|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| May 2018 |
|
|
Transfer of a murder trial after plea and preliminary hearing is unlawful; proceedings nullified and remitted to the High Court.
Criminal procedure – Transfer under s.256A Criminal Procedure Act – Transfer to resident magistrate with extended jurisdiction must be directed before plea and preliminary hearing; transfer after plea/preliminary hearing is invalid and renders subsequent proceedings a nullity
Appellate Jurisdiction – Exercise of revisional powers under s.4(2) AJA to quash irregular subordinate court proceedings and set aside sentence
Jurisdiction – Proper forum for trial of murder committed for trial to High Court unless valid transfer effected in accordance with s.256A
|
10 May 2018 |
|
Failure to record reasons for reassignment of a partly-heard trial vitiates successor magistrate’s jurisdiction; retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure—section 214(1) Criminal Procedure Act—reassignment of partly-heard trial—reasons for transfer must be recorded; failure to do so vitiates jurisdiction of successor magistrate and renders proceedings nullity—Appellate Jurisdiction Act s.4(2)—revisional power to quash and order retrial.
|
10 May 2018 |
|
A wrong statutory citation in a committal order is curable where the committing court had jurisdiction; record remitted to High Court.
Criminal procedure – committal to High Court – wrong statutory citation (s.243(1) v. s.246(1) CPA) – harmless/curable error under s.388 CPA; distinction from absence of committal (R v Asafu Tumwine); reading statements under wrong provision (s.247 v. s.246(2)) – curable; remedial option – remit record rather than exercise revision.
|
10 May 2018 |
|
Successor magistrate's takeover without recorded reasons vitiates proceedings; retrial ordered and sentence set aside.
Criminal procedure – Partly heard trials – Successor magistrate taking over without recording reasons – s.214(1) Criminal Procedure Act – Lack of jurisdiction renders proceedings a nullity; revisional powers under s.4(2) Appellate Jurisdiction Act to quash and order retrial.
|
9 May 2018 |
|
A transfer to a magistrate with extended jurisdiction after plea and preliminary hearing is unlawful.
Criminal procedure — s.256A CPA — transfer to resident magistrate with extended jurisdiction must occur before plea and preliminary hearing; transfer after those stages is unlawful and renders subordinate court proceedings a nullity — revisional powers under s.4(2) AJA — quashing proceedings and remitting to High Court.
|
8 May 2018 |
| October 2017 |
|
|
Court upheld conviction: visual identification reliable; no parade required; alibi and grudge defences rejected.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – visual identification – reliability where light conditions and prior acquaintance exist. Criminal procedure – identification parade unnecessary where witnesses knew the suspect
Evidence – testimony of relatives/neighbours may be credible and need not be corroborated if assessed on merits
Defence – alibi and allegations of motive as afterthoughts; failure to cross-examine weakens such defences. Appellate review – second appellate court slow to disturb concurrent factual findings unless clearly misapprehended
|
13 October 2017 |
|
Proceedings without DPP consent and a proper transfer certificate under the Economic Crimes Act are nullities, requiring quash and retrial.
Economic Crimes Act – jurisdiction – mandatory consent of DPP under s.26(1) – mandatory certificate of transfer under s.12(3) – absence renders subordinate court proceedings nullities – convictions and sentences quashed – retrial ordered.
|
13 October 2017 |
|
A leave to appeal incorporated in a struck-out appeal does not survive; fresh leave is required for a competent appeal.
Appellate procedure — Leave to appeal — Effect of striking out an appeal on incorporated leave — Rule 46(1) Court of Appeal Rules — Requirement to apply afresh for leave after lodging notice — Competence of appeal.
|
13 October 2017 |
|
A leave to appeal incorporated in a struck-out appeal does not survive; a fresh leave is required.
Civil procedure – appeals – effect of striking out an appeal – incorporated leave to appeal does not survive the striking out; fresh leave required
Court of Appeal Rules, r.46(1) – application for leave must be made after lodging the notice of appeal. Incompetence of appeal for want of proper leave – striking out with costs
|
13 October 2017 |
|
An incompetent appeal for lack of statutory notice must be struck out; the High Court's dismissal was quashed and proceedings revised.
Criminal procedure – appeal – notice of intention to appeal – compliance with section 361(1)(a) CPA; Competent vs incompetent appeals – incompetent appeal to be struck out, not dismissed; Appellate jurisdiction – revisional powers under section 4(2) AJA to quash erroneous High Court proceedings and orders; Consequences – collateral applications premised on flawed dismissal also susceptible to revision and nullification.
|
13 October 2017 |
|
Appellant's robbery conviction upheld based on reliable visual identification, immediate naming and conduct indicating guilty consciousness.
Criminal law – Visual identification – reliability where identification aided by lamp and moonlight and witnesses were previously known to accused; identification parade unnecessary where witnesses knew accused. Criminal procedure – defence of alibi and afterthought allegations – weight and requirement to raise/cross-examine
Evidence – immediate naming and conduct (refusal to open door) may support inference of guilty consciousness. Appellate review – scope of second appeal and disturbance of concurrent findings
|
12 October 2017 |
|
Absence of DPP consent and an incomplete transfer certificate deprived subordinate courts of jurisdiction, nullifying convictions and ordering retrial.
Economic Crimes Act – section 26(1) – DPP’s consent mandatory for trial of economic offences by subordinate courts
Economic Crimes Act – section 12(3) – certificate of transfer must properly and completely specify offences to confer jurisdiction
Jurisdiction – absence of mandatory consent/certificate renders proceedings a nullity – convictions and sentences quashed; trial de novo ordered. Procedural irregularity – remedied by nullification where jurisdictional prerequisites are unmet
|
12 October 2017 |
|
Leave to appeal in a struck-out appeal does not survive; a fresh leave is required before re-filing an appeal.
Civil procedure — Leave to appeal — appeal struck out — incorporated leave does not survive — Rule 46(1) Court of Appeal Rules — fresh leave required after lodging notice of appeal.
|
12 October 2017 |
|
Failure to file the statutory notice renders a criminal appeal incompetent and it must be struck out, not dismissed.
Criminal procedure – requirement to file notice of intention to appeal – section 361(1)(a) CPA – non-compliance renders appeal incompetent. Incompetent appeal is struck out, not dismissed – dismissal implies merits determination. Appellate revisional powers – section 4(2) AJA – power to quash and set aside erroneous proceedings and orders. Orders granting or denying extension of time based on a defective dismissal are nullified. Remedy: quash High Court judgment, set aside related orders; appellant may seek fresh extension and appeal
|
12 October 2017 |
|
A charge citing a non-existent statutory provision vitiated the trial; proceedings quashed and appellant released pending DPP decision.
Criminal law – particulars of charge – section 135 Criminal Procedure Act – citation of non-existent statutory provision – defective charge amounts to unfair trial – proceedings and judgments quashed under section 4(2) AJA – long custody as ground for release – DPP discretion to re-arrest/re-charge.
|
11 October 2017 |
|
Change of magistrate without stated reasons breached fair trial rights; proceedings quashed and appellant discharged.
Criminal procedure – change of presiding magistrate – s.214(1) CPA requires successor to state reasons and may resummon witnesses – failure renders proceedings nullity; right to fair trial (Art.13(6)(a)). Appellate jurisdiction – exercise of revisional powers (s.4(2) AJA) – quashing of proceedings and setting aside sentence; retrial vs. discharge considered in light of time served and DPP discretion
|
11 October 2017 |
|
|
10 October 2017 |
|
A defective armed-robbery charge failing to name the person threatened vitiates the trial; conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Criminal law – Armed robbery (s.287A Penal Code) – Essential ingredients – charge must disclose the person on whom violence or threat was directed. Criminal procedure – Sufficiency of charge (s.132 CPA) – omission of essential particulars renders charge incurably defective and vitiates trial. Trial fairness – Defective charge prejudices accused’s defence – nullity of proceedings
Retrial – Principles for ordering retrial (Fatehali Manji) – interests of justice may require retrial despite nullified proceedings
|
10 October 2017 |
|
An application for extension of time in cases tried by a subordinate court with extended jurisdiction must be made to that subordinate court, not the High Court.
Criminal procedure — transfer under s.256A CPA — subordinate court exercising extended jurisdiction — status of transferred case — Appellate Jurisdiction Act, s.11(1) — forum for application to extend time to give notice of appeal — jurisdictional limits — competence of appeal where extension invalid.
|
9 October 2017 |
|
High Court lacked jurisdiction to extend time after transfer under s256A(1); appeal struck out and High Court ruling quashed.
Criminal procedure – transfer under section 256A(1) CPA – effect on record and jurisdiction; Appellate Jurisdiction Act section 11 – division of powers between High Court and Resident Magistrate's Court (extended jurisdiction); extension of time – invalidity where granted by court lacking jurisdiction; Court of Appeal – revisionary powers under section 4(2) to quash unlawful proceedings.
|
9 October 2017 |
|
|
9 October 2017 |
|
|
7 October 2017 |
|
Victim's credible testimony and admissible medical reports upheld conviction and mandatory 30-year sentence for incest.
Criminal law – Incest: elements and mens rea; Consent immaterial in incest offences; Evidence – victim's testimony as best evidence in sexual offences; Medical reports (PF3) admissibility under s.291(4) Criminal Procedure Act as corroboration; Continuous sexual offences – adequacy of charging period; Sentencing – mandatory minimum thirty years where victim under eighteen (s.158(1)(a) Penal Code).
|
7 October 2017 |
| September 2016 |
|
|
Identification in a well‑lit room and the appellant’s obstructive conduct corroborated the victim and sustained the rape conviction.
Criminal law – Rape – Identification where assault began in darkness but victim later viewed accused in a lit room – visual identification held reliable. Criminal procedure – Sexual offence trials must be in camera (s.186(3) CPA) — failure to hold in camera not fatal where no objection and no prejudice shown
Evidence – Corroboration by accused’s conduct (threats, attempts to silence victim, facilitating presence) can support conviction. Medical evidence – Absence of sperm or PF3 details does not necessarily negate proof of rape
|
14 September 2016 |
| August 2016 |
|
|
|
27 August 2016 |
|
Premature discharge and cross-examination by assessors vitiated the trial, quashing conviction and ordering a retrial.
Criminal procedure – role of assessors – trials before the High Court must be with aid of assessors (s265 CPA) – premature discharge vitiates trial
Evidence – assessors’ role limited to putting questions through the court (s177 Evidence Act) – assessors must not cross-examine or re-examine witnesses. Trial-within-a-trial – to determine admissibility of cautioned/extra-judicial statements, held only after objection is raised; assessors excused for that purpose. Fair trial – procedural irregularities affecting assessors’ role constitute fatal irregularity warranting retrial
|
5 August 2016 |
|
Premature discharge and improper cross‑examination by assessors vitiated the trial and warranted quashing of conviction and retrial.
Criminal procedure – assessors – mandatory presence for High Court trials (s.265 CPA) – premature discharge vitiates trial
Evidence – role of assessors (s.177 Evidence Act) – assessors may put questions through the Court but must not cross-examine or re-examine
Evidence – cross-examination exclusive to adverse party (s.146, s.155 Evidence Act); assessor conduct undermining impartiality breaches fair trial. Constitutional law – right to fair trial (Art.13(6)(a)) – procedural irregularities may nullify proceedings. Appellate jurisdiction – invocation of revisional powers (s.4(2) AJA) to quash conviction and order retrial
|
5 August 2016 |
|
Conviction quashed due to defective charge sheet and misapprehension of weak, procedurally flawed evidence; appellant ordered released.
Criminal law – Rape – requirement that charge sheet identify specific category of rape under section 130(2) and relevant sentencing subsection (131(3)) where victim is under 18; defective charge vitiates proceedings
Evidence – absence of victim’s testimony and weaknesses in eyewitness account undermine prosecution case. Medical evidence – PF3 admissibility and procedural compliance with section 240(3) CPA; failure to read exhibit to accused and late/duplicate exhibition weakens probative value. Appellate review – concurrent findings may be disturbed where there is misapprehension of evidence leading to injustice
|
5 August 2016 |
|
Failure to comply with section 214(1) and a defective charge sheet vitiated the appellant's rape conviction.
Criminal procedure – section 214(1) Criminal Procedure Act – change of presiding magistrate – duty to give reasons and inform accused of right to continue or start afresh and recall witnesses – fairness of trial. Criminal law – charge sheet particulars – charging under incorrect/non‑existent provisions (130(1)(e) and 131 instead of 131(3)) – prejudice to accused – right to know nature of charge. Criminal procedure – evaluation of evidence – duty of trial and appellate courts to consider defence evidence – omission is a serious misdirection and vitiates trial
Remedy – cumulative procedural irregularities may warrant quashing conviction and setting aside sentence; retrial not always ordered
|
4 August 2016 |
|
Gang rape conviction upheld: victim and witnesses properly identified appellants at night; medical and contemporaneous evidence corroborative.
Criminal law – Sexual offences: gang rape – identification at night; familiarity, moonlight, close proximity and voice recognition can suffice for positive identification; Evidence Act s.127(2) – competence of child witness and voire dire; corroboration by medical evidence (PF3); appellate review of trial court's omission to evaluate defence; missing confessional document and unproduced exhibit do not necessarily render conviction unsafe when cumulative evidence is overwhelming.
|
4 August 2016 |
|
Applicant's admission and possession of elephant meat justified conviction for unlawful possession; appeal dismissed.
Wildlife Conservation Act – unlawful possession of Government Trophy (elephant meat) – proof by possession and admission; Concurrent findings of fact – appellate interference only where misdirection or miscarriage of justice established; Valuation of trophies – admissible valuation certificate; Procedural irregularities (inventory not read, no signed search certificate) – not necessarily fatal where probative evidence remains.
|
4 August 2016 |
|
|
4 August 2016 |
|
A conviction based on a defective or amended charge without informing the accused violates the right to a fair trial and is quashed.
Criminal law – defective charge – wrong or non‑existent statutory citation – prejudice to accused and fair trial implications; Criminal procedure – amendment of charge by trial court during judgment – impermissible without informing accused; Constitutional right – fair trial (right to be informed of charge and to defend) – violation warrants quashing conviction.
|
4 August 2016 |
|
Conviction quashed: major witness contradictions and failure to consider defence defeated proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Armed robbery – Sufficiency of evidence – Material contradictions in prosecution witnesses' accounts (dates of incident) – Single witness rule; evidence must be watertight
Evidence – Evaluation of inconsistencies – Duty of trial and appellate courts to address and, where possible, reconcile contradictions. Criminal procedure – Failure to consider accused's defence – vitiates conviction
Appeal – Interference with concurrent findings permitted where there are misdirections or non-directions on the evidence
|
3 August 2016 |
|
A charge based on a wrong statutory provision and unilaterally amended in judgment denied the accused a fair trial; conviction quashed.
Criminal procedure – defective charge – wrong/non‑existent statutory provision – prejudice to accused; unilateral amendment of charge in judgment unlawful; right to fair trial violated; conviction quashed. Civil v criminal forum – dispute of civil character ought to be pursued in civil proceedings
|
3 August 2016 |
|
A defective charge and unilateral amendment at judgment denied the appellant a fair trial; conviction quashed.
Criminal law – defective charge – incorrect or non-existent statutory citation – prejudice to fair trial. Criminal procedure – amendment of charge by trial court at judgment stage without informing accused – irregular and unfair. Nature of dispute – possible civil character of complaint
Remedy – conviction quashed and sentence set aside
|
3 August 2016 |
|
Appeal struck out as time‑barred for lacking Registrar’s certificate to exclude waiting time for copies.
Civil procedure — Appeals — Court of Appeal Rules 83(1) & 90(1) — notice of appeal and institution within prescribed time — exclusion of waiting time for copies requires Registrar’s certificate — absence renders appeal time‑barred — appeal struck out.
|
2 August 2016 |
|
An appeal filed after the prescribed period without a Registrar's certificate of delay is incompetent and struck out.
Court of Appeal Rules 83(1) and 90(1) – time for instituting appeals – requirement of lodging memorandum and record within 60 days of notice of appeal; Registrar's certificate of delay – necessity to exclude waiting time for High Court copies; absence of certificate renders appeal time‑barred and incompetent; remedy – striking out appeal; costs where incompetence is raised suo motu.
|
2 August 2016 |
|
|
1 August 2016 |
|
A guilty plea must be unequivocal; defective charges justified quashing convictions and ordering release rather than retrial.
Criminal procedure — plea of guilty — requirement that plea be unequivocal and admit all essential ingredients — defective charge sheet (failure to specify subsections; wrong statutory reference) — appealable defects where plea is ambiguous — appellate revision under s.4(2) AJA — retrial may be refused where charges are defective and would deny fair trial.
|
1 August 2016 |
|
Successor magistrate's failure to recall witnesses deprived appellant of fair trial; proceedings and sentence quashed.
Criminal procedure – Change of presiding magistrate – duty to inform accused of right to recommence trial or recall witnesses when successor takes over. Right to a fair trial – necessity for successor to hear witnesses and observe demeanour before composing judgment. Revisional powers – quashing proceedings and setting aside sentence where trial by multiple magistrates was defective. Discretion of Director of Public Prosecutions on preferring fresh charge after prolonged custody
|
1 August 2016 |
|
Sexual intercourse with a niece is not 'incest by males' under s.158(1)(a); conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Criminal law – Statutory interpretation of s.158(1)(a) Penal Code – 'Incest by Males' limited to granddaughter, daughter, sister or mother; niece excluded – Wrong charge renders proceedings nullity – Conviction quashed – New trial ordered – Legislative inconsistency with Law of Marriage Act noted.
|
1 August 2016 |
|
Conviction under s158(1)(a) for sex with a niece is invalid; proceedings quashed and retrial on proper charge ordered.
Criminal law – Incest by males – Interpretation of section 158(1)(a) Penal Code – Whether "prohibited sexual intercourse" includes nieces. Criminal procedure – Effect of wrong charge – Proceedings founded on inapplicable statutory provision are nullities; conviction quashed
Remedy – Revisionary powers and ordering of retrial on proper charge to be determined by the DPP. Statutory harmonisation – Disparity between Penal Code incest provisions and prohibited relationships under the Law of Marriage Act; comparative legislative reform noted
|
1 August 2016 |
| July 2016 |
|
|
Change of magistrate without resummoning witnesses denied the appellant a fair trial; proceedings and convictions quashed.
Criminal procedure – change of magistrate – duty to inform accused of right to have trial continue afresh and right to recall witnesses; Section 214(1) CPA – successor magistrate may act on recorded evidence but may resummon witnesses when necessary; Right to fair trial – importance of observing witness demeanour and assessing credibility; Trial irregularity renders proceedings a nullity; Remedy – quashing of proceedings and referral to DPP rather than automatic retrial where custody period is prolonged.
|
30 July 2016 |
|
A tribunal's proceedings are null where assessors were replaced mid-trial and their opinions were not recorded.
Land Disputes Courts Act s.23 – Composition of Tribunal – Chairman and at least two assessors required; assessors must give opinion before judgment and such opinion should be recorded; change of assessors mid-trial and absence of recorded opinions vitiate proceedings; s.45 non-curability where defects occasion failure of justice; nullity and revision under Appellate Jurisdiction Act s.4(3).
|
29 July 2016 |
|
Second and third appellants' identifications upheld; first appellant's identification inadequate and conviction quashed.
Criminal law – Armed robbery – Visual identification – Application of Waziri Amani safeguards; prior acquaintance and illumination as factors supporting identification; alibi assessment and concurrent findings on second appeal.
|
29 July 2016 |
|
Appellant denied fair trial where judgment was composed by magistrate who had not heard the case; retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure – change of magistrate – non-compliance with section 214(1) Criminal Procedure Act; right to fair trial (Art.13(6)(a)) – judgment composed by magistrate who did not hear evidence – proceedings nullified; retrial ordered; credit for time served.
|
29 July 2016 |
|
A guilty plea is not unequivocal where the cautioned statement and PF3 were not properly cleared, read out, or objections sought.
Criminal procedure — Guilty plea — Plea must be unequivocal — Admission of documents: clearing for admission, actual admission and reading out — Cautioned statement and PF3 — Failure to seek objections — Voluntariness complaint — Retrial ordered.
|
29 July 2016 |
|
Second and third appellants’ identifications were safe; first appellant’s generalized identification was unsafe and conviction quashed.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Application of Waziri Amani principles – Whether visual identification was safe given lighting, proximity and prior acquaintance. Criminal procedure – Second appeal – Deference to concurrent findings of fact unless perverse, unreasonable or misapprehended
Evidence – Alibi defence – Trial court’s assessment and rejection of alibi
|
28 July 2016 |
|
Appellant’s conviction based solely on uncorroborated dock/recognition evidence and missing police testimony was unsafe.
Criminal law – Rape – occurrence of sexual assault established by victim and clinical evidence; identification evidence critical to conviction; need for caution in visual identification
Evidence – Dock identification – inadmissibility/unsafety of dock recognition absent prior identification parade or contemporaneous description
Evidence – Prosecution duty to call material witnesses; unexplained failure to call arresting officer may attract adverse inference
Authorities – Waziri Amani principle: identification must be watertight before reliance
|
28 July 2016 |