|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| August 1983 |
|
|
|
11 August 1983 |
|
An appeal against a conviction for escaping lawful custody, admitted by the appellant, was dismissed for lack of merit.
Criminal law – Escape from lawful custody – Section 116 Penal Code – Admission of facts by accused – Admission sustains conviction where uncontested. Criminal procedure – Appeal – Appeal lacking merit – Refusal to admit for hearing and dismissal.
|
11 August 1983 |
|
Appeal dismissed: eyewitness identification reliable and appellants' alibis rejected, convictions for robbery with violence upheld.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence (Penal Code ss. 285, 286) – Eyewitness identification – Reliability of in-the-field identification. Criminal procedure – Defence of alibi – credibility assessment. Appeal – Safety of conviction – appellate review of credibility findings.
|
11 August 1983 |
|
Appeal dismissed; conviction affirmed on compelling circumstantial evidence and key-access inference; co‑accused’s acquittal unchallenged.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – When physical layout and lack of forced entry permit inference that persons with keys committed theft. Evidence – Accessibility and possession of keys as basis for inferential finding of guilt. Criminal procedure – Acquittal of co-accused not challengeable on appeal where the prosecution does not appeal. Sentencing – Appellate interference where sentence considered lenient but offender is first-time; sentence left undisturbed.
|
11 August 1983 |
|
Convictions unsafe where prosecution evidence contradicts the charge particulars and a charged count lacks supporting evidence.
Criminal law – sale of regulated goods – prosecution must prove quantity and price as alleged; discrepancies between charge and evidence render conviction unsafe. Criminal procedure – adequacy of particulars – identity of purchaser and evidence to support counts essential. Conviction unsafe where prosecution leads no evidence on a charged count or where trial reasoning appears emotional rather than evidence-based.
|
11 August 1983 |
|
An appellate court will not disturb concurrent credibility findings absent demonstrable error; assault conviction under s241 upheld.
Criminal law – Assault occasioning bodily harm (s241 Penal Code) – sufficiency of prosecution evidence Appeal – concurrent findings of fact – appellate deference to trial court on credibility and demeanour Evidence – witness credibility – appellate court reluctance to overturn findings based on demeanour without demonstrable error
|
11 August 1983 |
|
A revisional court cannot overturn a subordinate court's acquittal and substitute conviction absent a DPP appeal.
Criminal procedure — Revisional jurisdiction — Limits on revisional powers — A revisional court cannot substitute a conviction for a subordinate court's acquittal; challenge requires appeal by Director of Public Prosecutions.
|
10 August 1983 |
|
Appellant's identification was reliable; conviction for storebreaking and stealing upheld and appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – storebreaking and stealing – identification evidence – contemporaneous observation, pursuit and multiple identifications – appellate review of conviction.
|
10 August 1983 |
|
Appellant's unchallenged mechanical-failure claim insufficient to rebut evidence of dangerous high-speed driving causing fatal accident.
Criminal law – Dangerous driving causing death; adequacy of evidence of speed and skidding; defendant’s plea of sudden mechanical failure held insufficient where inspection report and eyewitness evidence uncontradicted.
|
10 August 1983 |
|
|
10 August 1983 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove amount stolen or link accused to missing funds.
Criminal law – Stealing by servant – Insufficiency of evidence – Audit evidence did not establish amount or link to accused – Conviction quashed.
|
10 August 1983 |
|
Appellants’ possession‑link via purchaser’s testimony and identification of recovered school property upheld convictions and three‑year sentences.
Criminal law – store‑breaking and stealing – possession of stolen property – identification of recovered goods – purchaser’s testimony as corroboration – sufficiency of evidence for conviction – sentence upheld.
|
9 August 1983 |
|
A police constable appellant's conviction for stealing by agent and two-year sentence upheld on credible eyewitness evidence.
Criminal law – stealing by agent; credibility of accused's denial; sufficiency of eyewitness evidence; sentencing – whether sentence excessive.
|
9 August 1983 |
|
The applicant's alibi failed where credible eyewitness identification and corroborated recovery of stolen goats made conviction inevitable.
Criminal law – theft – eyewitness identification – corroboration by recovery and identification of stolen property; alibi – sufficiency of defence evidence; appellate deference to trial court credibility findings.
|
9 August 1983 |
|
Misappropriation of entrusted sale proceeds amounts to theft by agent; conviction and three-year sentence upheld.
Criminal law – Theft by agent – Misappropriation of entrusted sale proceeds – Receipt and non-delivery of entrusted funds constitutes stealing by agent under s.273(b). Appeal – Credibility and admissions – Appellant’s denial on appeal cannot displace admission at trial. Sentence – Three years’ imprisonment confirmed as appropriate.
|
9 August 1983 |
|
Possession of recently stolen goods supported convictions for theft and receiving; appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Criminal law – Burglary and theft – Possession of recently stolen property as evidence of theft Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – requirement of guilty knowledge Evidence – Identification by complainant and possession as basis for inference of guilt Appeal – Review of convictions and sentences; no interference where trial court rightly drew inferences from possession
|
9 August 1983 |
|
Possession of recently stolen cattle supported conviction for cattle theft; appeal dismissed and five-year sentence upheld.
Criminal law – cattle theft – possession of recently stolen animals as circumstantial evidence – credibility of accused’s explanation – appellate interference where trial court factual findings sustained.
|
8 August 1983 |
|
Identification evidence upheld; conviction affirmed but nine-year sentence reduced to seven years.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence (torchlight, voice, prior acquaintance, prompt reporting) – conviction upheld; sentencing – trial court exceeded sentencing power, substituted with minimum lawful term.
|
8 August 1983 |
|
Insufficient proof that violence was for stealing; robbery convictions set aside and substituted with common assault, with immediate release.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Whether violence was for the purpose of stealing; common intention; adequacy of proof of theft; substitution of conviction to common assault under section 240 Penal Code.
|
8 August 1983 |
|
Identification by distinctive ear marks and witness inspections proved ownership, so conviction and minimum sentence were upheld.
Criminal law – cattle theft – identification by distinctive marks (ear cuts) – corroborative inspection evidence – defence of self-inflicted marks insufficient to raise reasonable doubt.
|
8 August 1983 |
|
Recent possession of the complainant's property supported convictions for burglary and theft; sentences were upheld.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – Recent possession doctrine – Possession of stolen property shortly after offence gives strong inference of guilt – Sentence – value threshold considered.
|
8 August 1983 |
|
Reported
Family Law — Separation — Petition for Judicial Separation — Proof of breakdown of marriage necessary.
Family Law — adultery — Proof of adultery — Circumstantial evidence may suffice.
Family Law — Contribution to acquisition of matrimonial property — Supervision of building of matrimonial house should entitle party to property rights. |
8 August 1983 |
|
Conviction for carrying passengers for "hire or reward" quashed where no evidence showed appellant received payment.
Criminal law – elements of offence ‘‘for hire or reward’’ – requirement to prove receipt of payment; Conviction cannot be founded on speculation or unsupported inference; Credibility findings must be supported by evidence; Lawful to give a lift without payment where no evidence of reward.
|
6 August 1983 |
|
Convictions for theft and issuing receipts quashed for lack of evidence linking the appellant to the acts.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – Insufficient evidence to prove theft where custody was insecure; failure to prove issuance of receipts or receipt of money by accused – convictions quashed.
|
6 August 1983 |
|
Talaq alone is not decisive; dissolution requires proof the marriage has irretrievably broken down under s110.
Family law – Divorce – Law of Marriage Act 1971 s.110 – Requirement that marriage be broken down beyond repair – Islamic law/talaq not applicable to dissolution proceedings by virtue of Judicature and Application of Laws Ordinance Cap 453 s.9(3A) – Separation alone insufficient to prove irretrievable breakdown.
|
6 August 1983 |
|
Theft conviction upheld; false-pretences conviction quashed where the victim was not defrauded because goods were paid by cheque.
Criminal law – Theft – Evidence of identification and missing cheque leaf sufficient to prove theft. Criminal law – Obtaining goods by false pretences – Not made out where the alleged victim was not defrauded because goods were paid by cheque. Sentencing – Concurrent sentences adjusted where one conviction quashed.
|
6 August 1983 |
|
Convictions for theft quashed where monies were paid as imprest and no evidence of misappropriation existed.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – Imprest payments – Whether monies lawfully paid as imprest can constitute theft absent evidence of misappropriation – Failure to account for imprest insufficient to establish criminal theft.
|
5 August 1983 |
|
An appeal against sentence and disqualification was dismissed as both punishments had already expired, leaving no effective relief.
Traffic law – Driving inconsiderately – sentence of fine in default of imprisonment and driving disqualification. Appeal – Mootness/expired sentence – where sentence and disqualification have been served/expired, appeal against them will be dismissed for want of effective relief.
|
5 August 1983 |
|
Reported
Road Traffic - Causing bodily injury through dangerous driving - Road Traffic Act 1973 ss. 40(1) and 63(2)(a) - Circumstances constituting the offence.
Road Traffic - Causing bodily injury through dangerous driving -Whether disqualification from driving mandatory.
Criminal Law -Mens rea - Whether necessary on a charge of dangerous driving causing bodily harm under s.s 40(1) and
42(l)(b) ofthe Road Traffic Act 1973.
Road Traffic - Requirement to report accident within twelve hours - Whether absolute - Road Traffic Act 1973, s.52(2)(b).
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Charges - Charge of causing bodily injury through dangerous driving brought under s. 42(l)(b) instead ofs.40(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1973 - Defective. |
5 August 1983 |
|
Reported
Convictions upheld: offending provisions, mandatory licence cancellation/disqualification, and strict 12-hour accident-reporting requirement clarified.
Road Traffic Act — Proper charge for causing bodily injury by dangerous driving (s.40(1) v. s.42(1)(b)); mandatory licence cancellation and minimum three-year disqualification; objective basis of dangerous-driving liability (style not intention); strict 12-hour reporting requirement under s.57(2)(b) unless physically incapacitated.
|
5 August 1983 |
|
Conviction quashed where evidence was scanty, key witness (purchaser) not called, and charge/evidence were inconsistent.
Criminal law – Theft – Proof beyond reasonable doubt – Conviction unsafe where evidence is scanty, conflicting, or key witnesses not called. Criminal procedure – Adequacy of record – Poor recording and omission of material witnesses may vitiate conviction. Pleadings – Charge sheet must correspond with evidence (confusion between goats/cattle and sheep undermines proceedings).
|
5 August 1983 |
|
Possession of complainant-identified stolen clothing and an unconvincing defence upheld convictions; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – housebreaking and stealing – possession of recently stolen goods identified by complainant – credibility of accused’s explanation – appeal dismissed.
|
5 August 1983 |
|
Conviction for stealing by public servant upheld where unexplained shortfall matched unpaid staff and bank-underpayment defence was rejected.
Criminal law – Stealing by a public servant – Cashing government cheque and failing to account for funds – Defence of bank underpayment – Credibility findings and conversion of public funds.
|
5 August 1983 |
|
Convictions for selling meat above fixed price upheld; vicarious liability affirmed; sentences adjusted on appeal.
Statutory price control validity of administrative price-fixing instrument under the Regulation of Prices Act Evidence and credibility assessment of undercover buyer and weight of prosecution evidence in sting operations Vicarious liability employer liability for statutory offences committed by employee in course of employment Sentencing courts power to vary excessive or unlawful magistrates sentences on appeal
|
4 August 1983 |
|
|
3 August 1983 |
|
Convictions quashed where prosecution failed to prove participation; association or spouse’s possession alone insufficient.
Criminal law – shopbreaking and stealing; sufficiency of evidence – association with offender and possession of stolen goods; proof of knowledge and participation required before conviction; appellate intervention where convictions unsupported by evidence.
|
2 August 1983 |
|
Appeal dismissed: owner’s identification of stolen cattle and corroborative evidence upheld conviction and five-year sentence.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – Identification of stolen animals by owner’s marks and circumstantial evidence – Admissibility and sufficiency of identification – Credibility of accused’s denial – Sentence (minimum term) upheld.
|
2 August 1983 |
|
Conviction for unlawful possession of elephant tusks upheld; sentence affirmed, but firearm forfeiture set aside and returned to appellant.
Criminal law – Unlawful possession of government trophy (elephant tusks) – proof of possession and credibility of defendant’s explanation. Evidence – appellate deference to trial magistrate’s credibility findings. Forfeiture – ancillary forfeiture of firearm not supported where no conviction for illegal hunting and ownership/origin unclear.
|
2 August 1983 |
|
Conviction for unlawful wounding quashed where appellant’s self‑defence claim created reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – unlawful wounding – burden of proof – whether prosecution disproved defendant’s claim that complainant struck first – self‑defence and reasonable doubt.
|
1 August 1983 |
|
Appellant’s admission, eyewitness account, and post-incident conduct sustained conviction for striking a pedestrian; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Road traffic offence/hit-and-run – Eyewitness identification and credibility – Admissions and post-incident conduct – Appellate review of sufficiency of evidence – Appeal dismissed.
|
1 August 1983 |
|
Appellant's corruption convictions quashed for insufficient evidence; private drafting of plaint not criminal.
Criminal law – Corruption/solicitation – Conviction unsafe where based on single uncorroborated witness and absence of trap or recovered money; private offer to draft a plaint not necessarily an offence.
|
1 August 1983 |
|
|
1 August 1983 |
|
Night-time identification and unproven exhibit linkage rendered the robbery convictions unsafe; appeals allowed, convictions quashed.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – night-time identification – insufficiency to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt – identification of exhibits (clothes) – prosecution burden to produce clear identifying marks – unsafe conviction quashed.
|
1 August 1983 |
| July 1983 |
|
|
Appeal against a fine for overpricing dismissed; inappropriate magistrate remarks insufficient to overturn sentence.
Criminal law – Sentencing – appellate interference with sentencing discretion – inappropriate sentencing remarks do not automatically vitiate a sentence where other valid reasons justify it; proportionality and discretion considered in review.
|
30 July 1983 |
|
Conviction for conversion and driving without licence upheld on eyewitness and circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law – Conversion (s.284) vs theft – sufficiency of circumstantial and eyewitness evidence; identification and inferences from disappearance and recovery of vehicle; driving without licence – proof and conviction; appellate review of credibility findings.
|
30 July 1983 |
|
Appeal dismissed where being found with stolen cattle and an admission supported conviction and mandatory minimum sentence.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – Possession of stolen property and admission as sustaining conviction; Evidence – Credibility – Appellate deference to trial court’s assessment of witnesses; Sentencing – Application of statutory minimum sentence.
|
30 July 1983 |
|
Appellant's guilty plea sustained despite missing price list; two-year sentence commuted to Shs 3,000 fine or 12 months' imprisonment.
Criminal law – Selling above maximum price – Plea of guilty - sufficiency of admission where prosecution does not produce official price list. Evidence – formal production of statutory instrument not always required where charge expressly alleges statutory maximum and accused admits facts. Sentencing – appellate mitigation of excessive custodial sentence; first offender; substitution with fine or imprisonment in default.
|
30 July 1983 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to call beneficiaries or rebut appellant's explanation about returned payrolls.
Criminal law – theft by public servant; proof required – tracing a cashed cheque insufficient without testimony from intended beneficiaries; destroying evidence – prosecution must rebut accused’s explanation; failure to call witnesses fatal to prosecution case.
|
30 July 1983 |
|
|
29 July 1983 |
|
|
29 July 1983 |