|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| June 1989 |
|
|
Second appeal dismissed: no sufficient evidence of irretrievable breakdown and no point of law to disturb concurrent factual findings.
Matrimonial law – alleged irretrievable breakdown of marriage – appellate review – concurrent findings of fact – second appeal requires arguable point of law or demonstrable error to justify interference.
|
30 June 1989 |
|
Second appellate court will not disturb concurrent factual findings absent a point of law or compelling reason.
Matrimonial law – irretrievable breakdown of marriage – appellate review of concurrent findings of fact – second appeal will not disturb subordinate courts’ factual findings absent legal error.
|
30 June 1989 |
|
Reported
Land Law - Mortgage - Definition of mortgage where customary law applies.
Land Law - Limitation - Period to redeem a mortgage created under customary law. |
30 June 1989 |
|
Reported
Applicant’s claim to redeem a customary mortgage barred by the 12-year limitation; appeal dismissed.
Limitation of actions – Law of Limitation Act 1971 – customary mortgage included in definition of mortgage – suit to redeem land from mortgagee must be brought within 12 years (First Schedule, Part I) – s.3(1) mandatory dismissal where limitation elapsed – s.39 extinguishment of rights.
|
30 June 1989 |
|
|
30 June 1989 |
|
An ex parte judgment entered without any evidence is unsupported and must be quashed and the matter reheard; seized property restored.
Civil procedure – Ex parte judgment – plaintiff permitted to proceed ex parte must adduce evidence (viva voce or affidavit) – absence of evidence renders ex parte judgment unsupported and liable to be quashed. Appealability – failure to apply to set aside ex parte judgment in trial court does not preclude appellate intervention where judgment lacks evidentiary foundation. Remedies – quash judgment and order rehearing; restore property seized in execution if judgment set aside.
|
30 June 1989 |
|
Conviction for erecting a road barrier set aside because the statute did not create that offence.
Statutory interpretation – Police Force Ordinance (Cap. 322) – Sections addressing stopping at police barriers do not create an offence of erecting road barriers; conviction for non-existent statutory offence set aside.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Attachment of third‑party cattle in execution was unlawful; father not liable for adult child’s debts and offspring award set aside for lack of evidence.
Civil procedure – Primary Court jurisdiction – plaintiff may sue in his own Primary Court or bring objection proceedings in the execution court; procedural irregularity not fatal where no failure of justice (s.37 MCA). Execution law – attachment – attachment of third party property in execution requires proof of ownership by judgment-debtor. Obligations – parent’s liability – father not liable for debts of an independent adult child. Evidence – monetary or restitutive awards based on offspring require evidence of pregnancy/issue.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Omission of the decree with a memorandum of appeal renders the appeal incompetent and must be dismissed.
Civil Procedure – Order 39 r.1 – Requirement that memorandum of appeal be accompanied by a copy of the decree – Mandatory compliance – Failure to attach decree renders appeal incompetent – No discretion to permit amendment or fresh appeal in such case; appeal dismissed with costs.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Appellate court affirms robbery conviction, finding eyewitness identification reliable and the appellant’s alibi unproven.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence: eyewitness identification at scene and at police station; adequacy of lighting and time for observation – Alibi: asserted hospitalization refuted by medical testimony – Appeal: trial court’s assessment of identification and alibi upheld.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Timing contradictions in the prosecution evidence did not create reasonable doubt; identification evidence upheld the robbery conviction.
Criminal law – robbery – appeal against conviction – contradictions in prosecution evidence regarding time of offence – alterations to charge sheet – identification evidence – whether contradictions raise reasonable doubt – conviction upheld.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Accused convicted of premeditated murder by poisoning; provocation rejected and sentenced to death by hanging.
Criminal law – Murder – Premeditation and administration of poison – Elements of intent and planning; Criminal law – Defence of provocation – applicability where alleged long-term adultery and refusal to attend rituals; Sentence – death by hanging as statutory punishment for murder under section 196 of the Penal Code.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Appeal against robbery convictions dismissed; identification and credibility upheld, alibi rejected for lack of statutory notice, sentence increased to 15 years.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence at night – lamp lit and familiarity between parties – reliability of identification; Defence of alibi – requirement of prior notice under s.124(4)(5) CPA – failure to comply and inconsistent supporting evidence undermining alibi; Sentencing – armed robbery seriousness warrants enhanced custodial terms.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Presence near a burglary and sounding an alarm does not, without more, prove participation; conviction and illegal sentence quashed.
Criminal law – shopbreaking and stealing – proof beyond reasonable doubt – presence at scene and raising an alarm insufficient to establish common intention or participation; sentencing – misapplication of Minimum Sentences Act and failure to specify concurrency/consecutivity – conviction and illegal sentence quashed.
|
29 June 1989 |
|
Where a plot is double‑allocated, the first unrevoked allocation prevails absent a formal revocation.
Land law – allocation of public land; double allocation; short‑term right of occupancy; revocation requires formal order; evidence and proof of non‑payment/non‑development; priority to first allocation where no valid revocation.
|
28 June 1989 |
|
An earlier short‑term right of occupancy prevails absent formal, proved revocation before a later allocation.
Land law – Allocation of land – short‑term right of occupancy – competing allocations to two parties; priority to first allottee absent proved, formal revocation. Evidence – requirement for documentary proof of notice/revocation and caution in relying on testimony of land officers. Property – unregistered short‑term rights of occupancy – effect and protection where allocation not formally revoked. Remedies – appellate court may set aside trial court judgment where revocation not established on balance of probabilities.
|
28 June 1989 |
|
|
28 June 1989 |
|
Temporary injunction application dismissed as overtaken by events; court refused to grant unenforceable oral restraint.
Civil procedure – Injunctions – Application for temporary injunction rendered academic where subject goods already removed from custody – Court will not grant orders that cannot be enforced; oral prayers at the bar inappropriate – O.37 r.1; ss.68(e), 95 CPC.
|
27 June 1989 |
|
Negligence and misrepresentation by the applicant's advocate do not justify extension of time to file an appeal.
Civil procedure – extension of time to file appeal – application for leave to file memorandum of appeal out of time – requirement of good and sufficient reason; advocate's negligence and misrepresentation not sufficient. Procedural fairness – ex parte proof by affidavit following non-appearance – court reliance on district court record and counter-affidavit to assess credibility.
|
27 June 1989 |
|
First accused convicted for theft due to custody and unexplained missing government gasket; second acquitted for lack of identification evidence.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – custody of store keys and unexplained disappearance of government property supports conviction. Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – prosecution must prove identity and ownership of the article beyond reasonable doubt; generic articles require specific marks or explanation of identification. Evidence – Identification evidence must show how witnesses recognized the specific article; bare assertions unacceptable.
|
26 June 1989 |
|
Appellant failed to prove respondents’ cattle damaged his crops; identification and credibility evidence was inadequate.
Civil evidence — Identification of animals — Hoof‑print tracking and identification by colour — Insufficiency where kraal contains many cattle and witnesses rely on third party; credibility findings of trial court entitled to deference on appeal.
|
24 June 1989 |
|
Under Nyakyusa customary law the bull given as bridewealth, tied to bride's virginity, is not refundable on divorce.
Customary law – bridewealth – bull symbolising appreciation of chastity – payment conditional on bride's virginity – non‑refundable on divorce (Nyakyusa customary law).
|
23 June 1989 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction for possession of Moshi quashed for failure to prove possession and identity beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of controlled liquor (Moshi) – proof of possession (actual vs constructive) – proof of identity of seized substance – prosecution must establish both possession and identity beyond reasonable doubt.
|
23 June 1989 |
|
Convictions for forcible entry and malicious damage quashed for lack of evidence and improper sentencing.
Criminal law – Forcible entry: requirement of violence or threats; Criminal law – Malicious damage: need for proof of deliberate intent and actual damage; Boundary disputes do not substitute for criminal elements; Criminal procedure – appellate courts must not impose punishments not authorised by the Primary Courts Criminal Procedure Code.
|
23 June 1989 |
|
A mere alteration of an offer letter does not confer title; year-to-year leases require revocation and builders who ignore stop orders bear demolition costs.
Land law – Right of occupancy – Offer and acceptance – Acquisition requires offer followed by acceptance evidenced by payment of fees. Year-to-year leases – Termination/revocation requires notice; reallocation cannot occur without revocation. Land allocation – Alteration of an offer letter does not substitute for fresh offer/acceptance. Remedies – Builder who ignores stop/court orders on another’s land bears risk; demolition and costs may be ordered. Administrative liability – Potential claim against authority that wrongly allocated land, not against innocent landowner.
|
23 June 1989 |
|
Where evidence is evenly balanced and no independent witness exists, the accused receives the benefit of doubt and conviction may be quashed.
Road traffic offences – reckless driving and causing bodily injury – conflicting accounts and absence of independent eyewitness – prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; sketch plan and vehicle damage insufficient to remove reasonable doubt.
|
22 June 1989 |
|
Appeal allowed where respondent failed to prove on balance of probabilities that village allocation of the shamba was valid.
Land allocation — evidence required to show vacancy before allocation — village allocation committees must ascertain land status — burden on plaintiff to prove valid allocation on balance of probabilities — appellate interference where evidence is inconclusive.
|
22 June 1989 |
|
Eviction from employer‑owned service housing falls within district court jurisdiction; reinstatement must be sought from labour tribunals.
Rent Restriction Act 1984 – service tenancy – employer/parastatal premises – Regional Housing Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over premises used by employees of government or parastatals.* Civil procedure – jurisdiction – District Court competent to adjudicate possession of employer‑owned service houses.* Labour law – reinstatement – only conciliation board or Permanent Labour Tribunal can order reinstatement of dismissed employees; administrative housing bodies lack that power.
|
22 June 1989 |
|
Reasonable force in defence of property justified acquittal; provocation does not excuse assault.
Criminal law – Assault – Provocation not a complete defence, only a mitigating factor for sentence – Defence of property – Use of reasonable force to repel forcible taking of mosque keys – Appellate review of acquittal.
|
21 June 1989 |
|
Concurrent findings that attached cattle belonged to a third party (father‑in‑law) were upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – execution and attachment – third‑party claim to attached goods – proof of ownership by third party. Evidence – concurrent findings of primary and district courts – appellate interference only where findings are unsupported or perverse. Customary law – bridewealth/return of dowry – effect on proprietary rights in execution proceedings.
|
20 June 1989 |
|
Where clerk’s failure to pay fees caused registration, court allowed case to proceed after payment and directed investigation.
Civil procedure – Court fees – Validity of filing where fees unpaid – Ordinarily plaint to be rejected for non-payment – Equitable discretion where counsel reasonably believed fees paid and registry registered the case – Directions to investigate refund.
|
20 June 1989 |
|
An appeal filed beyond the statutory 45-day period without leave is incompetent and dismissed; five-year sentence upheld.
Criminal procedure – time limit for filing appeals under s.361(b) – appeal must be filed within 45 days from finding, sentence or order; failure to apply for leave to file out of time renders appeal incompetent and liable to dismissal; appellate interference with sentence only where warranted – five-year sentence upheld.
|
20 June 1989 |
|
Appeal dismissed as time‑barred where appellant failed to seek leave to file out of time after receiving the judgment copy.
Criminal procedure – Appeal time limits – Appeal filed after statutory period (45 days under s.361 CPC) – Delay in obtaining judgment copy not excusing late filing where delay occurred after receipt – Requirement to apply for leave to file out of time – Time‑barred appeal held incompetent and dismissed.
|
20 June 1989 |
|
Appellate court increases rape sentence to reflect aggravated gravity where victim was appellant’s grandmother and quashes robbery conviction.
Rape — seriousness of offence — sentencing must reflect society's abhorrence; maximum penalty life imprisonment — increased sentence where victim was close family member; appellate adjustment of unduly lenient sentence; quashing of robbery conviction on appeal.
|
20 June 1989 |
|
Earlier lawful village allocation and occupation cannot be displaced by a later allocation; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – village allocation – valid allocation by village committee – prior allocation and occupation prevents later reallocation without just cause – appellate review of factual findings and witness credibility.
|
20 June 1989 |
|
Order for retrial after acquittal was unwarranted; acquittal confirmed and retrial order set aside.
Criminal law – acquittal and retrial – appellate power to order retrial – retrial not warranted absent misdirection or procedural irregularity; credibility of witnesses and ownership dispute as basis for acquittal; admission of documentary exhibit immaterial where central issue is witness credibility and ownership.
|
20 June 1989 |
|
Court substituted a fine for an inappropriate short custodial sentence under Road Traffic Act s39(5).
Road Traffic Act s39(5) – interpretation of custodial sentence as alternative to a fine; sentencing discretion – appropriateness of short imprisonment for first offenders; appellate substitution of sentence.
|
19 June 1989 |
|
Prosecution failed to prove disturbance or assault beyond reasonable doubt; convictions quashed and sentences set aside.
Criminal law – disturbance in public place; assault causing actual bodily harm – burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt; evaluation of conflicting witness evidence; duty to give sufficient weight to defence evidence; misdirection by trial magistrate.
|
19 June 1989 |
|
Possession of recently stolen property can justify conviction; a co-accused’s confession alone cannot convict others.
Criminal law – possession of recently stolen property – inference of guilt where stolen item found in possession shortly after theft. Evidence – confession by co-accused (s.33 Evidence Act) – cannot be sole basis for conviction of others; independent evidence required. Arrest conduct – hiding or fleeing insufficient alone to prove participation in the principal offence.
|
19 June 1989 |
|
The applicant’s recent possession of stolen goods and attempt to flee justified conviction for burglary.
Criminal law – Burglary (breaking into godown and stealing) – Doctrine of recent possession – Possession of stolen goods shortly after theft and attempt to flee may support conviction. Criminal law – Receiving vs. burglary – Recent possession plus surrounding circumstances can justify conviction for the more serious offence. Evidence – Sufficiency – possession and conduct of accused as circumstantial proof.
|
19 June 1989 |
|
Conviction for night-time robbery unsafe where identification rested on a single witness and material witness contradicted prosecution evidence.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification – reliance on single witness for night-time incident – danger of unsafe conviction; Admission of additional evidence on appeal – material witness whose testimony undermines prosecution case; Alibi – necessity to resolve contested issues of time and place before convicting.
|
19 June 1989 |
|
A registered Village Council must be sued for village matters; suing the chairman personally is improper; appeal dismissed.
Local government – Village registration – Registered Village Council is a legal person – capacity to sue and be sued. Civil procedure – Proper party – Wrong party sued (village chairman instead of Village Council) – appeal dismissed for wrong party. Remedy – No costs where party wrongly sued after alleged misdirection by magistrate – permission to refile without fresh fees upon affidavit. Directions – Fresh suit to be tried by different magistrate and assessors; certified copy of judgment to be read in Primary Court.
|
17 June 1989 |
|
Cautioned statement upheld; self‑defence rejected and the accused convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
Criminal law — Murder (s.196 Penal Code); admissibility and weight of cautioned statement despite incomplete Police Force Ordinance/Criminal Procedure Act formalities; self‑defence; legal provocation; forensic and eyewitness corroboration.
|
17 June 1989 |
|
Accusation of witchcraft is actionable per se; boycott is not necessarily false imprisonment; damages awarded Shs.200,000.
Defamation — imputation of witchcraft actionable per se; Criminal conviction admissible and conclusive evidence in related civil claim; Boycott/ostracism does not necessarily constitute false imprisonment; Assessment of damages for social stigma and risk of serious harm.
|
16 June 1989 |
|
An appellate court must not overturn trial court credibility findings absent clear misdirection or material error.
Land law – recovery of shamba – dispute whether land was lent (1983) or lawfully occupied after clearing bush (1973). Evidence – credibility of witnesses – trial court is best judge. Appeal – appellate court should not disturb trial court credibility findings absent clear misdirection or error.
|
16 June 1989 |
|
Appeal dismissed: appellant failed to prove ownership or prior occupation; lower courts’ factual findings sustained.
Property dispute — ownership of tree on village land — balance of probabilities — burden of proof on claimant — factual findings of trial court supported by evidence and site visit — appellate court unwilling to disturb findings absent clear contrary evidence.
|
16 June 1989 |
|
Plaintiff lacked standing and the claim to recover land was time‑barred under the 12‑year limitation rule.
Civil procedure – locus standi – plaintiff without letters of administration has no standing to sue over deceased’s property; Limitation of actions – Item 22, Part I, First Schedule, Law of Limitation Act – 12‑year limitation for recovery of land – claim time‑barred where deceased died in 1967.
|
16 June 1989 |
|
Appeal allowed in part: no evidence goods were supplied, theft convictions quashed; third guilty of obtaining money by false pretences.
Criminal law – alleged theft and obtaining money by false pretences – provenance of L.P.O. and delivery documents; handwriting identification by acquainted non‑expert witnesses; sufficiency of evidence to prove supply of goods; inference of conspiracy from circumstantial acts.
|
16 June 1989 |
|
A late objection years after grant of letters of administration cannot displace a valid grant absent sufficient, timely grounds.
Probate and administration – grant of letters of administration – review of long‑standing grants – effect of lapse of time and limitation statutes on applications to set aside letters.* Procedural irregularities and competing claims do not automatically vitiate a grant of administration absent sufficient cause.
|
15 June 1989 |
|
Ex parte judgment awarding admitted rent and telephone debts where the respondent was validly served and failed to defend.
Civil procedure – Service of process – service effected after refusal to accept documents – valid service and effect on proceedings Civil procedure – Ex parte proceedings – entry of judgment where defendant fails to appear or defend Contract/debt – admission of debt in writing and demand – evidentiary sufficiency to support judgment Remedies – award of damages for property removal (mosquito gauze) and interest and costs
|
15 June 1989 |