|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| March 1986 |
|
|
A confession leading to discovery is admissible despite alleged torture; corroborative evidence upheld the applicant's conviction.
Criminal law – confession alleged to be obtained by torture – confession leading to discovery admissible under s.31 Evidence Act; accomplice evidence – purchaser in open transaction not an accomplice; corroboration; sentence challenged for lack of proof of property value.
|
29 March 1986 |
|
Completed sale by delivery of title deeds negated fraud; conviction for obtaining money by false pretences quashed.
Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretences – Elements of offence: misrepresentation and fraudulent intention – Completion of sale by delivery of title deeds and payment – Effect of later attempt to reclaim deeds or flight on proof of fraud.
|
29 March 1986 |
|
Oral will lacking required formalities invalid; with balanced evidence and intestacy, land divided equally and appeal dismissed.
Wills – oral will – non‑compliance with formal witness requirements (3rd Schedule Rules 5, 6, 11) renders oral will invalid; Evidence – where proof is evenly balanced and no valid will exists, deceased deemed intestate; Informal family adoption does not confer statutory inheritance rights; Equity – equal division of disputed land between competing claimants.
|
26 March 1986 |
|
Conviction and minimum sentence affirmed; forfeiture order invalid and substituted with compensation under section 7 of the Minimum Sentences Act.
Criminal law – housebreaking – sufficiency of evidence for conviction; Minimum Sentences Act 1972 – confirmation of minimum sentence; Forfeiture orders – must specify statutory authority; section 300 Penal Code inapplicable; substitution of compensation under section 7 of the Minimum Sentences Act.
|
26 March 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed where magistrate lacked jurisdiction and DPP consent under the 1984 Economic Crimes Act.
Economic and Organised Crime Control Act 1984 – scheduled offences – hoarding money – offences to be tried under the Act, not Penal Code. Jurisdiction – s.3 High Court sitting as Economic Crimes Court. Prosecution prerequisites – s.12(3) certificate; s.26 DPP consent required before trial. Trial without statutory consent/certificate is a nullity; conviction and orders quashed.
|
26 March 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed where duplicate safe key evidence raised reasonable doubt; illegal three-year sentence raised to five years for co-accused.
Criminal law – theft and office breaking – proof beyond reasonable doubt – circumstantial and contradictory testimony about keys to safe; appellate review of convicting magistrate's disregard of material evidence; sentencing – illegal sentence substituted by court's revisional powers to impose statutory minimum.
|
26 March 1986 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and a post-mortem alone did not exclude reasonable doubt; accused acquitted of murder.
Criminal law – Murder – Reliance on circumstantial evidence – Medical cause of death (strangulation) insufficient to convict absent direct evidence linking accused to killing; reasonable doubt requires acquittal. Criminal liability – Omission/neglect – Failure to obtain medical assistance – whether omission establishes manslaughter or culpable negligence depends on proof of foresight and unlawful act.
|
26 March 1986 |
|
|
25 March 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed: appellate court upheld the original boundary marker's evidence and reversed the primary court's humanitarian re‑marking.
Land law – boundary dispute – competing boundary marks – credibility of original marker as decisive evidence. Civil procedure – appellate review – primary court erred by re‑fixing boundary on humanitarian grounds rather than on weight of evidence.
|
24 March 1986 |
|
Refund of bridewealth does not dissolve a customary marriage; adultery claim succeeds and six cattle awarded.
Customary marriage – bridewealth – refund/withdrawal of bridewealth does not automatically dissolve a customary marriage. Family law – adultery/enticement – a husband may maintain a claim where another person enticed or lived with his wife. Evidence/defence – subsequent awareness and continued cohabitation by the respondent negates a defence of initial ignorance. Damages – assessment for destruction of marriage (award of six head of cattle).
|
24 March 1986 |
|
Appeal partly allowed: Primary Court distribution restored; appellant ordered to pay Shs.185/= to respondent for plot extension.
Inheritance/distribution — credibility of payment evidence; failure to raise claims at trial; appellate correction: restore Primary Court distribution; refund of Shs.185/= for extension.
|
24 March 1986 |
|
The applicant’s cattle-theft conviction and statutory minimum sentence upheld where admissions and witness identification proved guilt.
Criminal law – Theft of cattle – Identification of recovered property – credibility of witnesses and admission by accused. Appellate review – factual findings and credibility – failure to challenge identification at trial bars raising it on second appeal. Sentencing – application and confirmation of statutory minimum sentence for scheduled cattle theft.
|
24 March 1986 |
|
|
24 March 1986 |
|
Sale of clan land by a female heir is void; limitation for such claims is twelve years and vendor must refund purchase price.
Customary land – Haya law – female heirs have usufruct only and cannot dispose of clan land – sale by female heir void. Limitation – Customary Law (Limitation of Proceedings) Rules GN.311/64 item 6 – twelve years applies to actions concerning clan land (not three months). Remedy – invalid sale requires refund by the incapacitated vendor; trial court to assess amount.
|
22 March 1986 |
|
Appellate court upheld dangerous-driving convictions but reduced sentences, finding consecutive terms and fine-plus-imprisonment improperly applied.
Criminal law – Dangerous driving causing death – Whether mechanical defects can excuse loss of control – Credibility and weight of vehicle inspector and eyewitness evidence. Sentencing – Concurrent versus consecutive sentences – Offences arising from same act should ordinarily attract concurrent sentences unless reasons justify otherwise. Sentencing – Imposition of fine plus substantive imprisonment – fine should afford a real option to avoid custody; imposing both may be improper. Mitigation – First offender and youth are relevant factors in reducing sentence.
|
21 March 1986 |
|
Prosecution failed to prove motive, credible assault evidence, or causation beyond reasonable doubt; accused acquitted.
Criminal law – murder charge – proof beyond reasonable doubt; child witness evidence – s.127 Evidence Act – reliability and corroboration; motive evidence – failure to prove reconciliation/meeting; medical evidence – post-mortem inconsistent with alleged blunt-force injuries; benefit of doubt to accused.
|
21 March 1986 |
|
Accused acquitted of murder for lack of intent, convicted of lesser homicide and sentenced to five years' imprisonment.
Criminal law – murder v. culpable homicide/manslaughter – requirement of malice aforethought and proof of intent; evidential weight of repeated non‑fatal assaults and absence of external injuries; medical evidence of pre‑existing condition (enlarged spleen) as causal factor; sentencing of first offender.
|
20 March 1986 |
|
Appellant failed to prove attached livestock belonged to his judgment-debtor; appeal dismissed and animals retained by respondent.
Civil procedure – Objection to attachment – Ownership dispute over attached property – Appellor must prove goods belonged to judgment-debtor before recovery. Appeal – Interference with primary court’s factual findings – Appellate court will not disturb supported findings of ownership. Execution of decree – Rights of judgment-creditor to recover attached property contingent on proof of ownership.
|
18 March 1986 |
|
Court held claim accrued on demand, suit not time-barred, and appellant failed to prove payment; appeal dismissed with costs.
Limitation of actions – computation of three-year period – cause of action accrues on demand, not necessarily on date of transaction. Civil evidence – burden of proof for payment – mere allegation of payment to a third person insufficient to discharge burden; proof on balance of probabilities required. Procedural fairness – absence at delivery of judgment not fatal where party is later informed and can appeal.
|
18 March 1986 |
|
Appellate court restored trial court’s finding of lawful allocation and occupation of disputed land, setting aside the district court reversal.
Land law – allocation by village committee – validity of allocation made in absence of village chairman – whether absence of chairman vitiates allocation. Civil procedure – appellate review – interference with primary court findings of fact and credibility. Evidence – continuous occupation, on-site inspection and boundary markers as support for title/possession findings.
|
17 March 1986 |
|
|
15 March 1986 |
|
The appellate court ordered concurrent sentences for all counts and corrected an excessive cumulative sentence.
Road Traffic Act – Sentencing – Dangerous driving causing death and injury – Concurrent versus consecutive sentences – When convictions arise from same transaction sentences should run concurrently unless good reason – Substitution of fines with custodial terms in default.
|
15 March 1986 |
|
Sale of clan land without clan consent and by an unsound vendor is invalid; redemption recognised and appeal dismissed with costs.
Customary land – Sale of clan land without clan consent – Vendor of unsound mind – Sale invalid; Customary law – Doctrine of redemption of clan land recognised; Limitation – 12 years under GN.31/1964; Compensation for unexhausted improvements – award of Shs.300 reasonable where purchaser benefited from produce.
|
13 March 1986 |
|
|
13 March 1986 |
|
Single-witness identification in darkness was unsafe; appeal allowed, conviction quashed and accused freed.
Criminal law – Robbery – Identification evidence – Single witness identification in darkness – Risk of mistaken identity – Acquittal of co-accused supports unsafe conviction – Appeal; conviction quashed.
|
13 March 1986 |
|
Appellate court restored trial-court credibility findings, ruling the house belonged solely to the appellant.
Property dispute – ownership of house built on appellant’s plot – whether house was sole or joint property; credibility of witnesses. Appellate review – deference to trial court on findings of fact and witness credibility – limited scope to overturn primary findings.
|
12 March 1986 |
|
|
12 March 1986 |
|
Murder not proved due to insufficient causal link; convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm and given a suspended sentence.
Criminal law – Murder – Causation where autopsy shows multiple possible causes of death – Insufficient evidence linking accused’s act to fatal conditions; s.300 Criminal Procedure Act – conviction on lesser offence (assault causing actual bodily harm); credibility of police witnesses; sentencing of police officer first offender.
|
12 March 1986 |
|
The applicant failed to prove the respondents enticed his wife; appeal dismissed with costs.
Family law/tort – alleged enticement of a spouse; burden of proof on claimant; recovery of search-related expenses; appellate review of factual findings and credibility assessments.
|
12 March 1986 |
|
Whether conviction for receiving stolen goods was supported by evidence and justified credibility findings.
Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – Sufficiency of evidence to prove knowledge and possession – Credibility findings of trial court – Appropriateness of sentence.
|
11 March 1986 |
|
A single night-time eyewitness identification may sustain a robbery with violence conviction if circumstances make misidentification unlikely.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – single witness identification – night-time identification – corroboration – magistrate's caution – mandatory minimum sentence.
|
11 March 1986 |
|
Uncorroborated accomplice testimony cannot safely sustain a stealing conviction; possessors of government property may be convicted as receivers.
Criminal law – Conviction based on accomplice evidence – Accomplice statements require corroboration; conviction unsafe if uncorroborated. Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – Possession of government property 'red-handed' supports conviction where recipients knew ownership. Appellate/revisional powers – Court may quash convictions of non-appealing co-accused where appropriate.
|
11 March 1986 |
|
Court upheld judicial separation for cruelty and awarded custody to the mother, prioritizing the children’s welfare.
Law of Marriage Act, s.99 – Decree of judicial separation for cruelty; evidence and credibility assessments; condonation; custody of infants – welfare paramount; Law of Marriage Act, s.125(3) presumption in favour of mother; custody review on reaching age ten.
|
10 March 1986 |
|
Conviction quashed and sentence set aside where record contained no evidence implicating the appellant.
Criminal law – Appeal – Conviction unsafe where no evidence implicates accused; conviction quashed and sentence set aside; order for immediate release.
|
10 March 1986 |
|
Convictions quashed where prosecution failed to disprove appellant’s unchallenged claim that seized goods belonged to a third party.
Criminal law – burden of proof – prosecution must prove possession beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal law – possession/ownership – presence of goods in house not conclusive proof of accused’s ownership or possession where an innocent explanation is given. Police procedure – duty to investigate ownership and circumstances of seized property before charging. Appeal – convictions unsupported by evidence and inadequate investigation are liable to be quashed.
|
10 March 1986 |
|
|
8 March 1986 |
|
|
8 March 1986 |
|
First accused convicted and sentenced to death for a revenge blow causing death; second and third acquitted for lack of evidence.
Criminal law – murder – sufficiency and weight of eyewitness and corroborative evidence – admissibility and corroborative value of police-prepared statements signed by accused – assessors’ disbelief not binding where evidence supports conviction – malice aforethought established where fatal blow inflicted as revenge after a fight.
|
8 March 1986 |
|
Appellate court upheld conviction for goat theft, finding nighttime identification reliable and refusing to disturb trial court findings.
Criminal law – Theft – Identification evidence at night – sufficiency of illumination (burning fire and moonshine) – credibility of witness testimony – appellate reluctance to disturb trial court’s factual findings.
|
7 March 1986 |
|
Suspicion from receipt discrepancies and negligence cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt in theft by servant cases.
Criminal law – stealing by servant – circumstantial evidence; burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt; chain of custody/issuance of receipt books; suspicion and negligence insufficient for conviction.
|
6 March 1986 |
|
Conviction based on mere opportunity and unreliable circumstantial evidence was unsafe and quashed.
Criminal law – theft; circumstantial evidence must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence; credibility of interested witnesses; opportunity alone insufficient for conviction; appellate intervention where conviction unsafe.
|
6 March 1986 |
|
Shooting at one soldier that killed another amounts to murder by transferred malice; provocation and insanity defences rejected.
Criminal law – murder by firearm; identification and post‑mortem evidence; defence of insanity/temporary incapacity; provocation test and transferred malice; trial procedure where only one assessor sat.
|
6 March 1986 |
|
|
5 March 1986 |
|
Circumstantial evidence failed to prove linkage to prison‑armoury theft; convictions quashed for reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence — requirement of irresistible inference before conviction; escape from lawful custody and store‑breaking/stealing — possession of firearm not by itself proof of link to prison armoury theft or conspiracy; benefit of doubt resolved for appellant.
|
5 March 1986 |
|
Reported
Tribunal’s failure to sit with statutory membership under s.11(2) Rent Restriction Act rendered its proceedings and orders void; rehearing ordered.
Administrative law – statutory tribunals – mandatory jurisdictional requirements – Rent Restriction Act 1984 s.11(2) – tribunal composition – failure to sit with required membership renders proceedings and orders nullity; remedy: set aside and rehearing de novo.
|
4 March 1986 |
|
Tribunal orders made without required members under s.11 are void; matter must be reheard by a properly constituted tribunal.
Rent Restriction Act 1984 s.11 — mandatory tribunal composition — chairman must sit with two other members; Non-compliance renders proceedings and orders void; Remedy: set aside and rehear de novo; Appeal route to Housing Appeal Tribunal ordinarily required where constituted.
|
4 March 1986 |
Landlord and Tenant - Regional Housing Tribunal - Jurisdiction - S. 11(2) ofthe Rent Restriction Act, 1984 |
4 March 1986 |
|
Appellate court set aside district judgment for wrongful admission of receipt and respondent’s trespass on appellant’s land.
Property/trespass – possession dispute; admissibility of documentary evidence not produced at trial; appellate evaluation of witness credibility; setting aside district court judgment; costs awarded to successful appellant.
|
4 March 1986 |
|
|
3 March 1986 |
|
|
3 March 1986 |