|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1985 |
|
|
Appellants' convictions for stealing by agent and fraudulent false accounting quashed for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – evidence – proof beyond reasonable doubt; theft by agent (s.273(b)) and fraudulent false accounting (s.317(b)) – insufficiency of a delivery note without proof of actual shortage; missing accounting records and inconsistent investigative testimony undermining conviction.
|
31 December 1985 |
|
Conviction for cattle theft quashed due to unreliable identification evidence and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Theft – Identification evidence – Reliability and sufficiency – Prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt – Unsafe conviction where identification is confused; restoration of seized property undermines prosecution case.
|
31 December 1985 |
|
Appellant's conviction for cattle theft upheld; co-accused's conviction quashed for reliance on police statements alone.
Criminal law — Cattle theft and receiving stolen property; sufficiency of evidence; falsified permits; reliance on police statements; revisional jurisdiction under s.373(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Act; quashing convictions lacking independent evidence.
|
31 December 1985 |
Family Law - Divorce under Islamic Law - Dissolution of marriage under Islamic Law - Wife obtaining divorce by self-reemption (khului) - Law of Marriage Act, 1971, s.107(3). Family Law - Separation of spouses - Whether court may compel a spouse to live with the other - Law of Marriage Act, 1971, s.40 Islamic Law - Divorce - Dissolution of marriage under Islamic Law - Wife obtaining divorce by self-reemption (khului). - Law of Marriage Act, 1971, S. 107(3). |
31 December 1985 |
|
Appellant's cattle-theft conviction quashed where prosecution failed to identify the unmarked cattle as stolen.
Criminal law – Theft – Proof of identification of stolen property – Essential requirement to link specific animals to accused where animals unmarked; insufficiency of unmarked-cattle evidence; appellate intervention where conviction unsafe. Appeal – Conviction and sentence quashed for lack of proof; order for return of property.
|
31 December 1985 |
|
A mutual savings arrangement does not make an agreed salary an underpayment of the statutory minimum; convictions quashed.
* Employment law – Regulation of wages – Whether an arrangement where an employee leaves part of salary with employer reduces agreed salary for minimum-wage offences – Agreed gross salary vs amounts actually paid * Criminal law – Elements of failure to pay statutory minimum wage – necessity of proving that agreed salary was below statutory minimum * Civil remedy – Withheld savings by employer may give rise to a civil claim rather than a criminal prosecution
|
31 December 1985 |
|
Reported
Section 107(3)(c) requires the Islamic act dissolving marriage to occur and be proved before judgment; post-judgment redemption is ineffective.
Law of Marriage Act s.107(3) – interpretation of cumulative conditions (a),(b),(c) for marriages in Islamic form; timing and effect of 'khului' (kujikhului/redemption) – must occur and be proved before or at hearing/judgment; post-judgment redemption ineffective; s.140 prohibits compelling spousal cohabitation.
|
31 December 1985 |
|
Court held compound offence cannot be split into separate counts; evidence was insufficient, conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
Criminal law – compound offence under s.296(1) Penal Code – impropriety of treating compound offence as separate counts – insufficiency of identification and ownership proof of alleged stolen property – requirement for corroboration of co-accused evidence – conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
|
31 December 1985 |
|
Court held brideprice does not bar children inheriting their mother; clan division of estate upheld.
Inheritance — customary law vs statute — brideprice payments do not extinguish children’s inheritance rights; legitimate and illegitimate children may inherit mother’s estate; distant relative’s claim based on brideprice not automatic; clan allocation may be endorsed by court.
|
30 December 1985 |
|
|
23 December 1985 |
|
|
20 December 1985 |
|
An unproved delivery chit unsupported by witness evidence cannot sustain a contractual claim; appeal dismissed.
* Contract — claim for supply of goods — reliance on delivery chit as sole evidence of delivery and debt. * Evidence — documentary proof — requirement to prove authenticity and authorship of documents; company rubber stamp insufficient without supporting testimony. * Civil procedure — failure to call viva voce evidence to prove a document may justify rejection and dismissal.
|
20 December 1985 |
|
The appellant's claim failed because the delivery chit was not properly proved or authenticated.
Contract claim for goods; documentary evidence—authentication and proof of delivery chit; burden of proof where claimant relies solely on a disputed unheaded, unsigned chit; failure to call corroborative witnesses fatal to claim.
|
20 December 1985 |
|
Marked goods in possession can justify unlawful-possession conviction, but forfeiture needs evidence; theft requires proof beyond reasonable doubt.
* Criminal law – Unlawful possession of property reasonably suspected to be stolen – circumstantial evidence and admissions – marked property as basis for reasonable suspicion. * Evidence – Requirement to show accused was stopped/detained/searched applies to conveying offences, not to possession in houses. * Property forfeiture – forfeiture of money requires evidentiary link to proceeds; hearsay insufficient. * Theft by servant – prosecution must exclude lawful explanations (employee purchases); absence of records or stocktaking may leave reasonable doubt.
|
20 December 1985 |
|
Primary Court’s finding of ownership of animals as bridewealth upheld; District Court erred in reversing it.
Property recovery — Execution against goods of a third party — Proof of ownership by evidence and documents — Bridewealth as source of ownership — Appellate interference with Primary Court factual findings.
|
20 December 1985 |
|
|
20 December 1985 |
|
|
20 December 1985 |
|
|
19 December 1985 |
|
|
19 December 1985 |
|
Respondent knew the woman's marital status; enticement established and damages reduced to six cattle.
Customary marriage; enticement of wife; proof of respondent's knowledge of marital status; absence of consent by husband; quantum of cattle damages; appellate review of factual findings.
|
18 December 1985 |
|
Divorce petition was incompetent for failure to obtain conciliatory-board referral and prior leave for petitioning within two years.
* Family law – Divorce – Requirement to refer matrimonial difficulties to a marriage conciliatory board and obtain certificate – exceptions and pleading of facts.
* Family law – Divorce – Requirement of prior leave to present petition before two years of marriage – jurisdictional effect of non-compliance.
* Civil procedure – Jurisdiction – Statutory preconditions to instituting divorce proceedings must be satisfied or specifically exempted in pleading.
|
18 December 1985 |
|
|
17 December 1985 |
|
A court may decide ownership of trees separately without first resolving ownership of the land.
Property law – ownership of trees – whether tree ownership claim requires prior determination of land title – appellate jurisdiction – remitting record for determination of tree ownership.
|
17 December 1985 |
|
|
17 December 1985 |
|
Concurrent lower-court findings upheld; res judicata inapplicable where prior judgment involved different parties.
Property succession and title; appellate review of concurrent findings; res judicata — plea raised late and inapplicable where prior decision involved different parties; Rule 11 Magistrates' Courts (Primary Courts) procedure.
|
16 December 1985 |
|
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Appellate court upheld theft conviction and statutory five-year sentence based on credible eyewitness and discovery evidence.
* Criminal law – Theft – Evidence – Direct eyewitness and discovery evidence supporting conviction. * Credibility – Trial court’s acceptance of prosecution witnesses where appellant failed to cross‑examine or provide credible alibi. * Sentencing – Statutory minimum sentence applicable for theft of public authority property.
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Conviction for theft by servant affirmed; Minimum Sentences Act misapplied but three-year sentence upheld.
* Criminal law – theft by servant – proof beyond reasonable doubt; credibility of prosecution witnesses. * Evidence – evaluation of witness credibility and weight of contradictory unsworn defence. * Sentencing – misapplication of Minimum Sentences Act 1972 where ownership by specified authority not proved; affirmation of appropriate custodial sentence on ordinary principles.
|
13 December 1985 |
|
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Joint-robbery convictions affirmed under common intention; conviction quashed for appellant lacking participation evidence.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – sufficiency of evidence – common intention/joint liability – Section 23 – Minimum Sentences Act (seven years) – acquittal where no participatory evidence.
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Possession, concealment and false register entries proved theft of government firearms; three-year statutory minimum sentence upheld.
* Criminal law – Theft of government property – Firearms and ammunition missing from armoury – Recovery hidden at defendant’s house – Possession plus concealment supports inference of theft.
* Evidence – Circumstantial evidence and false entries in official register – sufficiency to sustain conviction.
* Defence credibility – Claim of lawful issue for patrol duties rejected where concealment and falsification inconsistent with lawful issue.
* Sentence – Statutory irreducible minimum sentence applicable to theft of government property.
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Conviction affirmed on identification and recent possession; compensation reduced due to lack of evidential basis.
* Criminal law – theft – identification of stolen property by special marks – sufficiency of owner’s identification and doctrine of recent possession.
* Burden of proof – accused’s obligation to produce material to rebut prosecution’s case when disputing ownership.
* Sentence review – appellate restraint where sentence not manifestly excessive.
* Compensation – damages must be supported by evidence; court may adjust arbitrary awards.
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Convictions based on a flawed village identification parade and ambiguous dock identification were unsafe and quashed.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Identification parade conducted by a Village Chairman (not police) – failure to follow safeguards (right to representation; placement among similar persons; recording of fairness) – unconscious victim and long delay – dock identification unreliable – insufficiency to sustain conviction.
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Appeal against a cattle-theft conviction dismissed where police and buyer evidence proved the appellant sold recovered stolen cattle and sentence upheld.
* Criminal law – Theft of cattle – Evidence of police and buyer – identification and recovery of stolen property – credibility of witnesses – appeal against conviction. * Sentencing – statutory minimum sentence – appeal court's review and deference to trial court findings. * Restitution/compensation – not ordered where property recovered.
|
13 December 1985 |
|
|
13 December 1985 |
|
Concurrent factual findings affirmed; appeal dismissed with costs for failure to justify interference.
Civil appeal – attachment of property – sufficiency of evidence – failure to call witnesses – concurrent findings of fact by trial and first appellate courts – appellate interference.
|
12 December 1985 |
|
Appeal dismissed: District Court rightly awarded disputed land to respondent; appellant’s alleged purchase was unproven.
Land dispute – appeal from Primary Court – factual findings – adequacy of evidence (sketch map and witness testimony) – burden of proof for asserted purchase – appellate dismissal for lack of merit.
|
12 December 1985 |
|
Primary Court lacked power to order refund of bride‑price without marriage dissolution; appeal dismissed and cattle returned or compensated.
Family law – bride-price refund – Primary Courts cannot order refund absent petition and dissolution of marriage; irregular Primary Court order; attachment against third party; appellate revisional powers; remedy by return of property or cash compensation.
|
12 December 1985 |
|
No dowry refund where husband caused breakdown by chasing wife out and failed to prove her infidelity.
Family law – dissolution of marriage – refund of dowry/bride-price – entitlement to refund where one spouse is to blame for marital breakdown – refusal to attend conciliatory proceedings – duration of marriage and issue of children relevant to remedy.
|
12 December 1985 |
|
|
12 December 1985 |
|
|
11 December 1985 |
|
Adultery damages upheld where the respondent proved marriage and the appellant’s tenant defence was disbelieved.
Adultery — proof of adultery and entitlement to damages; Proof of marriage — corroborative testimony of spouse and burden of proof on alleged trespasser; Credibility — tenant vs. concubine; Appellate procedure — raising new issues on appeal.
|
11 December 1985 |
|
Whether entrusted cattle were to be returned or discharged by agreed monetary payment, and the evidential weight of tribunal testimony.
Property law – trust versus gift of livestock; evidence – admissibility and weight of prior reconciliation-tribunal testimony; credibility findings and quantification of monetary compensation.
|
10 December 1985 |
|
Husband entitled to a one‑quarter share of matrimonial house where credible contributions and household role were proven.
Family law – Divorce and division of matrimonial property – s.114(1) Law of Marriage Act 1971 – non‑monetary and indirect contributions (husband’s role and payments) can found a share; evidentiary credibility of claimed inheritance; procedural objections to magistrate on tribal grounds; additional evidence in appeal – direction and certification under Magistrates' Courts Act.
|
10 December 1985 |
|
Court allowed bridewealth refund but reduced it by one cow per year for eight years the mkamwana served.
Bridewealth refund — application to mkamwana arrangements — G.N. 279/63 — deduction for period of cohabitation and service — measure of deduction (one head per year).
|
10 December 1985 |
|
Appellant failed to prove ownership of disputed shamba; respondent's evidence and boundary marks prevailed and appeal dismissed.
* Land law – possessory/ownership dispute over shamba – assessment of oral evidence and boundary marks.
* Evidence – weight and credibility of witnesses; reliance on permanent crops as proof of ownership.
* Procedural – reliability of sketch plans drawn after view of locus in quo; when such plans may be rejected.
|
7 December 1985 |
|
A vague appellate judgment cannot overturn the Primary Court’s finding that the appellant owned the land.
* Land law – ownership dispute – primary court’s finding of ownership upheld where evidence favored the plaintiff; * Improvements and compensation – unfair to order owner to pay compensation to a trespasser; * Possession – long occupation (15 years) does not by itself establish title absent pleaded legal basis; * Appellate review – vague or indecisive appellate judgment cannot properly disturb lower court findings.
|
7 December 1985 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the alleged theft or provenance of seized items.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – authorship of bank pay-in slips – reasonable doubt where handwriting differences, bank stamp on duplicate, witness credibility defects and opportunity to alter documents; forfeiture – ownership and provenance of seized items must be conclusively proved.
|
7 December 1985 |
|
A late substantive amendment to dangerous-driving particulars and insufficient evidence rendered the conviction unsustainable.
* Criminal law – Road Traffic Act – dangerous driving – necessity for particulars of the specific act constituting dangerous driving in information. * Criminal procedure – amendment of charge – limits of section 209: timing and scope – late substantive amendment unlawful. * Criminal procedure – section 346 not available to cure substantive illegality. * Criminal law – duplicity: single count for two deaths improper. * Evidence – insufficiency of inference from skid marks/distance alone to prove overspeeding and guilt.
|
7 December 1985 |
|
Accused's self‑defence rejected; provocation reduced murder to manslaughter and five‑year sentence imposed.
* Criminal law – killing by stabbing – distinction between murder and manslaughter; provocation as partial defence. * Self‑defence – burden and credibility of the accused’s account. * Evidence – assessment of witness credibility where factual accounts conflict. * Sentencing – mitigation for youth, first offender and pre‑trial custody.
|
7 December 1985 |