Court of Appeal of Tanzania

This is the highest level in the justice delivery system in Tanzania. The Court of Appeal draws its mandate from Article 117(1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. The Court hears appeals  on both point of law and facts for cases originating from the High Court of Tanzania and Magistrates with extended jurisdiction in exercise of their original jurisdiction or appellate and revisional jurisdiction over matters originating in the District Land and Housing Tribunals, District Courts and Courts of Resident Magistrate. The Court also hears similar appeals  from quasi judicial bodies of status equivalent to that of the High Court. It  further hears appeals  on point of law against the decision of the High Court in  matters originating from Primary Courts. The Court of Appeal also exercises jurisdiction on appeals originating from the High Court of Zanzibar except for constitutional issues arising from the interpretation of the Constitution of Zanzibar and matters arising from the Kadhi Court.

Physical address
26 Kivukoni Road Building P.O. Box 9004, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
15 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
15 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
August 2023
Non-compliance with statutory committal requirements rendered trial evidence inadmissible; convictions quashed and matter remitted for fresh committal.
Criminal procedure – committal proceedings – requirement under section 246(2) CPA to read and explain information and substance of witnesses' evidence; admissibility of witnesses and exhibits at trial – need for reasonable notice under section 289(1) CPA when committal non-compliant; remedy – nullification of proceedings, quashing of convictions and remittal for fresh committal under section 4(2) AJA.
31 August 2023
31 August 2023
An unamended information naming absent co-accused rendered the trial a nullity; convictions quashed and retrial denied.
* Criminal procedure – defective information – naming absent co-accused – duty to amend under section 276(2) CPA – incurable defect vitiating trial. * Fair trial – accused must know the precise nature and particulars of the charge. * Power of court – section 4(2) AJA revisional powers – discretion to refuse retrial where further trial would be unjust. * Section 388 CPA not available to cure fundamental defects prejudicing the accused.
31 August 2023
A registered certificate of title is prima facie conclusive; unregistered interests require proof of prior possession or notice; damages set aside.
* Land law – Registered title – Certificate of title is prima facie/conclusive evidence of ownership; may be rebutted by proof of prior interest and possession or notice. * Land law – Unregistered interests – Section 33(1)(b) (Land Registration Act) preserves unregistered interests but requires proof. * Evidence – Parol evidence rule applies: oral evidence cannot vary or add to a written sale agreement pleaded as entire contract. * Remedies – General damages require factual assessment of causation and quantum; unsupported awards will be set aside.
30 August 2023
Inadequate summing up and defective admission of cautioned statements rendered murder convictions null and void; retrial declined.
Criminal procedure — summing up to lay assessors — adequacy and essential elements; assessors' opinions — compliance with s.298(1) CPA; repudiated cautioned statements — requirement for corroboration and proper admission; duty to give reasons when overruling objections; retrial — interest of justice.
30 August 2023
High Court wrongly decided appeal on merits after declaring it incompetent and denying parties their right to be heard.
Civil procedure – preliminary objection – competence of appeal – High Court sustaining preliminary objection then deciding merits – functus officio – revisional versus appellate jurisdiction – right to be heard – ex parte proceedings and setting aside.
29 August 2023
Conviction for impregnating a secondary school girl upheld; 30-year statutory maximum reduced to ten years as excessive.
* Education Act s.60A(3) – offence of impregnating a primary/secondary school girl – statutory maximum sentence versus mandatory penalty; sentencing discretion. * Evidence – sufficiency and corroboration: victim testimony corroborated by parent, teacher (attendance register), police and clinical officer. * Identity and age – discrepancies in PF3 do not necessarily vitiate proof where oral evidence is consistent. * Procedure – failure to cross-examine and to give a defence may be treated as acceptance of prosecution case.
29 August 2023
Appeal incompetent where notice and proceedings were directed to a deceased respondent; proceedings quashed as nullity.
Civil procedure – service of process – proceedings instituted against a deceased person are incompetent and a nullity; Court of Appeal may invoke revisional powers (s.4(2) AJA) to quash void proceedings. Rules implicated: Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules 2009, r.84(1) and r.90(3).
28 August 2023
CMA proceedings where an advocate gave unsworn evidence were a nullity and were remitted for rehearing before another Arbitrator.
* Labour law – termination/constructive resignation – CMA procedures – witness testimony must be under oath – advocate acting as witness – evidence irregularity vitiates proceedings – nullity and remittal to CMA for rehearing before a different Arbitrator.
28 August 2023
A timely alibi and material doubts in the prosecution case raised reasonable doubt, leading to quashing of the rape conviction.
Criminal law – rape – sufficiency and credibility of complainant’s evidence; defence of alibi – evidential burden shifts to prosecution once alibi is timely and particularised; appellate review of concurrent findings – interference justified where misdirection/non-direction and reasonable doubt apparent.
25 August 2023
An application for leave to appeal filed after the 14‑day limit under rule 45(b) is a nullity without Registrar's exclusion.
Court of Appeal – Application for leave to appeal (second bite) – rule 45(b) Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 – 14-day time limit from date of High Court refusal – Registrar’s certificate to exclude period awaiting copy – absence of certificate renders late application invalid – proceedings out of time are nullity – costs: interest of justice.
25 August 2023
Applicant granted extension to lodge notice of appeal after court found delay technical and excusable.
Extension of time — rule 10 and 45A(1) Court of Appeal Rules — good cause required — distinction between technical and actual delay — exclusion of time for preparation/serving of documents — appeal struck out for procedural failure.
25 August 2023
Unexplained delay and failure to call material witnesses undermined prosecution, resulting in acquittal.
* Criminal law – Statutory rape – requirement to prove victim’s age; inferences under section 122 Evidence Act. * Criminal procedure – Delay in reporting sexual offences; unexplained delay affects witness credibility. * Evidence – Duty to call material witnesses; failure may justify adverse inference. * Investigation – Inadequate inquiries and unrecorded statements may render conviction unsafe. * Credibility – Victim’s evidence must be credible and corroborated where necessary.
24 August 2023
A short delay caused by an advocate's human error justified extension to serve required documents absent demonstrated prejudice.
Civil procedure — Extension of time under rule 10 — Service of copy of Registrar letter under rule 90(3) — Human error distinguished from negligence — Calculation of service time co-extensive with 30-day period from judgment — Factors from Lyamuya applied — Prejudice and balancing of appeal rights.
22 August 2023
The applicant’s statutory rape conviction quashed for failure to prove the victim’s age and irregular admission of evidence.
* Criminal law – statutory rape – essential ingredients include penetration, victim's age (under 18) and identity of offender – proof of age is crucial. * Evidence – statement of age made before oath is not part of sworn evidence and cannot prove age. * Evidence – failure to read contents of documentary exhibit (PF3) after admission renders it liable to be expunged. * Evidence – cautioned statement admitted without required inquiry into voluntariness must be expunged.
21 August 2023