|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| February 1986 |
|
|
Appellate court upheld the appellant's conviction, convicted co‑accused for common intention, and reduced sentence.
Criminal law – Assault causing actual bodily harm – common intention – s.23 Penal Code – appellate substitution of conviction for acquittal – credibility of witnesses – sentence reduction for first offender.
|
28 February 1986 |
|
Conviction for theft by a cashier quashed where documentary attribution, witness corroboration and investigation were inadequate.
Criminal law – Theft by servant – Sufficiency and reliability of documentary and oral evidence – Witness with interest requiring corroboration – Hearsay and unsigned explanatory letters – Inadequate investigation and improper trial procedure rendering conviction unsafe.
|
28 February 1986 |
|
Convictions based on coerced, uncorroborated statements and weak circumstantial evidence were quashed and accused released.
Criminal law — admissibility of confessions — voluntariness; police brutality and coerced statements; need for corroboration of extra‑judicial admissions; insufficient circumstantial evidence to convict; appellate review and quashing of conviction.
|
28 February 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed where title and surveyor’s evidence proved a five-metre encroachment on respondent’s land.
Land law – Trespass/encroachment – Registered title and surveyor’s evidence establishing boundary and encroachment – Boundary beacons – Non-joinder of other trespassers immaterial.
|
28 February 1986 |
|
A pre-Act housing dispute may remain in and be disposed of by the Resident Magistrate's Court rather than be transferred to the Regional Housing Tribunal.
Civil procedure – transfer of proceedings – application of section 21 Civil Procedure Code permitting transfer to Regional Housing Tribunal. Rent Restriction Act 1984 – section 51 – continuation and disposal of pre-existing cases in the Resident Magistrate's Court. Case management – pragmatic disposition of backlog of cases filed before the Act’s commencement. Costs – no order as to costs.
|
27 February 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed; registered ownership precluded joint property claim and new complaints cannot be raised on appeal.
Family law – dissolution of marriage – division of matrimonial property – registered ownership defeats claim of joint acquisition. Family law – custody – appellate deference where child already in custody and respondent’s financial capacity relevant. Civil procedure – appellate scope – new complaints not raised in lower court are precluded on appeal. Evidence – unsupported medical recommendation insufficient to overturn custody findings.
|
27 February 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed: seller failed to deliver goods under written contract and did not refund respondent’s advance.
Contract law – sale of goods – written agreement for sale of bricks – advance payment for goods – non-delivery and failure to refund – credibility of oral defence against written contract – appellate review of trial court’s factual findings.
|
27 February 1986 |
|
Late prosecution appeal and insufficient evidence rendered the District Court's retrial orders untenable and were quashed on revision.
Criminal procedure – appeal against acquittal filed out of time – necessity of extension of time; presence of respondent at appellate hearing; propriety of ordering trial de novo where evidence is insufficient; revisionary powers under s.373(1)(b) Criminal Procedure Act 1985.
|
26 February 1986 |
|
|
26 February 1986 |
|
A customary will is invalid if a disinherited heir was not personally notified and given an opportunity to be heard.
Customary law – Declared Customary Law G.N. 436/63 (Bukoba) – Disinheritance – Article/Rule 35 requires personal notice and opportunity to be heard by person to be disinherited; non‑compliance invalidates customary will; natural justice; admissibility and effect of customary wills.
|
25 February 1986 |
|
Conviction for robbery quashed where complainant's uncorroborated evidence and a plausible defence raised reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – necessity to prove theft and violence beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – credibility and corroboration – inconsistencies in complainant's account and lack of independent eyewitnesses. Evidence – interested witnesses – effect of PW2’s relationship with complainant. Trial error – misdirection by assuming theft and over-reliance on presence of accused with a weapon. Defence – plausible self-defence/innocent explanation can raise reasonable doubt and render conviction unsafe.
|
25 February 1986 |
|
Appeals allowed: convictions for theft quashed where co‑accused evidence was uncorroborated and prosecution witnesses were suspect.
Criminal law – Theft – Conviction based on evidence of a co-accused – Distinction between confession and ordinary evidence of co-accused – Need for caution and corroboration where appropriate.* Evidence – Credibility – Investigating witnesses with access to property as potential suspects – Impact on safety of conviction.* Criminal procedure – Unsafe convictions – Quashing convictions where primary evidence is uncorroborated and suspect.
|
24 February 1986 |
|
Appeal allowed: trial court lacked jurisdiction and conviction was unsafe due to defective evidence about currency exhibits.
Jurisdiction — scheduled offences — Economic Sabotage (Special Provisions) Act — triable only by special tribunal; Criminal evidence — chain of custody and admissibility of currency exhibits — accused’s right to inspect and cross‑examine; Safe conviction — burden to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
|
24 February 1986 |
|
|
22 February 1986 |
|
Circumstantial and identification evidence established the appellants' guilt for theft; convictions and minimum sentences upheld.
Criminal law – theft by person employed in public service; circumstantial evidence and its sufficiency; identification evidence; appellate review of conviction and sentence.
|
22 February 1986 |
|
Conviction for reckless driving quashed where mechanical failure, not negligent driving, caused loss of control.
Road traffic — Reckless driving — Sufficiency of evidence — Mechanical failure (broken spring) causing loss of control — Expert evidence — Overturning not conclusive of negligence — Conviction quashed.
|
21 February 1986 |
|
Section 14, not section 44, governs extensions for applications; earlier Resident Magistrates’ decisions set aside.
Limitation Act — section 14 applicable to applications; section 44 applies to suits, not applications. Extension of time — Resident Magistrate’s power under s.14 to extend time for applications. Precedent — prior RM decisions set aside where time-bar and factual inconsistencies undermine reliance.
|
20 February 1986 |
|
Employer’s counterclaim for employee negligence and theft failed for lack of evidence; unpaid overtime and holiday pay awarded to employee.
Employment law – unpaid overtime, weekly rest days and public holiday pay – employer’s duty to keep records (Employment Ordinance s.35(a)). Civil procedure – counterclaim/set-off – burden of proof on claimant to establish loss and quantum. Evidence – allegations of negligence and theft require evidential proof; unsupported allegations are insufficient to succeed.
|
20 February 1986 |
|
Belief in witchcraft and prior supernatural apparitions did not constitute sudden provocation; murder conviction upheld.
Criminal law – Murder – Defence of provocation – Requirement of suddenness and loss of self-control – Alleged supernatural appearances insufficient where killing occurred later.
|
19 February 1986 |
|
Convictions for conspiracy to rob quashed where single witness unreliable and circumstantial evidence amounted only to suspicion.
Criminal law – conspiracy to commit robbery – whether circumstantial evidence and presence of weapons and uniforms establish intent to rob; reliability of single eyewitness testimony – suspicion insufficient for conviction.
|
18 February 1986 |
|
|
14 February 1986 |
|
A claim against village offices fails; the village or district council (or individuals personally) must be sued, not the office.
Local government — Civil procedure — Suability — Village Chairman and Ward Secretary as offices are not legal entities — Registered Village Councils and District Councils are legal entities and proper defendants — Individuals occupying offices may be sued personally for actionable civil wrongs — Pleadings must allege wrongful official act and quantifiable loss.
|
13 February 1986 |
|
Conviction for theft by a branch official quashed for insufficient evidence; receipt irregularity deemed administrative rather than criminal.
Criminal law – theft by servant – standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt – insufficient evidence where sums partially accounted for and co‑accused testimony unreliable. Evidence – credibility of co‑accused and documentary proof of deposits/expenditure critical to prosecution’s case. Administrative irregularity – improper use of locally purchased receipts for collections is disciplinary/administrative, not necessarily criminal. Sentencing – trial court’s failure to impose statutory minimum sentence noted as error in law.
|
13 February 1986 |
|
First appellant’s conviction quashed for insufficient proof; second appellant’s conviction and eight-year sentence affirmed based on reliable identification.
Criminal law — robbery with violence — sufficiency of evidence and burden of proof — misdirection by trial court; Identification evidence — familiar eyewitnesses, close-range observation, alibi rejection; Sentence review — eight years not excessive.
|
13 February 1986 |
|
Village officials may not lawfully seize private cattle without statutory authority; unpleaded damages cannot be awarded.
Local/village authority – unlawful seizure of private property – no statutory power to appropriate cattle as penalty; Constitutional protection against deprivation of property except by law; Civil procedure – damages must be pleaded and proved – unpleaded damages are not recoverable; Taxed costs upheld.
|
12 February 1986 |
Land Law - Right of Occupancy - Land held under a right of occupancy - Land purchased under dubious circumstances - Purchaser effects unexhausted improvements- Whether purchaser entitled to compensation for such unexhausted improvements. |
12 February 1986 |
|
Night-time identification supported by lighting, familiarity, duration and recovery of weapons can safely sustain robbery convictions.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – reliance on single eyewitness identification at night – admissibility and sufficiency of identification evidence where lighting, familiarity, duration, and clothing description are favourable. Corroboration – recovery of weapons from accused strengthens identification evidence. Evidentiary challenges – allegation that recovered weapons belonged to a third party insufficient to raise reasonable doubt where weapons were found on or linked to appellants.
|
12 February 1986 |
|
Reported
A trespasser who enters land in bad faith is not entitled to compensation for improvements.
Land law – Right of occupancy – Trespass and improvements – Entitlement to compensation for improvements requires good faith or apparent justification; bad-faith trespassers are not entitled to compensation – Equitable principle of unjust enrichment and statutory considerations distinguish bona fide purchasers from trespassers.
|
12 February 1986 |
|
Court affirmed the applicant's guilty plea and upheld conviction and minimum statutory sentence.
Criminal law – guilty plea – plea and facts read over – plea recorded as admission of truth – magistrate's understanding of accused – conviction on own plea – minimum statutory sentence upheld.
|
11 February 1986 |
|
|
10 February 1986 |
|
An unappealed acquittal bars later conviction; subsequent conviction and orders were quashed.
Criminal procedure — acquittal by lower court — absence of prosecution appeal — subsequent conviction by another court invalid — conviction, fine and compensation quashed.
|
10 February 1986 |
|
The appellant's conviction quashed for failure to prove identification of stolen property beyond reasonable doubt.
Theft – identification of stolen property – cogent evidence required; mere identification by common features (colour) insufficient; burden on prosecution to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt; accused’s unsworn dock statement does not shift burden of proof; conviction cannot rest on weakness of defence.
|
8 February 1986 |
|
Unlawful wounding conviction upheld; compensation order set aside due to applicant’s lack of opportunity to challenge it.
Criminal law – Unlawful wounding (s.228(1) Penal Code) – sufficiency of evidence and medical examination. Criminal law – Self‑defence – absence of lawful justification for use of a weapon. Procedure – Compensation awarded in criminal proceedings – fairness and opportunity to be heard; civil remedy for monetary compensation.
|
4 February 1986 |
|
|
4 February 1986 |
|
Conviction for cattle theft quashed because the alleged stolen skin was not produced in court, making supporting testimony irrelevant.
Criminal law – conviction safety – requirement to produce recovered stolen property as exhibit for inspection; doctrine of recent possession. Evidence – relevance of corroborative witness testimony when alleged stolen item is not produced. Procedural irregularity – failure to produce/record exhibit renders conviction unsafe.
|
1 February 1986 |
|
Delay in village allocation does not justify taking disputed land; inspection showed respondent lawfully cleared around his trees, appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – disobedience of lawful orders – whether clearing bush around trees on boundary constitutes offence under s.124 Penal Code; Customary land – effect of tribunal finding and humanitarian allocation directive – whether delay in allocation authorises self‑help; Appellate review – use of fact inspection to determine alleged re‑entry and lawfulness of conduct.
|
1 February 1986 |