Court of Appeal of Tanzania

This is the highest level in the justice delivery system in Tanzania. The Court of Appeal draws its mandate from Article 117(1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. The Court hears appeals  on both point of law and facts for cases originating from the High Court of Tanzania and Magistrates with extended jurisdiction in exercise of their original jurisdiction or appellate and revisional jurisdiction over matters originating in the District Land and Housing Tribunals, District Courts and Courts of Resident Magistrate. The Court also hears similar appeals  from quasi judicial bodies of status equivalent to that of the High Court. It  further hears appeals  on point of law against the decision of the High Court in  matters originating from Primary Courts. The Court of Appeal also exercises jurisdiction on appeals originating from the High Court of Zanzibar except for constitutional issues arising from the interpretation of the Constitution of Zanzibar and matters arising from the Kadhi Court.

Physical address
26 Kivukoni Road Building P.O. Box 9004, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
18 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
18 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2021
Appellate court quashed enhanced compensation after High Court decided new unpleaded issues without hearing parties.
Labour law – unfair dismissal – CMA award and High Court revision – competence of arbitrator to regulate procedure and authenticate proceedings. Civil procedure – appellate/revisional courts – right to be heard – new issues cannot be raised and determined without affording parties opportunity to address them. Evidence – authentication of tribunal record – signatures and coram as sufficient safeguards.
16 December 2021
November 2021
Denial of the right to be heard vitiates land tribunal proceedings and mandates a de novo retrial.
Land law; natural justice; constitutional right to be heard (Art.13(6)(a)); proceedings condemning parties unheard are a nullity; appellate revisional powers; order retrial de novo before DLHT.
5 November 2021
An appeal from a Ward Tribunal is incompetent and struck out if not supported by the required certificate on a point of law.
Land law – appeals from Ward Tribunal – requirement of certificate on a point of law (s.47(3) Land Disputes Courts Act). Civil procedure – competence of appeal – compliance with rule 46(1) Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. Procedural timing – inability to cure jurisdictional defect by obtaining certificate after appeal lodged. Remedy – appeal struck out with costs.
5 November 2021
Conviction upheld on confession despite flawed reliance on recent possession; sentence reduced and compensation set aside.
Criminal law – recent possession doctrine – requirements and limitations where accused offers a plausible explanation. Evidence – cautioned statement – admissibility despite procedural irregularities and probative value where not objected to. Conviction – sufficiency of evidence where confession corroborates other evidence. Sentencing – appellate interference where sentence excessive or beyond magistrate's jurisdiction; substitution of lesser term. Compensation order – setting aside where circumstances warrant.
5 November 2021
Failure to account for delay and absence of apparent illegality warranted dismissal of extension application; appeal dismissed.
Labour law – extension of time – applicant must account for delay and act diligently to justify extension. Civil procedure – service of process – SMS service without proof may be inadequate to establish effective notice. Extension of time – illegality as sufficient cause must be apparent on the face of the record; newly raised or unsubstantiated illegality will not automatically justify extension.
5 November 2021
Proceedings were nullities where economic-offence trials lacked DPP consent and certificate; convictions quashed and appellants discharged.
Criminal law — Economic offences — Offences under Firearms and Ammunition Control Act prescribed as economic offences under EOCCA Schedule (Para.31) — Requirement of DPP consent (s.26 EOCCA) and certificate conferring subordinate court jurisdiction (s.12(3) EOCCA) — Absence renders trial a nullity; appellate judgment based on null proceedings also null. Appellate jurisdiction — Revisional powers (s.4(2) AJA) — quash convictions, set aside sentences, order discharge.
4 November 2021
Child witness's unsworn evidence was discounted, but conviction upheld on corroborative eyewitness and medical evidence.
Evidence Act s127(2) – witnesses of tender age must be required to promise to tell the truth; failure is fatal and evidence must be discounted. Criminal Procedure Act s240(3) – PF3 admissibility where author testifies and is cross-examined. Rape – medical evidence (PF3) can corroborate penetration where victim’s evidence is excluded. Criminal procedure – failure to call or cross-examine witnesses and remaining silent undermines defence and credibility challenges.
4 November 2021
Failure to prove service of the notice of appeal on the respondent or advocate renders the appeal incompetent and is fatal.
Civil procedure — Appeals — Service of notice of appeal — Rule 84(1) and (2) C.A. Rules — Requirement to serve respondent or respondent's advocate at advocate's address; proof of service required; preliminary objection on competence may be decided as point of law; failure to comply renders appeal incompetent.
3 November 2021
Procedural defects in exhibit handling and failure to prove presence in game reserve rendered convictions unsafe.
Criminal law – wildlife offences – being in game reserve without permit; possession of weapons and game meat in reserve. Evidence – tendering and admission of exhibits – public prosecutor cannot properly tender exhibits in lieu of a witness; documentary exhibits must be read out after admission. Procedure – inventory of seized game – Inventory Form prepared without accused's participation contravenes PGO and is inadmissible. Proof of locus – prosecution must prove the accused were within statutory boundaries of protected area.
3 November 2021
Unimpeached complainant's immediate report and corroboration suffice to uphold rape conviction despite expunged medical report.
Criminal law – Rape – Proof of penetration and credibility of unimpeached complainant; admissibility of PF3 improperly tendered by prosecutor – expungement but oral evidence admissible; recognition identification; distinction between rape and incest by male.
1 November 2021
October 2021
Appellate judgment quashed and conviction overturned where prosecutor‑tendered exhibits and defective search evidence made prosecution case unsafe.
Criminal law – appellate duty to address grounds of appeal; admissibility of exhibits – public prosecutor cannot tender exhibits or act as witness; requirement to read out admitted documents; legality of search and need for independent corroboration; burden of proof in criminal cases.
29 October 2021
Variance between charge and evidence, material witness contradictions and defective exhibits defeated prosecution’s proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Wildlife offences – unlawful possession of government trophies – proof of possession and constructive possession. Criminal procedure – variance between charge particulars and evidence – duty to amend under section 234 CPA. Evidence – material contradictions among prosecution witnesses on crucial facts; effect on credibility. Admissibility – irregular tendering of documentary exhibit (trophy valuation certificate); expunction. Seizure procedure – defective certificate of seizure (timing, unauthorized officer, occupier’s signature) – reliability and admissibility.
29 October 2021
Failure to properly substitute and read the charge sheet rendered the appellants' trial a nullity and convictions were quashed.
Criminal procedure — Arraignment — Reading the substance of the charge and taking plea — Mandatory compliance (CPA s.228(1); EOCCA s.28). Substitution of charge sheet — Formal order required (CPA s.234). Validity of DPP consent/certificate — Date anomaly fatal to charge. Revisionary powers (AJA s.4(2)) — Nullification of proceedings; retrial discretionary and may be refused where prejudicial.
25 October 2021
Appellate court nullified lower appeal for failing to consider grounds and quashed convictions for lack of proof of reserve entry.
Appellate procedure – duty of an appellate court to address grounds of appeal – failure to do so attracts revisional remedy under s.4(2) AJA. Evidence – prosecution must prove essential ingredients of wildlife offences, including that accused was within statutory reserve boundaries. Criminal procedure – effect of failure to cross‑examine accused on material defence (alibi) weakens prosecution case. Exhibits – disposal of perishable government trophies and accused's right to be heard when disposal is ordered. Sentencing – minimum terms under amended EOCCA considered but enhancement unnecessary where conviction not sustained.
25 October 2021
Appellate court’s failure to address grounds voided its judgment; convictions quashed for procedural and evidential defects.
Appellate procedure – failure to address grounds of appeal – judgment nullity; AJA s.4(2) revision; National Parks Act amendment — non-existent offence; improper tendering of exhibits by Public Prosecutor; invalid inventory for perishable government trophies; right to fair hearing.
25 October 2021
Appellants’ convictions quashed for failure to consider defence and improper destruction of perishable trophy evidence.
Criminal procedure – appellate review – first appellate court’s duty to address grounds in petition of appeal; failure amounts to irregularity and denial of fair hearing – revisional powers under s.4(2) AJA. Criminal law – unlawful entry into game reserve and unlawful possession of government trophies – prosecution must prove essential elements beyond reasonable doubt, including location within reserve. Evidence – duty to evaluate defence evidence on appeal; failure renders conviction unsafe. Evidence/procedure – destruction/inventory of perishable government trophies requires presence/hearing of accused; failure renders exhibit inadmissible.
22 October 2021
Appeal allowed: convictions quashed for lack of jurisdiction and because one charged offence no longer exists under statute.
Criminal law; jurisdiction — EOCCA s.12(3) vs s.12(4) certificates for subordinate courts; statutory construction — NPA s.21 actus reus deleted by amendment; evidential sufficiency — arrest within park boundaries; retrial discretion under Fatehali Manji.
21 October 2021
Appellate court nullified lower appeal for failure to address grounds, expunged improperly tendered exhibits, and acquitted the appellant.
Criminal procedure — appellate review — first appellate court’s duty to address grounds of appeal; evidence — improper tendering of exhibits by prosecutor; jurisdiction — DPP certificate required before admission of exhibits; failure to consider defence and failure to cross-examine estops prosecution and undermines proof beyond reasonable doubt; invocation of s.4(2) AJA to nullify and re-evaluate appeal.
21 October 2021