|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| September 1988 |
|
|
Appeals against robbery convictions dismissed where reliable eyewitness identification and corroborative facts supported convictions.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence in daylight by two witnesses – Confession of co‑accused and possession of money – Alibi and explanation of possession rejected – Convictions upheld.
|
30 September 1988 |
|
Guilty pleas upheld and convictions affirmed; five-year sentences reduced to three years due to mitigating factors.
Criminal law – theft – plea of guilty – unequivocal plea supporting conviction – sentencing – mitigation (guilty plea, first offender, recovery of property) – appellate reduction of sentence.
|
30 September 1988 |
|
Appellate court affirmed conviction and 12‑month sentence for assault based on credible, corroborated evidence.
Criminal law – Assault causing actual bodily harm – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Appellant’s silence at trial and witness corroboration – Credibility and sufficiency of evidence – Sentence found appropriate.
|
30 September 1988 |
|
Appeal dismissed: unequivocal guilty plea supported conviction; five-year minimum sentence and compensation order upheld.
Criminal law – Plea of guilty – Whether plea was unequivocal and sufficient to sustain conviction. Criminal procedure – Sufficiency of charge – Whether accused informed of nature of offence and able to prepare defence. Sentencing – Minimum Sentences Act, 1972 – Lawful imposition of minimum custodial sentence. Restitution/compensation orders made in conjunction with custodial sentence.
|
30 September 1988 |
|
Respondent's credible alibi and reasonable explanation for possession of bicycle parts created reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal.
Criminal law – Theft – Alibi: accused need not prove alibi but may create reasonable doubt – Possession of recently stolen property: a reasonable explanation for possession may justify acquittal – Appellate interference: concurrent acquittals supported by credible evidence should not be disturbed.
|
30 September 1988 |
|
Conviction quashed where contradictory evidence and unassessed witness credibility made the false‑pretences charge unsafe.
Criminal law – obtain money by false pretences – necessity of proving misrepresentation – evaluation of witness credibility and possible bias – adverse inference from silence – civil versus criminal remedy for disputed compensation.
|
29 September 1988 |
|
|
29 September 1988 |
|
Primary Court proceedings are void where the mandatory two‑assessor requirement under the Magistrates' Courts Act was not complied with.
Magistrates' Courts Act s.7(1)–(2) – mandatory requirement to sit with not less than two assessors – decisions to be by majority of magistrate and assessors – non‑compliance renders Primary Court proceedings and decision invalid; custody order quashed.
|
29 September 1988 |
|
Applicant's conviction and sentence upheld based on reliable identification evidence; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law — Identification evidence — Visual identification in daylight; short interval between act and arrest; witness pointing out accused to police. Criminal appeal — Sufficiency of evidence to support conviction; appellate interference with sentence only if excessive.
|
29 September 1988 |
|
A late claim of mental illness cannot upset an unequivocal plea; conviction and two-year sentence affirmed.
Criminal law – conviction based on an unequivocal plea and recorded admissions – late assertion of mental disorder not entertained on appeal – sentencing: scheduled offence minimum sentence issue; possible distinction between theft and unauthorised use of vehicle.
|
28 September 1988 |
|
Whether the defendants are liable for battery, wrongful seizure/conversion of the plaintiff's bull and false imprisonment, and quantum of damages.
Torts – Battery (sjambocking) by members of a local Baraza; wrongful seizure/conversion of property (bull) and damages for loss of use; false imprisonment – insufficient particulars leads to nominal damages; ex parte proceedings where unchallenged evidence is treated as proved; assessment and quantification of damages.
|
28 September 1988 |
|
Convictions quashed where prosecution evidence and identification were insufficient and rested on mere suspicion.
Criminal law — proof of offence: necessity of evidence on nature of premises and stolen property; Identification — insufficiency and arrests based on suspicion; Suspicion alone inadequate for conviction; Convictions quashed and sentences set aside.
|
28 September 1988 |
|
Appeal allowed where trial judgment failed s.312(1) requirements and identification and evaluation of evidence were defective.
Criminal procedure – sufficiency of trial judgment under s.312(1) Criminal Procedure Act – requirement to state points for determination and give reasons; Identification of stolen property – proper procedure and proof (complainant identification, serial/receipt evidence) – adherence to Nafsoro Mohamed principles; Evaluation of defence – need for trial court to consider investigative conduct and plausible explanations before convicting.
|
28 September 1988 |
|
Appellant’s burglary and theft convictions quashed for lack of evidence of breaking and of recent or constructive possession.
Criminal law – Burglary – Essential element of "breaking" a closed or secured opening must be proved; Theft – Doctrine of recent possession – requires proof of actual or constructive possession, knowledge and control or that property was left for accused’s use or benefit; Constructive possession cannot be inferred solely because property is found with a third party.
|
27 September 1988 |
|
Night-time visual identification was unreliable; convictions based solely on it were unsafe and quashed.
Criminal law – Evidence – Visual identification at night – inherent unreliability and need to exclude mistaken identity; corroboration by possession.
|
27 September 1988 |
|
Confession corroborated by accused leading police to hidden stolen radio upheld; appeal against conviction dismissed.
Criminal law – housebreaking and theft – confession corroborated by discovery – recovery of stolen property where accused led police – sufficiency of evidence – alleged collusion between complainant and police – duty to call independent witnesses.
|
26 September 1988 |
|
The court convicted the accused of grievous bodily harm but found insufficient proof that the assault caused the deceased’s death.
Criminal law – causation in homicide – requirement to prove assault caused death; Expert medical evidence – opinion persuasive but not conclusive; Dying declaration – criteria under section 34(a) and admissibility; Extra‑judicial statements by co‑accused – self‑exculpatory statements not evidence against co‑accused; Alibi – assessment of credibility.
|
24 September 1988 |
|
Appeal allowed: court finds marriage irreparably broken down after lower courts’ misdirection and sets aside their judgments.
Divorce — irretrievable/irreparable breakdown of marriage — consideration of evidence of respondent’s second marriage and marital mistreatment; appellate review for misdirection by trial magistrate.
|
23 September 1988 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction for impersonating a public officer quashed for failure to prove essential elements beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Impersonation of public officer – Element that accused must act by virtue of alleged official status – proof required. Evidence – Credibility and corroboration – absence of clear introduction, police reporting or supporting witnesses undermines prosecution case. Criminal appeal – Conviction unsafe where essential elements not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
|
23 September 1988 |
|
Convictions for alleged embezzlement quashed where missing accounting records and audit discrepancies made proof of misappropriation unsafe.
Criminal law – Theft by servant/agent – Sufficiency of evidence – Necessity of proper accounting books and records to prove misappropriation of entrusted funds; missing records may render convictions unsafe.
|
22 September 1988 |
|
Credible identification without medical evidence of penetration or causal link rendered the defilement conviction unsafe.
Criminal law – Defilement – Whether prosecution proved penetration and causal link to accused – Role and weight of medical evidence in defilement cases. Identification evidence – Close relationship between complainant and accused – reliability versus need for corroboration. Evidentiary sufficiency – Blood on clothing and genital findings – necessity to connect such evidence to accused and to act of penetration.
|
20 September 1988 |
|
A voluntary but retracted confession can support a murder conviction when the court is satisfied of its truth; insufficient corroboration warrants acquittal of co-accused.
Criminal law – murder – admissibility and weight of retracted extra-judicial confession – corroboration requirements – evidentiary value of co-accused’s cautioned statement (not a confession) – conviction and acquittal where corroboration is lacking.
|
20 September 1988 |
|
Leader and a direct assailant caused death by torture; malice aforethought not proved, each sentenced to four years.
Criminal law – communal torture by village militia – doctrine of common intention and participation – credibility of militia eyewitnesses – role of expert (post‑mortem) evidence – malice aforethought required for murder.
|
20 September 1988 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove actual or constructive possession and burden was wrongly shifted to the defence.
Criminal law – Possession – Actual and constructive possession – Burden of proof on prosecution to establish possession beyond reasonable doubt; only then may defence show lawful possession on balance of probabilities; proximity and inconsistent witness evidence insufficient to prove possession; improper shifting of burden by trial court – conviction quashed.
|
20 September 1988 |
|
Whether a customary will complied with statutory attestation rules and whether the respondent lawfully occupied the disputed land.
Customary wills — attestation requirements for illiterate testators under Local Customary Law (No.4) Order 1963 and GN 436/63 (rules 19, 21); validity of competing customary wills; thumb‑print and signature formalities; customary succession and lawful possession following clan meeting.
|
19 September 1988 |
|
Reported
The court upheld the respondent as the lawful possessor of inherited land, dismissing the appellant's claim on procedural grounds.
Wills – Validity of Wills under Local Customary Law – Requirements for Wills executed by illiterate persons – Clan acknowledgment.
|
19 September 1988 |
|
Appeal allowed: prosecution evidence insufficient to prove assault causing grievous bodily harm; conviction set aside and appellant acquitted.
Criminal law – assault causing grievous bodily harm – sufficiency and credibility of prosecution evidence – inconsistencies and lack of corroboration – conviction cannot stand where evidence is unconvincing.
|
19 September 1988 |
|
Three defendants proved to have participated in destruction and threats; others’ convictions quashed; conditional discharge and compensation ordered.
Criminal law – malicious damage to property – threatening violence – identification of perpetrators – sufficiency of evidence. Review of sentence – whether term of imprisonment excessive – substitution of conditional discharge (section 38(1) Penal Code). Compensation for damage to property – reinstatement of Primary Court award. Public order/community harm – role of local authorities in addressing witchcraft‑related disturbances.
|
19 September 1988 |
Administration ofEstates- Inheritance - A will by an illiterateperson B - Conditionsfor validity thereof |
19 September 1988 |
|
Appellate court restored trial court's land‑possession findings, holding district court's reversal unjustified absent sufficient evidence.
Land law – possession and allocation by village authorities; credibility of witnesses – weight of trial court's locus in quo inspection; appellate review – deference to trial court factual findings and credibility assessments; requirements for overturning a credibility‑based finding.
|
19 September 1988 |
|
Identification and circumstantial evidence were insufficient to prove the accused guilty of murder; he was acquitted.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Reliability of identification made under torchlight and in intimidating circumstances; dangers of mistaken ID. Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Robbery, arson and presence at scene insufficient to convict absent reliable identification. Forensic evidence – Skull fracture and charring relevant to causation but may not conclusively establish precise cause of death. Assessors – Assessors’ concurrence with trial judge where identification evidence is doubtful.
|
17 September 1988 |
|
A parent who entrusts a child to relatives remains liable to compensate them for the child's upkeep when they assume parental care.
Family law – maintenance of infant children – duty to maintain applies whether child is in or out of parental custody – statutory duty and social/familial assumption of parental responsibilities may ground enforceable claim for compensation; credibility of witnesses and factual assumption of care determinative.
|
17 September 1988 |
|
Plaintiff not in possession; defendant lawfully allocated, registered and developed the plot; suit dismissed and defendant entitled to costs.
Land law – Right of Occupancy – existence and effective date; possession and trespass – requirement of actual or constructive possession to maintain trespass; allocation and registration of competing titles; revocation of right of occupancy by presidential order and registration; valuation of improvements and entitlement to costs.
|
16 September 1988 |
|
Traditional army tribunals cannot lawfully seize property or impose fines; plaintiffs entitled to restitution, refund and damages.
Constitutional law – Rule of law and due process – Traditional/party 'guidelines' cannot confer judicial power to non-state bodies. Property law – Unlawful seizure of goods – Right to restitution or value. Remedies – Refund of illegal fines and compensatory damages for lost goods and business interruption. Criminal/penal procedure – Only courts established by law may try and sentence offenders; extrajudicial tribunals unlawful.
|
15 September 1988 |
|
Accused convicted of manslaughter after fatal assault; ordered psychiatric observation earlier and sentenced to three years considering mitigation.
Criminal law – Manslaughter – Guilty plea to manslaughter accepted by court following facts which established fatal assault causing fractured ribs and internal haemorrhage. Criminal procedure – Mental fitness – Court ordered psychiatric observation where medical opinion suggested possible unsoundness of mind. Sentencing – Mitigation – lengthy remand, medical conditions, youth, first offender and dependent family considered in imposing three-year sentence.
|
15 September 1988 |
|
Appellant’s conviction for housebreaking and stealing upheld on recent possession and credible witness evidence; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – housebreaking and stealing – recent possession – credibility of witness – application of doctrine of recent possession; Sentencing – minimum sentences statute – value threshold for minimum sentence.
|
14 September 1988 |
|
|
14 September 1988 |
|
Bail refused due to risk of absconding and potential criminal syndicate involvement despite reliable sureties.
Bail — risk of absconding and interference with investigations — potential membership of criminal syndicate — weight of reliable sureties — public interest; economic crimes.
|
14 September 1988 |
|
An ex parte stay of execution was set aside where no notice of appeal had been given and an affected occupier had not been heard; points of law under the Rent Restriction Act certified for appeal.
Rent Restriction Act 1984 – applicability to housing tribunal and appeals – whether High Court may stay execution under Act (s.13(1)). Civil procedure – validity of ex parte stay of execution – requirement to notify and hear interested third parties. Appeal procedure – whether stay can be granted where no notice of appeal has been given; formulation of points of law for appellate consideration.
|
13 September 1988 |
|
Descendants who are not members of the owning clan cannot claim land held as clan property; appeal dismissed.
Land law – customary/clan land – whether land held by a clan can be claimed by descendants of a non‑clan occupier – where descendants are not members of the owning clan they have no title to claim.
|
13 September 1988 |
|
Reported
A juvenile's imprisonment was unlawful where statutory non‑custodial alternatives under the Children and Young Persons Ordinance were not considered.
Children and Young Persons Ordinance – definition of "young person" – section 22(2) prohibition on imprisonment of juveniles where alternative measures available – need to consider probation, discharge, repatriation or committal to approved school – custodial sentence of juvenile quashed.
|
13 September 1988 |
|
Appellate court finds conviction unsafe where a non‑audit inspection, lack of opportunity to explain discrepancies and unsupported handwriting ID occurred, and orders retrial.
Criminal law — Conviction based on inspection report mischaracterised as audit — Right to be given opportunity to explain accounting discrepancies — Handwriting identification without expert comparison — Procedural unfairness — Retrial ordered.
|
12 September 1988 |
|
Appellate court erred in rejecting trial evidence; marriage found irretrievably broken and divorce restored.
Family law – Divorce – Sufficiency of evidence to show marriage breakdown; Appellate review – Mischaracterisation of evidence and hearsay; Competence of witnesses; Proceedings in absence of parties under Magistrates’ Courts Act (proceeding on returned service).
|
10 September 1988 |
|
Offspring of a cow paid as bride-price are refundable upon a broken engagement under Rule 83 of the Customary Law Order.
Customary law – bride-price – offspring of livestock paid as bride-price are refundable on broken engagement (Rule 83, Customary Law (Declaration) Order G.N. No. 279 of 1963); assessors’ views; evidentiary proof of offspring.
|
9 September 1988 |
|
|
9 September 1988 |
|
Primary Court proceedings set aside where assessors' individual views and signatures were not recorded, per s.7(1)–(2) Magistrates' Courts Act.
Magistrates' Courts — Requirement to record assessors' views — Section 7(1) & (2), Magistrates' Courts Act 1984 — Failure to record and sign assessors' opinions is a fatal irregularity — Primary Court proceedings set aside — Right to re‑institute proceedings before different magistrate and assessors.
|
9 September 1988 |
|
Long delay and uncorroborated oral admission defeated an ownership claim to cattle under customary law; appeal allowed.
Civil procedure – Proprietary claim under customary law – proof of ownership and possession of cattle – necessity for corroboration of oral admissions. Limitation – Customary Law (Limitation of Proceedings) Rules 1963, Rule 45 – court may reject claims after unwarrantable delay where just determination may be prejudiced. Capacity to be sued – importance of proving in what capacity defendant is sued (owner, administrator, etc.).
|
9 September 1988 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove the appellant possessed stolen cement beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Theft – Proof beyond reasonable doubt – necessity of establishing ownership and link to alleged theft date. Evidence – Hearsay from absent informant inadmissible to establish essential facts. Circumstantial evidence – Suspicion from possession and condition of goods insufficient for conviction. Remedies – Quashing of conviction, set aside of sentence and restoration (or payment) for seized property.
|
8 September 1988 |
|
Plaintiff failed to prove ownership or wrongful conversion of disputed cattle; claim dismissed and costs awarded to defendant.
Property dispute — recovery of cattle — ownership and conversion — burden of proof on balance of probabilities — inadequate identification and inconsistent evidence — administrative communications insufficient to establish title — claim dismissed, costs to defendant.
|
8 September 1988 |
|
The applicant's restoration application was dismissed due to inconsistent, unsupported medical excuses and lack of corroborating evidence.
Civil procedure — Restoration of appeal after non‑appearance — Applicant's excuse must be credible and supported by evidence — Inconsistent affidavit and oral statements undermine restoration — Failure to produce alleged medical evidence fatal to application — Costs awarded to respondent.
|
8 September 1988 |