|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| September 1983 |
|
|
Appellate court found the original fine and disqualification excessive, substituted a reduced fine and ordered refund.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Excessive sentence – Trial magistrate acted on wrong principle in fixing heavy fine; appellate court substituted lesser fine and set aside disqualification.
|
8 September 1983 |
|
Appeal allowed: procedural irregularities and insufficient evidence (missing exhibits, inconsistencies) required quashing of theft conviction.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence to prove theft – missing exhibits and inconsistent totals – procedural irregularity: multiple magistrates and joining offences in one count (s.136(2) CPC) – substitution of charge during judgment – prejudice required to overturn conviction.
|
8 September 1983 |
Family Law-Divorce - Custody and maintenance of children - Whether party entitled to maintenance for a burden wilfully incurred. |
8 September 1983 |
|
Failure to consider an alibi is an error, but a late, uncommunicated alibi that does not create doubt will not overturn conviction.
Criminal law – Alibi – duty of court to consider alibi as part of all evidence – failure to consider is error in law; Credibility – identification evidence accepted where witnesses’ identification deemed reliable; Procedural – late-raised alibi (not given to arresting officer) undermines alibi’s credibility; Harmless error – omission to consider alibi did not affect outcome; appeal dismissed.
|
8 September 1983 |
|
Reported
A deserter who wilfully removes and keeps children cannot claim compensation; father bears primary maintenance duty.
Family law – maintenance of infant children – s.129 Law of Marriage Act 1971 – primary duty on father under subsection (1); subsection (2) exceptions – equitable/customary-law bar to recovery by party whose misconduct caused separation – no compensation for maintenance of children wilfully removed or kept by deserter.
|
8 September 1983 |
|
Conviction quashed where trial judge misdirected by implying accused bore burden to disprove the prosecution's case.
Criminal law – Burden of proof – Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; accused has no duty to disprove charge. Criminal procedure – Misdirection by trial judge – Shifting or implying burden on accused is fatal to conviction. Evidence – Single witness evidence – admissible but conviction cannot stand if judgment misstates legal standard.
|
7 September 1983 |
|
Eyewitness identification and brutality of attack proved murder; accused convicted and sentenced to death.
Criminal law – Murder; eyewitness identification; post-mortem evidence; intention to kill; lack of motive not fatal where identity proved; sentence of death.
|
7 September 1983 |
|
Appeal allowed in part: forgery and stealing convictions upheld; obtaining by false pretences convictions quashed.
Criminal law – Appeal – Evaluation of witness credibility and documentary evidence – Forgery (s.338) and stealing (s.265) upheld; obtaining money by false pretences (s.302) not proved.
|
7 September 1983 |
|
Reported
Appeal allowed: marriage declared subsisting due to non‑compliance with conciliation requirement and petition founded on petitioner’s misconduct.
Family law – Divorce – Requirement to refer matrimonial difficulty to Conciliation Board (s.101, Law of Marriage Act) – Validity of a Board’s certificate – Petition founded exclusively on petitioner’s misconduct – Prohibition under s.107(1)(a).
|
6 September 1983 |
|
Appeal allowed: marriage declared subsisting due to no valid conciliation certificate and petitioner’s own wrongdoing barring divorce.
Family law – Divorce – Breakdown of marriage – Irretrievable breakdown; Family law – Law of Marriage Act s.101 – Requirement of prior referral and Board certificate; Family law – Law of Marriage Act s.107(1)(a) – Petitioner’s own wrongdoing as bar to divorce.
|
6 September 1983 |
|
|
6 September 1983 |
|
|
6 September 1983 |
|
Convictions for cattle theft quashed where facts showed consensual safekeeping and no evidence of intent to steal.
Criminal law – Theft – Intention to steal (mens rea) – Whether consensual safekeeping and substitution of cattle constituted dishonest appropriation – Sufficiency of evidence – Trial magistrate's error in convicting without proof of intent.
|
5 September 1983 |
|
Respondent entitled to compensation for crops harvested by appellants who failed to notify or prevent her cultivation.
Land law – allocation of village land – compensation for crops planted by one person and harvested by another; procedural error in Primary Court judgment; failure to notify occupier of reallocation; entitlement to compensation for crops where owner/occupier was allowed to cultivate and later deprived of produce.
|
5 September 1983 |
|
|
3 September 1983 |
|
Convictions for conspiracy and obtaining by false pretences upheld; statutory minimum sentences applied where government funds exceeded threshold.
Criminal law – conspiracy to defraud; fraudulent accounting; obtaining by false pretences – credibility of prosecution witness (Regional Engineer) – proof of no works done. Sentencing – application of Minimum Sentences Act where defrauded money belongs to Government (specified authority) and exceeds statutory threshold – statutory minimum sentence enforced.
|
2 September 1983 |
|
Conviction on an unequivocal guilty plea upheld, but a 12‑month sentence was reduced to immediate release as excessive.
Criminal law – plea of guilty – conviction on an unequivocal plea upheld; sentencing – excessive custodial sentence set aside and substituted with immediate release.
|
1 September 1983 |
|
Conviction on a guilty plea upheld, but a 12‑month sentence for low‑value uncustorned goods was quashed as excessive.
Criminal law – possession of uncustorned/customs goods – guilty plea and effect on appeal – sentencing – manifestly excessive custodial sentence for low-value goods – sentence set aside and substituted for immediate release.
|
1 September 1983 |
|
Conviction for theft set aside and substituted with conversion under section 284; sentence reduced to six months and immediate release.
Criminal law – offence by public servant – unauthorised taking and use of employer's machinery – distinction between theft and conversion – appropriate charge under section 284 Penal Code; Sentence – appellate reduction where original term excessive.
|
1 September 1983 |
|
Conviction for soliciting a bribe quashed where sole complainant's inconsistent, uncorroborated evidence was unsafe.
Criminal law – Corrupt transaction/soliciting a bribe – Evidence and corroboration – Single complainant's testimony – Credibility and inconsistencies – Appellate intervention where conviction is unsafe.
|
1 September 1983 |
|
Conviction on guilty plea upheld; 12-month sentence reduced and set aside, appellant released immediately.
Customs offence – possession of uncustomed goods – guilty plea upheld; Sentence – 12 months excessive given few items and time served; Remedy – sentence set aside and substituted to effect immediate release.
|
1 September 1983 |
|
Owner’s claim to land upheld but must pay purchase price and compensate purchaser; appeal dismissed.
Property law – sale of land without owner’s consent; entitlement to compensation for improvements by purchaser; appellate review of second appeal; affirmation of restitution subject to payment of purchase price and compensation.
|
1 September 1983 |
| August 1983 |
|
|
Convictions quashed where prosecution failed to establish the accused's true identity due to misnaming and lack of clarification.
Criminal law – Identity of accused – Misnaming in charge sheet – Burden on prosecution to prove and clarify true name – Failure to do so renders convictions unsafe; convictions quashed and compensation order set aside.
|
31 August 1983 |
|
|
31 August 1983 |
|
Daylight identification by witnesses who knew the applicants upheld convictions for cattle theft.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – Identification evidence – Visual identification in broad daylight by witnesses who knew the accused – Credibility and opportunity to observe – Appeal dismissed.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Convictions for theft quashed where prosecution failed to disprove unrebutted explanations and failed to test key evidence.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – Burden of proof – Prosecution must disprove accused’s explanations beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – Trial court’s duty to test documentary evidence and call or invite key witnesses to rebut defence. Payments as imprests or authorised loans – cannot be converted into theft charges without proof of misappropriation. Unsafe conviction – convictions based on unrebutted explanations and untested evidence are liable to be quashed.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Appellants' convictions for unlawful wounding affirmed due to credible daylight eyewitness evidence; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Unlawful wounding – Sufficiency of evidence – Eyewitness identification in daylight supporting conviction. Criminal procedure – Appeal – Standard of review where trial court rejects an alibi or denial; appellate court will not interfere absent demonstrable error. Sentencing – Fines imposed affirmed where no misdirection shown.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Application to restore appeal dismissed for unproved illness, poor prospects of success, and undue delay.
Civil procedure — Restoration of appeal dismissed for want of prosecution — Applicant’s uncorroborated illness claim — Proof required to excuse non-appearance — Prospects of success on appeal — Delay and public interest in finality.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
An appellate court should not overturn a trial court's credibility-based findings formed from witnesses it heard.
• Evidence — credibility of witnesses — trial court which saw and heard witnesses best placed to assess credibility; appellate court should not overturn such findings lightly.
• Property — long possession (since 1936) as supporting evidence of ownership.
• Appeal — reversal of factual findings based on credibility is erroneous where trial tribunal observed witnesses.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Lost evidence and refusal to hear a material defence witness rendered the conviction unsafe, so appeal was allowed and release ordered.
Criminal procedure – lost documentary exhibits – prejudice to accused’s defence; right to call material defence witnesses – magistrate’s refusal and fair trial; conviction quashed where trial irregularities render verdict unsafe.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Appeal allowed where missing defence exhibit and refusal to call a defence witness prejudiced the appellant's fair trial, conviction quashed.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – Procedural fairness – Loss of defence exhibit from court record – Refusal to permit defence witness – Prejudice to accused – Conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Auditor’s reliable account books traced a cash shortage to the appellant; failure to explain justified conviction for stealing by servant.
Criminal law – Stealing by servant – Evidence of auditor based on books under accused’s control – Shortfall traced to accused’s hands – Failure to explain funds supports presumption of theft.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove dishonest intent by nurses who took drugs for safekeeping.
Criminal law – Stealing by public servant – Proof of dishonest intent (mens rea) – Presence in hotel not sufficient to infer intent to sell – Regulatory/disciplinary breaches distinct from criminal theft.
|
30 August 1983 |
|
Convictions quashed because a missing charge sheet and record inconsistencies prevented proper appellate review.
Criminal law — shopbreaking and stealing; Criminal procedure — incomplete record; missing charge sheet; procedural irregularity — appellate review impossible; Remedy — quashing proceedings and setting accused free.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Magistrate lawfully dismissed charges for want of prosecution after prosecution failed to proceed; appeal dismissed.
Criminal procedure – adjournments – discretion of trial magistrate to allow or refuse adjournment – failure of prosecution to call witnesses may justify dismissal for want of prosecution – appellate interference only where discretion not judicially exercised.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Conviction under Penal Code s.312 quashed where no evidence identified the written law making acquisition unlawful.
Criminal law – Alternative verdicts – conviction under s.312 Penal Code for 'unlawfully acquired' property requires identification of the specific written law and supporting evidence; Prevention of Corruption Act – conviction under alternative statutory offence without evidential basis is unsustainable; Forfeiture – cannot stand where underlying conviction is unsupported.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Admission and owner identification of recovered records supported conviction for possession of stolen property; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – theft/possession of stolen property; identification of property; weight of accused’s admissions; sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Appellant’s challenge to convictions for burglary and theft on identification grounds fails; appellate court upholds magistrate’s credibility findings.
Criminal law – Burglary and theft – Identification of stolen property by owner’s identifying marks and witness evidence – Credibility findings of trial court – Appeal court’s reluctance to interfere absent compelling grounds.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Conviction for unlawful importation upheld for failure to prove lawful importation, but excessive concurrent sentences set aside and discharged.
Customs law – burden of proof (s.167 East Africa Customs Act) – accused must prove place of origin or payment of duties – production of receipts not in accused’s name may be insufficient.* Criminal procedure – defective particulars of charge – minor errors in citing sections/ subsections curable and not fatal to proceedings.* Sentence – appellate reduction where sentence excessive and substantial time already served.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Evidence of the appellant found inside the house after a break‑in supported convictions for housebreaking and stealing; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Housebreaking (s.294(1) Penal Code) and stealing (s.265 Penal Code) – evidence of presence inside locked bathroom after entry and missing property supports conviction. Credibility – accused’s claim of invitation by complainant’s wife insufficient to raise reasonable doubt. Sentencing – concurrent custodial sentences within lawful minima upheld.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Uncorroborated confession implicating co-accused is insufficient for safe conviction and was quashed.
Evidence – Confession to police officer – admissibility and weight – confession by one accused implicating co-accused requires independent corroboration; trial court must warn of dangers of relying on such evidence; convictions based solely on uncorroborated implicating confession are unsafe.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
Second appellant acquitted for lack of evidence; first appellant’s conviction for buying stolen cattle upheld.
Criminal law – theft/receiving stolen property – sufficiency of evidence; possession and admission as proof; knowledge/mens rea required for conviction; appellate review of factual findings.
|
29 August 1983 |
|
|
27 August 1983 |
|
Appellant's conviction for an uncharged sum was quashed because he lacked notice and no evidence supported that specific amount.
Criminal law – stealing by servant – Conviction for sum not charged – Impermissible to convict on an amount not pleaded or supported by evidence. Criminal procedure – right to know charge and opportunity to defend – conviction unsafe where accused had no opportunity to meet specific allegation. Lesser/alternative offence – permissible only if lesser amount formed part of the charged offence and evidence supports it.
|
27 August 1983 |
|
Appeal allowed where identification evidence was unreliable and compensation order was set aside.
Criminal law – cattle theft – identification evidence – reliability and opportunity to observe – delay in reporting identification – assessment of contradictory evidence – compensation order set aside.
|
25 August 1983 |
|
|
25 August 1983 |
|
A defendant is entitled to police statements for impeachment; reasonable apprehension of bias warrants transfer to another magistrate.
Evidence Act s.154; right to impeach witness by reference to police statements; duty to disclose police statements to opposing party; reasonable apprehension of bias; change/transfer of trial venue.
|
25 August 1983 |
|
|
25 August 1983 |
|
Passenger identification at night was sufficient; alibi rejected and convictions and sentences upheld.
Criminal law – Road Traffic – Identification evidence at night – passenger who boarded vehicle after meeting driver at hotel, sat next to him, paid by vehicle light and noted registration, sufficient for positive ID. Criminal law – Alibi – burden to raise reasonable doubt; unsupported alibi properly rejected. Criminal procedure – variance in recording offence (careless vs dangerous driving) not fatal where evidence supports the more serious charge. Sentencing – convictions for causing serious bodily injury through dangerous driving upheld given injuries sustained.
|
25 August 1983 |
|
Appeal dismissed on convictions for forging payment vouchers and stealing; five-year sentence reduced to three years.
Criminal law – Forgery and stealing by public officer – Payment vouchers – Credibility of signature comparison and witness testimony establishing forgery and theft. Evidence – Acceptance of prosecution witnesses over appellant’s claim of authorised conduct by seniors. Sentence – Appellate reduction where imposed term not justified by amount stolen or statutory thresholds.
|
25 August 1983 |