|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| August 1990 |
|
|
Appeal against conviction for burning during a witchdoctor ritual dismissed; two‑year sentences upheld.
Criminal law – assault/bodily harm – participation in witchdoctor ritual causing burns – evidential sufficiency for conviction – possible non‑prosecution of ritual leader – sentencing review.
|
31 August 1990 |
|
Appellant’s sodomy and armed robbery convictions upheld based on reliable identification, medical and circumstantial corroboration.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Sodomy (unnatural offence) – necessity of corroboration and identification in sexual offences; medical evidence (anal laceration, spermatozoa) as corroboration. Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence and eyewitnesses – scene observations and nearby witnesses corroborating victim’s account. Criminal law – Armed robbery – use of weapon, seizure and admission of knife as supporting evidence. Sentencing – appropriateness; statutory minimum for serious robbery upheld.
|
31 August 1990 |
|
Appeal dismissed; trial court's finding of cattle trespass upheld and total damages of shs.50,000 awarded for loss and devaluation.
Civil — Tort (cattle trespass) — Proof of trespass and damages — Credibility findings of trial court entitled to deference where appellant adduces no corroborating witnesses — Delay/devaluation may justify additional award.
|
30 August 1990 |
|
Whether theft convictions were supported by admissible evidence and whether the omnibus sentence was proper.
Military criminal appeal – theft by agent – credibility of alleged handing-over of funds – reliance on viva voce evidence; conviction based on hearsay and failure to call material prosecution witness – conviction unsafe and quashed; sentencing – omnibus sentence incorrect, appropriate concurrent sentences considered.
|
29 August 1990 |
|
Reported
Certiorari and mandamus were refused where a wrongful dismissal action was available to the applicant under contract law.
Judicial review – certiorari and mandamus – discretionary remedies – existence of alternative contractual remedy – wrongful dismissal – labour law – adequacy of ordinary civil remedies vs. judicial review.
|
28 August 1990 |
|
Court upheld dowry refund (11 cows, 14 goats) and allowed cash payment at fixed valuation (total Shs.76,000).
• Family law – dowry (bridewealth) refund – assessment of quantum on divorce – consideration of marriage duration and equitable reduction.
• Civil procedure – appellate review – appellate court upholding factual and discretionary findings of lower courts.
• Remedies – substitution of animals with monetary equivalent and fixation of market values.
|
28 August 1990 |
|
Where High Court decisions conflict, a subordinate court may follow either authority and its choice is not automatically reviewable.
Criminal procedure – Bail – section 148(5)(g) Criminal Procedure Code – deposit requirement where alleged stolen property exceeds Shs 10,000,000. Precedent – Effect of conflicting High Court decisions – subordinate courts may follow either authority. Revision – absence of apparent error on record where lower court follows one of conflicting High Court rulings.
|
27 August 1990 |
|
Under Islamic succession rules a will cannot divest heirs (or dispose of more than one‑third without consent); appellant’s claim dismissed.
Succession law – validity and construction of a will under Islamic law; bequest to an heir; limits on testamentary disposal (one‑third rule). Probate/administration – effect of grant of administration and small‑estate probate proceedings on subsequent transfers. Property – bona fide purchaser for value without notice protected; remedy for alleged testamentary dispossession.
|
25 August 1990 |
|
Trial court's misdirection and failure to address defence evidence rendered the conviction unsafe and was quashed.
Criminal law – Theft by servant – Credibility and evaluation of evidence – Improperly assessing prosecution case in isolation and shifting burden of proof – Failure to consider defence explanations and material non‑directions – Conviction unsafe and quashed.
|
24 August 1990 |
|
Appeal allowed: lower courts erred; shamba declared applicant's property and no compensation payable; respondent to pay costs.
Property dispute – possession and ownership of shamba – insufficiency of evidence – respondent failed to call witnesses – lower courts erred in awarding compensation absent evidence – appeal allowed, judgment set aside.
|
24 August 1990 |
|
An unsafe conviction based on scanty, suspicious evidence was quashed and immediate release ordered.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – convictions cannot be based on mere suspicion; appellate power to quash unsafe convictions and order release when prosecution fails to support conviction.
|
24 August 1990 |
|
Ex parte judgment for plaintiff after evidence established embezzlement and unpaid balance; interest and taxed costs awarded.
Civil procedure – ex parte judgment where defendant acknowledged service but failed to defend; Recovery of misappropriated project funds – proof on balance of probabilities; Use of documentary accounts and foreign criminal conviction evidence for quantification; Award of interest and costs.
|
23 August 1990 |
|
Applicant's convictions for theft as a public servant upheld based on bank records and colleagues' handwriting identification.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – Reconciliation of revenue records with bank paying‑in‑slips – Shortfalls on bank originals versus office duplicates constitute evidence of misappropriation. Evidence – Documentary and handwriting identification by colleagues – credibility and weight of reconciliation evidence upheld. Appeal – Appellate restraint on disturbing trial court’s factual findings and credibility assessments absent misdirection. Sentencing – Seriousness and prevalence of public revenue theft justify upholding custodial sentences.
|
23 August 1990 |
|
|
23 August 1990 |
|
Reported
Unequivocal guilty pleas preclude appeal; imprisonment justified for possession of moshi in distribution quantities.
Criminal law – Plea of guilty – Unequivocal plea bars appeal under s.360 Criminal Procedure Act; admissions in open court are binding; afterthought assertions insufficient to invalidate plea. Sentencing – Possession of liquor in quantities indicating distribution justifies custodial sentence even for first offenders; increased statutory maximum reflects seriousness.
|
22 August 1990 |
|
Convictions quashed where trial continued in accused's absence without complying with statutory adjournment requirements.
Criminal procedure – adjournment and trial in absence – Requirements of s.226(1) Criminal Procedure Act – Dispensing with accused's presence and defence – Procedural non‑compliance renders trial a nullity. Evidence – sufficiency of evidence – conviction on complainant's sole testimony challenged.
|
21 August 1990 |
|
Circumstantial evidence that the appellant had exclusive access to the locked store upheld conviction and minimum sentence.
Criminal law – Theft by servant – Circumstantial evidence and exclusive control over keys – Fresh defence raised on appeal inadmissible – Minimum Sentences Act: appropriateness of sentence.
|
21 August 1990 |
|
Appeal dismissed: stall held to be cooperative society’s property; chairman’s supervisory role did not create personal ownership.
Property law – ownership dispute over market stall – allocation of land to cooperative society and characterization of stall as immovable property evidenced by audit reports and land officer testimony. Agency/official capacity – acts done by a chairman in supervision of construction do not, without more, create personal ownership rights. Civil procedure – appellate review affirms lower courts where documentary and consistent oral evidence establish title.
|
21 August 1990 |
|
Cash deposit under section 148 is discretionary; court granted bail with specified sureties, bonds and reporting conditions.
Criminal procedure – Bail – Section 148(6) and (7) Criminal Procedure Act – cash deposit is discretionary, not mandatory; court may attach conditions in exercise of discretion. Economic and Organised Crime Control Act – Section 35 does not fetter bail terms under section 148 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Bail conditions – sureties, bond, surrender of travel documents, reporting obligations, geographic restriction, appearance for mention.
|
21 August 1990 |
|
Appellate court upheld that uncorroborated, contrived ownership claims cannot defeat execution; appeal dismissed with costs.
Execution — seizure of property — objection proceedings — proof of ownership of seized goods — need for credible, corroborative evidence rather than unsupported assertions or contrived arrangements. Evidence — assessment of credibility — appellate court may reject Primary Court findings where evidence appears to be a contrivance by a judgment debtor to defeat execution. Civil procedure — execution of decree — objection and appeal — standard for interfering with appellate court findings.
|
20 August 1990 |
|
Delay in asserting title and credible local testimony supported the respondent’s ownership of the unregistered land.
Land law – unregistered village land – division between heirs and sale of co-owner’s share – evidence of local leaders and reconciliation board – delay in asserting title weakens claim – credibility of possession evidence.
|
17 August 1990 |
|
The applicant’s assault conviction was quashed due to unreliable evidence, doubtful medical documentation, and procedural unfairness.
Criminal law – assault causing actual bodily harm – safety of conviction – contradictions and inconsistencies in prosecution evidence; delayed and doubtful PF3 (medical) report; substitution of charge during trial without informing accused of rights – appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed.
|
17 August 1990 |
|
Appeal dismissed; matrimonial home acquired by joint efforts to be divided equally or sold with proceeds equally shared.
Family law – Divorce – Division of matrimonial property – Matrimonial home acquired by joint efforts – No evidence of trust or testamentary disposition in favour of children – Appropriate remedy where property cannot be partitioned is sale and equal division of proceeds.
|
17 August 1990 |
|
Eyewitness evidence upheld conviction and sentence for grievous harm causing permanent eye loss; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – grievous harm – stabbing causing permanent ocular injury – eyewitness corroboration – sufficiency of evidence – sentence and compensation review on appeal.
|
17 August 1990 |
|
Voluntary guidance to hidden tusks constituted a confession; conviction and 20‑year sentence for unlawful possession upheld.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of government trophies – discovery confession where accused voluntarily led search party to hidden caches – evidence of possession. Criminal procedure – rights on arrest (s.52 Criminal Procedure Act) – failure to raise non-compliance at trial cannot be advanced first on appeal. Sentencing – seriousness of wildlife offences (elephant tusks) can justify long custodial terms.
|
16 August 1990 |
|
Convictions based mainly on discredited visual identification and uncorroborated evidence were unsafe and therefore quashed.
Criminal law – Visual identification – Evidence of visual identification is of the weakest kind and requires elimination of all possibilities of mistaken identity before conviction. Criminal procedure – Sufficiency of evidence – Prosecution must call/corroborate key witnesses and produce material (e.g., payrolls) to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt. Appeal – Appellate court may quash convictions where identification and supporting evidence are unreliable.
|
15 August 1990 |
|
House occupied by the applicant's family exempt from execution despite wife's title; court grants repayment plan.
Civil procedure – Execution – Section 48(1)(e) CPC – Exemption of residential house occupied by judgment debtor, wife and dependants from attachment and sale – Applicability where title is in spouse’s name – Waiver by mortgagor held unsound – Court grants repayment instalments and sets aside attachment.
|
15 August 1990 |
|
Tribunal must record members’ opinions; unstamped but chargeable tenancy documents may be admitted after paying stamp duty and penalty.
Rent Restriction Act – s.11(4): tribunal chairman must seek and record other members’ opinions when deciding preliminary objections. Rent Restriction Act – s.21: applies where statutory standard rent has been determined; not confined to monthly tenancies. Stamp Duty Act – s.5(1) and schedule: tenancy instrument chargeable with duty; s.46(1) proviso requires opportunity to pay duty and penalty to make unstamped document admissible. Evidence law – unstamped but chargeable documents should not be summarily rejected; court should permit stamping on payment of duty and penalty.
|
14 August 1990 |
|
A voluntary cautioned confession corroborated by medical and eyewitness evidence supported a murder conviction; provocation failed.
Criminal law – murder – elements of proof – eyewitness and medical evidence corroborating a cautioned statement. Evidence – voluntariness and admissibility of retracted cautioned confession; corroboration requirement. Defence – provocation considered and rejected where words did not reasonably deprive ordinary person of self-control.
|
10 August 1990 |
|
Interlocutory injunction denied: no prima facie entitlement and balance of convenience did not favour the applicant.
Interlocutory relief – temporary injunction – Order 37 r.2 and s.95 – requirements: prima facie entitlement and balance of convenience – insufficiency of supporting affidavit – interaction with Government Notice 375 of 1989 (coastal setback).
|
9 August 1990 |
|
|
9 August 1990 |
|
Confession to local militia inadmissible and evidence insufficient to sustain the applicant's theft conviction.
Criminal law – theft – evidential sufficiency; admissibility of confession made to Sungusungu/local militia; contractual remittance obligations of a bus conductor; hearsay and failure to call alleged victims/witnesses; appellate intervention where conviction rests on inadmissible or uncorroborated evidence.
|
9 August 1990 |
|
Proceedings and judgment obtained by chamber application instead of a plaint were quashed; case remitted for retrial with proper pleadings.
Civil procedure – requirement to institute substantive suit by plaint (s.22 Civil Procedure Code; Order IV) – improper use of miscellaneous/chamber application and affidavit to decide substantive claim – proceedings quashed and judgment set aside under s.76(1)(b) – matter remitted for retrial with directions to file plaint and written statement of defence.
|
8 August 1990 |
|
Dismissal for want of prosecution without proof of service is irregular; appeal must be readmitted and heard on merits.
• Civil procedure – appeal – dismissal for want of prosecution – requirement of proof of service of hearing notice • Service of process – clerk’s unelaborated assertion insufficient as proof of service • Procedural fairness – adjournment and proper service required before dismissing appeal
|
7 August 1990 |
|
Applicant’s substantiated litigation-related disbursement bills (US$189,848) are payable by the respondent, plus application costs.
Costs — enforcement of properly substantiated disbursement bills related to litigation — proof and itemisation of charges (port dues, pilotage, mooring, dockage, etc.) — respondent’s failure to substantively oppose — costs of application awarded to applicant.
|
7 August 1990 |
|
Applicant entitled to recover US$89,848 for proved shipping/port bills; application granted and costs awarded to applicant.
Civil procedure — Proof and allowance of shipping/port service bills — Admissibility and sufficiency of witness evidence on bill composition — Consequences of respondent’s failure to file substantive reply — Award of costs.
|
7 August 1990 |
|
Night-time visual identifications with conflicting witness accounts failed to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt; accused acquitted.
Criminal law – Murder – visual identification evidence – night-time identifications by briefly-awakened occupants – reliability and caution required. Evidence – inconsistencies among prosecution witnesses and contradictions in arresting officer's account undermine identification. Burden of proof – prosecution must establish identity beyond reasonable doubt.
|
4 August 1990 |
|
The appellant's absence from duty alone is insufficient to sustain a conviction for factory breaking and theft.
Criminal law – Factory breaking and theft – Circumstantial evidence – Watchman absent from duty – Absence creates suspicion but is insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
|
4 August 1990 |
|
Court upheld convictions and eight‑year sentences for attempted robbery with violence, finding identification and corroboration reliable.
Criminal law – Attempted robbery with violence – Identification evidence – reliability where victims knew accused earlier and there was lamp light at scene. Criminal law – Complicity – whether witness who accompanied accused was accomplice. Sentencing – whether custodial term excessive given serious injury caused.
|
2 August 1990 |
|
Prescriptive title cannot defeat a recognized trust for a minor; occupiers failed to prove right or compensation.
Property law – Prescription – long possession as basis for title – minority and existence of trust interrupt or defeat prescription. Trusts – land held in trust for minor – trustee lacks beneficial interest to allocate to others. Compensation – unexhausted improvements/permanent crops – claimant must prove entitlement and value; contradictory evidence defeats award.
|
2 August 1990 |
|
Accused pleaded guilty to assault causing death; post‑mortem confirmed fatal injury and court convicted and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.
Criminal law – Plea of guilty – Acceptance of plea and reliance on prosecution facts; Homicide – post‑mortem evidence (fractured neck) as proof of cause of death; Sentencing – balancing mitigating factors (first offender, age, dependants, intoxication) against seriousness of assault causing death.
|
2 August 1990 |
|
Appellate court set aside an unjustified retrial order and, on reassessing evidence, convicted the respondent for corrupt transaction.
Criminal law – appellate review – ordering of retrial – retrial unjustified where original trial not illegal or defective. Criminal law – corruption/offence of receiving bribe – police trap money – purpose of payment (bribe v. legitimate payment). Evidence – assessment of witness credibility on appeal – appellate court entitled to reassess where misdirections/non‑directions by trial court.
|
1 August 1990 |