|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1986 |
|
|
Applicant’s challenge to an eight-year manslaughter sentence dismissed; sentencing judge properly exercised discretion.
Criminal law – Manslaughter – Sentencing – Appeal against sentence – Assessment of mitigating factors and exercise of judicial discretion – Appellate interference only where sentencing misdirection or manifest unfairness shown.
|
6 December 1986 |
|
A second appeal raising no point of law will not disturb concurrent factual findings supported by evidence.
Criminal law – Appeal – Second appeal raising no point of law – Concurrent findings of fact by trial court and High Court not disturbed
Evidence – Identification and role of accused by complainant and eyewitness – sufficiency to sustain conviction. Procedural issue – Withdrawal of charge against co-accused and subsequent testimony did not vitiate convictions
|
3 December 1986 |
|
Recent possession and identification by general features established cattle theft; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – possession and identification of stolen animals – identification by general features and descriptive document; sufficiency of proof beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal procedure – Amendment of charge – section 209 Criminal Procedure Code; improper rejection of prosecution evidence for charge-sheet discrepancy
Evidence – recent possession doctrine – short interval between theft and recovery supports conviction
Defence – credibility of robbery claim where not disclosed to investigating witnesses
|
3 December 1986 |
|
Appellate court quashes murder conviction as unsafe due to contradictory witness statements and uncorroborated confession.
Criminal law – Murder – Safety of conviction where key witnesses' in‑court identifications contradict prior police statements; Confession/admission – admissibility and requirement of corroboration; Appellate review – trial judge's duty to resolve material contradictions and treat uncorroborated identifications with caution; Prosecutorial discretion – nolle prosequi and appearance of administration of justice.
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed: circumstantial evidence and corroboration sufficient; appellants ordered to refund unrecovered stolen money.
Criminal law – stealing by servant – circumstantial evidence and custody of keys as incriminating fact
Evidence – accomplice testimony – requirement for corroboration and what constitutes adequate corroboration
Evidence – linking recovered property to original theft – bank-labelled bag and eyewitness testimony as connecting factors. Sentencing/statutory orders – Minimum Sentences Act 1972 (s.7) requires refund of unrecovered stolen money
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Circumstantial and corroborative evidence sustained convictions for bank theft; appellants ordered to refund unrecovered balance.
Criminal law – stealing by servant – circumstantial evidence and corroboration; accomplice evidence; admissibility and sufficiency without fingerprint proof; restitution under Minimum Sentences Act s.7; scope of second appeal.
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Circumstantial evidence sufficed to uphold a murder conviction despite misdirections about a repudiated confession.
Criminal law – Murder – Reliance on circumstantial evidence – Repudiated cautioned statement – requirement to assess truth or corroboration – post-arrest identification as part of confession not independent corroboration – sketch plan of limited value – provocation defence inadequately proved.
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Circumstantial evidence (excluding an inadmissible police confession) sufficed to uphold the murder conviction.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – sufficiency to convict of murder
Evidence – cautioned/confessional statement to police – admissibility and effect of repudiation
Evidence – conduct showing scene and sketch plan – when such matters are inseparable from a confession. Criminal defence – provocation – requirement of proof of alleged provocative act (adultery)
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Appeals against cattle‑theft convictions and sentences dismissed; evidence of recovery and arrest upheld; one appeal abated on death.
Criminal law – cattle theft – evidence of recovery and identification; lawfulness of arrest; sentencing – deterrence and proportionality; abatement of appeal on death (Rule 71).
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Appeal against cattle theft convictions and sentences dismissed; trial court’s acceptance of police and witness evidence upheld.
Criminal law – cattle theft – credibility of eyewitness and police evidence – suspects seen driving away stolen cattle – flight on sight – appeal against conviction and sentence – sentencing considerations: youth and recovery of property versus deterrence.
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Appeals against convictions for cattle theft dismissed; convictions and deterrent sentences upheld despite absence of recovered stock.
Criminal law – Theft – Cattle theft – Sufficiency of evidence to support convictions where stolen stock not physically recovered – credibility of evidence regarding armed party and circumstances of arrest
Sentencing – Deterrent sentences justified in areas with rampant cattle rustling
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Appellate court upheld murder conviction, rejecting custom and mental confusion defences and dismissing the appeal.
Criminal law – Murder – Evidence – Confession to private individuals and conduct at trial – weight and sufficiency of proof. Customary law – No recognition of customs permitting killing of another human being as a defence to murder. Mental condition – Alleged mental confusion/diminished responsibility not a recognized exculpatory defence in this case
Procedure – Defective particulars in information curable under appellate rules (Rule 103)
|
2 December 1986 |
|
Confessions held admissible and corroborated; appeals against murder convictions and death sentences dismissed.
Criminal law – murder – reliance on extra‑judicial confessions – admissibility and voluntariness; waiver of objections not raised at trial; corroboration of confessions by independent evidence (medical/ballistic and traced stolen property).
|
1 December 1986 |
|
The appellants' convictions based on extra-judicial confessions, duly recorded and corroborated, were upheld and appeals dismissed.
Criminal law – extra-judicial confessions – admissibility where recorded by District Personnel Officer appointed as justice of the peace; voluntariness – failure to object at trial precludes raising on appeal; corroboration of confession by independent evidence; appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
|
1 December 1986 |
|
Unreliable single-child identification and the trial judge’s failure to address an alibi rendered the murder conviction unsafe.
Criminal law – Identification – single child eyewitness whose account contained inconsistencies and improbable detail – conviction unsafe. Criminal procedure – Trial judge’s duty to consider and deal with alibi; to confine recapitulation to evidence on record. Appellate review – safety of conviction where identification evidence is doubtful
|
1 December 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed where sole uncorroborated purchaser’s testimony was unreliable and the prosecution’s case was inconsistent.
Criminal law – conviction unsafe where based on uncorroborated testimony of an interested witness; need for caution in identification evidence
Evidence – weight of eyewitness/identification evidence; importance of corroboration and consistency in chronology. Appellate review – interference warranted where trial court wrongly founded conviction on unimpressive or uncorroborated evidence
|
1 December 1986 |
|
Court upheld ten-year sentence for corrupt police officer, finding it not manifestly excessive and aggravated by breach of trust.
Criminal law – Corruption – Sentencing – Appeal against sentence – Whether sentence manifestly excessive; Police officer’s position as aggravating factor; Prevention of Corruption Act; Economic and Organised Crime Control Act.
|
1 December 1986 |
| November 1986 |
|
|
Appellant’s discovery of alleged adultery constituted legal provocation, reducing murder conviction to manslaughter and sentence to ten years.
Criminal law – murder v. manslaughter – whether discovery of adultery and heat of passion (legal provocation) reduces murder to manslaughter; appellate review of credibility findings and misdirection by trial judge; sentencing after substitution of conviction (remand time, brutality, first offender).
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Appellate court quashed conviction due to misdirection on evidence and incorrect rejection of credibility from a single lie.
Criminal law – conviction for theft by servant – appellate interference in second appeal – misdirection on evidence – assessment of accused’s credibility; lying on one point does not automatically discredit entire testimony.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Appeal allowed: murder conviction quashed due to unreliable eyewitnesses and inadmissible co‑accused statements.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – credibility of eyewitnesses – inconsistent statements to police and court – inadmissibility/use of co‑accused exculpatory statements against accused – assessors’ advice and appellate review of safety of conviction.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
An unsafe murder conviction based on unreliable eyewitnesses and exculpatory co-accused statements was quashed.
Criminal law – Murder – Reliability of eyewitness testimony – Inconsistencies and admissions on cross-examination undermining prosecution case; Co-accused statements – Exculpatory statements cannot be used to convict another accused; Assessors’ opinions – unanimous not-guilty advice as indicator of an unsafe conviction.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
An appellant's murder conviction was quashed because key eyewitness evidence was unreliable and co‑accused statements could not be used against him.
Criminal law – murder – safety of conviction – credibility and reliability of eyewitnesses; inadmissibility/limited weight of co‑accused statements against an accused; assessors' negative opinion reinforcing appellate intervention.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Appellants' murder convictions quashed where hostile witness and inconsistencies left guilt unproven beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – murder – insufficiency of evidence – hostile witness treated improperly at trial; alibi evidence and material inconsistencies creating reasonable doubt – conviction and death sentence quashed.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Suspicion of theft and refusal to be searched do not constitute legal provocation; malice aforethought upheld, murder conviction affirmed.
Criminal law – Murder – Provocation – Whether suspicion of theft constitutes legal provocation – Refusal to permit search – right to refuse search – intent inferred from weapon and injuries – malice aforethought established.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Mere suspicion of theft and refusal to be searched do not constitute legal provocation; malice aforethought established and conviction upheld.
Criminal law – murder – malice aforethought – whether legal provocation exists where only a suspicion of theft; refusal to be searched – no lawful provocation; intent inferred from weapon and injuries.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Appeal allowed: convictions quashed where hostile and inconsistent witness evidence left appellants' alibi creating reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Murder – Appeal against conviction – Credibility and treatment of hostile witness – Effect of inconsistent and delayed witness statements – Alibi and reasonable doubt – Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
The applicant's appeal against murder conviction dismissed; eyewitness identification and dying declaration found reliable.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – visual identification at night; dying declaration – admissibility and weight; credibility findings – appellate interference; sufficiency of evidence for murder conviction.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Eyewitness identification and a dying declaration were held reliable, so conviction and death sentence for murder were affirmed.
Criminal law – Murder – Identification evidence – Reliability of eyewitness identification where witnesses previously knew accused and saw him under torchlight at close quarters. Criminal law – Dying declaration – Admissibility and corroborative value in supporting conviction
Appeal – Safety of conviction – Assessment of totality of evidence (eyewitness testimony, dying declaration, post-mortem)
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Conviction upheld: cogent civilian identification corroborated a weak nocturnal complainant identification, appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence – Complainant’s impaired/night-time identification inadequate – Corroborative civilian identification sufficient to sustain conviction – Concurrent factual findings on identification not to be disturbed on second appeal.
|
29 November 1986 |
|
Appeal concerns sufficiency of identification and connection by recovered stolen property in armed robbery and sentencing.
Criminal law — Identification evidence in armed robbery — Recognition in illuminated conditions; possession/recovery of stolen property linking accused to offence; magistrate convictions and referral to High Court for sentencing in serious armed robbery matters; concurrent long-term sentences.
|
2 November 1986 |
| October 1986 |
|
|
Murder conviction reduced to manslaughter where death resulted from injuries sustained in a fight and sudden provocation.
Criminal law – murder v. manslaughter – provocation and heat of passion (ss. 201–202 Penal Code); contributory causes of death (s.203(e)); credibility where prosecution fails to call an available eyewitness; multiplicity of head wounds and medical evidence.
|
20 October 1986 |
|
Where contribution to death is established but malice aforethought is doubtful, murder conviction may be reduced to manslaughter and sentence reduced.
Criminal law – Homicide – Causation and contributory causes (s.203(e) Penal Code); mens rea – malice aforethought for murder; reduction of murder to manslaughter where intent to kill is not proved; evidential value of medical reports and absence of weapon exhibit.
|
20 October 1986 |
| June 1986 |
|
|
A third‑appeal cannot overturn concurrent factual findings that land is clan land; new, unpleaded issues are inadmissible.
Clan land – characterization of land as clan land – finding of fact by trial and appellate courts; Third appeal – limits on re‑examining concurrent findings of fact; Procedural law – issues not raised or evidenced in lower courts inadmissible on appeal; Redemption order – purchaser entitled to compensation for improvements; liability of sellers to refund purchase money.
|
30 June 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed for unsafe identification, unreliable post‑mortem and improper admission of an alleged voluntary police statement.
Criminal procedure — Evidence — Admissibility of cautioned/police statements — voluntariness and requirement of trial within a trial
Evidence Act s.27(2) — burden on prosecution to prove voluntariness. Forensic evidence — post‑mortem reliability — need for examiner's evidence and laboratory analysis to establish cause of death
Identification — single witness evidence — inconsistencies and requirement for corroboration. Dying declaration — weight limited where inconsistent with witness testimony and unreliable corroboration
|
29 June 1986 |
|
Belated retraction of a voluntarily made extrajudicial confession does not warrant exclusion if independently corroborated.
Criminal law — Extrajudicial confession — Admissibility and voluntariness — Belated retraction and failure to object at tendering — Corroboration by independent evidence — No requirement for trial-within-a-trial in these circumstances.
|
28 June 1986 |
|
Late retraction and torture claim did not vitiate a voluntary, corroborated extra‑judicial confession; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Admissibility of extra‑judicial confession – Voluntariness – Late retraction and torture allegation – Requirement for corroboration and effect of late objection.
|
28 June 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed where circumstantial proof failed to exclude other hypotheses and key exhibits were unproduced.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – sufficiency and requirement to exclude reasonable hypotheses; Exhibits – failure to produce physical exhibits weakens prosecution case; Witness statements – inconsistencies and peripheral untruths cannot corroborate circumstantial charge; Medical evidence – delayed examination undermines injury comparisons; Standard for prima facie case in circumstantial murder trials.
|
27 June 1986 |
|
Conviction based on weak circumstantial evidence and unproduced exhibits was unsafe and was quashed.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Requirement that such evidence exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence before convicting
Evidence – Failure to produce physical exhibits at trial undermines probative value
Evidence – Inconsistent or peripheral statements by accused are not reliable corroboration
Evidence – Lay observations of alleged injuries require timely medical support to be probative
|
27 June 1986 |
|
The applicant's retracted confession was found voluntary and truthful; appeal against murder conviction dismissed.
Criminal law — Confession — Voluntariness — Retraction — Whether confession induced by torture or intolerable pressure; Reliance on retracted/un corroborated confession where surrounding circumstances corroborate.
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and unexplained possession supported convictions; second appeal limited to points of law, so appeals dismissed.
Criminal law – store breaking and stealing – circumstantial evidence – possession of recently stolen goods and unexplained cash – inference of participation and receipt of proceeds
Appeal – second appeal – scope limited to points of law; factual complaints not entertainable
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Appellate court reduced a manslaughter sentence after finding trial judge misdirected himself and procedural lapse was curable.
Criminal law – manslaughter v. murder – appellate review of trial judge's characterization of facts as bordering on intentional killing. Voluntary intoxication – effect on culpability and classification of homicide. Criminal procedure – plea-taking irregularity; curative power of Rule 108 (Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules). Sentence review – reduction where trial judge misdirected and accused already in custody
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Court reduced manslaughter sentence to five years, finding trial misdirection and procedural irregularity curable under Rule 108.
Criminal law – Manslaughter versus murder – sentencing – intoxication as mitigating circumstance; misdirection by trial judge on 'borderline' intentional killing (s200 Penal Code). Criminal procedure – Plea-taking – failure to take plea to lesser offence before prosecution adducing facts – curable irregularity under Rule 108 (Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules)
Sentencing – interference and reduction where misdirection may have produced excessive punishment and pre-conviction custody credit
|
26 June 1986 |
|
Appellate court reduced an excessive 15-year sentence on a young first offender to immediate release.
Criminal law — Manslaughter; Sentencing — Excessive sentence; Youth and first offender status as mitigating factors; Failure of sentencing court to give reasons — appellate interference; Reduction to time served.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Appellate court reduced an excessive 15-year sentence, ordering immediate release given appellant's youth and first-offender status.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Excessive sentence – Youth and first offender status as mitigating factors – Trial judge's duty to give reasons – Appropriate appellate reduction to effect immediate release.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Convictions quashed where key witnesses were suspect and evidence was uncorroborated and improperly bolstered by an inadmissible statement.
Criminal law – Murder – Conviction based on uncorroborated evidence of witnesses who were themselves suspects – requirement of corroboration
Evidence – Admissibility – Exculpatory statement of a co-accused not amounting to confession and inadmissible to support convictions where maker did not testify. Trial procedure – Improper reliance on inadmissible evidence and failure to properly assess witness credibility renders conviction unsafe
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Court allowed out‑of‑time appeal where court‑appointed defence counsel on a dock brief failed to file the automatic appeal.
Criminal procedure — extension of time under Rule 8 — sufficient reason required. Dock brief representation — failure of court‑appointed counsel to lodge automatic appeal may justify extension. Appellate jurisdiction — Court of Appeal may entertain out‑of‑time application under s.10 and Rule 44 without prior High Court consideration
Evidence — admissibility of confession as a potentially determinative appellate issue
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction unsafe due to improper admission of cautionary statement, unreliable medical proof and inconsistent identification.
Criminal law – admissibility of cautionary statements – requirement of trial-within-a-trial to determine voluntariness under s.27(2) Evidence Act. Criminal law – identification evidence – inconsistencies and need for corroboration of sole identifying witness. Criminal law – medical evidence – inadequacy of post-mortem report in absence of examiner's evidence and laboratory analysis; proof of cause of death
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Murder conviction quashed; manslaughter substituted where no evidence defendants knew deceased was pregnant.
Criminal law – Murder v. manslaughter – mens rea (malice aforethought) – inference of knowledge of pregnancy – absence of evidence to attribute knowledge – substitution of conviction and sentencing.
|
25 June 1986 |
|
The appellants' murder convictions were quashed for lack of proven malice; manslaughter convictions and three-year sentences substituted.
Criminal law – Murder v. manslaughter – malice aforethought – requirement of proof of accused's knowledge of facts relied on to establish malice
Evidence – post-mortem findings and limits of inference about accused's knowledge
Appeal – substitution of conviction and sentence where original conviction unsustainable
|
25 June 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed: eyewitness credibility upheld and non-production of knife not fatal to murder conviction.
Criminal law — Murder — Credibility of eyewitnesses; Failure to produce weapon — adverse inference; Sufficiency of evidence on appeal.
|
24 June 1986 |