|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| September 1986 |
|
|
A drunken assault causing death amounted to manslaughter where malice aforethought was not established.
Criminal law – Homicide – Distinction between murder and manslaughter – malice aforethought and effect of intoxication on intent. Evidence – Eye-witness and medical evidence corroborating violent assault and causal link to death. Sentencing – seriousness of drunken killing, remand time and personal circumstances considered.
|
29 September 1986 |
|
Convictions for forgery and conspiracy quashed for lack of evidence and misappreciation of testimony.
Criminal law — Forgery and conspiracy to defraud — insufficiency of evidence; responsibility for payrolls lies with foremen and accounts/pre‑audit staff; appellate intervention where trial magistrate fails to properly analyse evidence and relies on extra‑judicial statements.
|
27 September 1986 |
|
Appeal allowed: convictions for forgery and conspiracy quashed for insufficient and improperly evaluated evidence.
Criminal law – Forgery and conspiracy – Sufficiency of evidence – Trial magistrate’s duty to analyse evidence – Weight to be accorded to out‑of‑court statements – Responsibility of supervisory officer for payments authorised but prepared and certified by subordinates.
|
27 September 1986 |
|
The applicant's convictions for forgery and conspiracy were quashed for lack of evidence and misappreciation by the trial magistrate.
Criminal law – Forgery – Master rolls and payment vouchers – Whether supervisory officer’s authorization establishes guilt for forgery where foremen prepared payrolls and accounts/pre‑audit sections checked payments. Criminal law – Conspiracy to defraud – Requirement of evidence of agreement between two or more persons; conspiracy cannot be founded on unilateral conduct. Evidence – Weight and evaluation – Improper reliance on extra‑judicial statements abandoned at trial; duty of trial court to analyse and weigh testimony and documents. Appeal – Miscarriage of justice – Quashing convictions where no evidence supports guilt.
|
27 September 1986 |
|
Application to set aside ex parte order denied for failure to show good cause; costs and ex parte judgment awarded to respondent.
Civil procedure – Order IX r.7 and s.95 CPC – Application to set aside ex parte proceedings – Requirement to show good cause – Credibility and sufficiency of affidavits – Court’s inherent discretion and costs.
|
25 September 1986 |
|
Welfare of the child governs custody of a child born of a void marriage; appeals cannot be improperly struck out.
Family law — Custody of children born of void marriage — Welfare of the child paramount — Section 128 Law of Marriage Act not giving absolute maternal entitlement — Child's wishes at age nine not decisive — Maintenance awards to reflect current means and living standards — District Court lacked power to strike out competent appeal.
|
23 September 1986 |
|
Reported
Mother’s custody of child born of void marriage affirmed; welfare outweighed father’s claimed entitlement; maintenance increased to Shs.250/month.
Custody of infant born of void marriage – Section 128 Law of Marriage Act – mother’s entitlement conditional, court discretion; welfare of the child paramount; jurisdiction to strike out appeals – limits of District Court powers; maintenance – adequacy, enquiry into parents’ means and prevailing conditions; child’s wishes – weight appropriate to age.
|
23 September 1986 |
Family Law - Custody of children - Child born out of a void marriage - Whether the mother of the child has an absolute right to custody. Family Law - Custody of children - Child expresses wishes with whom she wants to live - Whether such wishes to be given weight. Family Law - Maintenance - Assessment of - Factors to be taken into consideration. Family Law - Custody of Children - Factors to be taken into account before giving custody of a child to a party. |
23 September 1986 |
|
Appellate court found damages excessive where the respondent’s injuries were minor healed cut wounds.
Civil damages – assault – assessment of damages – whether Shs. 20,000/- award excessive where injuries were cut wounds that healed. Appellate review – factual assessment of medical evidence and credibility – appellate court finding of minor, non-permanent injury. Relation between prior criminal compensation and subsequent civil damages claims.
|
22 September 1986 |
|
|
20 September 1986 |
|
Applicant failed to prove reasonable personal need; court refused to order vacant possession.
Rent Restriction Act (s.19) – vacant possession – proof of landlord’s reasonable personal requirement – evidence of alternative accommodation by tenant – credibility and relevance of late assertions of other business interests.
|
17 September 1986 |
|
Appeal against robbery convictions dismissed where eyewitness and police evidence proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – robbery – eyewitness identification and police recovery of property; credibility of defence alleging coercion by police; conviction and statutory minimum sentence upheld.
|
17 September 1986 |
|
Confession corroborated by repayment and evidence of conversion supported conviction for stealing by agent; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – stealing by agent – receipt of funds, failure to deliver or account, and conversion to own use as evidence of offence. Evidence – confession – voluntariness and corroboration by subsequent conduct (partial repayment). Appeal – sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction despite absence of direct proof of banking or loss.
|
15 September 1986 |
|
Appellants challenged possession under s.19(1)(f); court stressed onus to prove reasonableness, but ordered possession and dismissed appeal.
Rent Restriction Act s.19(1)(f) – possession for reconstruction – statutory requirement of ‘reasonableness’ before ordering possession – onus on party seeking possession – sufficiency of affidavit evidence – court’s discretion to require grant of new tenancy is permissive – appellate determination where material before appellate court.
|
12 September 1986 |
|
Recent possession and identifying marks supported conviction for robbery with violence; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Elements – threat of violence applied immediately before or at time of theft. Criminal evidence – Recent possession – inference of guilt from possession of stolen property bearing identifying marks. Evidence – Identification marks and documentary/witness corroboration. Appellate review – deference to trial court credibility findings and reasoning.
|
12 September 1986 |
|
Reported
Investigation into exam leakage breached natural justice by failing to inform and hear the applicant; decision quashed and certificate ordered.
Administrative law – delegation of powers – Council’s creation of an Executive Committee under IFM Act s.6(2)(f) valid. Higher education – investigation of alleged examination leakage – disciplinary consequences engage right to fair hearing. Natural justice – duty to inform of adverse allegations and to afford opportunity to answer; failure renders decision susceptible to certiorari. Remedies – certiorari and mandamus where investigatory process denied procedural fairness.
|
12 September 1986 |
|
An investigatory committee’s failure to afford procedural fairness in an academic inquiry vitiated the Institute’s punitive decision.
Administrative law – academic investigations – natural justice – investigatory committee obliged to inform interviewee of specific adverse allegations and allow fair opportunity to answer; statutory delegation – Council may create Executive Committee to act between meetings; disciplinary jurisdiction – Students’ Disciplinary Committee does not cover academic examination integrity; remedy – quashing of decision and mandamus to award certificate.
|
12 September 1986 |
|
Reported
Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Disciplinary Proceedings in higher educational institution - Failure to sufficiently appraise a student of the particulars of the prejudicial allegations made against him - Rule of natural justice not complied with. |
12 September 1986 |
|
Applicant denied fair hearing in examination-leak inquiry despite council’s valid delegation to an executive committee.
Administrative law — delegation of powers: Council validly established Executive Committee under statutory powers; Academic discipline — scope: student disciplinary rules do not cover examination leakage; Natural justice — right to be informed of allegations and to answer adverse material; Remedies — court may grant relief where procedural unfairness in institutional inquiries causes severe prejudice.
|
12 September 1986 |
|
Conviction for robbery quashed because identification evidence was unreliable and prosecution did not support conviction.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence – Reliability of identification where complainant lost consciousness – Unsafe to convict on dubious identification – Appeal allowed; conviction, sentence and compensation set aside.
|
11 September 1986 |
|
Conviction for burglary upheld; sentence increased to mandatory five years due to stolen property value exceeding statutory threshold.
Criminal law – Burglary (s.294(1)) and stealing (s.265) – sufficiency and credibility of identification and search party evidence; Sentencing – Minimum Sentences Act 1972 s.5(d) – mandatory five-year sentence where stolen property value exceeds Shs.5,000; Appellate review – interference with trial court's credibility findings and substitution of erroneous sentence.
|
11 September 1986 |
|
Non-compliance with section 214 and unsafe night identification led to conviction and sentence being quashed.
Criminal procedure – change of presiding magistrate – section 214 Criminal Procedure Act – duty to inform accused of right to have witnesses re-summoned – non-compliance renders proceedings a nullity. Evidence – identification – night-time conditions, darkness inside dwelling and lack of corroboration render identification unsafe. Evidence – alibi supported by defence witness may raise reasonable doubt where uncontradicted. Remedy – conviction and sentence quashed where proceedings are irregular and identification evidence is unreliable.
|
10 September 1986 |
|
A labour tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine an individual employer–employee termination dispute; its award was quashed.
Labour law – jurisdiction of Permanent Labour Tribunal – scope of "trade dispute" – dispute between employer and a single employee not a trade dispute absent union or collective representation – Security of Employment Act governs individual termination – certiorari to quash void award.
|
10 September 1986 |
|
Disciplinary committee acted fairly under rules of natural justice; club failed to verify player registration; certiorari dismissed.
Football disciplinary procedure – player registration and transfer rules – duty of club officials to verify player identity – natural justice and opportunity to be heard (written submissions) – certiorari remedy.
|
5 September 1986 |
|
Appeal against conviction and penalties for causing death by dangerous driving dismissed; eyewitness evidence upheld.
Road Traffic Act — dangerous driving causing death; credibility of eyewitnesses; appellate review of magistrate’s findings; adequacy of charge; sentencing and licence cancellation.
|
5 September 1986 |
|
An unauthorized individual village allocation cannot defeat prior ownership proven by credible independent evidence.
Land law – village land allocation – validity of grant by village government versus individual officer’s directive; evidence and membership of village; assessment of lower courts’ fact-finding; independent corroboration of prior occupation/title.
|
3 September 1986 |
|
The appellant's fresh suit for costs was improper and unsupported; appeal dismissed and Shs.2,000 restoration upheld.
Civil procedure — Proper remedy against a Primary Court's costs order is appeal, not fresh proceedings; claims for costs must be substantiated by evidence; courts may dismiss fictitious or unsupported claims and uphold orders restoring monies.
|
2 September 1986 |
|
Non‑framing of issues and omission to consider a letter did not vitiate trial; credible evidence established entrusted funds and appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – discretion to frame issues – failure to frame issues not necessarily fatal. Evidence – assessment of credibility – trial court’s determinations entitled to deference on appeal. Documentary evidence – omission to consider annexed document not material where no miscarriage of justice shown. Contract/receipt dispute – entrustment of money and balance proved on balance of probabilities.
|
1 September 1986 |