|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| March 1988 |
|
|
Failure to inform accused of statutory rights and reliance on untested, unreliable evidence rendered conviction unsafe; retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure – mandatory warning under section 231(1) CPA – failure to inform accused of right to give evidence and call witnesses; Evidence – reliance on untested co-accused and unreliable witness – unsafe conviction; Procedural irregularity going to root of trial – conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
|
30 March 1988 |
|
Court allowed temporary foreign travel for pilgrimage by accused on bail, subject to bond, two sureties, passport release and strict return period.
Bail variation – permission to travel abroad for religious pilgrimage – factors: citizenship, residence, availability of reliable sureties, absence of State opposition – conditions: monetary bond, two sureties, temporary release and mandatory surrender of passport, fixed return period.
|
30 March 1988 |
|
Marriage does not disqualify a woman from inheriting clan land in usufruct under section 20 of the Law of Inheritance.
Inheritance law – clan land – section 20, Law of Inheritance (GN No. 436 of 1963) – woman may inherit clan land in usufruct; marriage does not dis-entitle her – usufructuary rights versus power to dispose.
|
29 March 1988 |
|
A permissive long-term occupation by a daughter does not override a first-born son's customary inheritance rights to ancestral land.
Customary inheritance – Restatement of Customary Law (G.N. 436 of 1963, Cap. 333) – daughter’s rights versus son’s rights – usufructuary occupation versus ownership; Prescriptive/possessory claims – long occupation and cultivation do not necessarily confer ownership against hereditary principal heir; Appeal – appellate interference where lower courts misapplied customary law.
|
29 March 1988 |
|
Fundamental procedural defects at Primary Court rendered lower proceedings null and required a retrial before a different magistrate.
Primary Court procedure – trial irregularities – no opportunity to adduce evidence – assessors expressing opinions before summing up – absence of written judgment – proceedings null and void – retrial ordered.
|
29 March 1988 |
|
Application to examine a probate petitioner refused; omission of beneficiaries does not automatically bar grant.
Probate and Administration – examination of petitioner under section 61 – where objection to grant is substantive contest, examination may be inappropriate. Probate procedure – caveat under section 50 is ordinarily the proper remedy to challenge proposed grants; delay may preclude it. Letters of administration – surviving spouse ordinarily entitled to grant; omission of beneficiaries from petition does not automatically disqualify grantee; duty to exhibit inventory and accounts (s.103(1)).
|
29 March 1988 |
|
Appeal dismissed: applicant failed to prove ownership or right of occupation; respondent inherited the disputed land.
Land law – ownership and possession – whether plaintiff proved title or right of occupation; credibility of oral witness evidence; appellate review of concurrent findings of fact.
|
29 March 1988 |
|
Conviction for robbery quashed where possession and a list of names failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Circumstantial evidence – Possession of property and a paper list – Identification and ownership not established – Insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt; Trial in absence – Section 227 Criminal Procedure Act – Proceeding lawful where accused absconds.
|
28 March 1988 |
|
Equivocal guilty pleas and misapplication of section 21(1) led to quashing of traffic convictions and sentences.
Road Traffic Act — section 21(1) — learner motorcyclist may drive without accompaniment; Equivocal plea — necessity of full facts when recording guilty pleas; Sentencing — inappropriate imposition of maximum fines/imprisonment without inquiry into means; Appeal — convictions quashed where plea and charge defective.
|
28 March 1988 |
|
Conviction for theft by a public servant quashed where handing-over document and co-accused’s admissions made conviction unsafe.
Criminal law – Stealing by persons in public service – sufficiency of evidence and credibility of prosecution witnesses. Evidence – Handing-over certificate found in cash box – probative value despite being unwitnessed when admitted and signed by co-accused. Appeal – Conviction unsafe where defence and admissions by co-accused cast doubt on prosecution case.
|
28 March 1988 |
|
An accused who retracts a guilty plea during mitigation may have the plea withdrawn; conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Criminal law – plea of guilty – withdrawal/retraction before sentence – where mitigation disputes earlier admissions a plea may be withdrawn and full trial ordered. Appeal – s.360(1) Criminal Procedure Act – limits on appeals after guilty plea subject to exceptions where factual retraction occurs. Remedy – conviction quashed, sentence set aside, refund of fine and retrial ordered.
|
28 March 1988 |
|
A guilty plea can be withdrawn in mitigation; conviction may be quashed and a retrial ordered.
Criminal procedure – guilty plea – retraction in mitigation – withdrawal of plea before sentence – s.360(1) Criminal Procedure Act – quashing conviction and ordering retrial.
|
28 March 1988 |
|
Appeal challenges sufficiency of eyewitness identification and alibi in cattle theft prosecuted under the Economic and Organized Crimes Control Act.
Criminal law — Cattle theft — Identification evidence and alibi — Trial under Economic and Organized Crimes Control Act (s.12(3) DPP authorization) — Compensation order.
|
28 March 1988 |
|
Court ordered sale of abandoned foreign aircraft to recover unpaid landing, parking charges and repair and mitigation costs.
Aviation law – aerodrome control and safety obligations of national regulator under ICAO/Chicago Convention; Abandonment of aircraft – long-term parking, lack of certification/operation and resulting right to removal and sale; Remedies – sale of aircraft and application of proceeds to landing, parking charges and repair/mitigation costs; Procedure – substituted service by publication and ex parte proof against non-resident defendants.
|
26 March 1988 |
|
An unjoined alleged father cannot be bound by paternity findings; matter quashed and remitted for hearing with necessary parties joined.
Paternity – non‑joinder of putative father – findings not res judicata as to unjoined third party – necessary party doctrine – Magistrates' Courts Act s.29(b) – quash and remit for de novo hearing with joinder of putative father.
|
25 March 1988 |
|
Appellant's conviction for public-service theft quashed where evidence showed he had handed over collected funds to co-accused.
Criminal law – theft by person in public service – sufficiency of evidence; handing-over document as proof of transfer of funds; co-accused's admissions affecting credibility of prosecution case; appellate intervention where conviction unsafe.
|
23 March 1988 |
|
Decree‑holder’s uncorroborated suspicion that attached cattle belonged to the judgment‑debtor was insufficient — appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – Attachment and objection proceedings – Decree‑holder must prove that attached goods belong to the judgment‑debtor; mere suspicion insufficient; uncorroborated statement by witness inadequate to sustain attachment.
|
22 March 1988 |
|
Where execution seized cattle from a non-party without proof they belonged to the judgment-debtor, the attachment was unlawful and must be restored.
Execution of decree – Attachment of property – Attachment from non-party’s kraal – Requirement of proof of ownership or possession by judgment-debtor – Unlawful attachment where decisions rest on conjecture; entitlement to restoration and costs.
|
22 March 1988 |
|
Resident Magistrate lacked jurisdiction over unregistered customary land; proceedings quashed for want of jurisdiction.
Magistrates' Courts Act s63(1) — jurisdiction over unregistered customary land — suits must be in Primary Court unless the Republic is a party or High Court gives leave — proceedings in other courts without statutory conditions are void for want of jurisdiction.
|
22 March 1988 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Charges - Substitution of -
Charge of unlawful wounding withdrawn and fresh charge of causing grievous harm substituted -
Charge substituted after prosecution witnesses had given evidence -
Provisions of s. 234 of Criminal Procedure Act, 1985 not complied |
21 March 1988 |
|
Unauthorized removal alone does not establish liability for accidental deaths absent evidence of causation.
Customary law – alleged unauthorized removal (kutorosha) – whether unauthorized removal establishes liability for accidental death; Causation – requirement of evidence linking defendant to accident; Civil damages – availability of insurance recovery.
|
20 March 1988 |
|
Possession of elephant tusks without government authorization is unlawful; accused convicted, given a one-day sentence and tusks forfeited to Government.
Criminal law — Possession of wildlife trophies — Elephant tusks — Requirement of government authorization for lawful possession — Mistaken belief in third party’s licence insufficient as a legal defence — Sentencing: mitigation (first offender, age, ill health) vs. public interest in deterrence — Forfeiture of seized trophies to Government.
|
19 March 1988 |
|
Appellant's bank theft conviction upheld on witness and pay‑in slip identification; sentence increased to ten years concurrent imprisonment.
Theft by public servant – identification of signature and teller’s stamp as proof of receipt – absence of handwriting expert does not necessarily weaken identification evidence – sentencing discretion; increase on appeal; concurrent sentences.
|
18 March 1988 |
|
Appeal dismissed: eyewitness identification and possession of stolen items sufficiently supported robbery conviction.
Criminal law - robbery with violence - identification of accused - possession of stolen property shortly after offence - concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts - appellate interference only where good reason shown.
|
18 March 1988 |
|
Appellate court upheld cheating conviction and one-year sentence, declining to disturb concurrent credibility findings.
Criminal law – Cheating – Sufficiency of evidence – Appellate deference to trial court’s credibility findings. Criminal procedure – Appeal – Concurrent findings of fact – When appellate court may or may not disturb trial court findings. Sentencing – Whether one-year imprisonment is excessive – appellate review of sentence.
|
16 March 1988 |
|
Convictions for forcible entry cannot stand where land ownership is undetermined; mens rea and correct charge must be established.
Criminal law – Forcible entry (s.85) and criminal trespass (s.299) – Ownership of land must be judicially determined before convicting for trespass/forcible entry; mens rea absent where title unresolved – Forcible detainer (s.86) may be the proper offence where occupier refuses to vacate – Substitution to non-cognate offence impermissible – Jurisdiction: Primary Court may hear land held under right of occupancy (Land Ordinance cap.113).
|
16 March 1988 |
|
Whether a detective-constable confession and vague hearsay testimony may safely sustain a conviction for stealing by a servant.
Evidence — admissibility of confession — section 27 Evidence Act — only police of corporal rank or above competent to take confessions. Evidence — hearsay and lack of concreteness — village committee testimony insufficient to prove custody or disposition of funds. Criminal procedure — right to call defence witnesses — adjournments, bail cancellation and failure to produce witness may affect safety of conviction. Theft by servant — sufficiency of direct payment evidence versus uncorroborated or inadmissible statements.
|
16 March 1988 |
|
Non-compliance with ss.196 and 205 CPC and weak evidence render the trial a nullity; conviction quashed.
Criminal procedure — Second magistrate’s jurisdiction — Non-compliance with s.196 CPC (informing accused) — Non-compliance with s.205 CPC (right to testify and call witnesses) — Omission renders trial a nullity; Insufficient identification and failure to call material witnesses undermine conviction.
|
15 March 1988 |
|
A supporting affidavit failing to distinguish knowledge from belief is incurable; no triable issue, judgment entered for plaintiff.
Civil procedure – Order 35 leave to defend – Supporting affidavit must state which facts are true to deponent’s knowledge and which to belief/information; failure is incurable. Application disclosing no triable issue where defendant admits claim and offers payment. Defective affidavit rejected; judgment entered for plaintiff.
|
15 March 1988 |
|
Convictions for dangerous driving quashed where alleged brake failure and conflicting evidence created reasonable doubt.
Road Traffic Act – dangerous driving – causation – whether prosecution proved driving at dangerous speed beyond reasonable doubt; defence of brake failure; weight of conflicting eyewitness evidence; absence of expert evidence on mechanical failure.
|
12 March 1988 |
|
Forgery and obtaining-money convictions upheld by inference from possession; co-accused’s conviction quashed for unreliable corroboration.
Criminal law – Forgery and uttering a false document – cheque forged and signatures false; Obtaining money by false pretences – inference from possession and conduct where no satisfactory explanation is offered; Accomplice evidence – requirement for caution and corroboration; Credibility of witnesses and motives to implicate; Misappropriation of public funds – sentences considered.
|
12 March 1988 |
|
Alleged coerced confession found admissible under s.29 and corroborated by eyewitness identification; appeal dismissed.
Evidence — Confession — Cautioned statement — Admissibility under Evidence Act s.29 where inducement alleged — inducement not likely to cause untrue admission. Evidence — Retracted/repudiated confession — requires corroboration; corroboration may be satisfied by reliable identification evidence. Identification — eye-witness identification under favourable conditions can sustain conviction. Appellate review — trial magistrate’s findings on voluntariness and credibility entitled to deference where reasonable.
|
11 March 1988 |
|
Heirs’ claim for recovery of a house sold to a bona fide purchaser is misconceived; appeal dismissed and suit dismissed with costs.
Inheritance/title dispute – will previously declared void – sale by devisee to third party.* Bona fide purchaser for value without notice – purchaser obtains good title despite disputed inheritance.* Remedy – once property sold to bona fide purchaser, heirs’ remedy may be against seller (monetary), not recovery from purchaser.* Civil procedure – conditional orders and dismissal where relief misconceived.
|
11 March 1988 |
|
A court must hear an accused's special reasons before imposing a statutory disqualification for driving without insurance.
Motor Vehicles Insurance Ordinance – conviction for driving without required insurance – statutory disqualification mandatory unless special reasons exist. Procedural fairness – accused must be afforded opportunity to advance reasons before a disqualification order is made. Remedy – quash disqualification and remit for consideration of special reasons.
|
9 March 1988 |
|
Delay in asserting land rights bars recovery; valid village allocation permits possession subject to compensation.
Land allocation by village authority – validity of allocation of vacant land – delay/sleeping on rights – entitlement to possession versus compensation – weight of village meeting determinations.
|
8 March 1988 |
|
Appeal dismissed: appellant failed to credibly account for two entrusted cattle; respondent had right to sue.
Civil appeal – safekeeping of cattle – failure to return entrusted property – burden of proof for alleged theft – need for corroborative evidence (police/ten‑cell report) – locus standi where custodian acted for family member.
|
8 March 1988 |
|
Appeal dismissed: reliable eyewitness identification upheld and concurrent robbery sentences affirmed.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – eyewitness identification; identification parade; reliability of in‑court identification; mistaken identity defence; concurrent sentences; appeal dismissed.
|
7 March 1988 |
|
Contradictory prosecution evidence failed to establish a prima facie case, justifying acquittal under section 230.
Criminal law – Theft – Identification evidence – Sufficiency of prosecution case at close of case – Prima facie case test under s.230 Criminal Procedure Act; contradictions in prosecution evidence; appellate review of acquittal.
|
5 March 1988 |
|
Until statutory acquisition formalities are complete, the occupier retains title; premature allocations are invalid and constitute trespass.
Land law – Land Acquisition Act – completion of acquisition formalities; vesting by certificate of title – effect of registration and cancellation – premature allocation by Land Office – jurisdiction to try trespass where acquisition pending – meaning of s.7 (yielding up possession vs. time limit on petition).
|
5 March 1988 |
|
Alleged written sale not produced; court measured and allocated a portion or allowed respondent to redeem.
Land dispute — clan land — proof of sale — failure to produce written agreement — admissibility — oral evidence of third-party sale — locus standi of clan member/trustee — remedy by measurement and allocation or redemption; Primary Court supervision and sketch plan.
|
4 March 1988 |
|
Conviction quashed where the second magistrate failed to inform the appellant of right to re‑summon the crucial witness, prejudicing the trial.
Criminal law – Conviction for stealing – sufficiency of evidence as to agency and misappropriation – independent commercial dealings versus agency. Criminal procedure – Section 214(2)(a) Criminal Procedure Act 1985 – accused’s right to have a witness re‑summoned and re‑heard – mandatory requirement. Procedural irregularity – failure to inform accused of statutory right – prejudice and nullity of trial. Remedy – conviction quashed, sentence set aside, no retrial ordered.
|
4 March 1988 |
|
Court convicted the accused of manslaughter, finding his cautioned statement voluntary and corroborated by credible witnesses.
Criminal law – Voluntariness and admissibility of cautioned statements – Confession corroborated by independent witnesses and details.* Evidence – Credibility of village witnesses and police – Assessment of motive and opportunity to lie.* Homicide – Manslaughter – Proof by admissions plus corroborative testimony.* Sentencing – Consideration of antecedents and time spent in remand custody.
|
4 March 1988 |
|
A guilty plea admitting all material ingredients cures variances between charge and prosecution facts.
Criminal law – Plea of guilty – Unequivocal admission of every ingredient of the offence – Variance between charge sheet and facts as to amount – Curable irregularity when accused accepts statement of facts without reservation – No miscarriage of justice; sentence confirmed.
|
4 March 1988 |
|
|
3 March 1988 |
|
Long possession and planting of permanent crops can establish cession of land; appeal dismissed and costs awarded.
Land law – ownership dispute over rural plot (shamba) – long possession and planting of permanent crops as indicia of cession/ownership. Evidence – probative weight of prolonged occupation and permanent cultivation in proving transfer of land. Civil appeals – appellate court may uphold reversal of primary court findings when supported by evidence of possession and acts of ownership.
|
3 March 1988 |
|
Reported
Failure to inform accused of statutory rights after charge alteration and failure to consider insanity vitiated the conviction.
Criminal procedure — alteration/substitution of charge — compliance with section 234(1) and (2)(b) Criminal Procedure Act — duty of court to inform accused of right to recall witnesses and further cross‑examination; Criminal law — defences — obligation to consider insanity plea as distinct from drunkenness; Failure to comply with statutory procedural safeguards vitiates conviction.
|
1 March 1988 |