|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| November 1983 |
|
|
An auditor's admission of responsibility and corroborative audit evidence can sustain a theft conviction despite missing bank documents.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – proof of ingredients of statutory offence; Evidence – non-production of primary documents (bank statements, paying-in slips) and whether adverse inference under section 122 Evidence Act should be drawn; Evidentiary value of audit reports and witness testimony prepared from information supplied by accused; Admission of responsibility by accused and its weight in establishing guilt.
|
21 November 1983 |
Criminal Law - Provocation - Effect of intoxication. Criminal Law - Intoxication - Whether drunkenness may occasion a mistaken belief that a person is entitled to exercise the right of self-defense |
21 November 1983 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Bail - Surety failing to produce accused in Court - What court to do. |
21 November 1983 |
|
Reported
The accused’s drunken mistake of fact and lack of murderous intent reduced murder to manslaughter; three‑year sentence imposed.
Criminal law – homicide – distinction between murder and manslaughter – role of intoxication in negating mens rea. Criminal law – provocation – lawful rescue cannot constitute legal provocation. Criminal law – self‑defence – reasonable mistake of fact (including drunken misconception) may negate murder. Evidence – post‑mortem opinion by possibly unqualified person requires corroboration. Procedure – information should adequately specify place of offence.
|
21 November 1983 |
|
Intoxication and a reasonable mistake of fact reduced a murder charge to manslaughter; three-year sentence imposed.
Criminal law — murder v. manslaughter; intoxication and mens rea; provocation (lawful defence of another cannot be provocation); self-defence based on reasonable mistake of fact; adequacy of particulars in information; caution as to post-mortem evidence by possibly unqualified person.
|
21 November 1983 |
|
Reported
A surety should not be summarily imprisoned for an accused's non-attendance without being given time to produce the accused.
Criminal procedure – surety – failure to produce accused – whether magistrate may summarily imprison surety without affording opportunity to produce the accused. Criminal procedure – preferred remedy for surety’s default is forfeiture of bond or sale of property, not immediate imprisonment. Revisionary jurisdiction – s. 329 Criminal Procedure Code – setting aside unlawful custodial sentences.
|
21 November 1983 |
|
Conviction unsafe where applicant's identification was doubtful and prosecution selectively failed to charge others; escape charge unsupported.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Reliability of eyewitness identification; Selective prosecution and its effect on safety of conviction; Insufficiency of evidence for an escape-from-custody charge; Appellate intervention to quash unsafe convictions.
|
16 November 1983 |
|
Appellants' cattle-theft convictions upheld; appellate court reduced the first appellant's sentence from eight to five years.
Criminal law – Theft – Possession of stolen property and identification evidence – Sufficiency of witness testimony to sustain conviction – Sentence review – appellate reduction of excessive term.
|
16 November 1983 |
|
|
16 November 1983 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Person pretending to be a victim of police activities - Whether proper to charge him with impersonating a police officer. |
15 November 1983 |
|
Appellants' unverified receipts failed to rebut third‑party evidence; appeal dismissed and District Court judgment upheld.
Civil recovery of stolen goods – claim for cattle and offspring – proof of ownership and delivery of offspring required; Evidence – credibility of documentary receipts – lack of stamp or corroboration renders receipts unreliable; Weight of third‑party testimony about payment of replacement cattle; Appellate review upholding district court’s variation where no evidence of offspring delivery.
|
13 November 1983 |
Administrative Law - Deportation - Whether the President has the power to deport a person from Tanzania Mainland to Zanzibar. Statutory Interpretation - Territory - the President to deport a person from any part of the Territory to any other part of the Territory - Meaning of Territory - Section 3, Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1972. |
12 November 1983 |
|
Reported
Habeas corpus may test executive deportation orders; presidential deportation to Zanzibar under Tanganyika Ordinance was ultra vires.
Criminal procedure – habeas corpus – scope to challenge executive detention despite statutory bar on appeals; statutory interpretation – "Territory" defined as Tanganyika – President’s deportation order to Zanzibar ultra vires; constitutional powers – sections 11(1) and 94(1) do not authorize deportation from Tanganyika to Zanzibar.
|
12 November 1983 |
|
The court dismissed the applicants' challenge to rent increases, finding the tribunal properly applied principles and considered comparable rents.
Rent law – determination of standard rent – whether tribunal properly exercised discretion in fixing rent by reference to comparable local rents – scope of appellate interference with tribunal findings of fact and discretion.
|
9 November 1983 |
|
Appellate court quashed a trial acquittal and convicted the respondent for corrupt transaction on evidence from a marked-money sting, sentencing three years.
Criminal law – Corruption – Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act s.3(1) & (3) on evidence from a sting using marked notes and eyewitnesses. Criminal law – False pretence (Penal Code s.302) – not established where complainant initiated payment seeking ‘help’. Appeal – appellate intervention where trial magistrate misdirected in law despite supported findings of fact. Sentence – statutory minimum under Minimum Sentences Act applied.
|
8 November 1983 |
|
Failure to write or complete a trial judgment (s171 C.P.C.) is a failure of justice; conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure – Section 171(1) C.P.C. – requirement for written judgment to state points for determination, decision and reasons – non‑compliance amounts to failure of justice. Criminal procedure – Incomplete or unwritten judgment – equivalent to failure to write judgment and incurable irregularity – conviction quashed. Appeal – Where conviction quashed – retrial may be ordered where in the interests of justice (availability of exhibits, known whereabouts, portion of sentence served).
|
8 November 1983 |
|
Reported
Sentencing without a recorded, reasoned judgment breaches section 171 CrPC; conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure – requirement to write judgment – section 171 Criminal Procedure Code – points for determination, decision and reasons – failure to record conviction – incurable irregularity – failure of justice – conviction quashed; retrial ordered.
|
8 November 1983 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Judgment incomplete - Conviction not entered - S. 171, Criminal Procedure Code, Cap 20 - Failure of justice - Whether to order retrial. |
8 November 1983 |
|
Appellant's theft conviction upheld despite interested witnesses and lack of direct proof of missing property.
Criminal law – Theft by servant – conviction based on evidence of interested witnesses – corroboration not required where witnesses are not accomplices but caution warranted; flight as corroborative circumstance; identification of property by type and circumstantial inference; absence of direct proof of missing property not fatal to prosecution.
|
7 November 1983 |
|
|
7 November 1983 |
|
Appeal dismissed: circumstantial evidence, flight and recovered cash proved the appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Burglary and theft – Circumstantial and eyewitness evidence – Whether such evidence proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal procedure – Appeal – Evaluation of alibi and accused’s explanation for possession of money. Evidence – Flight and recovery of cash as corroborative factors in establishing guilt.
|
7 November 1983 |
|
Appeal allowed for insufficient evidence of encroachment or tree destruction; village authority to fix permanent boundary.
Land dispute — alleged encroachment and destruction of trees; sufficiency of evidence to prove destruction and boundary trespass; adequacy of court site inspection without plan; role of village authority in resolving boundary/path disputes.
|
7 November 1983 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and recovered items with matching serial numbers established guilt; alibi rejected and appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Burglary and theft – Circumstantial evidence – Sufficiency of circumstantial chain linking accused to disposal of stolen property – Recovery and identification of stolen items by serial/ledger numbers – Credibility of alibi.
|
6 November 1983 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and recent possession linked the appellant to stolen machinery; alibi rejected and conviction affirmed.
Criminal law – circumstantial evidence – chain of circumstances must point irresistibly to accused's guilt – doctrine of recent possession applied. Criminal evidence – identification of property – recovered stolen machines identified by serial/marking numbers matching police records. Criminal procedure – alibi – inconsistent and uncorroborated alibi rightly rejected by court.
|
6 November 1983 |
|
The applicant unlawfully attached the respondent's cattle; owner not liable for a relative’s debts.
Property attachment — requirement to prove seized chattels belong to the named suspect; burden of proof on seizing party; liability for relatives' debts — none; unlawful attachment and restoration of property.
|
5 November 1983 |
|
Trial court improperly shifted burden to accused and convictions based on loose accounting were quashed.
Criminal law – burden of proof – accused not required to "shake" prosecution case or prove defence on balance of probabilities; insufficiency of evidence where prosecution relies on imperfect accounting records; acceptance of oral evidence of payments where documentary proof absent.
|
5 November 1983 |
|
Conviction must rest on independent evidence; unsupported co‑accused allegations cannot sustain conviction.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – conviction cannot be based on uncorroborated allegation by co-accused; unlawful possession admissions; identification of stolen property by serial number; appellate review of factual findings.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
Assault conviction upheld on strong identification and medical evidence; robbery convictions quashed for insufficient, uncorroborated evidence.
Criminal law – identification evidence – positive on-the-spot identification by civilians corroborated by immediate arrest and medical reports – sufficient for assault conviction. Criminal law – robbery with violence – reliance on single uncorroborated witness and lack of police investigation renders conviction unsafe. Exercise of revisional powers – quashing of co-accused's conviction where prosecution case is inadequate.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
A rent tribunal cannot grant an increase larger than that sought; the court substituted the requested 50% increase.
Rent law — Rent tribunal powers — Whether a tribunal may award an increase beyond that applied for — Appellate correction of tribunal orders granting excessive relief.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
Appellant’s failure to provide address justified ex parte proceedings; credible police evidence upheld corruption conviction.
Criminal law – Corruption – Offering a bribe to a police officer – Credibility of police witnesses; Criminal procedure – Duty of appellant to provide address for service – Failure to notify change of address – Appeal may proceed ex parte; Appellate review – Where lower court’s credibility findings are reasonable, conviction will be upheld.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
|
4 November 1983 |
|
Credible identification evidence upheld robbery convictions; sentence varied to concurrent 12‑month terms; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence: familiarity, available light, opportunity to observe and independent identification at different places support reliability. Criminal procedure – Conviction upheld where trial court's acceptance of eyewitness testimony was justified. Sentencing – Error where sentence imposed on one count only though convicted on two counts; appellate court may vary sentence and order concurrent terms.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
|
4 November 1983 |
|
Appellate court upheld convictions for housebreaking and theft despite non‑production of broken padlock and appellant's escape claim.
Criminal law – housebreaking and theft – identification of stolen property – owner identification of recovered goods as supporting conviction. Evidence – non-production of physical exhibit (broken padlock) – omission considered but not fatal where other credible evidence proves entry and theft. Credibility – trial magistrate's findings – appellate court reluctant to disturb where evidence supports verdict. Timing – possibility of committing offence after escaping arrest – sufficient interval can permit conviction.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
Conviction for malicious damage quashed where tractor-caused damage lacked evidence of wilful destruction.
Criminal law – Malicious damage to property – Requirement of wilfulness/mens rea – Damage caused by a hired tractor during ploughing lacks evidence of wilful destruction – Matter more properly civil than criminal.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
Appellant’s cattle-theft conviction upheld on irresistible inference from circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law – cattle theft; circumstantial evidence and inferences – where entrusted property is found unlawfully disposed of and no alternative explanation is offered, an irresistible inference of guilt may justify conviction.
|
4 November 1983 |
|
Reported
The plaintiff was granted specific performance and mesne profits after the defendant breached the sale contract despite an informal waiver.
Contract law – Variation of written contract requires formal written agreement; waiver and forbearance operate despite lack of consideration; tender of performance must be unconditional and communicated; remedy of specific performance with mesne profits measured by rental value where vendor wilfully delays.
|
3 November 1983 |
|
Reported
Conviction quashed where defective particulars, double charging and insufficient evidence failed to prove dangerous driving.
Criminal law – Road Traffic offences – Dangerous driving and causing death through dangerous driving charged on same facts – Prohibition against double punishment (s.21 Penal Code); Pleading – Particulars of dangerous driving must specify act/omission; Evidence – Proof of speed and lookout duty; Trial misdirection – improper reliance on post-impact marks and failure to appreciate right of way.
|
3 November 1983 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Charges - Accused charged with dangerous driving and causing death through dangerous driving - Counts not preferred in the alternative - Illegal.
Road Traffic - Evidence - Evaluation of - No evidence that appellant departed from the standard of driving expected of a reasonably prudent driver.
Evidence - Evaluation of - No evidence that appellant departed from the standard of driving expected of a reasonably prudent driver. |
3 November 1983 |
|
Conviction for disobedience of lawful orders overturned where prosecution failed to prove existence, authority, and notice of the order.
Criminal law — Section 124 Penal Code — Disobedience of lawful orders — Elements to be proved: existence of order; lawful authority of issuer; accused’s actual knowledge; knowing disobedience — Distinction from criminal trespass (s.299) where boundary fixed by a competent tribunal.
|
3 November 1983 |
Contract - Written contract - Variation of terms must be in writing. Contract - Variation - Consideration - Agreement that varies the terms of an existing contract must be supported by consideration. Contract - Waiver - Waiver of contractual rights - Need not be supported by consideration. Contract - Mesneprofits-Assessment of Rent Restriction Act, 1962. |
3 November 1983 |
|
Beneficiaries knew of probate proceedings and unreasonably delayed appealing; leave to appeal out of time was rightly refused.
Probate and administration – application for appointment of administrators – whether beneficiaries were summoned or aware of Primary Court proceedings – delay and leave to appeal out of time – credibility of affidavit versus court record – exercise of discretion to refuse extension of time.
|
2 November 1983 |
|
Reported
Carrier liable for loss of goods in transit; consignment-note "not checked" endorsement does not absolve liability.
Carriage of goods – common carrier liability – loss in transit – consignment note endorsement "not checked by Railways" ineffective to exclude carrier's liability – TRC Act s.34 – recovery of value of missing goods and direct incidental expenses – freight payment not refundable.
|
2 November 1983 |
Contract - Fundamental breach - Effect of fundamental breach on exemption clauses. |
2 November 1983 |
|
Appeal dismissed: court upheld respondent’s will as genuine and rejected appellants’ forged will and land claim.
Land law – succession by will under customary context – validity of will and formalities under 3rd Schedule to G.N.436/63; ink and witness/formal requirements. Evidence – findings on genuineness of wills; onus and credibility where competing wills alleged to be forged. Procedure – effect of earlier Regional Customary Land Tribunal decision and issue of res judicata.
|
1 November 1983 |
|
Convictions based solely on identification were upheld where on-scene identifications were confirmed by a proper identification parade.
Criminal law – identification evidence – reliance solely on identification – initial on-scene identification corroborated by properly conducted identification parade renders ID reliable. Criminal procedure – service and presence – multiple unsuccessful service attempts and detailed memorandum may justify proceeding in appellant's absence. Criminal procedure – counsel's notice under s.318 C.P.C. – hearing may proceed despite counsel not attending.
|
1 November 1983 |
|
|
1 November 1983 |
|
Appellant’s fingerprints on removed louvres contradicted his account; circumstantial evidence upheld conviction for breaking and stealing.
Criminal law – Burglary and theft – Circumstantial evidence – Fingerprints on removed louvre glasses – Inconsistency of accused’s explanation with physical operation of louvre mechanism – Absence of prints on remaining louvres reinforcing guilt; Appeal against conviction dismissed.
|
1 November 1983 |
|
Five-year sentence for unlawful possession of government trophies reduced to statutory two-year minimum as excessive.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Unlawful possession of government trophies (Wildlife Conservation Act s.67) – aggravating factors (use of government vehicle, semi‑automatic rifle) – requirement for reasons when departing above statutory minimum – appellate reduction to statutory minimum.
|
1 November 1983 |
| October 1983 |
|
|
|
31 October 1983 |