Court of Appeal of Tanzania

This is the highest level in the justice delivery system in Tanzania. The Court of Appeal draws its mandate from Article 117(1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. The Court hears appeals  on both point of law and facts for cases originating from the High Court of Tanzania and Magistrates with extended jurisdiction in exercise of their original jurisdiction or appellate and revisional jurisdiction over matters originating in the District Land and Housing Tribunals, District Courts and Courts of Resident Magistrate. The Court also hears similar appeals  from quasi judicial bodies of status equivalent to that of the High Court. It  further hears appeals  on point of law against the decision of the High Court in  matters originating from Primary Courts. The Court of Appeal also exercises jurisdiction on appeals originating from the High Court of Zanzibar except for constitutional issues arising from the interpretation of the Constitution of Zanzibar and matters arising from the Kadhi Court.

Physical address
26 Kivukoni Road Building P.O. Box 9004, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
19 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
19 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2003
Reported
Bank validly exercised contractual power of sale after borrower's default; radio sale notices did not constitute defamation.
Contract law – Loan agreement interpretation; Clause 6 repayment schedule; Clause 7 power of sale of mortgaged property; Enforcement after default; Publication in enforcement context – defence to defamation; Demand notice and auction publicity.
11 December 2003
Reported

Contract—Loan agreement - Default to pay consecutive installments — Whether  the failure constitutes breach of contract. Contract — Loan agreement — Power of sale of mortgaged property securing the loan - When the power ofsale is exercisable.

Torts - Defamation - Advertisement of sale of mortgaged property over the radio — Whether the advertisement is defamatory of the defaulting borrower.

11 December 2003
The appellants’ appeal was time-barred; the registrar cannot lawfully extend the appeal period by certificate.
Civil procedure — Appeals — Time limits under Rule 83(1) — Exclusion for time to prepare copy of proceedings — Registrar’s certificate of delay — Registrar lacks power to extend appeal time — Only Court can extend time — Failure to state address for service in record (Rule 89(1)(b)) — Substantial compliance and no prejudice test.
10 December 2003
Reported
Appeal struck out as time‑barred; registrar cannot extend appeal time by issuing a second certificate of delay.
* Civil procedure — Appeals — Time limits under Rule 83(1) — 60 days from supply of proceedings — appeal time‑barred. * Civil procedure — Certificate of delay — Registrar cannot extend time to institute appeal — only Court may grant extension. * Civil procedure — Two certificates of delay — later certificate cannot validate a time‑barred appeal. * Civil procedure — Record of appeal — omission of address for service under Rule 89(1)(b) — substantial compliance and absence of prejudice may cure defect. * Professional conduct — Advocate’s lack of diligence does not excuse non‑compliance with court rules.
10 December 2003
November 2003
Reported
Court held government retained ownership; statutory notices and possession did not vest property in the judgment debtor.

Property law – vesting of government property post-1964; Public Enterprises Decree – enabling power to acquire property vs. vesting; Legal Notice designating head office does not vest ownership; Freeport declaration (Legal Notice) does not transfer title; handing-over note and long possession do not confer ownership against the government.

20 November 2003
A notice of appeal not endorsed by the Registrar (or authorized deputy) is defective and the appeal is struck out.
Civil procedure – Appeal procedure – Notice of appeal – Requirement that notice be lodged with and endorsed by the Registrar under Rule 76 and Form D – No delegation of Registrar's endorsement – Defective notice renders appeal incompetent – Strike out under Rule 82 with costs.
20 November 2003
Applicant failed to prove respondent sourced the defamatory article; appeal dismissed and cross-appeal for costs allowed.
Defamation — burden of proof on person alleging source of publication; production of documents — late production and Order XV r.2; relevance — post-dated documents; evidentiary conflicts — resolution without expert where parties fail to call one; costs — follow the event.
20 November 2003
Revision application struck out for citing wrong statutory provision and failing to state grounds, constituting incompetence and abuse of process.
Appellate procedure – Revision – Correct enabling provision required to properly move the Court; Court Rules – Notice of motion must conform to Form A and state grounds (Rule 45(2)); Procedure – Revision versus appeal – pursuing concurrent remedies may constitute abuse of process.
14 November 2003
Reported
Application for revision struck out where wrong statute cited and notice of motion failed to state grounds, constituting incompetence and abuse of process.
* Civil procedure – Revision – Requirement to cite correct enabling provision when moving the Court; wrong or inapplicable citation renders application incompetent. * Court Rules – Notice of Motion/Form A – Rule 45(2) requires grounds to be stated; failure to do so is a fatal defect. * Amendment – Typographical errors in enabling provisions must be corrected before preliminary objection is determined. * Abuse of process – Seeking revision while appeal/extension/leave proceedings are pending is improper where the order is appealable with leave.
14 November 2003
Reported

Civil Practice and Procedure — Court process - Party pursuing two different avenues in different Courts at the same time — An abuse of the Court process.


Civil Practice and Procedure - Applications - Application to Court of Appeal - Notice of motion citing a wrong or non-existent provision of law - Whether valid. Court of Appeal -

Court of Appeal Rules - Application for revision - Form prescribed for application - Notice of Motion not substantially conforming to prescribed form -Whether Court can properly be moved - Rule 45(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules 1979.

14 November 2003
Reported

Banking - Securities for bank advances - Mortgage over house - Whether mortgage is a simple mortgage - Preconditions for realization of a simple mortgage - Section 58(3) of the Transfer of Property Decree Chapter 150 of the Laws of Zanzibar.
Mortgages — Mortgage over a house - Whether the mortgage is a simple mortgage - Conditionsfor realization of a simple mortgage.
Land Law - Sale ofmortgagedproperty - Sale by auction.- No evidence of foul play - Whether price obtained is the market price at the auction.

12 November 2003
Bank entitled by mortgage deed to sell without court intervention; notice and public auction were valid, appeal dismissed.
* Mortgage law – characterisation of mortgage – whether deed constituted a simple mortgage under s.58(3) of Cap.150. * Power of sale – contractual clause permitting exercise of statutory powers ‘‘without the restrictions’’ of the Transfer of Property Decree – effect on requirement for court intervention (s.69). * Notice – validity of demand and notice prior to sale. * Sale procedure – public auction v. private treaty; evidentiary burden to prove collusion and undervalue. * Civil procedure – parties bound by pleaded issues; unpleaded issues cannot be decided at appeal.
12 November 2003
Reported

Labour law - Terminal benefits - Assessment of terminal benefits - Assessment done by Labour Officer but disputed by the appellants — Whether assessment by Labour Office was reliable.
Labour law — Respondent had given money for purchase of motor cycle as means for transport for the first appellant while working for respondent - Whether the motor cycle belonged to the respondent on termination of the contract of employment.
Civil Practice and Procedure - Judgment - Judgment too scanty and contained in only two sentences - Whether meeting the requirements of a judgment - Order XLVI, rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Decree Chapter 8 of the Laws of Zanzibar.

11 November 2003
Reported

Civil Practice and Procedure - Objection proceedings — Duty of the Court in objection proceedings - Order XLVII, rule 1(i) and Order XXIV, rule 53 of the Civil Procedure Decree Chapter 8 and section 5(1)(c) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1979.

11 November 2003
A registry receipt stamp does not prove documents were supplied to the respondent's advocate; the Notice of Appeal was timely and valid.
* Civil procedure – Appeal – Notice of Appeal – whether registry receipt stamp proves supply of proceedings to advocate – effect on computation of limitation period under Court of Appeal Rules 1979 (Rule 84). * Service/supply of records – proof required; registry endorsement insufficient if registrar avers wrongful issue to an unidentified person. * Striking out – application dismissed where notice filed within statutory period after actual supply to advocate.
10 November 2003
October 2003
Reported
Appellate courts must give reasoned judgments; doubtful identification and unjustified sentence enhancement require quashing conviction.

Criminal law – appeal – requirement under section 276(1) for judgments to state points for determination and reasons; identification evidence – visual identification and adequacy of descriptions; sentencing – limits of judicial notice and improper enhancement of sentence without factual basis.

31 October 2003

Criminal Practice and Procedure — Appeals - Second appeal - Duty of an appellate Court on a second appeal - Section 276(1) of the Criminal Procedure Decree of Zanzibar.

Evidence - Misdirection or non-direction on the evidence - Duty of appellate Court when there have been mis-directions or non-directions by the Court(s) below.

Criminal Practice and Procedure - Judgment - What a judgment should contain - Section 276(1) ofthe Criminal Procedure Decree Zanzibar.

31 October 2003
Reported

Administrative Law - Delegation of Powers — Power to issue clove export permit - Power vested in a Sheha - Whether that power may be exercised by a shehia councillor - Regional Administration Authority Act Number 1 of 1998, Interpretation of Laws and General Provisions Act 1984, and the Cloves Act 1985.

31 October 2003
Reported
A clove-transport permit issued by an advisory council member and lacking required purpose is invalid; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law — Cloves Act 1985 s3(1),(2): export/transportation requires valid permit stating purpose and reason; Sheha alone (or authorized deputy) may issue permits — Shehia Advisory Council members lack licensing authority; Interpretation Act s63(4) applies only where person is charged with office duties; omission of mandatory particulars invalidates permit.
31 October 2003