Court of Appeal of Tanzania

This is the highest level in the justice delivery system in Tanzania. The Court of Appeal draws its mandate from Article 117(1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. The Court hears appeals  on both point of law and facts for cases originating from the High Court of Tanzania and Magistrates with extended jurisdiction in exercise of their original jurisdiction or appellate and revisional jurisdiction over matters originating in the District Land and Housing Tribunals, District Courts and Courts of Resident Magistrate. The Court also hears similar appeals  from quasi judicial bodies of status equivalent to that of the High Court. It  further hears appeals  on point of law against the decision of the High Court in  matters originating from Primary Courts. The Court of Appeal also exercises jurisdiction on appeals originating from the High Court of Zanzibar except for constitutional issues arising from the interpretation of the Constitution of Zanzibar and matters arising from the Kadhi Court.

Physical address
26 Kivukoni Road Building P.O. Box 9004, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
14 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
14 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
July 2023
Leave to appeal granted where High Court wrongly decided substantive issues; jurat omission complained was not incurable.
Civil procedure – Leave to appeal – Exercise of discretion in applications for leave: court must assess whether proposed grounds raise issues of general importance, novel points of law or a prima facie/arguable appeal and must not determine substantive issues; Jurat of attestation – essentials under section 8 Notaries Public and Commissioners for Oaths Act – only omission of date, place or the authority (whom) renders affidavit incurably defective; Revision/Review – competence against orders marking suits withdrawn.
21 July 2023
The applicant's conviction was quashed for unsafe visual identification and insufficient incriminating conduct.
Criminal law — Visual identification — Recognition at night — witness must describe source, placement and intensity of light and room size; witness credibility and prompt identification important — Alleged incriminating conduct cannot substitute for unreliable identification — Conviction quashed for unsafe identification.
21 July 2023
A High Court judgment lacking issues, evidence analysis, and reasons was nullified and remitted for a fresh judgment.
Criminal procedure — Written judgment — Requirement to state points for determination, decision and reasons — Section 312(1) CPA. Assessors — Opinions not binding but Judge must analyse evidence and give reasons when disagreeing — Section 298(2) CPA. Evidence — Reliance on repudiated cautioned statements requires corroboration and analysis. Remedy — Nullification of defective judgment and remittal for fresh judgment; appellants to remain in custody.
20 July 2023
Failure to call a crucial witness and prior litigation supporting respondent’s possession led to dismissal of appellants’ land claim.
Land law – ownership and possession; locus in quo inspection; adverse inference and material witness non‑attendance; res judicata — scope and limits; evaluation of prior primary‑court judgment as evidence of title or possession.
20 July 2023
Absence of assessors' written opinions in DLHT record vitiates proceedings, warranting quash and remittal for compliance.
Land law; District Land and Housing Tribunal procedure; mandatory involvement of assessors; sections 23 and 24 LDCA; Regulation 19 of the Regulations; assessors written opinions must be read to parties and filed; absence of opinions vitiates proceedings; quash and remit remedy.
20 July 2023
Child witness’s evidence given without the s.127(2) promise is inadmissible; conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Evidence Act s.127(2) – child witnesses – mandatory promise or oath before giving evidence; non‑compliance renders testimony inadmissible and liable to expungement. Section 127(6) does not override or cure failure to comply with s.127(2). Sexual/unnatural offences involving a child – uncorroborated medical or hearsay evidence is insufficient once child’s testimony is excluded. Retrial may be ordered where trial was vitiated by admissibility defects; trial to be before another magistrate.
19 July 2023
Applicant's late reference and failure to show good cause or identify error justify dismissal and refusal of extension.
Civil procedure — Reference against single Justice — Rule 62(1) time limit and rule 8 computation; Extension of time — "good cause" requirement; Ignorance of law, third‑party assistance, age/forgetfulness not good cause; New evidence in reference — only issues raised before Single Justice admissible without leave.
19 July 2023
Failure of a successor magistrate to record reasons for takeover violated the individual calendar system and vitiated the trial proceedings.
Civil procedure – Order XVIII Rule 10(1) CPC – Successor magistrate must record reasons for taking over trial; failure is procedural irregularity. Civil procedure – Individual calendar system – continuity of trial before assigned judge/magistrate; departures require recorded reasons. Revision/remedies – Misapprehension of evidence by successor and non-recording of reasons vitiate proceedings; nullification and remittal appropriate. Costs – Where appellate proceedings arise mainly from trial court irregularity, parties to bear their own costs.
13 July 2023
The appellant’s conviction was quashed after the child’s unsworn testimony and an irregularly obtained cautioned statement were expunged.
Evidence — Child witness — section 127(2) Evidence Act — mandatory promise to tell the truth; failure to record promise renders testimony valueless. Criminal Procedure — cautioned statement — narration of contents before formal admission and recording after four-hour limit under s.50(1)(a) CPA without extension — inadmissible and to be expunged. Appeal — sufficiency of evidence — conviction unsafe where inadmissible evidence is central.
12 July 2023
Acquittal alone does not prove malicious prosecution; respondents failed to show lack of reasonable and probable cause.
Malicious prosecution — burden to prove absence of reasonable and probable cause and malice; acquittal does not ipso facto prove malicious prosecution; reasonable suspicion may arise from circumstantial facts involving employee duties and presence in suspect vehicles.
11 July 2023
Omission under s.210(3) CPA not fatal; evidence proved incest beyond reasonable doubt; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Procedure – non-compliance with section 210(3) Criminal Procedure Act – omission not fatal absent prejudice; Evidence – incest (s.158 Penal Code) – victim’s testimony, eye-witness arrest and medical evidence can prove offence beyond reasonable doubt; Appellate procedure – new factual grounds not entertained on second appeal; PF3 admissibility – irregular admission expunged by first appellate court.
11 July 2023
Leave to seek judicial review was improperly granted without the impugned disciplinary decision; mandamus to compel production is the correct step.
Judicial review – Leave to apply for prerogative orders – leave is a necessary precondition and requires prima facie material; Administrative/discplinary law – police disciplinary process – Inspector General as final disciplinary authority; Remedies – mandamus to compel production of impugned decision and records; Civil procedure – incompetence of substantive judicial review without valid leave and without impugned records; Appellate jurisdiction – revisional powers under section 4(2) AJA to quash flawed High Court rulings.
10 July 2023
Failure to conduct voire dire and lack of corroboration made the rape conviction unsafe; appeal allowed and conviction quashed.
Criminal law – Evidence – Child witness of tender age – Failure to conduct voire dire renders testimony unsworn and requires corroboration; Criminal procedure – Admission of documents – Cautioned statement and PF3 admitted but not read out must be expunged; Evidence – Hearsay by relatives and medical evidence of penetration insufficient to identify or corroborate the alleged assailant; Standard of proof – Where corroboration is absent, conviction unsafe and must be quashed.
10 July 2023
Inconsistent child identification and inadequate investigation meant the applicant's conviction could not be sustained.
Evidence — Child witness — Sworn evidence and competency under Criminal Procedure Act; admissibility and duty to ensure understanding of oath. Sexual offences — Conviction on uncorroborated child’s evidence — requirement that testimony be ‘nothing but the truth’ and rigorous credibility assessment under section 127(7) Evidence Act. Identification — Visual identification reliability, need for identification parade and corroborative investigation. Criminal procedure — Adequacy of police investigation; failure to call material witnesses and arresting officer undermines prosecution case.
10 July 2023