|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| April 2026 |
|
|
Failure to prove service by affidavit and omission to notify of ex parte judgment date vitiated the proceedings; matter remitted for retrial.
Civil procedure – Service of summons – Rule 19(3)(b) requires affidavit or sworn proof of service – Allegation of refusal insufficient – Notice of date of delivery of ex parte judgment mandatory – Failure to prove service and notify vitiates proceedings – Revisional powers; remit for retrial
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Interim injunction granted restraining bank from selling disputed land after applicant met the three-part injunction test.
Temporary injunction — requirements: prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience — restraint on sale/auction of disputed land — Order XXXVII r.1(a) & s.95 CPC — non-opposition by respondents
|
17 April 2026 |
|
A flawed locus in quo visit does not invalidate a judgment when the respondent’s ownership is proved by admissible evidence.
Land law – locus in quo visit irregularity – curable if decision rests on admissible evidence; Evidence – sale agreement and corroboration sufficing to prove ownership; Principle nemo dat quod non habet – purchaser from person without title cannot obtain valid title
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Joinder of the Attorney General by notice to the Deputy AG was proper; non-parties cannot be charged under Order XXXVII for civil contempt.
Civil procedure — joinder of Attorney General — notification via Deputy Attorney General sufficient; interlocutory joinder order not appealable separately; civil contempt — Order XXXVII inapplicable to non-parties, such persons to be charged under Penal Code s.124; preliminary objections must be pleaded before court
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Plaintiff failed to prove municipal allocation; suit dismissed and title-processing payments ordered refunded.
Land law – allocation versus title-processing; burden of proof on claimant; administrative payments not equivalent to acquisition costs; absence of title deed; refund of processing fees
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Lodging a notice of appeal transfers jurisdiction over stay of execution to the Court of Appeal; trial court lacked jurisdiction.
Civil procedure — Stay of execution — Effect of notice of appeal — Jurisdiction shifts to the Court of Appeal once notice lodged — Order XXI R.29 CPC; Court of Appeal Rules (Rule 11) — Sua motu issues and right to be heard
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Appellant proved ownership by documentary and oral evidence; sale by deceased’s children was void and Tribunal’s decision set aside.
Land law – ownership dispute – evaluation of documentary and oral evidence – validity of sale/exchange agreements (P1, P2, D1) – nemo dat quod non habet – non-joinder of purported purchaser (company) – remedies: declaration, injunction, compensation and damages
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Technical delay from withdrawing a timely-filed challenge can justify an extension to seek judicial review leave.
Limitation — Extension of time — Technical delay caused by withdrawal of a timely-filed application — Judicial review leave — Discretion, promptness and diligence — Respondent’s concession not binding
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Omission of a necessary party from appellate proceedings renders the appeal incompetent and ousts appellate jurisdiction.
Civil procedure — Appeal — Joinder of parties — All parties to original proceedings must remain parties in subsequent appeals unless cogent reasons justify omission — Omission of necessary party renders appeal incurably defective and divests jurisdiction
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Conviction quashed for failure to call material witnesses and missing medical evidence; sentence illegally exceeded statutory range.
Criminal law – grave sexual abuse – failure to call material witnesses – adverse inference; PF3 and medical evidence – importance for proof of penetration; victim’s testimony – weight and corroboration; typographical inconsistencies – non-fatal; sentencing – illegal life sentence where statute prescribes 20–30 years
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Failure to determine all grounds of appeal denied the appellant's right to be heard, requiring remittal for fresh judgment.
Appellate procedure — Right to be heard — Failure to determine each ground of appeal renders judgment a nullity; Matrimonial property — Jurisdiction/conciliation board; Law of Marriage Act s.114(1) — Division of assets and decree of divorce; Extension of time and alleged illegality; Concurrent findings of fact on second appeal
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Applicant granted 30-day extension for technical delay in attaching tribunal judgment; no abuse of process found.
Land appeals — Extension of time — Technical delay for failing to attach tribunal judgment in eCMS — Judicial discretion — Abuse of process — Promptness and diligence
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Recognition identification under adequate lighting and post‑mortem evidence established guilt, resulting in three convictions for murder.
Criminal law — Murder — Identification by recognition at night — Waziri Amani criteria applied — Post‑mortem evidence (exsanguination) — Exclusion of cautioned statements — Alibi notice and weight — Malice aforethought inferred from force and injuries
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Allegations of fraud to impeach registered land title require higher proof; registered titles upheld and suit dismissed.
Land law – Registered title and validity – Challenge to title based on alleged fraud and procedural impropriety – Requirement for heightened standard of proof for allegations of fraud – Loan and handing-over agreements, village approval, survey and issuance of title deeds
|
17 April 2026 |
|
Dismissal for want of prosecution despite the appellant's advocate being present breached the right to be heard; suit restored.
Civil procedure – dismissal for want of prosecution – presence of advocate – right to be heard (Article 13(6)(a)) – sufficient cause for restoration of dismissed suit
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Representative plaintiffs' land suit struck out for vague land description and failure to serve mandatory 90‑day government notice.
Civil procedure – preliminary objection; immovable property – sufficiency of description under Order VII r.3 CPC; Government Proceedings Act s.6(2) – mandatory ninety‑day notice to government; representative suit – requirement to specify or annex particulars; ECMS filing and procedural compliance
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Registrar of Titles is not automatically necessary; a Certificate of Occupancy prima facie outweighs permissive occupation or uncertified sale.
Land law – Joinder of Registrar of Titles – necessary party test; Certificate of Occupancy as prima facie evidence of ownership; long occupation and sale agreement versus registered title; requirement of cogent evidence to challenge registered title
|
16 April 2026 |
|
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Applicants failed to prove fraud or other statutory grounds; revocation of letters of administration dismissed.
Probate law – Revocation under s.49 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act; Allegation of fraud – requirement for full particulars and higher standard of proof; Duty to exhibit inventory/accounts; Administrator's powers to deal with estate property; Lack of heirs' consent – publication/exemption and jurisdictional procedure
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Applicants failed to satisfy the prima facie, irreparable harm and balance-of-convenience tests for a temporary injunction.
Civil procedure – Temporary injunction – Interim relief in probate – Triple-test (prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience) – Wrong citation of enabling provision not fatal where court has jurisdiction – Affidavit must disclose material facts and evidence
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Failure to conclusively determine alleged juvenile’s age vitiated the trial; material contradictions led to quashing conviction and no retrial.
Criminal law — Jurisdiction — Alleged juvenile — Duty to determine age conclusively; Inconclusive medical age assessment; Fundamental irregularity vitiating proceedings; Material contradictions in prosecution evidence on timing; Retrial declined under Fatehali Manji principles
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Appellant failed to prove ownership or adverse possession; trial tribunal's finding that land formed part of deceased's estate upheld.
Land law – ownership dispute over parcel forming part of deceased's estate; burden of proof on claimant; evaluation of evidence; adverse possession requirements; admissibility of letters of administration
|
16 April 2026 |
|
A fresh suit challenging a Primary Court’s interlocutory seizure order was inappropriate; remedy lay in the issuing court, not a new action.
Abuse of process; malicious prosecution; interlocutory seizure order; Primary Court jurisdiction; remedy before issuing court (appeal/revision/judicial review); requirement of ulterior purpose and special damage; functus officio (ancillary powers)
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Conviction quashed where contradictions about the victim's age created reasonable doubt in an s130(2)(e) rape charge.
Criminal law – Rape (s130(2)(e)) – proof of victim's age – material contradictions in testimony – need for documentary/dispensary records – benefit of doubt to accused
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Limitation in land claims arising from deceased estates is a mixed law-and-fact issue; premature dismissal was improper.
Limitation of actions – land claims from deceased estates – accrual of cause of action (date of death versus dispossession/adverse possession) – Law of Limitation Act ss.9(1), 9(2), 24(1), 33(1) – mixed question of law and fact – preliminary objection inappropriate – reliance on unannexed documents improper – case remitted for rehearing de novo
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Administrator with unrevoked letters cannot be sued personally; suit struck out for lack of locus standi.
Probate and administration of estates — locus standi — effect of unrevoked letters of administration — section 71 Probate and Administration of Estates Act — filing Forms V and VI do not close probate — preliminary objection — striking out suit for suing administrator personally
|
16 April 2026 |
|
An appeal against an interlocutory ruling on a preliminary objection is incompetent and struck out.
Land law – interlocutory ruling on preliminary objection – appealability – Rule 22, Land Disputes Courts (The District Land and Housing Tribunal) Regulations G.N
No. 174/2003 – competence – striking out and remittance
|
16 April 2026 |
|
Proceedings after a dismissal without a restoration order are void; conviction and sentence were quashed as nullities.
Criminal procedure — Dismissal under Section 222/226(1) (now s238/s243) — Requirement to discharge accused — Re-institution within 30 days — Proceedings after dismissal without restoration are a nullity; conviction quashed
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Summary judgment granted for unpaid NSSF contributions after defendant failed to seek leave to defend.
Civil procedure – Summary judgment under Order XXXV – Rule 2(1)-(2) – Failure to apply for leave to appear deemed admission of plaint; Recovery of unpaid statutory NSSF contributions under s.79(2) NSSF Act – Registered employer liability – Costs awarded to plaintiffs
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Omission of a judgment debtor in execution proceedings should be cured by joinder, not automatic nullification.
Civil procedure – Execution proceedings – Non-joinder of necessary party – Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC – Joinder vs. vitiation – Right to be heard – Court’s suo motu power
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Applicant’s dilatory conduct and failure to prosecute barred extension of time to appeal an ex parte judgment.
Extension of time – Law of Limitation Act s.14(1) – good cause – alleged illegality of ex parte judgment – non‑service and lack of notice – effect of dilatory conduct and failure to prosecute preliminary objection
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Failure to record and communicate reasons for transfer vitiates successor magistrate’s proceedings; remittal for retrial de novo.
Civil procedure – Transfer of part-heard matters – Order XVIII Rule 15(1) & (2) CPC – Failure to record and communicate reasons – Successor magistrate’s proceedings nullified – Predecessor’s recorded proceedings upheld – Remittal for retrial de novo
|
15 April 2026 |
|
|
15 April 2026 |
|
High Court quashed DLHT execution of a defective ward settlement, holding ward tribunals lack decree-making power.
Land law – Ward Tribunal mediation orders – Ward tribunals limited to mediation post-amendment – Executability of settlement agreements – DLHT jurisdiction to execute orders – Revisional jurisdiction of High Court – Res judicata / res sub judice doctrine – Right to be heard (audi alteram partem)
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Appellant's misjoinder and documentary-evidence complaints failed; primary court oral evidence was sufficient and appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – necessary party – determination is fact-specific; Primary courts – admissibility and sufficiency of oral evidence under Primary Court Evidence Rules; Requirement of documentary proof – not absolute in primary courts; Appellate review – no merit where lower courts considered evidence and findings are supported by record
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Absence of mandatory DPP consent and unexplained change of magistrate rendered the economic-offence trial void ab initio.
Criminal law – Economic and Organized Crimes – Mandatory DPP consent/certificate for subordinate court jurisdiction – Failure to record consent renders trial void ab initio; Criminal procedure – Change of trial magistrate – Reasons required for substitution; Procedural fairness – Preliminary hearing and reasons in judgment (not decided in view of jurisdictional defects)
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Absence of DPP consent and unexplained magistrate change rendered the trial void; conviction quashed.
EOCCA — mandatory DPP consent for subordinate court jurisdiction; change of magistrate — duty to record reasons; procedural irregularities vitiating trial; nullity of proceedings
|
15 April 2026 |
|
The applicants were granted extension of time to file an appeal due to a technical delay after withdrawal with leave.
Extension of time – sufficient cause – technical delay arising from withdrawal with leave to refile – discretionary factors: length of delay, reasons, diligence, prejudice – protection of right of appeal
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Appellant proved ownership on a balance of probabilities; respondents' failure to call material witnesses warranted adverse inference and appeal allowed.
Land law — ownership dispute; burden of proof on claimant; identification of immovable property; oral evidence and corroboration; failure to call material witnesses — adverse inference; applicability of written disposition rules to village land
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Insufficient identification and lack of proven ownership of the recovered phone undermined the prosecution's case against the appellants.
Criminal law – armed robbery; identification of accused – reliability of visual and dock identification; proof of ownership of alleged stolen property – admissibility and authentication of documents, IMEI and SIM linkage; procedural irregularity – delay in arraignment (s.33(1) CPA); appellate re-assessment of factual findings
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Non-joinder of alleged related parties did not justify striking out the applicant's suit; joinder or continuation was required.
Civil procedure — Joinder of parties — Order I rr.3, 9 & 10 CPC — Non-joinder/misjoinder — Suit not defeated by non-joinder unless effective decree impossible — Proper remedy: order joinder or proceed — Striking out inappropriate where absent parties not necessary
|
15 April 2026 |
|
The applicant’s appeal was dismissed as time-barred for being filed beyond the 30-day statutory period under section 25(1)(b).
Criminal appeal — Limitation period — Appeal to High Court from District Court — Section 25(1)(b) Magistrates' Courts Act — Time runs from date of judgment — Late filing without extension results in dismissal
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Applicant's extension application dismissed for lack of locus standi where no proof of administrator appointment was provided.
Civil procedure – locus standi as administrator of estate – proof of appointment required; Preliminary objection – threshold jurisdictional issue to be determined first; Overriding objective – cannot cure failure to comply with mandatory procedural rules
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Clearing bush alone does not confer title; respondent proved ownership by gift inter vivos, so adverse possession failed.
Land law – modes of acquisition – gift inter vivos – burden and standard of proof (balance of probabilities) – adverse possession – clearing bush/virgin land insufficient to confer title – priority principle
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Extension of time granted where delay arose from bona fide prosecution of struck-out revision and counsel’s minor oversight was excusable.
Civil procedure — Extension of time under Limitation Act s.14(1) and CPC s.105 — time spent pursuing a struck-out application may constitute sufficient cause — advocate’s negligence: minor procedural lapses excusable where refusal defeats substantive justice — no demonstrated prejudice
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Court granted the applicant extension to file a labour revision due to technical e‑filing delays and continuous judicial process.
Labour law — Extension of time; technical delay due to e‑filing/system anomalies; Lyamuya criteria for extension; judicial notice of electronic case records; revision of CMA award
|
15 April 2026 |
|
The court struck out the applicant's revision as functus officio because the same issue had been finally decided earlier.
Functus officio; revision under s.394 Criminal Procedure Act; committal proceedings; amendment of proposed charge; plea-taking at committal for economic offences
|
15 April 2026 |
|
Non‑joinder of an alleged middleman seller does not invalidate a land decree; appellants must confine submissions to pleaded grounds.
Land law – sale by instalments and occupation – possessory/equitable rights – part‑performance and estoppel – non‑joinder and necessary party test – appellate review constrained by pleadings
|
14 April 2026 |
|
Prisoner’s dependence on an absent prison officer can constitute sufficient cause to grant an extension of time to file an appeal.
Criminal procedure — Extension of time under s.382(2) CPA — Lyamuya factors — Account for delay and diligence — Prisoner’s dependence on prison officers as sufficient reason — Plea of guilty: premature to determine at extension stage
|
14 April 2026 |
|
An equivocal guilty plea and absence of unlawfulness in admitted facts warranted quashing conviction and setting aside sentence.
Criminal law – Plea of guilty – Equivocal plea and Laurent Mpinga exceptions; Grievous harm – ingredients (including unlawfulness) – requirement that particulars disclose unlawfulness; Sentencing – discretionary maximum, mitigation, and prohibition on reliance on extraneous matters; Appeal limits under s.381 Criminal Procedure Act
|
14 April 2026 |