|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2014 |
|
|
A prisoner who timely notifies intention to appeal may get extension where prison authorities' delay prevented filing.
Criminal procedure - sections 361(1) and 363 CPA - prisoner’s notice of intention to appeal - duty of prison authorities to transmit appeal documents - extension of time where delay attributable to prison officials - reasonableness of affidavits from prison officers.
|
12 December 2014 |
|
Trial judge’s pre-formed conclusion of guilt and reliance on unadmitted statements denied the appellant a fair trial; retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure – fair trial – impartial tribunal – trial judge forming conclusive view of guilt before defence heard amounts to bias and vitiates trial
Evidence – alleged confessional statements – reliance on statements not tendered in evidence is improper. Constitutional law – Article 13(6)(a) right to fair hearing; international fair trial guarantees
Remedy – nullification of trial, conviction and sentence; retrial ordered where public interest permits
|
11 December 2014 |
|
Appellate court reduced a manifestly excessive manslaughter sentence after trial judge failed to weigh key mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Reduction of sentence for manslaughter – Appellate interference where sentence is manifestly excessive or material mitigating factors ignored. Sentencing principles – Weight of guilty plea, intoxication, remand custody and family dependents as mitigating factors – Aim of punishment is reformation
Procedure – Trial judge must state and consider specific mitigating factors and articulate sentencing objective
|
11 December 2014 |
|
Court reduced a seven-year manslaughter sentence for failure to consider key mitigating factors, ordering immediate release.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Manslaughter – Whether a custodial sentence is manifestly excessive where trial judge failed to specify consideration of material mitigating factors (first offender status, intoxication, lengthy remand, guilty plea, family dependence, ill-health) – Remedy: reduction to time already served resulting in immediate release.
|
10 December 2014 |
|
Appellant’s provocation defence rejected; killing found premeditated, conviction and death sentence upheld.
Criminal law – Murder – provocation – requirement of sudden loss of self-control; timing of alleged provocation crucial. Confessional statements – admissibility and evidential weight; corroboration by post-mortem injuries. Forensic pathology – nature and severity of wounds as evidence of premeditation versus accident
Appeal – appellate review of trial judge’s assessment of credibility and assessors’ unanimous verdict
|
5 December 2014 |
| November 2014 |
|
|
A purchaser is not bound by a vendor’s oral lease liabilities unless the sale expressly transfers those liabilities.
Land law – lease – purchaser of land – whether purchaser assumes vendor’s tenancy liabilities absent express sale terms – presumption purchaser takes assets only. Civil procedure – joinder – necessity to join vendor to claim arising from lease executed with vendor
Evidence – proof on balance of probabilities – insufficiency of documentary attestation without attesting witness and lack of proof of alleged loss. Appellate review – assessment of trial chair and assessors’ opinions – discretionary evaluation of evidence
|
18 November 2014 |
| October 2014 |
|
|
Review applications must rely on Rule 66(1) grounds; extension of time requires good cause and a real prospect of successful review.
Criminal procedure – Review applications – confined to Rule 66(1) grounds; not a substitute for appeal. Civil procedure – Extension of time – must show good cause under Rule 10 and indicate a real prospect of success on Rule 66(1) grounds. Procedural duty – applicant must seek and pursue copies of judgment; failure may amount to negligence, not sufficient cause for delay
|
27 October 2014 |
| August 2014 |
|
|
Revision requires citing s.4(3) AJA; Labour Court appeals proceed under s.57 (point of law), not s.5(1)(c) leave.
Civil procedure — Revision v
Appeal — A party invoking Court of Appeal revisional jurisdiction must cite the enabling provision (s.4(3) AJA) in addition to the Rules; Rule 65 alone is insufficient. Civil procedure — Revision not alternative to appeal — Revision may not replace appeal where a right of appeal exists except in exceptional circumstances. Labour law — Appeals from Labour Court — Section 57 Labour Institutions Act permits appeal to Court of Appeal on point of law only; leave under s.5(1)(c) AJA is not required for such appeals
|
22 August 2014 |
| June 2014 |
|
|
Appellant found legally insane at the time of the killing; conviction quashed and detention in mental hospital ordered.
Criminal law – Insanity – legal insanity under section 13(1) Penal Code – re‑evaluation of non‑medical evidence to determine mental state. Criminal procedure – Medical reports – requirement under section 291(3) CPA to inform accused of right to call medical expert; failure to do so renders report inadmissible
Evidence – cautioned statements retracted at trial require corroboration and cannot corroborate other evidence
Assessors – duty to be directed on vital issues (e.g. provocation) and to give opinion; omission is fatal to conviction
Remedy – special finding under section 219(3) CPA and detention in mental hospital as criminal lunatic
|
27 June 2014 |
|
Failure to prove victim's age and variance in particulars rendered the statutory rape conviction defective and quashed.
Criminal law – Statutory rape – burden to prove victim's age – proof of age essential to charge. Criminal procedure – Variance between particulars of offence and trial evidence – defective and incurable charge
Appeal – Quashing conviction where essential element not proved beyond reasonable doubt
|
26 June 2014 |
|
The appellant's untested, retracted confessions were improperly admitted and uncorroborated, rendering the conviction unsafe and quashed.
Criminal law – confession evidence – extra-judicial and cautioned statements – requirement of inquiry into voluntariness before admission; burden on prosecution (Evidence Act s.27(2)). Criminal procedure – trial within trial/inquiry – duty to analyse confession contents in judgment to establish true confession (Tuwamoi principle)
Confessions – retracted/conflicting statements require caution and corroboration; uncorroborated retracted confessions may render conviction unsafe. Criminal procedure – requirement to specify statutory provisions of conviction (s.312(2) CPA) noted as not observed
|
26 June 2014 |
|
Applicant improperly sought revision instead of appeal; application struck out for incompetence and costs.
Appellate and revisional jurisdiction — Appellate Jurisdiction Act s.4(3) (enabling provision) — Rule 65 Court of Appeal Rules (procedural) — Non‑citation of enabling provision renders application incompetent;* Appeal v Revision — where appeal lies (s.5(1)(c) AJA), revision is not an alternative except in exceptional circumstances (Halais Pro‑Chemie v Wella);* Probate proceedings — invocation of PAEA orders — procedural compliance required for appellate challenge.
|
25 June 2014 |
|
Second appeal dismissed; identification was watertight based on recognition, lighting, proximity and credibility of witnesses.
Criminal law – armed robbery – visual identification – recognition of accused as known person – factors: lighting, proximity, duration, prior acquaintance, description to police; identification must be watertight.* Appeals – second appeal – limited to questions of law but appellate intervention permitted where lower courts misapprehend evidence.* Corroboration/identification parade – not required where conditions of identification are favourable.
|
23 June 2014 |
|
A Notice of Appeal omitting the lower court's decision number is incurably defective; appeal struck out.
Criminal appeal – Notice of Appeal – validity – requirement to state date of judgment, name of judge/magistrate, lower court and correct registration/decision number – Rule 68(1) Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 – incurably defective notice – appeal struck out.
|
23 June 2014 |
|
A defective notice of appeal that omits the correct judgment date renders the appeal incompetent and is struck out.
Criminal procedure – Appeal – Notice of appeal – Requirement to state correct date of High Court judgment – Mandatory compliance with Rule 68 of the Court of Appeal Rules – Defective notice renders appeal incompetent – Appeal struck out under Rule 4(2)(a).
|
23 June 2014 |
|
Applicant granted extension to seek review over arguable denial of right to be heard due to un-summoned witness.
Court of Appeal — Extension of time under Rule 10 — Good cause factors (delay, reasons, diligence, arguable case, prejudice) — Alleged denial of right to be heard by failure to summon witness — Reviewability of appellate decision where record is unclear.
|
23 June 2014 |
|
An appeal is incompetent and liable to be struck out where the Notice of Appeal misstates the decision's registration particulars.
Appeals – Notice of Appeal – mandatory particulars required (date, judge, court, correct registration number) under Rule 68(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules; incorrect citation/registration renders notice incurably defective; appeal struck out under Rule 4(2)(a).
|
20 June 2014 |
|
Conviction for statutory rape quashed where charge omitted specific rape category and the victim’s age was not proven.
Criminal law – Rape – Defective charge for failing to specify category under s.130(2) – Non‑compliance with s.135( a)(ii) Criminal Procedure Act – Failure to prove age in statutory rape – Defects incurable under s.388(1) – Conviction quashed.
|
19 June 2014 |
|
Conviction quashed due to defective charge, improperly affirmed child evidence and lack of independent corroboration.
Criminal law – defective/uncertain charge and amendment without fresh plea – competency and affirmation of child witnesses (s127(2) Evidence Act) – need for corroboration of unsworn child evidence – requirements for particulars (time, age) – appellate duty to revise illegal sentence.
|
19 June 2014 |
|
Conviction upheld where appellant was apprehended at scene and failed to challenge prosecution witnesses.
Criminal law – armed robbery – identification and apprehension at the scene – sufficiency of direct evidence versus circumstantial evidence. Criminal procedure – failure to cross-examine prosecution witnesses – effect on credibility (Browne v Dunn). Appellate procedure – late challenge to ability to follow trial proceedings on language grounds not entertained
|
19 June 2014 |
|
Successor judge illegally vacated earlier postponement and sentenced respondent while appeal was pending; sentence set aside.
Criminal law – sentencing – illegality – successor judge vacating earlier order and sentencing while appeal pending – sentence nullified. Appellate jurisdiction – revisional powers (s.4(3) Appellate Jurisdiction Act) – correction of manifest illegalities in trial court proceedings
Procedure – effect of leave/appeal pending (sub judice) on trial court's competence to proceed
|
16 June 2014 |
|
A notice of appeal misstating the High Court case number and judgment date is incompetent and the appeal may be struck out.
Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 – Rule 68(1) & (2) – requirements of a notice of appeal – incorrect High Court case number and judgment date – incompetence of notice – Rule 4(2)(a) – striking out appeal.
|
16 June 2014 |
|
Failure to enter a statutory conviction renders a trial court's judgment a nullity; appeal court quashed and remitted for proper judgment.
Criminal procedure – Judgment writing – Mandatory requirement to enter a formal conviction under ss. 235 and 312(2) CPA; failure renders judgment and sentence a nullity. Appellate review – High Court cannot uphold an appeal based on a non-existent valid conviction. Revisionary powers – Court of Appeal may invoke s. 4(2) AJA to quash defective proceedings and remit for proper judgment
Sentencing – Sentence may be directed to run from initial incarceration upon remittal
|
16 June 2014 |
|
Convictions quashed where single-witness identification and lack of description of stolen items made the prosecution case unsafe.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – single witness identification – need for corroboration; failure to call police to whom identification/description was given; failure to describe stolen items or identify special marks before tendering exhibits – conviction unsafe.
|
16 June 2014 |
|
Notices of appeal with incorrect case numbers and judgment dates are incompetent and justify striking out the appeal.
Court of Appeal Rules 2009 — Rule 68(2) — mandatory content of notice of appeal; incorrect High Court case number and judgment date — competence of notice; Rule 68(1) — notice institutes appeal; Rule 4(2)(a) — striking out incompetent appeals; suo motu review of procedural compliance.
|
13 June 2014 |
|
Failure to enter a formal conviction under the CPA renders the judgment and sentence a nullity; Court quashed and remitted.
Criminal procedure – Judgment writing in subordinate courts – Requirement to enter a formal conviction specifying the offence, statutory provision and punishment (s.235 and s.312(2) CPA). Criminal procedure – Failure to enter a conviction – Fatal and incurable irregularity rendering judgment and sentence a nullity. Appellate jurisdiction – Exercise of revisional powers (s.4(2) AJA) to quash and remit for proper judgment and sentence
Sentencing – Credit for time already spent in custody when sentence is re-entered
|
13 June 2014 |
|
|
12 June 2014 |
|
Variance between charge particulars and evidence and inadequate nighttime identification rendered the robbery convictions unsafe.
Criminal law – variance between charge particulars and evidence; requirement to amend charge under section 234(1) CPA; identification at night – need to prove source/intensity of light, proximity and duration; identification parade – absence may render dock identification unsafe.
|
12 June 2014 |
|
Convictions overturned where night-time visual identification was unsafe and prosecution failed to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Visual identification – night-time identification requires proof of type and intensity of light, proximity, duration and early naming of suspects; failure to satisfy safeguards renders identification unsafe; appellate interference permitted where lower courts misappreciate evidence.
|
12 June 2014 |
|
Appellant failed to displace revocation and factual findings of customary ownership; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – allocation and revocation of title – revocation addressed to a different name but same plot number – effect on title; Civil procedure – appellate review of factual findings – deference to tribunal’s credibility and factual determinations absent exceptional circumstances; Locus standi – entitlement to sue based on land office revocation and plot identification; Costs – general rule that successful party is awarded costs absent special circumstances.
|
9 June 2014 |
| March 2014 |
|
|
Appeal struck out as incompetent because the decree was dated earlier than the judgment, rendering it invalid.
Civil procedure – appeal competency – requirement for valid decree – decree date must not precede judgment date (Order XX r.7 Civil Procedure Code). Court of Appeal Rules r.96(1)(h) – need to file copy of valid decree. Preliminary objection – appropriate to dispose of pure points of law without addressing merits
|
18 March 2014 |
|
Conviction based on unreliable night-time identification and inconsistent single-witness testimony was quashed.
Criminal law – Visual identification – Evidence must be watertight before convicting on identification; single-witness identification with contradictions unsafe – Appellate interference with concurrent findings where identification evidence is unreliable.
|
18 March 2014 |
|
Defective particulars cured where accused was informed; multiple fatal stab wounds established murder, self-defence rejected.
Criminal procedure — Particulars of information/charge — compliance with sections 132, 135 and Second Schedule; curative provision of section 388(1) CPA. Criminal law — Murder vs manslaughter — inference of malice aforethought from use of knife and multiple fatal wounds to vulnerable parts (chest, abdomen). Criminal law — Self-defence — credibility assessment and requirement to show reasonable belief and proportionality
Evidence/procedure — Post-mortem findings; role and limits of assessors (may ask questions but not cross-examine); procedural irregularities that are non-fatal
|
18 March 2014 |
|
Revision is not a substitute for appeal; absent proof the appeal route is blocked, the application was struck out with costs.
Appellate procedure – Revision under s.4(3) AJA – Revision is discretionary and not a substitute for appeal – Revision only appropriate where appellate process blocked – Court will not revise matters not before it.
|
17 March 2014 |
|
Convictions for entry and weapons upheld; hunting and trophies convictions quashed for insufficient evidence and improper exhibit handling.
Criminal law – National Parks Act – offences: unlawful entry and possession of weapons
Evidence – duty to cross-examine (Browne v Dunn) – failure to cross-examine treats testimony as unchallenged. Criminal procedure – perishable exhibits – section 353 CPA and section 101 Wildlife Conservation Act require tendering of perishable trophies; certification alone is insufficient. Sufficiency of evidence – unlawful hunting not established
|
17 March 2014 |
|
Convictions quashed where common intention was not proved and trial court committed procedural and sentencing irregularities.
Criminal law – Manslaughter v. murder – requirement to prove common intention under section 23 Penal Code
Evidence – inconsistencies, credibility, and proper procedure for declaring a hostile witness
Sentencing – obligation to afford an accused opportunity to present mitigating factors (section 320 Criminal Procedure Act). Appellate review and revision – quashing unsafe convictions and releasing detainees
|
17 March 2014 |
|
Court upheld murder conviction, finding the sole eyewitness' nighttime identification reliable and the appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – visual identification at night – reliability of single witness identification; corroboration is practice not rule of law; assessment of credibility; motive as supporting evidence.
|
17 March 2014 |
|
Dying declaration duly corroborated and an extra‑judicial statement admitted without objection justified conviction; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Murder – Dying declaration – Requirement and sufficiency of corroboration; Extra-judicial statement/confession – Retraction and admissibility where statement was produced without objection; Identification evidence – sufficiency in the context of corroborated dying declaration.
|
17 March 2014 |
|
|
15 March 2014 |
|
Revision application struck out because appeal, not revision, was the appropriate remedy and the appeal route was not shown to be blocked.
Appellate v revisional jurisdiction – Revision under s.4(3) AJA not a substitute for appeal – Revision discretionary – Revision appropriate where appellate process is blocked – Preliminary objection to competency of revisional application.
|
14 March 2014 |
|
Appellants’ convictions quashed where medical evidence indicated natural death and trial judge erred procedurally and on causation.
Criminal law – Causation and medical evidence – Post-mortem showing death from natural disease may defeat prosecution’s causal link; Common intention (s.23 Penal Code) – must be proved by cogent positive evidence and assessors must be addressed; Use of untendered statements – inadmissible as basis for conviction; Sentencing – accused must be allowed to mitigate (s.320 CPA).
|
13 March 2014 |
|
An unopposed, affidavit-supported application to effect late service of an address for service under Rule 86(1)(a) was granted with a 14-day extension.
Civil procedure – Service – Requirement under Rule 86(1)(a) Court of Appeal Rules 2009 to give notice of a full and sufficient address for service – Failure to comply – Application supported by affidavit – Unopposed application – Grant of relief and extension of time to effect service.
|
13 March 2014 |
|
An unopposed application to remedy failure to serve the required address for service under Rule 86(1)(a) was granted.
Civil procedure – Court of Appeal Rules 2009, Rule 86(1)(a) – duty to serve full and sufficient address for service – failure to comply – application to remedy non-compliance – unopposed application granted.
|
13 March 2014 |
|
Visual identification amid mob violence was unreliable so the appellant’s murder conviction was quashed.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Visual identification in chaotic mob situation – Necessity to exclude mistaken identity; Evidence Act s.143 – quality over quantity of witnesses; Criminal Procedure Act s.194 – alibi notice affects weight but not consideration.
|
13 March 2014 |
|
Conviction quashed where identification was doubtful and alleged written admission was not produced as evidence.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – reliability and Waziri Amani standard – failure to tender alleged written admission/confession – related witnesses and credibility (s.127 Law of Evidence Act) – appellate review of credibility.
|
12 March 2014 |
|
Alleged illegality (non-joinder and denial of hearing) justified extension of time to seek revision.
Civil procedure – extension of time – Rule 10 Court of Appeal Rules – good cause – alleged illegality as sufficient reason to extend time (Devram Valambia principle). Civil procedure – preliminary objection – competence of application for extension of time – application for extension is procedural and not 'hopelessly out of time'. Administrative law – non-joinder and denial of hearing – allegation of illegality may justify extension to enable substantive review
|
11 March 2014 |
|
A child’s unsworn testimony, corroborated by a parent and the accused’s admissions, upheld a rape conviction despite procedural defects.
Criminal law – Rape – Proof of penetration (even slight) suffices under the Penal Code. Child witness – defective voir dire; unsworn evidence requiring corroboration
Evidence – PF3 improperly admitted where accused not informed of right to call doctor (s.240(3) CPA); expunged. Related witnesses – relatedness does not invalidate competence or credibility (s.127 Law of Evidence Act)
Admissions – accused’s admission to lay witnesses can corroborate complainant
|
10 March 2014 |
|
Summary rejection of first appeal was improper where substantial issues (charge, age, penetration, witness credibility) required full consideration.
Criminal procedure – summary rejection of first appeal under section 364(1)(c) – requirements for summarily dismissing an appeal; Criminal law – rape charge particulars – correct statutory subsection where victim is under 18; Evidence – proof of age, proof of penetration, related prosecution witnesses, and compliance with section 63 and PF3 requirements.
|
6 March 2014 |
|
Appellants' convictions quashed for inadequate identification of persons and property and an irregular sentence.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Necessity for naming suspects at earliest opportunity and eliminating missing links between crime and arrest; identification parades
Evidence – Identification of property – need for specific marks/serial numbers for items like bicycles. Criminal procedure – Alibi raised without notice under s.194(4) should nonetheless be assessed under s.194(6)
Sentencing – Minimum statutory sentence must be observed unless special circumstances justify departure
|
4 March 2014 |
|
Victims’ credible uncorroborated testimony upheld rape convictions; appellate court ordered mandatory compensation.
Criminal law – Rape – Sufficiency of evidence – victim’s testimony may suffice without corroboration under s.127(7) Evidence Act where court records reasons and is satisfied witness truthful. Criminal procedure – Admission of PF.3 medical reports – compliance with s.240(3) Criminal Procedure Act necessary; non-compliance may render PF.3 objectionable but conviction may stand on other credible evidence
Appeals – Concurrent findings of fact – appellate court will not disturb credibility findings absent misdirection or miscarriage of justice
Sentencing – Mandatory compensation under s.131(1) Penal Code – appellate court may make such order if lower court omitted it
|
3 March 2014 |