|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| May 1987 |
|
|
Reported
Family Law - Enticement - Adultery - Assessment of damages for adultery or enticement - Court to have regard to the custom of the community to which the parties belong - Whether husband and wife were living together-S74 Law of Marriage Act 1971. |
28 May 1987 |
|
Appeal to retain full brideprice dismissed; no evidence customary rule applied and lower court’s reduction justified.
Customary law – brideprice (lobola) restitution on dissolution – effect of marriage duration and children on amount refundable – applicability of claimant’s tribal custom when respondent is of a different community – appellate interference with lower court’s discretionary adjustment.
|
28 May 1987 |
|
Remarriage after a valid divorce order is not an offence under s.152(1) if the woman was no longer married when she remarried.
Criminal law – Offence of a married woman marrying another man (s.152(1) Law of Marriage Act) – Effect of a valid primary court decree of divorce – Impact of a subsequent successful appeal – Necessity of the accused being married at time of the ceremony.
|
28 May 1987 |
|
Appellate court allowed appeal and set aside revisional order where revisional court misdirected itself on sufficiency of theft evidence.
Criminal law – appeal from revisional order – revisional court substituting its view for trial court’s findings – sufficiency of evidence to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt – acquittal restored where defence explanation and owner’s testimony exonerate accused.
|
28 May 1987 |
|
Appeal dismissed; district court rightly increased brideprice return given short marriage, single issue and subsequent remarriage.
Family law — dissolution of marriage — brideprice (dowry) reclamation — effect of short marriage, issue and subsequent remarriage on quantum of cattle to be returned — appellate review of enhancement of award.
|
28 May 1987 |
|
Appellate court quashed cheating conviction after finding misdirection on burden of proof and insufficient evidence.
Criminal law – Cheating (s.304 Penal Code) – Standard and burden of proof – Appellate review – Misdirection by magistrate shifting burden – Matter possibly civil rather than criminal.
|
27 May 1987 |
Civil Practice and Procedure – Attachment – A person's head of cattle attached to satisfy a compensation order against his brother – Attachment unlawful. |
27 May 1987 |
|
Appellant's silence at trial left prosecution evidence unchallenged; appeal against false‑pretences conviction dismissed.
Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretences – Payment for non‑existent land – Accused's failure to call evidence or dispute prosecution case at trial – Unsubstantiated appellate assertions insufficient – Appeal dismissed.
|
26 May 1987 |
|
Eyewitness identification in daylight upheld conviction; alibi rejected and court ordered statutory compensation.
Criminal law – identification evidence – eyewitness identification in daylight from about 15 paces, familiarity as neighbours and discovery with stolen property – reliability and sufficiency to convict. Criminal law – defence of alibi – requirement of reasonable truth and corroboration in light of prosecution evidence. Sentencing – statutory minimum custodial sentence upheld. Compensation – mandatory order under s.7 Minimum Sentences Act; appellate revision to remedy trial court omission.
|
26 May 1987 |
|
|
25 May 1987 |
|
|
24 May 1987 |
|
Convictions for robbery quashed because the victim’s inconsistent statements and weak corroboration made the convictions unsafe.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Unsafe conviction due to materially inconsistent victim testimony and weak corroboration – Appeal quashes conviction and sentence – Release ordered.
|
23 May 1987 |
|
Appeal allowed where evidence showed attached cattle belonged to the appellant, not the judgment-debtor; costs awarded.
Civil procedure – execution of decree – attachment of property – disputed ownership – evaluation of evidence – no proof of fraudulent relocation to evade execution.
|
22 May 1987 |
|
Appeal dismissed: reliable identification and appropriate minimum sentence upheld for robbery with violence.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identity evidence – Witnesses knew accused – Daylight identification – Minimum statutory sentence and corporal punishment – Appeal dismissed.
|
22 May 1987 |
|
Conviction for corruptly giving money to a police officer upheld on credible single-witness evidence.
Criminal law – Corruption – Corrupt transaction by giving money to police officer – Evidence of single witness – Credibility and burden of proof.
|
21 May 1987 |
|
Conviction for cattle theft quashed where recovered skin was not specifically identified and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – theft of cattle – identification of stolen animal – skin, horns and tail insufficient to establish identity absent specific distinctive marks or features. Evidence – prosecution burden – necessity to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt; mere assertion of identification without particulars is inadequate. Appeal – perverse conviction where essential identification evidence is lacking; quashing of conviction and sentence.
|
20 May 1987 |
|
Death in a fight without proof of malice aforethought reduces murder to manslaughter; accused sentenced to ten years.
Criminal law – Homicide – Distinction between murder and manslaughter – malice aforethought must be proved for murder. Death in course of an affray/ fight – ordinarily manslaughter absent proof of intent to kill. Self-defence/excessive force – may reduce culpability. Sentence – use of a lethal weapon and lengthy custody weigh in favour of substantial imprisonment.
|
19 May 1987 |
|
|
19 May 1987 |
|
Acquittal for unlawful possession due to unreliability of evidence, non-production of bag and possible planting.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of gemstones – burden on prosecution to prove possession beyond reasonable doubt – ownership/possession inference where items found in shared room. Evidence – credibility of witnesses; non-production of alleged container; failure of co-occupant to testify. Circumstantial suspicion of planting where room unsecured.
|
18 May 1987 |
|
A widow may inherit a share of property jointly acquired with her husband; proof of joint acquisition and witness credibility determine entitlement.
Inheritance — Customary law — Widow's entitlement to share of estate — Joint acquisition or contribution by wife — Proof and credibility of evidence — Appellate variation of lower courts' decisions.
|
16 May 1987 |
|
Res judicata requires identical parties; Nyakyusa customary rules and substitute residence led to equal division of the estate.
Civil procedure – res judicata – requires identity of parties in earlier and later proceedings (Primary Courts Civil Procedure Rules, Rule 11). Customary law (Nyakyusa) – intestate succession – senior-most male child as primary heir. Customary land – adoption of substitute residence without divestment converts it into clan land for inheritance. Relief – equal division of estate occupied by deceased; supervision and sketch plan ordered.
|
15 May 1987 |
|
The appellate court upheld the respondent's robbery convictions based on reliable identification and rejected the appellants' alibi.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence under bright moonlight – Prolonged face‑to‑face contact and familiarity – Corroboration – Alibi insufficiency – Appellate review – Confirmation of statutory minimum concurrent sentences.
|
15 May 1987 |
|
Appeal dismissed: credible evidence of cattle trespass and oral admission of liability; extension of time application also refused.
Civil liability for crop damage by animals – trespass by cattle – admissibility and weight of oral admission of liability made in presence of elders – appeal: whether trial court's finding against weight of evidence – extension of time to appeal – effect of pending review application and Order 42 CPC – limitation rules.
|
15 May 1987 |
|
Accused’s voluntary admissions and post-mortem corroboration sufficed to convict him of murder despite no direct eyewitness testimony.
Criminal law – Murder – Reliance on extra-judicial and cautioned statements as primary evidence in absence of direct eyewitnesses – voluntariness and admissibility. Evidence – Post-mortem report corroborating cause of death from cut/penetrating wounds. Evidence – Omission to call an arresting non-eyewitness is not necessarily fatal to the prosecution. Motive – Cattle rustling as explanatory circumstance supporting inference of joint intent.
|
13 May 1987 |
|
Convictions quashed where identification was unreliable and receiving charge lacked proof of knowledge or belief the goods were stolen.
Criminal law – store‑breaking and stealing – identification of stolen property – unsatisfactory identification cannot ground conviction. Criminal law – receiving stolen property – requires knowledge or belief property stolen; mere, unwitting custody for a guest insufficient. Evidence – witness credibility and hostile witnesses – contradictions and admissions under pressure undermine prosecution case. Burden of proof – conviction must rest on strength of prosecution evidence, not weaknesses in defence.
|
12 May 1987 |
|
Reported
Labour Law - Labour dispute - Existence of- Letter from Secretary General of Juwata to Regional Secretary of Juwata instructing the latter to pursue a complaint - Whether evidences existence of a dispute.
Civil Practice and Procedure - Interlocutory injunction - Application for - Principles governing power to grant such application. |
12 May 1987 |
|
Appellants’ uncorroborated alibi rejected; reliable identification evidence sustained convictions and appeal was dismissed.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – sufficiency and reliability – factors: lighting, distance, prior acquaintance, consistency and corroborative clothing recovery. Criminal procedure – Appellate review – scope: deference to trial court on credibility and demeanour findings absent clear misdirection. Alibi – uncorroborated alibi insufficient to raise reasonable doubt.
|
11 May 1987 |
|
Conviction cannot stand where identity is based on hearsay and alleged medical 'admission' without viva voce evidence.
Criminal law — Murder — Identification evidence — Hearsay reports of an eyewitness’s statements — Admissibility and sufficiency — Unsworn child witness — Reliance on medical/psychiatric reports and alleged confession without calling the doctor — Proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
11 May 1987 |
|
Reported
A purchaser who paid, took possession and received title deed acquires an interest preventing attachment pending formal transfer.
Property law – Sale of immovable property – Effect of payment, delivery of possession and handing over title deed before registered conveyance – Attachment in execution – Whether purchaser’s equitable/proprietary interest protects property from attachment against vendor.
|
9 May 1987 |
|
Where a defendant is acquitted on substantive counts establishing lawful acquisition, conviction for failure to explain under s.8 would be unjust; appeal dismissed.
Prevention of Corruption Act s.8(1),(2) – requirement to give full account of monies/property – adequacy of written reply. Criminal Procedure – jurisdiction – trial venue where explanatory document was written and addressed. Criminal Procedure Code (sections 71–73/181–183 CPA) – when conviction may be entered for non‑compliance with statutory notice; interplay with acquittal on related substantive counts. Abuse of process/unjustness – conviction or retrial improper where acquittal on substantive counts establishes lawful acquisition.
|
9 May 1987 |
Civil Practice and Procedure - Objection proceedings - House of judgment debtor attached in execution of decree - House already sold to objector - Objector given possession of the premises and the title deed - Transfer of ownership not finalized - Requisite consent to transfer not yet obtained - Whether the house liable to attachment. |
9 May 1987 |
|
Conviction for theft by servant quashed where evidence showed another employee also had access and opportunity to cause the shortage.
Criminal law – theft by servant – burden of proof – necessity to prove accused was sole person in charge of goods and exclusive opportunity to commit theft. Evidence – stocktaking and accounting discrepancies – identification of person responsible; conflicts in handover evidence undermine prosecution case. Sentencing/compensation – award must correspond to proven/pleaded particulars; compensation order inappropriate if conviction unsafe.
|
9 May 1987 |
|
Assessors’ majority in a primary court binds the court; a district revisional court cannot order conviction after acquittal.
Magistrates' Courts — Primary court assessors' majority binds the court — Difference between magistrate and assessors — Remand to district court for opinion unlawful — Revisional jurisdiction: district court cannot substitute conviction for acquittal or order primary court to convict (Magistrates' Courts Act ss.8,18(2); see ss.7,21 of 1984 Act).
|
8 May 1987 |
|
Conviction based on a bare identification of common items without distinguishing features is unsafe.
Criminal law – Theft – Identification of stolen property – Common, undistinguished articles require clear method of identification on record; bare ownership assertion is insufficient – Conviction unsafe where identification inadequate.
|
8 May 1987 |
|
Possession of recently stolen property and failure to call witnesses justified upholding conviction and sentence.
Criminal law – burglary and stealing – possession of recently stolen property; evidential weight of possession; failure to call witnesses undermining defence; appeal – sufficiency of evidence; sentence lawful.
|
8 May 1987 |
|
Possession of stolen property and witness identification upheld the applicant's conviction for burglary and theft.
Criminal law – Burglary and theft – Possession of stolen property and identification by complainant as evidence – Unexplained possession: rejection of uncorroborated claim of purchase where accused calls no witnesses.
|
8 May 1987 |
|
Possession of identified stolen property, unsupported purchase claims, and concurrent sentences: appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – possession of stolen property and identification by complainant as evidence for conviction. Criminal law – Defence of purchase – uncorroborated claim without named sellers or witnesses is insufficient to create reasonable doubt. Sentencing – concurrent terms upheld as lawful.
|
8 May 1987 |
|
|
6 May 1987 |
|
Conviction upheld on recent possession; district court unlawfully increased a primary court's statutory minimum sentence.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – Recent possession doctrine – conviction sustained where stolen goods found in accused's house and defence uncorroborated. Criminal procedure – Appeal – Appellate powers limited by subordinate court's jurisdiction – Magistrates' Courts Act s.17(b) (Cap. 537). Sentencing – Minimum Sentences Act – primary court may only impose prescribed minimum; appellate court may not increase beyond that jurisdiction.
|
6 May 1987 |
|
Whether the appellant purchased the shamba or only redeemed pledged land; court affirmed purchase and reinstated primary judgment.
Land dispute – ownership v. redemption/pledge – credibility of trial court findings – failure to call material witnesses – unchallenged written purchase document – limitation period and intra‑clan sale implications on right of redemption.
|
5 May 1987 |
|
A landlord must prove availability of reasonably equivalent alternative accommodation under section 19 before obtaining vacant possession.
Rent Restriction Act s.19(1)(ii) – landlord seeking vacant possession must prove both personal need and availability of reasonably equivalent alternative accommodation; trial findings on tenancy status must be supported by evidence.
|
5 May 1987 |
|
Two accused convicted for soliciting and receiving a bribe to refrain from charging a brewing offence; sentenced to three years.
Corruption — Soliciting and receiving advantage to refrain from charging an offence — Evidence and credibility of prosecution witnesses — Accuseds' denials insufficient to create reasonable doubt — Conviction and sentence under Prevention of Corruption Act read with Economic and Organized Crime Control Act.
|
5 May 1987 |
|
Appeal allowed: occupier was a gratuitous occupant, not a tenant; purchaser entitled to vacant possession with costs.
Property — vacant possession — purchaser seeking possession after purchase — occupier’s status (tenant vs gratuitous occupant) — Rent Restriction Act: requirements for vacant possession and role of alternative accommodation.
|
5 May 1987 |
|
Court convicted accused for unlawful possession of Part I poison absent licence or plausible explanation, fined Shs.5,000 or one year default.
Economic and organised crime – Possession of goods suspected to be stolen or unlawfully acquired (ss.56(1), 59 and First Schedule para.8(a),(b) Act No.13/1984); Part I poisons – requirement of licence/certificate; evidentiary value of possession and failure to give explanation; credibility of arresting officers versus claim of planting; sentencing — fine in lieu of imprisonment under s.59(3).
|
4 May 1987 |
|
Hearsay evidence cannot sustain a claim for damage to livestock; appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil evidence – hearsay insufficiency; burden of proof on claimant in damage to livestock claims – credibility and appellate review of factual findings.
|
2 May 1987 |
|
|
1 May 1987 |
|
Reported
A person's property cannot be seized to satisfy another's compensation order solely because they are related.
Execution/attachment – seizure of third party property to satisfy compensation order – kinship insufficient to render third party liable; burden to prove ownership; wrongful seizure – reliance on Gwao bin Kilimo v. Kisunda bin Ifuti.
|
1 May 1987 |
|
Reported
Appellant held liable for enticement and adultery; damages reduced from twelve to five head of cattle as excessive and punitive.
Family/Delict — Enticement and adultery — Evidence supporting finding of enticement and adultery; prior misconduct and contemporaneous discovery relevant.* Damages — Adultery/enticement — Quantum discretionary; court must consider community custom and whether spouses were living together.* Damages — Excessive awards with punitive element impermissible; appellate reduction justified.
|
1 May 1987 |
|
Reported
Appeal allowed because magistrate misapplied interim injunction principles and overlooked the eviction notice's legality.
Interim injunction — scope of inquiry — magistrate must not determine substantive issues; Interim injunction — principles: bona fide contest, balance of convenience, irreparable injury; Eviction notices — legality and authority of issuing officer; Labour dispute — sufficiency of evidence to show pending dispute; Conduct of plaintiff — refusal to collect terminal dues not necessarily unmeritorious.
|
1 May 1987 |