totality of evidence and entitlement of trial court to reject alibi.
26 July 1985
Identification corroborated by recovered clothing and a prison letter undermining the alibi; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – identification evidence – reliability of eyewitness identification at dusk and corroboration by recovered clothing. Criminal procedure – admissibility of documentary evidence – prison letter alleged to procure false testimony. Defence of alibi – assessment and rejection where inconsistencies and fabrication are shown. Appeal – safety of conviction where identification and corroborative evidence are strong.
26 July 1985
Appellate court upheld manslaughter conviction, finding defence an afterthought and ten-year sentence not excessive.
Criminal law – Manslaughter; assessment of witness credibility and materiality of inconsistencies – afterthought defence rejected as not raised in prosecution case; sentence not manifestly excessive.
26 July 1985
An eight-year manslaughter sentence for a provoked killing was excessive and replaced with immediate release.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Excessive sentence – appellate intervention to reduce sentence Criminal law – Manslaughter – provocation and possible self-defence as mitigating factors Plea of guilty – relevance in sentencing and mitigation
24 July 1985
Circumstantial and voice identification evidence upheld to establish appellant's possession of firearm and guilt for triple murder.
Criminal law – Murder – Circumstantial evidence – Possession of firearm – Voice identification by neighbours – Absence of gun register does not necessarily vitiate prosecution case.
24 July 1985
First appellant's conviction quashed for failure to properly evaluate alibi; second appellant's conviction upheld on reliable identification.
Criminal law - murder; identification evidence and corroboration; alibi — duty to weigh defence and prosecution evidence together; voir dire for young witness — no prejudice where none shown; unsafe conviction; appeal allowed as to first accused, second accused's conviction upheld.
23 July 1985

Evidence - Judge’s failure to consider defence evidence when dealing with prosecution evidence - Judge arriving at the conclusion without considering defence evidence - Misdirection.

23 July 1985
Court reduced 12-year sentence to 5 years, holding intoxication affects mens rea and is not an aggravating factor.
Criminal law – sentencing – manslaughter (conviction on dying declaration) – intoxication relates to mens rea, not an aggravating sentencing factor – appellate reduction of excessive sentence – credit for prolonged remand.
23 July 1985
Close-range eyewitness identification and supporting circumstantial evidence upheld the appellant's murder conviction despite no identity parade.
Criminal law – Murder – intention to kill or cause grievous harm where another person is killed by the same act; transferred or concurrent causation issues. Identification evidence – reliability of eyewitness identification after close, prolonged daylight contact; absence of identity parade not fatal where circumstances permit identification. Circumstantial evidence – adequacy to establish accused as only possible perpetrator. Rejection of fabricated alibi/afterthought allegations regarding police coaching of witness.
23 July 1985
Appeal dismissed: in‑court identification and circumstantial evidence sufficiently supported the murder conviction.
Criminal law – identification evidence – adequacy of in-court identification where witness had ample opportunity to observe accused in daylight. Criminal procedure – identification parade – absence of parade not necessarily fatal to prosecution where identification circumstances are strong. Evidence – circumstantial and direct evidence combined to support conviction. Credibility – defendant’s afterthought allegations of police coaching held implausible.
23 July 1985
Sole eyewitness credibility and appellants' deliberate lies provided corroboration supporting murder convictions.
Criminal law – Murder – Reliance on evidence of single eyewitness – Need for corroboration – Lies by accused about material facts can amount to corroboration – Circumstantial evidence and last-seen-if-unexplained principle.
22 July 1985
Appellate court upheld murder conviction where credible sole eyewitness testimony was corroborated by the appellant’s adopted statement.
Criminal law – Murder – Reliance on sole eyewitness – Corroboration required – Defendant’s unsworn extra‑judicial statement adopted in court can corroborate eyewitness – Delay in reporting and failure to call corroborative witnesses not automatically fatal – Appellate deference to trial judge’s credibility findings.
22 July 1985
Conviction for murder upheld where sole eyewitness evidence was corroborated by the appellant’s adopted extra‑judicial statement.
Criminal law – Murder – Conviction on the evidence of a single eyewitness – necessity for corroboration. Criminal procedure – Failure to call alleged corroborative witnesses – effect on credibility of eyewitness. Evidence – Accused’s unsworn adoption of extra‑judicial statement as corroboration. Acquittal of co‑accused where no corroboration of sole witness.
22 July 1985
Whether a High Court judge sitting alone may validly grant bail under section 29(4) of the Act.
Criminal procedure – Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, 1984 – Interpretation of "High Court" – Jurisdiction to grant bail under section 29(4) – Role of Economic Crimes Court and section 35 – Lay members – Validity of bail conditions and effect of erroneous reference to section 35.
10 July 1985
January 1985
Appeal dismissed: eyewitness credibility and medical evidence supported manslaughter conviction and ten-year sentence.
Criminal law – manslaughter – credibility of eyewitnesses – material vs. immaterial contradictions; defence raised late – afterthought; post-mortem evidence – blunt-force head injury; intoxication as partial defence.
1 January 1985