|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| November 1985 |
|
|
Conviction quashed where evidence was insufficient and reasonable possibilities of innocence were not excluded.
Criminal law – Sufficiency of evidence – Conviction unsafe where reasonable possibilities of innocence exist and premises security not established
Evidence – Possession and hearsay – Possession by another and hearsay statements insufficient to prove accused’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal procedure – No case to answer – Possession of stolen property and statements may require calling accused to answer, but that does not necessarily validate conviction of another
|
30 November 1985 |
|
Ancient bridewealth claim dismissed for lack of evidence and as time‑barred under customary limitation rules.
Customary law – bridewealth – recovery claims – requirement of proof of payment and witnesses; Limitation – Customary Limitation Rules – accrual and 12‑year enforcement period for customary claims; Succession – liability of heir for antecedent obligations where claim is stale or unproven; Civil procedure – appellate review of concurrent lower‑court findings where evidence is insufficient.
|
30 November 1985 |
|
Claim for recovery of loaned cattle held time-barred under three-year limitation period; appeal dismissed.
Limitation law – accrual of cause of action for money lent – Item 2, Schedule to G.N
No.311 – three-year limitation period – demand or death as accrual dates – delay prejudicing a fair trial
|
29 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Civil Practice and Procedure - Hearing - Altering the nature of claim at hearing - Whether allowable under Primary Courts&rsquo
Civil Procedure Rules - Rule 44 of the Primary Court’s Civil Procedure Rules
Family Law - Maintenance - Compensation for maintenance of deceased’s children while cohabiting with their mother
|
29 November 1985 |
|
Conviction for theft by a court watchman quashed where prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Theft by a person in public service – Standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt – Circumstantial evidence and unexplained gaps (possession of keys, recovery from third party) – Benefit of doubt.
|
29 November 1985 |
|
Claim for refund of bridewealth dismissed: only 11 cattle proved, suit time-barred, and marriage broke down due to husband's cruelty.
Customary law — bridewealth — proof of payment/receipt of cattle — documentary and oral evidence requirements
Limitation — actions for return of bridewealth — effect of delay/time-bar. Family law — dissolution of marriage due to husband’s cruelty — consequence for refund of bridewealth
Evidence — failure to prove a document against an adverse party
|
29 November 1985 |
|
Reported
A claimant cannot abandon pleaded claims and succeed on a different claim at hearing without proper pleadings or evidence; appeal dismissed with costs.
Primary court procedure — alteration of claim at hearing — limitation to pleadings (rule 44) — requirement of supporting evidence — irregular judgment and failure of justice warranting reversal.
|
29 November 1985 |
|
Garnishee attachment requires proof the third party owes the judgment debtor; seizure without such proof is unlawful.
Execution — garnishee/attachment against third party — requires proof that third party is indebted to judgment debtor; seizure without proof unjustified.
|
28 November 1985 |
|
Conviction upheld on credible child-witness evidence; uncorroborated testimony may suffice under s127(3) if court is satisfied.
Criminal law – Evidence of children of tender years – Section 127(3) Law of Evidence Act allows conviction on uncorroborated child evidence after warning and satisfaction of truth. Child witnesses – credibility and consistency – trial court may act on uncorroborated but credible child testimony
Alibi – failure to establish alibi despite calling defence witnesses. Omission to call prosecution witnesses – failure to call 10 Cell Leader not fatal where no application made at trial
|
27 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Withdrawal of a suit does not create automatic liability; claimant must prove costs and court attendance is not compensable.
Primary Courts Civil Procedure Rules (G.N
No. 310/64) – rule 16(1) withdrawal of proceedings; Civil costs – burden of proof for claimed expenses – necessity of documentary or reliable oral evidence; Damages – 'inconvenience' of attending court not recoverable
|
27 November 1985 |
|
Withdrawal of a suit does not impose automatic liability; claimed expenses must be proven with reliable evidence.
Civil procedure – withdrawal of proceedings under Rule 16(1) of Primary Courts Civil Procedure Rules – withdrawal does not ipso facto create liability; claimant must prove losses; necessity of documentary or reliable oral evidence for costs; attending court not prima facie compensable as "inconvenience."
|
27 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Civil Practice and Procedure - Primary Courts Civil Procedure Rules, G.N. No. 310/64 rule 16(1) - Whether withdrawal of suit is conclusive evidence of liability in a claim for compensation
Civil Practice Procedure - Primary Courts Civil Procedure Rules - Whether in a claim for costs, the claimant must adduce evidence to prove the alleged expenses
Civil Practice and Procedure - Primary Courts Civil Procedure Rules - Whether Court proceedings are an inconvenience for which damages are recoverable
|
27 November 1985 |
|
An applicant not party to original probate proceedings who failed to object lacks standing to appeal.
Administration of estate – appointment of administrator – seizure of estate property; Locus standi/competence to appeal – requirement to be party to original proceedings; Procedural waiver – failure to object at time of seizure bars later challenge; Civil procedure – competence of appeals from primary to district and high court.
|
27 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Family Law - Adultery - Damages for - Where party not validly married - Whether suit for damages for adultery can be sustained - Law of Marriage Act, 1971, s. 72(2)
|
26 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Adultery claim dismissed where defendant reasonably believed partner unmarried and plaintiff failed to prove a valid marriage.
Family law – Adultery claims – Defence under s.72(2) Law of Marriage Act: absence of knowledge and reasonable diligence; customary betrothal and brideprice as evidence of belief in unmarried status; burden on claimant to prove valid subsisting marriage; failure to disclose cause of action.
|
26 November 1985 |
|
Non-cultivation does not extinguish ownership; land of deceased reverts to heir and cannot be validly given away by a non-owner.
Land law – Ownership and abandonment – Non-cultivation (reversion to bush) does not extinguish owner’s title; land of a deceased reverts to heir; a non-owner cannot validly give away or allocate another’s land.
|
23 November 1985 |
|
Conviction upheld: recent possession of stolen goods linked appellant to burglary; escape from custody insufficient.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – Recent possession doctrine – Sufficiency of evidence where accused found with recently stolen property – Escape from custody does not necessarily invalidate conviction based on independent evidential links to theft.
|
23 November 1985 |
|
Conviction based on uncorroborated testimony of implicated witnesses is unsafe and is quashed; appellant released.
Criminal law – Conviction safety – Reliance on testimony of witnesses with interests or potential accomplices requires independent corroboration; such witnesses cannot corroborate one another on identification
Evidence – Accomplice and interested witness evidence – risk of self-serving testimony and need for corroboration. Criminal procedure – Quashing of conviction where identification and primary evidence are uncorroborated
|
23 November 1985 |
|
A Resident Magistrate's Court lacks jurisdiction to hear Primary Court appeals and a non-party cannot appeal an acquittal.
Jurisdiction – Magistrates' Courts – Whether a Resident Magistrate's Court may hear appeals from Primary Courts; Appeal procedure – Appeals from Primary Courts to District Court under Magistrates' Court Act; Locus standi – Only complainant or DPP may appeal an acquittal; Competency of appeals by non-parties.
|
23 November 1985 |
|
Appeal dismissed: plaintiff's boundary and title evidence preferred; cultivation alone did not establish defendant's ownership.
Land dispute – proof of ownership by balance of probabilities – credibility of oral boundary evidence (wild fig tree, banana plantations) – unreliability of sketch plan omitting key natural mark – cultivation/possession (sugarcane/bananas) insufficient to establish title – contradictory defence evidence.
|
23 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Civil Practice and Procedure - Jurisdiction of Primary Courts - Whether a Primary Court has jurisdiction to try a common law tort of malicious prosecution
|
23 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Primary Court lacked jurisdiction over malicious prosecution claim; proceedings quashed and suit may be brought in Resident Magistrate's Court.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction of Primary Court – Primary Court civil jurisdiction arises where suit founded in customary law – malicious prosecution is a common law tort and not part of customary law
Tort – malicious prosecution – requires consideration of reasonable and probable cause and proof of special damages. Procedural fairness – failure to consider essential issues and hear evidence renders proceeding untried and subject to quashing
Forum – action properly instituted in Resident Magistrate's Court if Primary Court lacks jurisdiction
|
23 November 1985 |
|
A mischaracterised claim for matrimonial assets (labelled as "fidia") was unproven and the appeal dismissed with costs.
Matrimonial property – Characterisation of claims – Distinction between maintenance and division of matrimonial assets; Misdescription of claim as "fidia au masurufu"; Burden of proof to show assets acquired during marriage; Effect of remarriage on remedy for matrimonial property.
|
22 November 1985 |
|
A Primary Court award remains valid if it reflects a majority view including the trial magistrate’s adopted opinion, and silence by an assessor does not invalidate it.
Civil procedure – Primary Court awards – validity where an assessor abstains – majority view and the trial magistrate’s vote; Assessment of damages – whether alleged conduct (relationship with respondent’s wife) can justify enhanced compensation on appeal.
|
22 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Proceedings and judgment based solely on pleadings and assessors' opinions without evidence are a nullity; appeal allowed.
Civil procedure – trial irregularity – no evidence adduced – pleadings are not evidence (absent admissions) – assessors' opinions and judgment given without evidential basis are invalid – proceeding quashed.
|
22 November 1985 |
|
Appellant's theft conviction upheld; compensation reduced by value of ten recovered timbers (total ordered shs. 1,700).
Criminal law – Theft: admissibility and effect of appellant's sworn admissions at trial; identification of recovered property; compensation reduced by value of property recovered by police.
|
22 November 1985 |
|
Conviction quashed where night-time identification was unreliable and alibi wrongly burdened the accused.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Night-time observations – Identification must be absolutely watertight to support conviction. Criminal procedure – Alibi defence – Accused does not bear burden to prove an alibi; court must consider whether it raises reasonable doubt
Evidence – Inconsistent eyewitness accounts and lack of corroborative recovery of stolen property undermine safety of conviction
|
21 November 1985 |
|
Trial court custody order restored: child belongs to the respondent but stays with the appellant until age seven.
Family law – custody of child; presumption of paternity from marriage; appellate interference with unappealed portions of judgment; maintenance obligations.
|
21 November 1985 |
|
Execution of a pre-1964 decree in 1981 was time-barred; a post-expiry written admission could not revive the right to enforce.
Customary law limitation – Customary Law (Limitation of Proceedings) Rules (effective 29 May 1964) – 12-year limitation for execution of judgments – limitation runs from date rules took effect where right accrued earlier – post-expiry written admission cannot revive extinguished enforcement right; finality of earlier court judgments.
|
21 November 1985 |
|
Failure by a primary court magistrate to produce a written judgment renders proceedings a nullity and mandates a retrial.
Primary court procedure — requirement of a written judgment — summing-up and assessors’ opinions not a substitute; Appeal — no valid appeal where no written judgment exists; Representation — village council suits require authorised office-bearers or proper mandate.
|
21 November 1985 |
|
Reported
A District Court cannot enhance a Primary Court sentence beyond the Primary Court’s statutory sentencing limits.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Review and enhancement of sentence by District Court – Limits of District Court to impose sentence exceeding Primary Court’s statutory maximum – Primary Court sentencing discretion – Mischaracterisation of medical report and misdirection – R. v Juma Iddi principle concerning interference with sentence.
|
20 November 1985 |
|
District Court may not enhance a Primary Court sentence beyond the Primary Court's lawful maximum; enhancement based on mischaracterised injuries set aside.
Criminal law – sentencing – appellate review – enhancement of sentence by District Court beyond Primary Court's lawful power – limits under Magistrates' Courts Act and Primary Courts Criminal Procedure Code; misdirection by reviewing court where enhancement based on mistaken factual classification of injuries; appellate restraint where trial court's sentence not manifestly improper.
|
20 November 1985 |
|
Multiple extra‑judicial confessions corroborated by discovery of remains upheld murder conviction; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Murder – Extra‑judicial confessions and admissions – Corroboration by discovery of remains – Credibility findings of trial judge and appellate review – Unsigned/unsworn trial statement not displacing prior confessions.
|
20 November 1985 |
|
Publicly accusing a neighbour of witchcraft and procuring a healer constitutes defamatory conduct attracting liability and costs.
Defamation – accusation of witchcraft – public identification and parading – procurement of traditional medicineman – joint tortfeasor liability – admissions before administrative authority as evidence – absence of justification – damages awarded.
|
20 November 1985 |
|
An appellate court will not disturb trial court credibility findings absent compelling justification.
Civil procedure – appeal against concurrent findings of fact; credibility of witnesses – appellate court will not disturb trial court’s acceptance of evidence absent demonstrable error; tort – cattle trespass (damage to crops) evidence and burden of proof.
|
20 November 1985 |
|
Convictions for receiving stolen property quashed where prosecution relied on inadmissible hearsay and improperly shifted burden of proof.
Criminal law – receiving stolen property – possession and knowledge – inadmissible hearsay where declarants not called to testify; burden of proof – prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; improper shifting of burden vitiates conviction; appellate revision to quash convictions.
|
20 November 1985 |
|
|
19 November 1985 |
|
Appeal dismissed: respondent proved entitlement to Shs.1,900; alleged illegality from foreign procurement was unfounded.
Civil claim for money — recovery of balance after purchase of spare parts — proof of payment and partial refund
Evidence — credibility and admissions — corroboration by police testimony and pleadings. Contract law — alleged illegality due to foreign procurement and currency issues — not a bar to enforcement where payment and contract were local
|
19 November 1985 |
|
Theft conviction quashed where interested witnesses’ uncorroborated testimony left reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Theft – Standard of proof – Conviction cannot rest on testimony of interested witnesses without independent corroboration
Evidence – Interested witnesses – Evidence from household members and employer/driver must be treated with caution. Criminal procedure – Reasonable doubt – Alternative explanations and lack of corroboration may require acquittal
Sentencing – Minimum Sentences Act noted where property is government-owned and offender is an adult
|
19 November 1985 |
|
Appellate court adjusted damages where award relied on an untested agricultural officer’s report and approved a party settlement.
Civil procedure – assessment of general damages – reliance on a Ward Agricultural Field Assistant’s written report without summoning him – appellate reduction of quantum – unavailability of witness – endorsement of settlement by appellate court.
|
19 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Evidence - Dying declaration-Accused's failure to reply to deceased’s statement naming him as assailant - Whether amounts to acknowledgement of the truth of the dying declaration
Evidence - Dying declaration - Prerequisites before it can have evidential value
Evidence - Dying declaration - Repeated several times - Whether proof of the truth of its content
|
18 November 1985 |
|
Reported
Conviction cannot rest solely on dying declarations without independent corroboration; accused acquitted for reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Dying declaration – admissibility and caution – practice requires corroboration before acting on dying statements
Evidence – Silence of accused in presence of declarant – when it may or may not amount to corroboration
Causation – post‑mortem showing tetanus from septic cut wounds establishing violent death
Identification – dangers of identification in darkness and inconsistent eyewitness accounts
|
18 November 1985 |
|
Appellant failed to prove cruelty; Primary Court erred and appellate courts correctly dismissed the divorce petition.
Divorce law — Cruelty and irretrievable breakdown as grounds for divorce — sufficiency of evidence; Appellate review — reversal of Primary Court where findings unsupported by evidence; Evidence — credibility and lack of corroboration of allegations.
|
18 November 1985 |
|
|
16 November 1985 |
|
Appeal dismissed where lower courts found sale occurred with clan consent and one clan member cannot redeem land from another.
Family/Customary Land – Sale within clan – Whether sale made without clan consent; Redemption (right to redeem) – Limits where purchaser and seller are clan members; Appellate review – Interference with concurrent factual findings supported by clear evidence.
|
15 November 1985 |
|
Respondent proved appellant’s assault liability; appellate court reduced damages for insufficient proof of loss.
Tort — assault — civil liability for personal injuries; credibility of witnesses. Assessment of damages — quantum — insufficiency of proof of loss of earnings; use of reasonable wage estimate
Appeal — reduction of damages and adjustment of costs where award found excessive
|
15 November 1985 |
|
Reported
A defective rape charge can be cured under section 346 if corroborative evidence exists and no miscarriage results.
Criminal law – Rape – Charge particulars must allege absence of consent or force/threats; omission renders charge defective. Criminal procedure – Section 346 CPC – Conviction may be sustained despite defective charge where no substantial miscarriage of justice and accused understood the case against him
Evidence – Corroboration in sexual offences – Warning against convicting on uncorroborated evidence is practice not law; circumstantial evidence may suffice
Sentencing – Three-year imprisonment for deliberate, violent rape upheld as not excessive
|
15 November 1985 |
|
Evidence contradicted suicide; severe injuries and conduct established intent to kill, conviction for murder and death sentence.
Criminal law — Murder — Distinguishing suicide from homicidal assault — Medical and eyewitness evidence on cause of death — Circumstantial evidence (history of ill‑treatment and post‑offence conduct) relevant to intent — Sentence: death.
|
15 November 1985 |
|
Appellate court dismissed administratrix’s claim to livestock as estate property due to insufficient evidence, hearsay, and undue delay.
Administration of estates – claim to property as estate assets – burden of proof and admissibility of hearsay – effect of delay and failure to claim while custodian alive – appellate review of lower courts' findings.
|
14 November 1985 |
|
Detaining another’s livestock without witnesses imposes the risk of loss and liability for missing animals.
Civil law – Conversion of property – Seizure and detention of livestock – Liability where detained animals go missing after seizure
Evidence – Burden and proof – Failure to call witnesses to count seized animals; party detaining goods bears risk of loss
Procedure – Value and number of animals – trial court’s factual finding upheld where respondent’s evidence unrefuted
|
14 November 1985 |