|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1992 |
|
|
|
31 December 1992 |
|
Conviction unsafe where night‑time flashlight identification and five‑month delay occurred without an identification parade.
* Criminal law – Identification evidence – Night‑time identification by torchlight – Reliability and need for detailed description and/or identification parade; effect of long delay between offence and arrest on safety of conviction.
|
30 December 1992 |
|
|
22 December 1992 |
|
Appeals dismissed: eyewitness identification found reliable and convictions upheld.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Reliability of eyewitnesses and identification parade – Sufficiency of prosecution evidence – Appeal against conviction – Credibility of defence explanations.
|
22 December 1992 |
|
An appeal lacking the required judgment and decree is incompetent; the proper remedy for omitted documents is review, not re-admission.
Civil procedure – Appeal – Record of appeal must include judgment and decree – Failure to attach judgment/decree renders appeal incompetent; Remedy where documents omitted – application for review rather than re-admission or extension of time; Registry misplacement of documents – does not automatically entitle party to re-admit appeal.
|
22 December 1992 |
|
Applicant failed to prove entitlement to subsistence, transit or incidental allowances after transfer; appeal dismissed with costs.
Employment law – transfer and allowances – entitlement to subsistence, transit and incidental expenses – burden of proof on claimant; evidential weight of employer allocation of accommodation; routing correspondence does not imply managerial approval.
|
22 December 1992 |
|
Acquittal set aside and retrial ordered where trial magistrate failed to resolve conflicting evidence and appellate court could not assess credibility from record.
Criminal law — trial procedure — duty of trial magistrate to decide contested factual issues and assess credibility; appellate review — limitations of reassessing witness credibility from record alone; remedy — retrial where trial court fails to determine key facts.
|
21 December 1992 |
|
|
19 December 1992 |
|
The appellant failed to prove adultery; appeal dismissed for insufficient and unsupported evidence.
* Family law – adultery – burden of proof – requirement to prove adultery on balance of probabilities; corroboration and credibility. * Evidence – direct versus circumstantial evidence; inadmissible or extraneous factual reliance by trial court. * Civil procedure – appellate review – setting aside trial judgment when conclusions are unsupported by the record. * Delay and failure to report – effect on credibility and sufficiency of claim.
|
18 December 1992 |
|
Reported
A conciliation board acted ultra vires in hearing a time‑barred reference; High Court quashed its award and granted certiorari and mandamus.
* Administrative law – prerogative remedies – certiorari and mandamus – High Court supervisory jurisdiction over quasi‑judicial tribunals. * Joinder – affected persons may be joined as respondents in applications for prerogative orders. * Limitation – Law of Limitation Act 1971 does not extend to proceedings before Regional Conciliation Boards under the Security of Employment Act. * Time bar – tribunal acts ultra vires in hearing a reference filed after statutory limitation period. * Discretion – court may grant relief but refuse costs where applicant shares procedural fault.
|
18 December 1992 |
|
Reported
Prerogative orders - Parties to applications for prerogative orders -Whether a private individual may joined as a co-respondent in an application for prerogative orders.
Labour law - Limitation of time - Time within which to file a reference to the Labour Conciliation Board or further reference to the Minister - Security of Employment Act 1964 and Law of Limitation Act 1971. |
18 December 1992 |
|
Appellant’s failure to show sufficient cause for non-appearance justified dismissal of the suit and dismissal of the appeal.
Civil procedure – dismissal for non-appearance – Order 17 Rule 2 and Order 9 Rule 8 – application to set aside dismissal requires sufficient cause and credible explanation; insufficiency warrants refusal to restore suit.
|
17 December 1992 |
|
Court upheld dissolution of marriage for adultery, threats and refusal to have intercourse; items in respondent’s name remain her property.
* Family law – divorce – grounds – adultery, refusal to have sexual intercourse, failure to provide maintenance and threats as evidence of irretrievable breakdown.
* Evidence – eyewitness testimony, community reconciliation efforts and criminal conviction supporting marital breakdown.
* Matrimonial property – items acquired in one spouse’s name treated as personal property under section 160 of the Law of Marriage Act; procedure for division of other disputed assets.
|
17 December 1992 |
|
Appeal dismissed for failure to join and afford a hearing to the third party whose possession of the vehicle was affected.
Procedure – joinder of necessary parties – appeal affecting third‑party possession must cite and allow hearing to that third party; Natural justice – right to be heard before deprivation of property; Civil procedure – competence of appeal when necessary parties omitted.
|
17 December 1992 |
|
Procedural defects in counts and inadequate particulars warranted quashing the convictions and ordering a retrial.
Criminal procedure — indictment irregularities — improper joinder of distinct forgery allegations — inadequate particulars as to accused’s capacity — proceedings quashed and retrial ordered.
|
16 December 1992 |
|
Acquittal upheld because a written agreement was not a confession and prosecution failed to prove cheating beyond reasonable doubt.
* Criminal law – cheating – requirement to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt – effect of delay in reporting alleged offence on credibility. * Documentary evidence – whether a written agreement constitutes a confession or admission of criminality. * Appellate review – interference with acquittal where prosecution evidence is weak.
|
16 December 1992 |
|
Conviction quashed where night-time identification was unreliable and lacked corroborative evidence.
* Criminal law – Identification evidence – Night-time incident with gunfire and injured witnesses – Identification unreliable without descriptive particulars or corroboration. * Criminal law – Evidence – Failure to recover stolen property as absence of corroboration. * Criminal procedure – Appeal – Conviction unsafe and liable to be quashed where identification is unreliable.
|
16 December 1992 |
|
Identification evidence obtained in darkness and panic was unreliable; convictions quashed for lack of corroboration and reasonable doubt.
* Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence obtained in darkness and amid panic – reliability and need for corroboration.
* Criminal procedure – Alibi evidence – whether alibis destroyed by prosecution.
* Appeal – Convictions unsupported by prosecution and founded on questionable identification – appeals allowed.
|
16 December 1992 |
|
Appeal allowed: convictions for theft/destruction set aside where appellant was wrongly convicted on an uncharged count and evidence was insufficient.
Criminal law – Conviction on count not charged – Trial court erred in convicting appellant on an uncharged count; insufficient evidence to show appellant was custodian or had access to stolen receipts – Convictions, sentences and compensation orders set aside.
|
16 December 1992 |
|
Appeal against rape conviction dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld based on clear identification and supporting medical and circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law – Rape – Sufficiency of evidence and corroboration – Identification in daylight; medical evidence (ruptured hymen and blood) as supportive; appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
|
16 December 1992 |
|
|
16 December 1992 |
|
Appellant's robbery conviction upheld; sentence reduced as pangas did not constitute "armed robbery" under Act No.10/1989.
* Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Sufficiency of evidence: footprints, flight, confession and recovery of stolen property support conviction.
* Criminal law – Sentencing – "Armed robbery" under Act No. 10 of 1989 – requires firearm or similar instrument; pangas do not qualify.
* Appeal – Conviction upheld; sentence reduced.
|
16 December 1992 |
|
Appellant's failure to prove boundaries and respondents' credible purchase evidence warranted dismissal of the land dispute appeal.
* Land dispute – ownership claims; oral evidence of purchase – credibility of witnesses; burden to prove boundaries; failure to call boundary witnesses; encroachment allegations; appellate review of factual findings.
|
15 December 1992 |
|
A 16-year delay and procedural irregularities in paternity proceedings made the lower courts' judgments unsound, so appeal succeeded.
* Family law – paternity proceedings – undue and inordinate delay (16 years) – prejudice to parties and reliability of claim; * Civil procedure – procedural irregularity in joining parties – effect on validity of lower courts’ judgments; * Appellate review – setting aside decisions unsupported in law and fact.
|
15 December 1992 |
|
Whether the appellant's conviction for receiving a stolen bicycle was supported by evidence and properly upheld.
Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – knowledge and possession; Evidence – documentary evidence and credibility; Appellate procedure – duty of appellate court to evaluate trial evidence; Alteration of property and attempts to procure false evidence as indicia of guilty knowledge.
|
14 December 1992 |
|
|
14 December 1992 |
|
Circumstantial evidence upheld the appellant's conviction despite an inadmissible out‑of‑court statement; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – circumstantial evidence – sufficiency to convict; Evidence Act s.34B – admissibility of out‑of‑court statement of absent witness – conditions precedent; caution statement – voluntariness and evidential weight; adverse inference from silence/failure to call witnesses; Minimum Sentences – sentence confirmed.
|
14 December 1992 |
|
Appellant’s unsupported claim of land purchase failed; lower courts’ finding of respondent’s lawful ownership is upheld.
Land law — proof of title — sale of land — need for documentary evidence or credible witnesses to prove purchase; mere assertion insufficient; credibility and consistency of oral testimony; appellate review upholding factual findings of lower courts.
|
14 December 1992 |
|
|
11 December 1992 |
|
Identification and corroboration of a herdsboy's testimony upheld conviction for cattle theft; alibi rejected.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Reliability of single-witness identification of stolen property and suspect – Corroboration – Alibi defence – Sufficiency of evidence to support conviction for cattle theft.
|
11 December 1992 |
|
|
11 December 1992 |
|
Conviction upheld on reliable visual ID and corroboration; 30-year sentence unlawful under non-retroactive Act, reduced to 12 years.
* Criminal law – robbery with violence – visual identification evidence – tests for reliability (nighttime, lighting, time of observation, prior acquaintance, distance). * Corroboration – guest-house attendance and false name as circumstantial corroboration of identification. * Sentencing – non-retroactivity of Minimum Sentences Act (Act No.10 of 1989); substitution of unlawful sentence.
|
11 December 1992 |
Civil Practice and Procedure - Assessors - Summing up to assessors - Magistrates Courts (Primary Courts) (Judgment of Court) Rules, G.N. No. 2, 1988. |
11 December 1992 |
|
Appellate court reinstated trial court's ownership finding, emphasizing deference to trial-court credibility assessments and ordering costs to respondent.
* Civil procedure — Appeal — Appellate court's duty not to lightly disturb trial court's findings of fact and credibility; deference to witnesses seen and heard by trial court. * Property/ownership dispute — Assessment of oral and documentary evidence on ownership of premises.
|
11 December 1992 |
|
Reported
Section 6 ministerial fiat requirement to sue the government infringes access to courts and is unconstitutional.
* Constitutional law – right of access to courts – whether ministerial consent required to sue the State infringes constitutional right to access and fair hearing
* Government Proceedings Act – section 6 (ministerial fiat) – adequacy of safeguards, arbitrariness and delay
* Derogation clause – article 30(1)–(2) – public interest, proportionality and reasonableness
* Equality – discriminatory impact (mainland v Zanzibar)
* Comparative and international jurisprudence relied upon (Golder v UK; Wight v Madagascar; Shah v AG (Uganda))
|
11 December 1992 |
|
Reported
Appellate court allowed claim for crop damage, finding eyewitness identification sufficient and reducing vague damage estimate to TSh 10,000/=.
Civil damages — crop destruction by cattle — evidence of identity by eyewitnesses; Procedural irregularity — summing up to assessors contrary to Magistrate's Courts (Primary Courts) Judgment Rules (GN No.2 of 1988) Rule 3; Appellate intervention — adjusting vague damage estimate rather than remitting; Credibility — respondent’s denial and assault undermining defence.
|
11 December 1992 |
|
Claims arising from a residential lease fall within the Regional Housing Tribunal’s jurisdiction; High Court suit struck out.
* Rent Restriction Act, 1984 – jurisdiction – disputes arising out of lease relations fall within Regional Housing Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
* Civil procedure – concurrent jurisdiction – suit should be instituted in the lowest competent forum (section 13 CPC).
* Forum conveniens – High Court inappropriate where Regional Housing Tribunal is the proper lower forum.
|
10 December 1992 |
|
Reported
Court reduced an ex parte bill of costs, disallowing post‑hearing claims and cutting advocate and disbursement fees.
Costs – Taxation of bill – Advocate’s fees claimed where advocate abandoned client or attendance not shown – Advocate’s fees disallowed or reduced. Costs incurred after finalisation of the case are not recoverable. Taxing master’s assessment may be interfered with if unjudicial; ex parte claims require proof on balance of probabilities. Verification of disbursement receipts required.
|
10 December 1992 |
|
The applicant's employment-contract claim was time-barred; prior proceedings before the Permanent Labour Tribunal did not suspend limitation.
Law of Limitation Act – First Schedule item 7 (actions on employment contracts) – six-year limitation; requirement to plead grounds of exemption in the plaint (Order VII) – replies cannot cure failure to plead; section 21 Limitation Act – proceedings before Permanent Labour Tribunal do not amount to proceedings in a "court" for suspension of limitation; Act No. 3 of 1990 (Industrial Court) not retrospective.
|
10 December 1992 |
Taxation of Costs - Bill of costs - Omnibus award - Whether supportable. |
10 December 1992 |
|
Primary court should require documentary proof of title for attached goods; appellate court properly admitted bailment record and appeal dismissed.
* Civil procedure – attachment of property – objection to attachment – requirement to produce documentary evidence of bailment/ownership in primary court.
* Appellate review – exercise of discretion to admit documents produced on appeal – admissibility and weight of bailment record.
* Primary courts’ duty to take initiative to require production of documents when ownership of attached goods is disputed.
* Evidence – unverified assertions insufficient to uphold attachment against documentary and oral proof of bailment.
|
10 December 1992 |
|
Appeal dismissed: conviction for stealing municipal funds upheld; sentence increased to statutory five-year minimum.
* Criminal law – Stealing by servant – possession of municipal receipt book and sold receipts as proof of collection and misappropriation.
* Evidence – documentary evidence (receipt book) may discharge need to call payers where receipts show amounts collected.
* Mens rea – illness or intention to return money does not necessarily negate criminal intent to steal.
* Sentencing – where property belongs to a specified authority statutory minimum sentence applies.
|
10 December 1992 |
|
Res judicata does not bar a land claim where a prior judgment concerned different parties and separate sub‑parcels; long possession prevailed.
* Civil procedure – res judicata – prior judgment between different parties does not bar subsequent suit by another occupier of a separate sub‑parcel within same larger holding. * Land law – possession and proof of gift from original owner – long occupation supports title/possession claim. * Evidence – assessment of credibility and historical occupation relevant to land disputes.
|
8 December 1992 |
|
Appeal dismissed: enticement claim fails where plaintiff’s failure to maintain wife justified her leaving; lower magistrate erred in making unsupported factual finding.
Family law – enticement of spouse – Law of Marriage Act 1971, s.73(1)-(2); justification for spouse leaving matrimonial home (failure to maintain). Procedure – appellate review – Magistrate’s factual finding without evidence; obligation to invoke s.21(1)(a) Magistrates Courts Act 1984 to receive further evidence.
|
8 December 1992 |
|
A militia member who unjustifiably frightens and chases a person is liable for losses caused by that person’s flight.
* Tort — Wrongful intimidation/chase by quasi-police/militia member — liability for losses caused by victim’s flight. * Evidence — Admission and written undertaking at local authority/CC office admissible. * Burden of proof — accused official must justify use of power; cannot shift burden to victim. * Joint and several liability between co-tortfeasors.
|
8 December 1992 |
|
Signing a delivery note and retaining possession for testing can constitute acceptance, rendering the recipient liable for the purchase price.
Sale of goods – delivery note – effect of signing "received in good condition" – reservation "subject to testing" – acceptance vs rejection – duty to arrange testing – liability for price.
|
8 December 1992 |
|
An untimely appeal filed after leave to refile, without explanation, is time-barred and dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – limitation of actions – appeal filed after leave to refile – ninety-day period under Law of Limitation Act; absence of affidavit explaining delay – appeal time-barred and dismissed; tenancy – default in rent and unauthorized erections – eviction justified.
|
8 December 1992 |
|
An ex-parte divorce decree must be set aside where a co-respondent was not duly served with notice of petition and hearing.
Family law – Divorce procedure – Service of petition – Law of Marriage (Matrimonial Proceedings) Rules, Rule 21(1) – Requirement that respondent and every co-respondent be duly served before hearing in their absence – Service on another party’s advocate does not suffice absent proof of agency – Ex-parte decree set aside where service not proved.
|
8 December 1992 |
|
Appeal against robbery-with-violence conviction dismissed where eyewitness identification and evidence of force were reliable.
* Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Elements proved where money was forcibly taken and accused threatened victims with weapons (panga and iron rod).
* Evidence – Identification – Reliability where appellant was known to witnesses and incident occurred in adequate light; no mistaken identity shown.
* Appeal – Reappraisal of credibility – Appellate court will not interfere where trial court's findings are supported by evidence.
|
8 December 1992 |
|
Appeal dismissed: eyewitness identification reliable and prosecution proved appellant's participation in robbery with violence.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Identification evidence – familiarity and sufficient light – reliability of eyewitness identification – joint enterprise/common intention – appellate interference with trial court's factual findings.
|
8 December 1992 |