Results.
49 judgments found.
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
December 2012
Medical proof of rape existed but procedural irregularities and unreliable testimony defeated conviction against the appellant.
Civil procedure — Procedure — Legality of searches/arrests — Midnight raid without warrant or community officials may taint prosecution case
Criminal law — Rape — Medical evidence confirming sexual assault is not necessarily sufficient to convict a particular accused absent reliable linking evidence
Evidence
— Burden of proof
— procedural irregularities can undermine reliability
— Single witness/corroboration
17 December 2012
Refusal to recuse plus failure to identify stolen property led to quashing of armed robbery conviction.
Civil procedure — Judicial impartiality — Recusal/recusal requests — refusal to withdraw where reasonable apprehension of bias exists results in miscarriage of justice
Criminal law — Armed robbery
Criminal procedure — Accused silence — adverse inference not available where prosecution fails to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Evidence — Identification of property
12 December 2012
The applicant’s challenge to an eight-year manslaughter sentence fails; sentence not manifestly excessive.
Criminal law — sentencing — Manslaughter
— appellate intervention only where sentence is manifestly excessive, inadequate, based on wrong principle, overlooks material factor, or is illegal
— reduction from statutory life term to fixed term for mitigating factors
11 December 2012
An eight-year manslaughter sentence was upheld because the trial judge properly considered mitigating factors.
Criminal law — sentencing — Manslaughter — Mitigating factors — Appellate interference limited to manifestly excessive/inadequate sentence, wrong principle, overlooked material factor or illegality
11 December 2012
Appeal allowed because unsafe night-time single-witness identification and unaddressed inconsistencies vitiated the conviction.
Criminal law — Visual identification
— Prosecution’s duty to explain contradictions
— single-witness night identification
11 December 2012
Single night-time identification by an impeached witness was unsafe; conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
Criminal law — identification evidence — Single witness night-time identification under traumatic surprise — Waziri Amani guidelines on factors to be considered
Criminal procedure — Conviction unsafe where identification and credibility unresolved — conviction quashed
Evidence
— PF3 expunged
— Prior inconsistent police statements affecting witness credibility — prosecution’s failure to explain contradictions
11 December 2012
Conviction quashed where identification of stolen phones and recovery of cash were insufficient, rendering the verdict unsafe.
Criminal law — Armed robbery — Identification of stolen property — insufficient description of distinctive marks on mobile phones — recent possession doctrine inapplicable
Criminal law — unexplained non-recovery of alleged cash
— appellate intervention where conviction unsafe
— evidence standard: identification beyond reasonable doubt required
10 December 2012
High Court wrongly summarily dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal under the wrong statute; matter remitted for full hearing.
Criminal procedure — Summary rejection of appeal — Correct statutory basis is — Summary dismissal an exceptional power to be exercised sparingly — severe sentence (life imprisonment) requires full hearing
10 December 2012
High Court misapplied law in summarily dismissing appeal; matter remitted for hearing on merits.
Appellate practice
— Appeal/revision procedure — Summary rejection of appeal under s 364(1) Criminal Procedure Act — Requirement to peruse record and certify lack of substance (Iddi Kondo principles)
— sentencing — Severe sentence (life imprisonment) — Inappropriateness of summary dismissal without full consideration
10 December 2012
Rape conviction quashed for inadmissible medical report and prosecutorial failure to call a key witness.
Criminal law
— Evidence — PF3 inadmissible without s.240(3) compliance
— Rape
7 December 2012
Failure to comply with s.240(3) CPA and omission to call a material witness warranted quashing the rape conviction.
Criminal law — Rape — consent as essential ingredient
Criminal procedure
— admissibility of medical reports
— Prosecution duty
Evidence — unexplained delay in arrest may undermine prosecution’s case
7 December 2012
Killing during a quarrel lacked malice aforethought; murder conviction substituted with manslaughter.
Criminal law — Murder — malice aforethought — provocation and fights negating malice — appellate substitution of conviction and sentence
6 December 2012
6 December 2012
Conviction based on inadequately proved recent-possession evidence quashed; sentence exceeded magistrate’s statutory power and was set aside.
Criminal law
— Burglary and stealing — doctrine of recent possession — Proof and identification of stolen property
— concurrent findings of fact — appellate restraint — When appellate court may interfere with concurrent findings of fact
Criminal procedure — Sentencing — Limits of subordinate court sentencing powers under section 170 Criminal Procedure Act — Criminal Procedure Act s 170(1)(a)
6 December 2012
Death in the course of a quarrel may negate malice aforethought, warranting conviction for manslaughter.
Criminal law
— evaluation of evidence — Effect of drinking, provocation and a contemporaneous affray on intent
— Homicide: murder versus manslaughter — Whether malice aforethought proved where death followed a quarrel and fight
5 December 2012
Non‑compliance with statutory interview time limits vitiates a cautioned statement; without it circumstantial evidence failed to sustain conviction.
Criminal procedure — admissibility of cautioned statement — statutory interview period — non‑compliance vitiates confession
Criminal procedure — Circumstantial evidence
— conviction quashed and sentence set aside
— sufficiency to sustain conviction
5 December 2012
4 December 2012
4 December 2012
September 2012
Non‑compliance with s.240(3) CPA renders PF3 inadmissible and inconsistent victim evidence can make a conviction unsafe.
Civil procedure — Appeal — Appellate court power to quash conviction where evidence is unreliable
Criminal law — sexual offences
— conviction may rest on uncorroborated victim testimony if credible
— Corroboration is a practice not a rule of law
Criminal procedure — Admission of PF3
Evidence — Witness credibility — Material inconsistencies in identification and facts may render a conviction unsafe
11 September 2012
March 2012
Conviction on recent possession quashed where ownership and identification of the recovered phone were not proved.
Criminal law — Armed robbery — doctrine of recent possession — Essential requirement to prove recovered property belonged to the complainant (identifying marks/serial numbers or receipt)
Criminal procedure — fair trial — duty of trial court to consider and analyse defence evidence when evaluating prosecution case — proper recording of exhibits/search
Evidence — Identification of exhibits — Necessity of serial numbers/receipts and proper tendering
30 March 2012
Conviction based solely on unproven recent possession is unsafe; conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
Criminal law — Robbery with violence — Identification and recent possession
Criminal procedure — admissibility of cautioned statements — duty to conduct enquiry into voluntariness
Evidence — Doctrine of recent possession — requirements: possession, positive identification, recentness, and relation to charged offence
30 March 2012
Appellate court quashed conviction and death sentence, expunged irregular preliminary hearing and ordered a retrial to protect the appellant's alibi.
Criminal procedure — Preliminary hearing
— Non‑compliance with s.192(3) (reading/explaining memorandum and accused's signature) — Counsel cannot admit facts for accused
— Effect of irregular preliminary hearing — Proceedings expunged; facts no longer deemed proved under s 192(4)
Criminal law — Retrial — When to order (Fatehali Manji principle) — Revision under Appellate Jurisdiction Act s 4(2)
29 March 2012
Preliminary Hearing defects (failure to read/explain memorandum and lack of accused's signature) vitiated proceedings; retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure — Preliminary hearing — non‑compliance with s.192(3) (reading/explaining memorandum and accused's signature) — counsel cannot admit facts for accused
— retrial ordered in interests of justice
— revisional powers
29 March 2012
Victim's credible testimony can sustain a rape conviction, but sentencing must reflect uncertainty as to the accused's age.
Criminal law
— Juvenile sentencing — Duty to judicially ascertain age affecting criminal responsibility — Revisional powers under Appellate Jurisdiction Act s4(2)
— Rape — Conviction on victim's testimony — Sufficiency of evidence without additional witnesses
Criminal procedure — Appellate review of concurrent findings — Disturbance of concurrent findings only for misapprehension of evidence or miscarriage of justice
28 March 2012
Victim’s credible testimony alone sustained a rape conviction; sentence set aside due to doubt about the appellant’s age.
Appellate practice — Appellate jurisdiction — Exercise of revisional powers under s.4(2) AJA to correct sentencing illegality
Civil procedure — Appeal — concurrent findings of fact — Appellate deference to trial court credibility findings unless clear misapprehension or legal error
Criminal law
— Rape — Victim’s evidence
— sentencing — Age uncertainty — Where age affects criminal responsibility, court must judicially determine age
Evidence — PF3 and corroboration
28 March 2012
District Court lacked jurisdiction to try scheduled economic offences without DPP consent; convictions quashed and release ordered.
Appellate practice — Appellate jurisdiction — power to revise, quash proceedings and set aside convictions where jurisdictional defects exist
Criminal procedure — Jurisdiction — scheduled economic offences
28 March 2012
Trial of scheduled economic offences in subordinate court without DPP consent is jurisdictionally invalid; convictions quashed.
Criminal procedure — Jurisdiction — scheduled economic offences
— Court of Appeal may invoke s.4(2) AJA to revise and quash proceedings
— immediate release ordered pending lawful detention
— Prior consent of Director of Public Prosecutions and certificate of transfer required for prosecution in subordinate court
— retrial left to DPP under Article 59B(2)
— trial without such consent is nullity
28 March 2012
District Court lacked jurisdiction to try scheduled economic offences without DPP consent; proceedings quashed and sentences set aside.
Appellate practice — Appellate jurisdiction act (s.4(2)) — revisional powers to quash proceedings and set aside sentences where trial conducted without jurisdiction
Criminal law — Jurisdiction
28 March 2012
Reported
High Court single-judge determination of a Court-martial appeal was void for lack of the three-judge quorum; decision quashed.
Criminal procedure — Court-martial appeals — Appeals lie to the Court-martial Appeal Court constituted by High Court judges
— estoppel cannot validate statutory defects
— non-compliance renders decision a nullity
— quorum of three judges required
28 March 2012
A single High Court judge cannot hear a court-martial appeal; statutory three-judge quorum is mandatory, else decision is null.
Administrative law — Constitutional/administrative law — mandatory statutory composition of appellate courts — non-compliance renders proceedings a nullity
Civil procedure — Procedural law — estoppel cannot be invoked to validate non-compliance with statutory duties (no estoppel against statute)
Military law — appeals from Court-martial — statutory route — Court-martial Appeal Court constituted by High Court judges under C.146 — three-judge quorum required
28 March 2012
Victim's credible testimony upheld rape conviction; sentence set aside due to age uncertainty and substituted for immediate release.
Criminal law
— Juvenile sentencing — Duty to judicially ascertain age affecting criminal responsibility — Penal Code s131(2)(a)
— Rape — Victim’s testimony as primary evidence — Victim's evidence may suffice under s127(7) Evidence Act
Criminal procedure — PF3 (medical report) — Admissibility and weight of PF3 when expunged by appellate court
27 March 2012
Appeal dismissed: identification and victim’s testimony (with medical corroboration) sufficiently established gang rape.
Civil procedure — Procedure
Criminal law
— identification — Visual identification standards, circumstances favouring correct identification (short distance, opportunity to observe)
— sexual offences — gang rape — Sufficiency of complainant’s evidence and requirement for corroboration
Evidence
— Medical evidence as corroboration in rape cases
— minor discrepancies in dates immaterial to probative value
26 March 2012
Assessors' exclusion rendered several exhibits inadmissible, but untainted circumstantial evidence upheld murder convictions.
Criminal law
— aiding and abetting (s.22(1)(c)) — presence, conduct and failure to dissociate can establish liability (Zuberi principle)
— Murder — circumstantial evidence, recent possession, flight, concealment and leading police to body can prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Criminal procedure — assessors — exclusion of assessors during reception of evidence renders such evidence inadmissible
26 March 2012
Despite improperly admitted confessions, untainted circumstantial evidence proved the applicants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law — Admissibility — cautioned statements and exhibits improperly received without assessors expunged
Criminal law — Criminal liability
— Aiding and abetting
— presence plus conduct/dissociation assessed for complicity
Criminal procedure — trial with assessors
Evidence — circumstantial evidence and conduct (flight, concealment, leading to body) can sustain murder conviction
26 March 2012
Reported
Assessor exclusion rendered several exhibits inadmissible, yet untainted circumstantial evidence sustained the appellants' murder convictions.
Criminal law
— Circumstantial evidence — possession of victim's property, flight, discovery of body, admissions — sufficiency to prove murder
— Criminal liability — aiding and abetting/principal in second degree — conduct and failure to dissociate
Criminal procedure — trial with assessors — exclusion of assessors during reception of evidence — trial within a trial — basis for expunging exhibits admitted in assessors' absence
Evidence — Cautioned/confessional statements — admissibility and effect
26 March 2012
Improperly admitted cautioned statements were expunged, but convictions upheld on recent possession and corroborative evidence.
Criminal law
— doctrine of recent possession as supporting inference of guilt in robbery‑murder
— sufficiency of identification of stolen property
Criminal procedure — admissibility of cautioned statements — compliance with s.50 and s.57 CPA — trial‑within‑trial and role of assessors
Evidence
— co‑accused statements and requirement for corroboration
— Evidence act
26 March 2012
Improperly admitted cautioned/statements were expunged, but recent possession and corroborative conduct sustained convictions; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law — Admissibility of cautioned statements — compliance with CPA ss.50,57 and s.265 procedure
Criminal law — Evidence Act s.34B
— assessors and trial-within-trial procedure
— corroboration of co-accused statements and sufficiency of evidence to support conviction
— cumulative conditions for hearsay/statements
— identification of stolen property and doctrine of recent possession
26 March 2012
23 March 2012
23 March 2012
Trial combining economic and non‑economic offences without DPP consent is null; convictions quashed and appellants released.
Criminal procedure — Jurisdiction — Economic offences
— combining economic and non-economic offences without DPP certificate renders proceedings nullity
— convictions and sentences quashed
— DPP's consent
— matter remitted to DPP discretion
— release ordered
— Unlawful possession of arms and ammunition as scheduled economic offences
23 March 2012
Reported
Conviction quashed where extra-judicial statement was admitted without assessors and exhibits lacked lawful search and chain of custody.
Criminal law — admissibility of extra-judicial statements — mandatory presence and involvement of assessors
— exclusion renders admission illegal and expungeable
— Prosecutorial discretion as to whom to charge
Criminal law — Murder
23 March 2012
Reported
Appeal dismissed: witness identification, corroborated by flight and common intention, supported conviction and death sentence.
Criminal law — identification evidence
— Application of section 23 Penal Code (common intention)
— Factors: prior acquaintance, uncovered face, adequate lighting, proximity and duration of observation
— Flight and evasive conduct as corroboration
— Prosecutorial discretion on witness calling
19 March 2012
Applicant's visual identification, corroborated by flight, was sufficient to uphold conviction and sentence.
Criminal law — Visual identification
— Common intention
— corroboration by flight and evasive conduct
— reliability factors: prior acquaintance, illumination, proximity and duration
19 March 2012
A criminal appeal from a Primary Court is incompetent without a High Court certificate under section 6(7)(b) AJA.
Appellate practice — Appellate procedure — third appeals in criminal matters originating in Primary Court — mandatory requirement of a High Court certificate under s.6(7)(b) AJA
Civil procedure — Procedural compliance — jurisdictional preconditions for instituting appeal to Court of Appeal
Criminal procedure — competence of appeal
19 March 2012
A criminal appeal from a Primary Court is incompetent without a High Court certificate under section 6(7)(b) AJA.
Appellate practice — Appellate procedure — Criminal appeals originating in Primary Courts require High Court certificate that a point of law is involved before appeal to Court of Appeal — Appeal struck out
19 March 2012
Conviction quashed: identification unreliable and chain of custody of stolen items defective, making the conviction unsafe.
Civil procedure — Procedure — Fair trial — record may dispel complaints of denial of opportunity
Criminal law
— Charge — distinction between burglary (dwelling house at night) and breaking into a building (non-dwelling)
— identification — visual identification — Waziri Amani criteria
Evidence — Recent possession
19 March 2012
Conviction unsafe due to weak visual identification and defective chain of custody; appeal allowed and conviction quashed.
Criminal law
— Charge formulation — distinction between housebreaking and burglary (dwelling requirement)
— doctrine of recent possession — requirements include possession, nexus with accused, positive ownership identification and recent theft
— identification evidence — Visual identification — contradictions and unfavourable conditions undermine reliability
Criminal procedure — fair trial — record may refute claim of denial
Evidence — Exhibits and chain of custody
19 March 2012
The applicant's revision application was struck out for incompetence due to incorrect statutory citations and improper affidavit grounds.
Criminal procedure — Revision
— competency of revision application where appeal is appropriate
— ignorance of law by a lay litigant is no defence
— incorrect citation of enabling provisions
14 March 2012
Applicant's revision application with incorrect statutory citations and improper supporting grounds was incompetent and struck out.
Civil procedure — Competence of application — revision — Revision not an alternative to appeal
13 March 2012