|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| September 1989 |
|
|
Court refused full pre-judgment attachment but ordered an interim prohibition on disposal of assets and deposit of travel documents.
Civil procedure – adjournment for advocate’s indisposition; attachment before judgment – allegations of asset dissipation – refusal of full attachment where it would cripple business – interim prohibitory injunction and deposit of travel documents as balanced interim relief.
|
30 September 1989 |
|
Refund of brideprice does not dissolve a marriage; only a court can, so the child belongs to the lawful husband.
Family law – customary marriage – effect of refund of brideprice – refund does not dissolve marriage; only a court can dissolve marriage. Paternity – child born shortly after brideprice refund treated as conceived in wedlock where marriage not judicially dissolved.
|
29 September 1989 |
Limitation Law - Limitation in customary law - No specific period
oflimitation specified -But no unwarrantable delay is allowed.
Family Law - Inheritance - Inheritance ofwife - Legal effect on
children and property. |
29 September 1989 |
|
Appeal over ownership of attached cattle dismissed; appellate court’s reallocation in favour of respondent upheld with costs.
Property dispute — ownership and possession of attached cattle — conflicting trial and appellate allocations (12 vs 33 heads) — appellate review — appeal dismissed and costs awarded.
|
29 September 1989 |
|
Reported
Limitation Law - Limitation in customary law - No specific period of limitation specified - But no unwarrantable delay is allowed.
Family Law - Inheritance - Inheritance of wife - Legal effect on children and property. |
29 September 1989 |
|
Reported
Seventeen-year delay in customary-law cattle claim is unwarrantable; inheritor holds cattle and child cannot claim while inheritor lives.
Customary law — Limitation of proceedings (GN No.311/1964 r.5) — unwarrantable delay may bar claims; six-year delay previously held unwarrantable; 17-year delay here barred claim. Customary inheritance (installation of inheritor) — effect on property rights: wife and child become legal family of inheritor; child has no separate claim to property held by inheritor while inheritor lives. Trial error — failure to address limitation is fatal.
|
29 September 1989 |
|
Reported
Constitution Law - Constitutional right - Right to the protection of property. |
29 September 1989 |
|
Reported
Property taken and awarded by non‑state Sungusungu is unlawful; recipient must return unlawfully obtained cattle.
Customary enforcement groups (Sungusungu) lack judicial power; seizures by non‑state actors unlawful under constitutional property protections; recipient of unlawfully obtained property must restore it; aggrieved party should sue the unlawful actors for further recovery.
|
29 September 1989 |
|
Written marriage contract binding on respondent; extraneous evidence inadmissible and third parties not bound.
Contract law – written marriage/brideprice agreement – admissibility of extraneous evidence – privity of contract – third parties cannot be bound by another’s contract – appellate review setting aside lower court for admitting irrelevant evidence.
|
28 September 1989 |
|
Court applied Islamic inheritance rules to allocate estate shares and remitted distribution; separate land appeal dismissed—state acquisition extinguished rights.
Islamic inheritance — classification of heirs — fixed sharers (dhawu al-faraid), residuaries (asabah), relations through females — determination and application of shares.* Probate — application of Islamic succession rules and remittance for distribution.* Property law — acquisition by a public body extinguishes prior individual rights; lack of evidence of planting defeats compensation claims for trees.* Civil procedure — appellate confirmation and remittal to trial court; dismissal of appeal with costs.
|
28 September 1989 |
|
Appeal partly allowed; customary marriage not proved, concubinage not marriage, adultery damages reduced to five heads of cattle.
Adultery damages – proof of marriage – distinction between customary marriage and concubinage – evidentiary burden on claimant of customary marriage – quantum of damages reduced where spouses were living apart; damages compensatory not punitive.
|
28 September 1989 |
|
Applicant failed to prove he was misled by counsel and the proposed out-of-time appeal lacked reasonable prospects of success.
Civil procedure – application for leave to appeal out of time; alleged legal misadvice as ground for extension; requirement of evidence from alleged adviser; assessment of prospects of success; occupation versus transfer of property to discharge debt.
|
28 September 1989 |
|
Tribal/community tribunals lacked judicial power to convict or confiscate property; courts may not enforce such illegal orders.
Constitutional/administrative law – separation of judicial power – judicial power vested exclusively in courts of law; tribal or community councils lack judicial authority to convict or confiscate property. Civil procedure – enforcement of orders – courts cannot enforce or condone illegal/unlawful orders made by bodies without jurisdiction.
|
27 September 1989 |
|
Marriage Conciliatory Boards cannot dissolve marriages; only courts may, so seizure of cattle for brideprice was unlawful.
Family law – dissolution of marriage – Marriage Conciliatory Boards have no power to grant divorces; only courts may dissolve marriages (s.92 Marriage Act No.5/1971) – seizure of property as refund of bride price unlawful if dissolution not effected by a court.
|
27 September 1989 |
|
|
26 September 1989 |
|
Appeal allowed; lower courts erred procedurally—ex parte Primary Court judgment must be set aside through application before a valid appeal.
Civil procedure – Ex parte judgment – Proper remedy for defaulting party is application to Primary Court to set aside ex parte judgment before appeal; District Court must not entertain appeals where ex parte set-aside has not been sought; paternity disputes require careful procedural safeguards.
|
26 September 1989 |
|
Appellant failed to prove respondent induced his wife to desert him; credibility findings upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil law – alleged inducement to desert marital home – burden and standard of proof – credibility of witnesses – appellate deference to trial court findings.
|
26 September 1989 |
|
Conviction for receiving stolen paddy quashed where market sale in presence of witnesses failed to prove the appellant’s guilty knowledge.
Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – Proof of guilty knowledge; Evidence – Sufficiency of inference from failure to inquire into origin of goods; Evidence – Commercial sale in market with witnesses as supporting lawful transaction; Delivery of purchased goods to buyer’s premises not necessarily indicative of criminal knowledge.
|
26 September 1989 |
|
Appellate court confirms convictions and concurrent two‑year sentences based on credible identification and recovery evidence.
Criminal law – Theft (Penal Code s.265) – Identification and recovery of stolen property – Credibility of witness identification – Appellate review of conviction and sentence.
|
23 September 1989 |
|
Section 59 protects a spouse's right to remain in the matrimonial home but does not nullify a sale or authorize redemption.
Matrimonial home – Law of Marriage Act s.59 – sale by one spouse without consent – effect on validity of sale; Spouse’s proprietary interest arising from joint efforts – enforceability against purchaser with notice; Section 59 protects right to reside but does not provide for redemption; Remedy: reinstatement in occupation; costs each party.
|
22 September 1989 |
|
Appeal dismissed for failure to prove respondent’s cattle caused destruction of appellant’s cotton; evidence lacked independent corroboration.
Civil damages claim for crop destruction – proof on balance of probabilities – credibility findings – absence of independent corroborative evidence – appeal dismissed.
|
22 September 1989 |
|
Whether the appellant was the proper heir liable for bride‑price refund and whether courts should have deducted for marriage duration and considered undue delay.
Customary law – bride‑price refund – liability of heir to repay bride‑price – proof of main heirship required. Civil procedure – party‑properly – necessity to allow evidence on heirship rather than summarily dismissing point. Customary Law (Limitation of Proceedings) Rules GN No. 311/1964 – rule 5 – courts may reject claims where unwarrantable delay prejudices just determination. Assessment of refund – courts should consider duration of marriage, number of children and fault for breakdown when awarding bride‑price repayment.
|
22 September 1989 |
|
|
22 September 1989 |
|
Whether the respondent proved theft to justify Sungu Sungu seizure; appellate reliance on an unproduced document was improper.
Evidence – theft alleged before customary tribunal (Sungu Sungu) – burden and quality of proof required to justify seizure of property. Evidence – hearsay and failure to call key witnesses weaken claim. Documentary evidence – inadmissibility/weight of an unproduced document (Exhibit B) relied upon by appellate court. Customary justice – limits where determinations lead to deprivation of property without proof. Remedy – return of unlawfully seized property.
|
21 September 1989 |
|
An appeal succeeds where appellant’s annulment was supported by respondent’s clear trial admissions; District Court wrongly preferred a later retraction.
Family Law – Law of Marriage Act – annulment for lack of consent – marriages arranged by parents without parties’ consent may be null and void. Evidence – weight of a party’s written and trial admissions – later retraction on appeal cannot easily displace clear prior admissions. Appellate review – appellate court should not prefer a late retraction over contemporaneous signed statements and trial evidence.
|
21 September 1989 |
|
An unlawful arrest in a civil dispute entitles the complainant to damages; Shs 16,250/= award for lost goods upheld.
Civil procedure – unlawful arrest – arrest in relation to a civil dispute unlawful; Damages – loss of goods during transit – award of Shs 16,250/= upheld; Liability – principal actor liable, two other persons absolved.
|
21 September 1989 |
|
High Court set aside District Court’s allowance of appeal, finding respondent’s possession and testimony superior to appellant’s weak documentary proof.
Land law – Ownership dispute – Sufficiency and credibility of documentary versus oral evidence of title and long possession. Civil procedure – Appeal – Whether District Court properly allowed appeal against trial court given evidential record. Evidence – Weight of oral testimony proving continuous possession and improvements as supporting a claim to land.
|
21 September 1989 |
|
Offspring of animals given as brideprice remain the payee’s property and are not refundable on divorce.
Family law – brideprice – animals given as brideprice – ownership of animals and their offspring – paragraph 45, Law of Persons Act (No. 279 of 1953) – offspring of animals paid as brideprice not refundable on dissolution of marriage.
|
20 September 1989 |
|
The appeal was allowed because the trial magistrate's civil jurisdiction was not demonstrated and procedural requirements were unmet.
Civil jurisdiction – whether a district magistrate has been validly appointed or empowered to try civil cases – requirement of Government Notice or record demonstrating civil appointment. Civil procedure – appeals – Order 39 rule 1 Civil Procedure Code – memorandum of appeal must be accompanied by copy of decree; failure renders appeal incompetent. Nullity – proceedings conducted without proven jurisdiction are null and require retrial before a competent forum.
|
20 September 1989 |
|
An appeal is incompetent without the lower court’s decree; customary leaders lack power to lawfully seize or adjudicate property.
Civil procedure – Appeal competency – requirement that a memorandum of appeal be accompanied by a copy of the decree of the lower court. Customary/traditional authorities – lack of judicial power – unlawful seizure or detention of property – property attachment requires court conviction or finding.
|
20 September 1989 |
|
Identification and a corroborated confession upheld the robbery conviction; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence; cautioned police statement; corroboration by conduct and circumstances; proof beyond reasonable doubt; appellate review of trial findings.
|
20 September 1989 |
|
Reported
Issuance of talaka plus failed reconciliation certificate mandates divorce under s107(3); wife’s domestic contribution did not warrant half the assets.
Family law – Islamic marriage – s.107(3) Law of Marriage Act: talaka plus conciliatory Board certificate of failure requires court to find irreparable breakdown and grant divorce; Matrimonial property – s.114(1)-(2): domestic contributions count but division depends on extent of contribution, debts, customs, children’s needs; equal division not automatic where one spouse provided funds.
|
19 September 1989 |
|
Appeal dismissed: sitting together and suspicion alone do not prove adultery; evidence failed to meet balance of probabilities.
Evidence – adultery – whether sitting together constitutes adultery – requirement of proof on balance of probabilities and need for corroboration. Civil procedure – appeals – frivolous or vexatious appeals – appellate court’s review of factual findings of lower courts.
|
19 September 1989 |
|
Appellant’s denial of a 1976 sale failed; lower courts’ acceptance of respondent’s witness evidence upheld and appeal dismissed with costs.
Evidence – credibility of witnesses – whether respondent proved sale of land and houses by testimony and witnesses. Civil appeals – appellate review of factual findings – whether lower courts properly preferred respondent’s evidence. Property disputes – proof of sale where land not registered and transaction supported by oral witnesses.
|
19 September 1989 |
|
Conviction for causing actual bodily harm quashed because prosecution failed to prove appellant’s participation beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Assault causing actual bodily harm – Sufficiency of evidence to prove participation – Alibi and corroboration – Standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt – Unsafe conviction and appellate interference.
|
18 September 1989 |
|
Recent possession after long delay insufficient to prove theft; supports receiving-stolen-property conviction and sentence reduction.
Criminal law – Theft – Doctrine of recent possession – Delay of ten months insufficient to infer original theft. Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – Substitution of conviction under s.306(1) Criminal Procedure Act. Sentencing – Reduction to statutory minimum where value not proved and accused is youthful first offender. Procedure – Defective/ambiguous charge sheet/joinder curable where no prejudice.
|
18 September 1989 |
|
Appeal dismissed; identification evidence was reliable, so convictions and sentences for robbery with violence were upheld.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence; identification evidence – reliability factors: prior acquaintance, lack of surprise, torch illumination, contemporaneous descriptions to police, corroborating injuries and bloodstains; alibi rejected; convictions upheld.
|
18 September 1989 |
|
Identification evidence, corroborated by surrounding circumstances and physical evidence, upheld the applicants' robbery convictions.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Conviction based on identification evidence – Identification evidence must be watertight but may be upheld where contemporaneous circumstances (torchlight, prior acquaintance, exchange of words, physical evidence and prompt arrest) satisfactorily corroborate it.
|
18 September 1989 |
|
|
18 September 1989 |
|
Reported
Conviction for theft by servant quashed where unsigned remittance records and ambiguous statements failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Theft by servant – sufficiency of evidence – reliance on unsigned internal remittance records versus ticket books – admission by accused — requirement proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
18 September 1989 |
|
Whether oral evidence and village allocation suffice to establish title to disputed rural land.
Land law – disputed rural parcel – proof of purchase by oral evidence – absence of vendor’s testimony – village allocation and credibility of village/ten‑cell witnesses – appeal dismissed.
|
17 September 1989 |
|
Damages for adultery are discretionary and limited to reasonable customary compensation; full customary refund not automatic.
Customary law – compensation/blood‑money paid under customary arbitration – entitlement to refund where criminal charge dropped; Matrimonial law – damages for adultery under s.14(1) Law of Marriage Act No.5 of 1971 – discretionary, non‑punitive assessment; appellate review – interference only where discretion misused.
|
16 September 1989 |
|
The appellant's identification in a daylight robbery was sufficient; the conviction and seven-year sentence were upheld.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – visual identification in broad daylight – proximate and prolonged observation supports reliability of ID; corroboration by a witness who knew the accused. Criminal procedure – summary dismissal of frivolous appeals under s.362 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Sentence – seven years’ imprisonment is the statutory minimum for robbery with violence.
|
16 September 1989 |
|
Eyewitness evidence and failure to give statutory alibi notice led to convictions for causing death; common intention applied.
Criminal law – homicide/causing death by assault – whether prosecution proved death resulted from assault beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal procedure – alibi – requirement to give notice under section 194 CPC and effect of non-compliance. Criminal liability – common intention (section 22 Penal Code) – joint responsibility for death resulting from a common unlawful purpose. Evidence – credibility and corroboration of eyewitness testimony.
|
15 September 1989 |
|
Service contract breached; trial court properly applied restitutionary principles under section 83, and appeal was dismissed.
Contract law — personal service contract — failure to perform — restitution/refund under section 83 of the Law of Persons; Law of Contract (Cap. 433) — section 23(2) and public policy; Primary/ District Courts — Registrar’s Circular No.2/1984 and applicability of customary contract law.
|
15 September 1989 |
|
Claim for refund of brideprice dismissed as time‑barred; divorce, not widowhood, and delay decisive.
Family law – brideprice refund; applicability of Law of Persons provision concerning widowhood; effect of divorce and cohabitation on status; locus standi of administrator; limitation of actions – no specific period for brideprice claims but courts may dismiss for undue delay.
|
15 September 1989 |
|
No police arrest authorisation shown; excessive force in resistance; convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to eight years.
Criminal law – Murder v. manslaughter – Self-defence and reasonable force – Unlawful or informal arrest – Credibility of witnesses – Medical evidence on cause of death.
|
15 September 1989 |
|
|
14 September 1989 |
|
Customary law cannot compel a relative to pay another’s debts; appeal to attach the objector’s cattle dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – attachment in execution – whether decree-holder may attach third party’s property alleged to be relative of judgment-debtor Customary law – liability for debts – whether customary rule can compel a son to pay his father’s debts Constitutional law – right to property (Bill of Rights, Art. 24) – customary rules inconsistent with property rights are void Appellate review – Primary Court assessors’ customary findings set aside by District Court upheld by High Court
|
14 September 1989 |
|
Appellate court will not disturb trial court’s demeanour-based credibility findings absent no evidence, misinterpretation, or perversity.
Criminal law – Theft of cattle – Identification and ownership – Credibility of witnesses based on demeanour; Appeal – Appellate restraint – When to interfere with trial court findings of fact (no evidence, misinterpretation, or perverse finding); Evidence – Value of eyewitness testimony and corroboration in livestock theft cases.
|
14 September 1989 |