|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| August 1986 |
|
|
Long uninterrupted possession of land supports ownership of the land and its perennial crops; appeal dismissed and costs awarded.
Land law – long possession and adverse occupation – ownership of land and perennial crops (coconut, mango) – credibility of witnesses – appellate review of primary court findings; costs awarded.
|
26 August 1986 |
|
One accused acquitted for insufficient evidence; co-accused’s conviction upheld but sentence reduced to five years.
Criminal law – Theft – Conviction – Sufficiency of evidence to prove participation beyond reasonable doubt – Acquittal where evidence against co-accused is inadequate. Criminal law – Sentencing – Whether term excessive – Reduction of sentence for first offender in absence of aggravating circumstances. Evidence – Witness credibility and disputed account of whether property was borrowed or stolen.
|
23 August 1986 |
|
Appellate court restored trial court’s division of jointly acquired matrimonial property, finding the reduction unreasonable.
Matrimonial property – division of property acquired by joint efforts – valuation uncertainty – appellate interference with trial court’s factual and monetary findings.
|
21 August 1986 |
|
Reported
An employer cannot unilaterally avoid a Minister's reinstatement order by paying statutory compensation and twelve months' wages.
Employment law – Enforcement of Minister/Board reinstatement orders under s 27 – decision final, binding and enforceable as a decree. Specific performance – s 27(2) empowers courts to order re-engagement/reinstatement and award damages for non‑compliance. Compensation under s 40A(5) – statutory compensation plus twelve months' wages is available but only at the instance of the aggrieved employee; employer cannot unilaterally elect this remedy.
|
21 August 1986 |
|
Reported
Labour Law - Summary dismissal- Minister orders reinstatement of dismissed employee - Whether employer may terminate services and pay statutory compensation instead - Security of Employment Act, Cap 574. |
21 August 1986 |
|
Whether the appellant cooperative inherited the respondent's employment liabilities from former registered villages.
Cooperative Societies Act 14/1982 – transitional provisions (s.181(e), s.181(g)) – scope of saving clauses; Registered villages under Act No.21/1975 and Act No.9/1979 – whether appointments/employees saved; Employer liability – succession of liabilities; Severance Allowance Act s.8A(1)(d) – "deemed" continuity limited to severance claims and not proof of actual continuous employment.
|
20 August 1986 |
Cooperative Societies - Interpretation -Appointments’ mentioned in s.I81(c) ofthe Cooperative SocietiesAct, 1982 - Whetherthey include employees of the various cooperative societiesformed underAct no. 27 of 1968. C Labour Law - Employee ofregistered villages - Whether employment continued automatically on dissolution ofregistered villages and establishment ofcooperative societies in theirstead |
20 August 1986 |
|
Reported
Criminal Law - Theft - Discrepancy in accounts- Whether amounts to theft.
Statutory Interpretation - Person employed in the public service -Person employed by a subsidiary of a parastatal organization -
Whether falls within definition of “person employed in the public service ", - Penal Code section 5. |
20 August 1986 |
|
Reported
Acquittal upheld due to unreliable accounting evidence and improper aggregation of separate thefts into one charge.
Criminal law – Theft by person employed in the public service – requirement to prove statutory status of public service employee. Criminal procedure – Form of indictment – separate takings/fraudulent conversions must be charged in separate counts. Evidence – Accounting evidence and credibility of accountant – necessity to verify cash, document calculations and produce clear, consistent figures. Sufficiency of evidence – Conviction unsafe where prosecution's principal witness gives confused, undocumented and unverified figures.
|
20 August 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed; conviction for theft of school property by a public servant upheld on credible, corroborated evidence.
Criminal law – Stealing by person employed in the public service – sufficiency and corroboration of eyewitness and documentary evidence. Evidence – Ownership and possession of public property – evaluation of defence explanations and documentary inconsistencies. Appellate review – credibility findings of trial court – allegation of judicial bias unsupported. Sentencing – minimum statutory term upheld as appropriate.
|
18 August 1986 |
|
Trial misdirection on alibi did not vitiate conviction due to overwhelming, reliable identification evidence.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – alibi defence – no burden on accused to prove alibi – trial misdirection – identification evidence and daylight identification – appellate review of misdirection where prosecution evidence overwhelming.
|
18 August 1986 |
|
Forfeiture set aside where evidence showed a valid licence and therefore lawful possession; property to be returned or value paid.
Criminal law – Forfeiture of property – Forfeiture not appropriate where accused’s possession is lawful by virtue of a valid licence. Licence validity – Dates of licence and date of possession determine lawfulness of possession. Restitution – Return of property or payment of proceeds/value where forfeiture set aside.
|
15 August 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed: reliable night-time identification under electric lights and proper identification parade upheld the conviction.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Eyewitness identification at night under electric lighting – Protracted opportunity to observe – Identification parade – Alibi rejected – Appeal dismissed.
|
15 August 1986 |
|
Conviction based on doubtful identification is unsafe where the record lacks time, method and prior-acquaintance evidence.
Criminal law – Robbery – Conviction based on identification evidence – Necessity to prove time and conditions affecting identification; prior acquaintance and method of identification relevant to reliability. Criminal procedure – Dock identification – Potential unreliability absent identification parade or corroboration. Appeal – Conviction unsafe where identification evidence is vague or unsupported.
|
14 August 1986 |
|
Appeal dismissed because the defendant village was not shown to be a registered legal entity capable of being sued.
Property law – Suit for possession – Defendant must be a legal person; village must be shown to be registered and corporately capable of being sued – Absence of registration renders suit incompetent.
|
14 August 1986 |
|
Confession corroborated by recent possession upheld conviction; original fine unlawful and substituted with five years’ imprisonment.
Criminal law – breaking and stealing – correct statutory charge under s.296; erroneous citation harmless. Evidence – confession corroborated by recent possession of stolen property. Sentencing – scheduled offence with value exceeding statutory threshold attracts minimum five-year imprisonment; fine as alternative unlawful.
|
14 August 1986 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure -Assessors - Failure or omission B to involve assessors when taking plea - Whether curable defect. Criminal Law - Pleas- Accused convicted on his own plea of guiltyOn appeal accused alleges plea was entered by the magistrate against his wish - What appellate court to do. |
14 August 1986 |
|
Reported
The appellant's robbery conviction was quashed due to procedural errors, including lack of assessors' involvement and unclear charges.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – procedure – plea of guilty – assessors' involvement required under the Magistrates Court Act 1984.
|
14 August 1986 |
|
|
14 August 1986 |
|
Convictions quashed: entrustment and receipt of goods negated theft and false-pretense offences.
Criminal law – stealing by agent – entrustment and dishonest appropriation; Criminal law – obtaining money by false pretences – requirement of false representation and intent to defraud; insufficiency of evidence to sustain convictions.
|
14 August 1986 |
|
Convictions for theft by agent and false pretence quashed for lack of proof of essential elements.
Criminal law – Theft by agent – failure to prove non-use of entrusted property; Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretences – essential elements of false representation and intent to defraud absent where purchaser receives goods.
|
14 August 1986 |
|
A duplicitous charge or unviewed exhibits do not void conviction absent prejudice; forfeited goods must be sold for Government revenue.
Criminal law – Charge formulation – duplicity/omnibus charges – prejudice required to quash conviction. Criminal procedure – Sufficiency of particulars – necessity to inform accused of nature of offence. Evidence/procedure – Viewing and tendering of exhibits – failure to view not fatal absent prejudice. Property forfeiture – Forfeiture to Government; proceeds to be realized as Government revenue (not gratuitous transfer to a parastatal).
|
13 August 1986 |
|
|
13 August 1986 |
|
Two accused convicted of murder on voluntary confessions and recovery of body parts; three co-accused acquitted for lack of corroboration.
Criminal law – murder – elements: death, unlawful act and malice aforethought – proof beyond reasonable doubt. Confession – voluntariness and corroboration – accused leading to body as corroborative act. Corroboration – confession by one accused cannot convict co-accused without independent corroboration (Evidence Act s.33(1)(c) principle). Provocation by witchcraft – strict requirements; mere belief or accusation insufficient to reduce murder to manslaughter.
|
13 August 1986 |
|
Accused charged with triple murder acquitted after court finds he acted in lawful self-defence.
Criminal law – murder – self-defence – application of sections 18, 18A and 18C of the Penal Code; assessment of witness credibility; weight of assessors’ unanimous opinion where judge finds evidence unreliable.
|
12 August 1986 |
|
Appellate court restored trial finding that purchaser’s receipt and long possession established ownership; payment was compensation, not conveyance.
Land law – ownership disputes – assessment of evidence on appeal – appellate court must consider trial evidence; written receipt and long, uncontested possession support title; payment described as compensation does not transfer ownership.
|
12 August 1986 |
|
Conviction substituted to obtaining by false pretences and three-year sentence confirmed; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law — distinction between cheating (s.304 Penal Code) and obtaining by false pretences (s.302 Penal Code); evidential requirements for each offence; substitution of conviction under s.306(3) Criminal Procedure Act, 1985; confirmation of sentence.
|
11 August 1986 |
|
Insufficient circumstantial evidence rendered the appellant’s conviction for shop theft unsafe; conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
Criminal law – Theft – Sufficiency of evidence – Circumstantial evidence and inferences – Rejection of defence does not alone prove guilt – Unsafe conviction to be quashed.
|
11 August 1986 |
|
Identification corroborated by recovered stolen property upheld two convictions; one conviction quashed; sentencing adjusted on appeal.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence and absence of identification parade – discretion under Criminal Procedure Act; alibi and police custody evidence; possession of stolen property as corroboration; sentencing limits of subordinate courts under Criminal Procedure Act 1985 s.170 and appellate courts’ sentencing powers.
|
4 August 1986 |
|
Whether a herdsman’s customary Nsika tenure became ownership by enfranchisement, allowing inheritance and valid sale.
Land tenure – Customary Nyarubanja tenancy – Nsika (labour) as consideration for occupancy – Enfranchisement converting customary tenure into ownership – Succession and validity of sale by heirs.
|
2 August 1986 |
|
Reported
The appellant cooperative was not the respondent's employer; statutory provisions cited do not establish continuous employment.
Cooperative societies – succession and liability – construction of s.181(e) and s.181(g) of the Cooperative Societies Act 1982 – limits on transfer of employees and liabilities. Registered villages under Act No. 21/1975 – distinction from cooperatives registered under Act No. 14/1982. Employment law – continuity of employment – s.8A(3) Severance Allowance Act deems continuity only for severance allowance claims, not general liability. Employer liability for arrears – plaintiff must sue actual employer (registered villages) not a distinct later-registered cooperative.
|
1 August 1986 |