|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| October 1983 |
|
|
Claim to recover land sold and possessed since 1955 is time-barred; appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – limitation/time-bar – recovery of land – long adverse possession and sale in 1955; Evidence – Primary Court procedure – Rule 10 GN 22/64 – inadmissibility of testimony by representatives who did not personally perceive facts; Discretion – retrial not warranted where subsequent admissible evidence establishes sale and long possession.
|
29 October 1983 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Charge of robbery c/s 285 of B Penal Code, Cap 16 - Whether causing grievous harm is cognate minor offence to robbery, and can therefore be substituted for robbery. Criminal Law - Meaning of minor cognate offence - One that forms part of a series of lesser offences necessary to complete major offence. |
28 October 1983 |
|
Reported
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Cognate offences - Whether causing grievous harm can be substituted for robbery. |
28 October 1983 |
|
Reported
Causing grievous harm cannot substitute for robbery; conviction reduced to assault and sentence reduced to nine months.
Criminal law – Robbery – Substitution of convictions – Whether causing grievous harm is a cognate minor offence to robbery – Assault and theft as lesser offences of robbery – Illegality of convicting for an uncharged offence.
|
28 October 1983 |
|
Reported
Conviction for grievous harm cannot be substituted for robbery; court substituted assault conviction and reduced sentence.
Criminal law – Robbery – Components of robbery are assault and stealing – Cognate minor offence principle – Causing grievous harm is not a cognate minor offence to robbery and must be specifically charged – Unlawful substitution of conviction – Appellate substitution to assault and reduction of sentence.
|
28 October 1983 |
|
|
28 October 1983 |
|
Conviction for aiding a prisoner's escape upheld where prison officers' ID evidence and register proved the appellant's identity.
Criminal law – Aiding escape (s.117(1) Penal Code) – Proof of identity – Credibility of prison officers’ identification – Corroboration by prison register – Sufficiency of evidence to convict – Sentence confirmed.
|
27 October 1983 |
|
Female heir cannot validly sell clan land; sale ineffective but purchaser may claim compensation; negligent guardian liable to refund.
Customary/clan land — sale by female heir — application of s.20 Second Schedule G.N. No.436/1963 — purported sale ineffective; purchaser entitled to compensation for improvements; guardian’s neglect may render him liable to refund purchase price.
|
26 October 1983 |
|
Recent-possession inference upheld where appellants could not explain possession of stolen goods; sentences found appropriate; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Theft/housebreaking – Recent possession – Where stolen goods are found in accused’s possession shortly after theft and accused cannot explain possession, doctrine of recent possession may justify conviction. Burden of explanation – Accused must give a satisfactory account of recent possession or inference of guilt may follow. Sentencing – Statutory minimum sentences upheld; concurrent/secondary sentences not excessive.
|
26 October 1983 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction unsafe due to unreliable identification and misapplication of burden of proof and alibi.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – reliability affected by poor lighting, movement of persons and inconsistent descriptions. Criminal law – Burden of proof – conviction must be proved beyond reasonable doubt; implication is not proof. Criminal procedure – Alibi – accused does not bear burden to prove alibi; it is impermissible to reject defence witnesses solely because they did not accompany accused.
|
26 October 1983 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and a credible dying declaration established the accused's guilt for murder; death sentence imposed.
Criminal law – Murder – Circumstantial evidence – Rimon Musoke principle – Dying declaration – Corroboration as practice not law – Identity of assailant – Malice aforethought.
|
26 October 1983 |
|
Reported
A guardian-heir who sells land reserved for an infant’s use is liable to compensate the infant; courts cannot order relief against non-parties.
Inheritance and clan land – s.20 of 2nd Schedule to G.N. 436 of 1963; Guardianship – heir-guardian cannot take full possession while wards live; Sale of ward’s land – liability for deprivation and maintenance; Civil procedure – cannot grant relief against non-party; Relief must follow the plaint.
|
25 October 1983 |
|
Appellants’ alibi rejected and convictions for cattle theft upheld after they were caught driving the stolen cattle.
Criminal law – Cattle theft; Evidence – apprehension in possession of allegedly stolen property; Defence of alibi – credibility assessment and rejection; Appeal – sufficiency of evidence and affirmation of conviction.
|
25 October 1983 |
|
Appellant’s redemption claim time‑barred; will upheld and heir sustained; appeal dismissed.
Limitation — redemption of clan land — Cory & Hartnoll para 568 — three‑month limitation — claimant aware of sale since 1968 but sued in 1979 — time‑barred. Succession — validity of will — reasons for appointment of heir — no basis for disinheritance. Applicable law — paragraph 568 of Cory & Hartnoll governs limitation, not G.L. 311 of 1964.
|
25 October 1983 |
|
Redemption of pledged clan land is barred after a mandatory three-month period under customary law.
Customary law – clan land – redemption of pledged or sold land – pledge versus sale – three-month limitation to redeem or challenge sale (Cory & Hartnoll; Jacob Tibifukula v Daudi Justinian).
|
25 October 1983 |
|
Reported
Irregular assessor participation and unnamed assessors rendered the primary court unlawfully constituted, nullifying its proceedings.
Assessors — unlawful composition of tribunal — assessor who missed part of trial may not participate; Magistrates Courts Act s.8(3) and s.32(2) — s.32(2) cannot cure jurisdictional defects; Duty to record assessors’ names — accountability and appellate scrutiny; Natural justice — right to be judged by those who heard the evidence.
|
25 October 1983 |
Civil Practice and Procedure - Assessors - Trial commenced with two assessors, then trial adjourned - On resumption only one assessor present - During summing and judgment there were two assessors - Whether irregularity curable. |
25 October 1983 |
Customary Law - Haya - Succession - Inheritance of land by female member of the family. Customary Law - Guardianship - Maintenance of minor by elder children of the same family. |
25 October 1983 |
|
Appeal against accomplice‑based conviction and five‑year minimum sentence dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Criminal law – shopbreaking and stealing – conviction based substantially on accomplice evidence – corroboration required and present – Minimum Sentences Act applicable where stolen property value exceeds threshold – five‑year minimum sentence affirmed.
|
24 October 1983 |
|
Appellant's conviction upheld on corroborated accomplice evidence; five-year minimum sentence under the Act affirmed.
Criminal law – shopbreaking and stealing – conviction based on accomplice evidence – corroboration by circumstantial evidence and identification – Minimum Sentences Act – scheduled offence and application of statutory minimum sentence regardless of owner’s private status.
|
24 October 1983 |
|
One theft conviction quashed for lack of complainant evidence; other convictions upheld on credible eyewitness testimony.
Criminal law – Evidence of eyewitnesses – Daylight discovery and immediate presence of victim; credibility and lack of motive to fabricate support conviction. Criminal procedure – Necessity of complainant’s testimony for theft charge – absence of evidence requires quashing conviction. Sentencing – concurrent sentences and effect of setting aside one sentence.
|
24 October 1983 |
|
Appeals against convictions for cattle theft and slaughter dismissed; brand identification and possession of carcass parts supported convictions.
Criminal law – Theft and slaughter of cattle – Identification by brand mark and owner’s identification of skins – Possession of carcass parts at accused’s homestead – Sufficiency and credibility of prosecution evidence – Defence claims of superimposed branding and fabrication.
|
24 October 1983 |
|
Accomplice testimony corroborated by independent facts upheld conviction; five-year minimum sentence under the Minimum Sentences Act affirmed.
Criminal law – accomplice evidence – requirement for corroboration; shopbreaking and stealing – scheduled offence under Minimum Sentences Act 1972; application of minimum sentence where stolen property is privately owned; sufficiency of circumstantial corroboration to uphold conviction.
|
24 October 1983 |
|
Court convicted applicant of murder, finding malice aforethought in fetching a weapon and shooting the victim; sentenced to death.
Criminal law — Murder — Proof of death and causation — Eyewitness evidence and confession — Post‑mortem confirmation — Malice aforethought established by fetching weapon and deliberate close‑range shooting — Mandatory death sentence.
|
24 October 1983 |
|
|
24 October 1983 |
|
Convictions for burglary and theft upheld; trial sentence for burglary increased to five years under Minimum Sentences Act.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – identification and seizure of stolen property – sufficiency of evidence; Criminal procedure – absence of named complainant from witness box not necessarily fatal where other victims identify property; Sentencing – Minimum Sentences Act applicability where value of stolen goods exceeds statutory threshold; Appeal – appellate court power to vary unlawful sentence.
|
24 October 1983 |
|
Single‑witness identification under adequate lighting and proven post‑mortem injuries established the accused's culpability for murder.
Murder – proof of death by violent injury (post‑mortem confirmation) – single‑witness identification – reliability factors (lighting, proximity, prior acquaintance) – corroborative circumstantial evidence – credibility of witness with medical/mental history.
|
22 October 1983 |
|
Visual identification in darkness and an uncorroborated dying declaration created reasonable doubt, requiring acquittal of the accused.
Criminal law – murder – identity of perpetrator – reliability of visual identification at night and effect of torchlight. Evidence – dying declaration – requirement of corroboration under s.34(1). Evidence – delay and contradictions in arrest and reporting – impact on probative value.
|
22 October 1983 |
|
The respondent’s equivocal statement was not an admission; conviction based on such plea and generalized facts was unsustainable.
Criminal law – plea – equivocal statements do not constitute unequivocal admissions of guilt. Evidence – affirmation – generalized facts insufficient to establish offending within charged period. Procedure – trial court should not treat an equivocal answer as a guilty plea; conviction on such basis is unsustainable.
|
20 October 1983 |
|
|
19 October 1983 |
|
|
19 October 1983 |
|
|
19 October 1983 |
|
|
18 October 1983 |
|
Accused’s sudden panga attack found deliberate; convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
Criminal law – Murder v. manslaughter – Sudden unprovoked panga attack – Intention to cause death or grievous bodily harm – Credibility of witnesses – Capital sentence.
|
18 October 1983 |
|
Whether the respondent proved encroachment where inconsistent ant-hill markers and prolonged occupation by the applicant failed to establish boundaries.
Land law – boundary disputes – burden of proof on claimant to establish true boundary on balance of probabilities. Evidential issues – inconsistent witness statements and unsatisfactory boundary markers (ant-hills) undermine boundary claims. Customary law – ant-hills not proper boundary marks under Bahaya custom in this case. Possession and improvements – prolonged occupation and cultivation (six years) and lack of protest weigh against encroachment claim. Procedure – importance of sketch plans/site plans when courts undertake site visits in boundary disputes.
|
17 October 1983 |
|
|
17 October 1983 |
|
Threats, weapon possession and suspicious conduct insufficient for conviction when circumstantial evidence does not exclude innocence.
Criminal law — Murder — Identification of killer — Circumstantial evidence — Circumstances must exclude any reasonable hypothesis other than guilt — Possession of weapons, threats and suspicious conduct insufficient without a direct link to the fatal act.
|
17 October 1983 |
|
Reported
Smell of alcohol alone does not justify cancelling an accused's bail or remanding a witness; such orders were quashed.
Criminal procedure — Bail — Smell of alcohol alone is not sufficient ground to cancel bail or remand an accused. Judicial/ Magisterial powers — Limits on punitive measures; personal impressions must not dictate court orders. Remand of witness — Improper as a penalty when no drunkenness or lawful cause shown. Supervisory review — Appropriate to suspend and refer potentially unjust magisterial orders for inspection.
|
14 October 1983 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Cancellation of bail conditions for smelling of alcohol - Witness remanded in court custody - Example of unjust use of magisterial powers. |
14 October 1983 |
|
Appellate court upheld trial finding that an oral sale and completion by the purchaser vested ownership; appeal dismissed with costs.
Property law – sale of partially completed building – oral contract valid where no statutory requirement for writing (unsurveyed area). Evidence – findings of fact and credibility by trial court entitled to deference on appeal. Remedies – completion of building and part payment held to evidence purchaser’s proprietary interest; no entitlement to deduct alleged completion expenses from claimed rent.
|
13 October 1983 |
|
The appellant's claim for specific performance was dismissed as res judicata because the land had been previously adjudicated.
Civil procedure – res judicata – claim for specific performance barred where the same land was previously adjudicated between the same parties.* Appeal – whether fresh proceedings may be entertained on same subject matter after prior determinations – held: no; appeal dismissed.
|
12 October 1983 |
|
|
12 October 1983 |
|
Appellate court reduced a manifestly excessive fine for overloading, considering the appellant's low income and first-offender status.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Excessive fine – Court may reduce manifestly excessive fine considering offender's means and first-offender status; Overloading – seriousness and deterrence.
|
12 October 1983 |
|
Conviction quashed where unreliable evidence and lack of warning on unsworn child testimony made the verdict unsafe.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – unsworn evidence of child witnesses – need for judicial warning when convicting on testimony of young children; credibility of prosecution witnesses; insufficiency of proof of possession of stolen money.
|
12 October 1983 |
|
|
12 October 1983 |
|
|
11 October 1983 |
|
Reported
Appellant’s challenge to a clan land sale was time‑barred under customary law requiring action within three months.
Customary law — clan land sales — three‑month limitation to nullify sale (Cory & Hartnoll para 568); presumption of knowledge for village residents; absence to rebut presumption requires strong evidence; sale price established by document (Shs.40,000); time‑bar precludes redemption.
|
11 October 1983 |
|
Court convicted accused of wilfully causing her newborn’s death by throwing it into a pit latrine on circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law – killing of a newborn – circumstantial evidence sufficing to prove wilful act – mental disturbance defence examined and rejected – post‑mortem septicemia as cause of death.
|
11 October 1983 |
Customary law-Sale of clan land without witnessing of clan members-Reversion of land to clan members. Customary law-Redemption of clan land-Limitation period 3 months from date of knowledge of sale-Para 568, Cory & Hartnoll’s Customary Law of the Haya Tribe-Rule mandatory. |
11 October 1983 |
|
An appellate court upheld a primary-court boundary finding based on a locus visit and sketch plan and allowed the appeal with costs.
Land law – boundary dispute between adjoining shambas – Primary court locus visit and sketch plan – weight of trial court’s factual findings – appellate reluctance to overturn site-inspection findings absent firm ground.
|
10 October 1983 |