|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| August 1981 |
|
|
Failure to comply fully with section 314 CPC (notice and petition) bars an out-of-time appeal; counsel's leave is not good cause.
Criminal procedure – Section 314 CPC – requirement for timely notice of intention to appeal and lodging of petition – time for obtaining copy of judgment excluded – ‘‘good cause’’ for extension – partial compliance insufficient – possession of judgment copy sufficient for lodging memorandum.
|
31 August 1981 |
|
Court upheld the applicant's robbery conviction, finding the complainant's eyewitness identification reliable.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Reliability of eyewitness identification – Face-to-face encounter in light, description of clothing and parade identification as supporting factors. Criminal procedure – Alibi – Unparticularized denial of presence insufficient to raise reasonable doubt.
|
31 August 1981 |
|
Court increased the respondent's imprisonment and licence cancellation for causing death by dangerous driving, enforcing statutory minimums.
Sentencing – Road Traffic Act – causing death by dangerous driving – statutory minimum custodial sentence where death has occurred (s.40(1) and s.63(2)(a)). Licence cancellation/disqualification – minimum periods under s.27(1)(a). Departure from statutory minima – requires special reasons; absence thereof grounds appeal success.
|
31 August 1981 |
|
Accounting book discrepancies alone cannot sustain a theft conviction absent complaint or further proof linking accused to misappropriation.
Criminal law – Theft – Evidence – Account books showing shortages are insufficient alone to prove theft; absence of owner/consignee complaint undermines proof of misappropriation.
|
31 August 1981 |
|
Conviction for arson quashed where nighttime identification was unsafe and the appellant’s alibi was not disproved.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Night-time sightings relying on firelight and moonlight from considerable distances – Reliability of lay estimates of distance; Alibi – Prosecution’s burden to disprove alibi – Benefit of doubt and quashing unsafe convictions.
|
31 August 1981 |
|
Convictions quashed where identification was uncertain and prosecution failed to call key witnesses, giving appellants benefit of doubt.
Criminal law – identification evidence – inability to positively identify assailant due to poor lighting undermines conviction; Criminal procedure – prosecution duty to call key witnesses – failure to call witnesses who reported incident weakens prosecution case; Credibility – trial court’s assessment may be unsafe where material uncertainties and untested witnesses exist; Benefit of doubt – accused entitled to acquittal where reasonable doubt persists.
|
31 August 1981 |
|
Application for extension of time to appeal dismissed; child found legitimate and custody rightly awarded to the father.
Civil procedure – application for extension of time to appeal – whether applicant received judgment copy in time; Family law – legitimacy of child – determination by reference to dates of marriage and birth; Custody – best interests and parental entitlement where child is legitimate and mother has remarried.
|
31 August 1981 |
|
A credible accomplice's testimony can sustain conviction despite lack of independent corroboration; s.33(1) not applicable after guilty plea.
Criminal law – confession of co‑accused – s.33(1) Evidence Act – inapplicability where co‑accused pleaded guilty before joint trial concluded. Criminal law – accomplice evidence – court must assess credibility and seek independent corroboration. Evidence – absence of corroboration does not automatically render a conviction unsafe if accomplice evidence is credible and proves the case beyond reasonable doubt.
|
29 August 1981 |
|
A conviction under Penal Code s.312(1)(a) requires possession discovered via Cr.P.C. s.24; uncorroborated interested-witness evidence is insufficient.
Criminal law – Penal Code s.312(1)(a) – possession or conveying of property suspected to be stolen – construction with Criminal Procedure Code s.24 – conviction under s.312(1)(a) requires applicability of s.24 in appropriate cases. Evidence – credibility and corroboration – testimony of interested witnesses (shop owner, transporter) not sufficient without independent corroboration to establish possession beyond reasonable doubt.
|
28 August 1981 |
|
Convictions quashed and retrial ordered where a succeeding magistrate wrote judgment without observing witnesses under section 196.
Criminal law – Traffic offences – dangerous driving causing death and bodily injury – causation and role of mechanical defects (broken front spring). Evidence – expert/inspection report versus oral opinion; improper substitution of judicial opinion for evidence. Criminal procedure – section 196 Criminal Procedure Code – succeeding magistrate taking over trial must ensure fairness, recall witnesses if necessary; failure may require retrial. Remedy – convictions quashed and retrial ordered; revisional powers used to set aside second accused's conviction. Administrative – driving licence suspension operative from date of order.
|
28 August 1981 |
|
Daylight positive identification and uncorroborated alibi upheld conviction for robbery with violence.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence – Value of prior acquaintance and daylight observation in ruling out mistaken identity. Criminal procedure – Variance between evidence and charge – Discrepancy as to amount stolen does not necessarily vitiate prosecution if core offence (robbery with cash box) is proven. Evidence – Alibi – Uncorroborated alibi insufficient to overturn positive eyewitness identification.
|
27 August 1981 |
|
Confession made in presence of people's militia inadmissible; night identification unreliable — conviction quashed.
Criminal law — Robbery with violence; admissibility of confession made before people’s militia under section 28 Evidence Act; people’s militia equated to police for arrest powers; identification at night by single witness unreliable; post-offence spending insufficient corroboration.
|
27 August 1981 |
|
A written, witnessed acknowledgement at arbitration revives a debt and restarts the limitation period, making the suit timely.
Civil procedure – limitation of actions – written acknowledgement of debt at arbitration revives obligation and restarts limitation period; Evidence – signed, witnessed memorandum binds maker despite later oral retraction; Appeal – appellate court erred in dismissing suit as time‑barred without considering revival by written acknowledgment.
|
26 August 1981 |
|
Conviction based on association and unproven alibi is unsafe; prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – alibi – burden of proof – accused not required to prove alibi; conviction cannot rest on mere association, proximity or suspicion; prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
|
25 August 1981 |
|
Credible witness evidence proved a loan and Shs. 800 outstanding; the appellant’s denial was disbelieved and appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – Debt claim – Loan of Shs.1,200 with partial repayment – Proof of loan and balance due; credibility of witnesses and appellate review of findings of fact.
|
25 August 1981 |
|
Appellate court quashed cattle-theft conviction due to confused record and insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the stolen cattle.
Criminal law – Theft – Sufficiency of evidence – Identification of stolen property and proximity to recovered meat/skins – Failure to call an informant – Uncorroborated admissions – Unsafe conviction warranting quashing on appeal.
|
25 August 1981 |
|
Appellate court restored trial court dismissal where owner failed to prove ownership and appellate court had no reason to overturn credibility findings.
Civil procedure – execution against judgment debtor – seizure of goods bailed to judgment debtor – ownership and proof in action for recovery; Appellate review – duty to give reasons when reversing trial court credibility findings; Remedies between owner and judgment debtor for loss in execution.
|
24 August 1981 |
|
The applicant entitled to unpaid balance of timber purchase price; respondent's overpayment counterclaim dismissed.
Contract – formation and parties – documentary acknowledgement establishes direct contract and unpaid purchase price; evidentiary assessment rejects third-party payment defence; counterclaim for overpayment dismissed.
|
22 August 1981 |
|
Failure to record assessors' opinions and to investigate merits invalidated the trial; retrial ordered without fresh fees.
Criminal/Civil procedure – Role of assessors – Trial magistrate must record assessors' opinions before delivering judgment; failure to do so and cursory investigation vitiates proceedings, warranting quashal and retrial; consideration of ability to pay fresh fees on retrial.
|
21 August 1981 |
|
Disputed land held to belong to respondent’s father; maternal uncle had no authority to divide it, appeal dismissed.
Land law – ownership dispute over cultivated land (shamba) – determination of root of title; Customary succession – whether property descended from respondent's father or from parties' mother; Customary authority – validity of maternal uncle's division under Kiluguru customary law; Appellate review – Primary Court and District Court conflicting findings; High Court affirms paternal ownership.
|
21 August 1981 |
|
Heirs, not living unrelated persons, are liable for a deceased's debts; appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – execution – Liability for debts – No law permits compelling a living person to pay another's debts; debts of a deceased payable by heirs/legal representatives; right of contribution among co‑heirs.
|
20 August 1981 |
dministrative Law-Habeas Corpus application-Confinement in a fenced area at a Resettlement Centre-Whether tantamount to unlawful detentionResettlement of Offenders Act No. 8 of 1969. |
20 August 1981 |
|
Confining a resettler behind barbed wire under armed guard is unlawful and removable by habeas corpus.
Resettlement of Offenders Act – treatment of settlers – confinement behind barbed wire and 24‑hour armed guard – ultra vires and unlawful. Preventive Detention – effect of custodial measures at resettlement centre – unlawful deprivation of civil liberties. Criminal Procedure – habeas corpus (s.348) – appropriate remedy to challenge unlawful confinement.
|
20 August 1981 |
|
Appellant proved repayment of the cow; respondent proved entitlement to only two goats, not six.
Civil recovery of chattels — burden of proof — credibility of witness evidence — repayment of specific items (cow proved repaid; only two goats awarded).
|
20 August 1981 |
|
Appellant failed to prove he returned bridewealth; burden of proof requires evidence, appeal dismissed.
Family/customary law – bridewealth (lobola) – allegation of return of bridewealth – burden of proof rests on party alleging repayment; absence of witnesses or customary proof fatal to defence.* Civil procedure – burden of proof – he who alleges a fact must prove it.* Appeal – appellate court endorsing trial court where appellant fails to produce evidence to support affirmative defence.
|
19 August 1981 |
|
Drunk-driving conviction quashed for lack of chain of custody; other convictions upheld and illegal sentences on two counts amended.
Traffic law – drunk driving – chemist's report insufficient without evidence of chain of custody and identification of blood sample. Evidence – necessity of proving sequence of events and sample identification where laboratory analysis is relied upon. Sentencing – statutory minimum fines and imprisonment; sentences below statutory minima are illegal and must be set aside and substituted. Traffic offences – sufficiency of evidence for careless driving, driving without licence, and use of vehicle not in good mechanical repair.
|
18 August 1981 |
|
Identification and circumstantial evidence upheld convictions for uttering a false document and stealing; minimum sentence affirmed.
Criminal law – forgery, uttering false document and stealing – identification evidence – corroboration by witnesses and circumstantial evidence. Sentencing – Minimum Sentences Act – scheduled offence – statutory three-year minimum – no mitigation to reduce sentence.
|
18 August 1981 |
|
Applicant’s claim for upkeep dismissed because trial judgment lacked preponderant evidence; appellate reversal upheld.
Civil procedure – appeals – findings of fact to be determined on preponderance of evidence. Evidence – weight of evidence where one party adduces no witnesses and the other produces corroborating testimony. Family law – dispute over custody/upkeep claims assessed by evidentiary strength.
|
18 August 1981 |
|
Delay caused by counsel's neglect justified leave to appeal out of time; lower court erred in refusing leave.
Appeal out of time – delay caused by advocate's negligence – affidavit explaining delay – judicial discretion to grant extension – improper reliance on presumed res judicata; merits not determinative at leave stage.
|
18 August 1981 |
|
Appellate court upholds customary-law award of 20 cattle to respondent and dismisses appeal with costs.
Inheritance (customary law) – distribution of cattle among heirs – application of customary law in dividing estate. Evidence – credibility of eyewitness (uncle) testimony regarding assembly and division of cattle after death. Appellate review – when appellate court should not disturb factual findings and customary-law applications of lower courts.
|
17 August 1981 |
|
Possession of alleged stolen clothing without prior descriptive identification by the complainant is insufficient to sustain conviction.
Criminal law – Theft and burglary – Identification of allegedly stolen property – Complainant must describe property and distinguishing features before item is shown – Bare assertion of ownership insufficient to prove provenance beyond reasonable doubt.
|
13 August 1981 |
|
Appeal dismissed: driver who knowingly drove with defective brakes liable for collision and convictions.
Road Traffic Act – Reckless driving (s.42(1) & s.63(b)) – Vehicle not in good order (s.39(1)(a) & (5)) – Driver’s duty to ensure roadworthiness – Mechanical failure of brakes not a defence if driver knew of defect – Appeal dismissed.
|
12 August 1981 |
|
The appellant’s conviction for theft by servant was quashed because documentary and testimonial inconsistencies raised a reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Theft by servant; Sufficiency of evidence – burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt; Weight and interplay of documentary company records (LPOs, Cash Sales) and ledger entries; Credibility of prosecution witnesses and benefit of doubt.
|
12 August 1981 |
|
|
12 August 1981 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure-Failure of an appellate court to re-evaluate evidence and to consider material issues involved therein-Procedure to followed on appeal. |
11 August 1981 |
|
Proceedings under the Rent Restriction Act must be commenced as civil suits under the Civil Procedure Code; affidavit-only injunctions are improper.
Rent Restriction Act s.11C(1) – commencement of claims as civil suits – Civil Procedure Code s.22 – requirement to present plaint – propriety of chamber summons and affidavit in landlord-tenant possession disputes – procedural fairness and ex parte injunctions.
|
11 August 1981 |
|
Appellant teller’s conviction for stealing affirmed where depositor testimony, bank identification and expert handwriting/stamp evidence proved appropriation.
Criminal law – Theft by servant – Whether teller who stamped and signed duplicate pay‑in slips and failed to remit cash to bank committed theft. Evidence – Identification of handwriting and signature – Value of bank officials’ identification corroborated by handwriting expert. Evidence – Stamp impression comparison – Matching of rubber stamp to impressions as corroboration. Evidence – Absence of bank records and originals – Inference that funds did not reach bank.
|
10 August 1981 |
|
Cattle held to be part of the deceased's estate; appeal dismissed and administrator to be appointed for customary distribution.
Inheritance and succession – ownership of livestock – evidentiary proof of ownership – customary law distribution – appointment of administrator to administer deceased's estate.
|
8 August 1981 |
|
Conviction for cattle theft quashed where seized animals were not positively identified and co-accused gave untested dock statements.
Criminal law – Theft – Identification of property – Whether witnesses to a transaction identified seized animals as same cattle; credibility assessment where co-accused give dock statements but do not testify; requirement that prosecution positively disprove innocent explanations.
|
7 August 1981 |
|
Handwriting identification by familiar witnesses upheld; the applicant's conviction for stealing by servant affirmed.
Criminal law – Stealing by servant – liability where official issued receipts but failed to account for collected funds. Evidence – Handwriting identification – admissibility and sufficiency of testimony by persons acquainted with accused's handwriting under Evidence Act. Proof beyond reasonable doubt – limitation of liability to sums traceable to receipts signed by accused. Sentence – concurrent terms not excessive.
|
6 August 1981 |
|
Evidence that raises only reasonable suspicion (an earlier meeting and remark) is insufficient to convict for grievous harm.
Criminal law – Sufficiency of evidence – Grievous harm – Whether meeting and ominous remark earlier the same evening can alone prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt – Evidence raising only reasonable suspicion insufficient for conviction.
|
6 August 1981 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction quashed where sole inculpatory report by a co-accused was uncorroborated and later denied.
Criminal law – theft – conviction based solely on a co-accused’s report – requirement for corroboration of such report; insufficiency of uncorroborated evidence to sustain conviction.
|
6 August 1981 |
|
Storekeeper’s false acknowledgement of full delivery upheld as evidence of stealing by servant; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – stealing by servant – delivery note signed for 600 bags when only 460 received – evidence of false representation and dishonesty. Evidence – credibility of driver, security officer and labourers – corroboration and circumstantial inference from signed delivery note. Defence of entrapment/conspiracy – allegation rejected for lack of credible support. Appeal – appellate court upholds trial magistrate’s factual findings and conviction.
|
6 August 1981 |
|
Conviction for cattle theft quashed due to inconsistent evidence and a coerced confession.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – Sufficiency and consistency of prosecution evidence – Voluntariness and admissibility of confession obtained under pressure – Unsigned/unsworn child evidence and corroboration – Unsafe conviction and appeal allowed.
|
6 August 1981 |
|
Appeal against dangerous-driving conviction dismissed; evidence supported negligence and allegation of magistrate bias was unproven.
Traffic law – Dangerous driving – Causing bodily injury – Duty to keep proper lookout and reduce speed near zebra crossing and school warning sign – Credibility of eyewitness and police evidence – Unproven allegation of judicial bias.
|
5 August 1981 |
|
|
4 August 1981 |
|
Fingerprint and physical evidence upheld a circumstantial conviction, but convictions based solely on an uncorroborated co‑accused's testimony were quashed.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – fingerprint and physical evidence can sustain conviction if only consistent with accused's guilt. Criminal law – Reliance on uncorroborated testimony of a co‑accused is unsafe; corroboration required before convicting another suspect. Procedural – Inconsistencies between charge particulars and witness testimony may undermine prosecution case.
|
2 August 1981 |
|
Whether misdirection on burden vitiates conviction and whether sentencing without proven value under Minimum Sentences Act was lawful.
Criminal law – Burden of proof; misdirection as to onus; harmless error doctrine; Theft by person employed in public service – sufficiency of evidence; Documentary proof (chit/ledger) absence; Sentencing – Minimum Sentences Act; requirement (and absence) of proof of value of stolen property; deterrence and public interest in sentences involving parastatal thefts.
|
1 August 1981 |
|
Appeal dismissed: primary court’s finding of irretrievable breakdown upheld on evidence of cruelty and second marriage.
Divorce — cruelty and second marriage — evidence of neighbours corroborating petitioner — finding of irretrievable breakdown upheld — appellate interference with primary court factual findings refused.
|
1 August 1981 |
|
Appellate court upholds Primary Court finding of irretrievable breakdown due to cruelty and second marriage, dismissing the appeal.
Family law – Divorce – Irretrievable breakdown of marriage – Cruelty and corroborative neighbour evidence – Effect of respondent marrying second wife and neglect on marriage dissolution.
|
1 August 1981 |