Results.
77 judgments found.
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
May 1992
Pistol licence suspension reduced to one year; rifle and shotgun suspensions upheld for public safety and appellant’s unfitness.
Firearms licensing — suspension vs cancellation — fitness to possess firearms where applicant is ‘easily confused’ — proportionality of suspension period — public safety risk (theft/poaching) v. individual protection needs.
29 May 1992
Applicant's genuine sale agreement established ownership; rent‑arrears claim must be pursued before the Regional Housing Tribunal.
Land law — Jurisdiction — rent arrears claims for residential tenancy disputes belong to the Regional Housing Tribunal
Land law — Property law — authenticity of sale agreement
— thumb‑printed agreement accepted as valid
— unsigned/unauthorised sale agreement has no evidential value and cannot pass title
29 May 1992
Appeal dismissed: eyewitness identification and recovered property upheld conviction and 15-year sentence.
Criminal law
— Defence of alibi — evaluation and rejection where credible eyewitnesses place accused at scene
— Robbery with violence — Identification evidence and identification of stolen goods
Criminal procedure — Appeal — Non-appearance at appellate hearing
29 May 1992
Conviction quashed where co‑accused’s untested confession and contradictory evidence rendered the verdict unsafe.
Criminal law — Evidence
— Confession of co-accused — Inadmissible as sole basis for conviction without independent corroboration
— Sufficiency of evidence to convict — Witness contradictions and non-incriminating conduct giving rise to reasonable doubt
29 May 1992
Failure by the applicant to file the required petition in the District Court mandates striking out the appeal to the High Court.
Criminal law — Magistrates courts act s.25(3) — mandatory requirement to file petition in District Court for appeals to High Court
— appeal struck out
— costs awarded
— procedural compliance jurisdictional
29 May 1992
29 May 1992
29 May 1992
Appellant lacked probate and locus to sue; respondent lawfully occupied development-authority allocated municipal land.
Land law — right of occupancy and allocation by development authority — Probate/administration — locus standi to sue — injunction and mesne profit claims
29 May 1992
29 May 1992
28 May 1992
Conviction quashed as unsafe due to missing trial record pages and unreliable reliance on co-accused evidence.
Criminal law — Criminal appeal — safety of conviction — Missing trial record and reliance on co-accused evidence
27 May 1992
Appeals against robbery convictions dismissed; court upheld identifications, corroborated confession and vehicle linkage.
Criminal law
— Confessions — Retracted/repudiated confessions
— Robbery with violence — Visual identification — Night-time, surprise attack and poor lighting render identification unreliable
— identification of vehicle (registration, engine, chassis) — Identification and seizure of vehicle — Circumstantial corroboration linking accused to transportation of stolen property
27 May 1992
Omission of voir dire for child witnesses does not automatically invalidate evidence; corroboration and reliable identification upheld conviction.
Criminal law — identification — Broad daylight, close range and immediate apprehension support safe identification
Criminal procedure — Appeal against sentence — High Court will not increase sentence where State has not appealed
Evidence
— Child witnesses — Omission does not ipso facto render evidence inadmissible but increases need for corroboration
— Corroboration of child evidence — Medical evidence and independent witness locating accused on victim provided sufficient corroboration
27 May 1992
27 May 1992
Eyewitness and possession evidence upheld convictions; non-production of corroborative witness not fatal; sentences reduced to 18 months.
Criminal law — theft from motor vehicle
— alleged police coaching of witnesses
— appellate reduction of excessive sentence
— sufficiency and credibility of eyewitness evidence
27 May 1992
Reported
Court dismissed jurisdictional objection but stayed the suit to obtain the Labour Officer's opinion on managerial status.
Labour law — jurisdiction
26 May 1992
Court stayed wrongful dismissal suit pending labour officer’s opinion on whether the applicant held a managerial post, affecting jurisdiction.
Labour law — jurisdiction
26 May 1992
26 May 1992
26 May 1992
Criminal law
— Criminal practice and procedure -appeals — Appeal against acquittals originating in the
— Criminal trespass — Whether a charge of criminal trespass can succeed where ownership ofthe land has not been determined in a civil case
Land law — Land ownership — Whether a Criminal Court can determine matters of land ownership
26 May 1992
A bona fide claim of right based on a prior civil judgment can negate wilful and unlawful intent for malicious damage.
Criminal law — Malicious damage to property — unlawfulness where execution follows civil decree — Penal Code s.326(1)
26 May 1992
Civil procedure — Labour law- jurisdiction — Whether court has jurisdiction to stay proceedings in order to obtain the labour officer's opinion whether a party is employed in the management of the business of the 1 employer. Proper order
26 May 1992
Private complainant lacks statutory right to appeal acquittal; ownership disputes must be resolved in civil court.
Criminal law — Trespass
— criminal proceedings are not a proper forum to determine title to land
— declaratory findings of ownership in criminal trials are improper and subject to quashing
Criminal procedure — appeal from District Court acquittal
— only Director of Public Prosecutions may appeal in public prosecutions
— private complainant has no right of appeal
26 May 1992
Reported
Private complainant cannot appeal a public prosecution acquittal; criminal courts cannot decide disputed land ownership.
Criminal procedure
— Appeal against acquittal — only DPP may appeal acquittal
— criminal court cannot adjudicate civil debt without proper civil process — Criminal courts cannot determine competing land ownership claims
Trespass — Trespass to land — Ownership dispute — Where ownership of land is disputed the criminal charge is inappropriate and complainant should pursue civil remedy
26 May 1992
25 May 1992
25 May 1992
Court found the occupant inherited title from his father; transfer to purchaser was not shown to be fraudulent, and the occupant’s right preserved.
Land law — Land/occupancy — dispute over right of occupancy after NHC redevelopment and plot amalgamation — evidentiary weight of institutional records and tenant testimony
Land law — Property law — succession to right of occupancy — proof on balance of probabilities
Land law — Transfer/alienation
— burden on party alleging fraud to prove bad faith strictly
— presumption of good faith
25 May 1992
Appeal allowed: land sold within same clan, sale witnessed by clan members, redemption not permitted.
Land law — Clan land — redemption after sale — whether sale was outside the clan — evidence of sale and clan consent (documentary and witness evidence)
25 May 1992
Appeals dismissed: evidence of a presented L.P.O. and conduct sufficed to uphold convictions for obtaining goods by false pretences.
Criminal law — obtaining goods by false pretences — Presentation of L.P.O./document as false representation — Sufficiency of evidence to prove dishonest procurement
25 May 1992
Long absence undermined defendant's claim; court upheld plaintiff's title and possession of the homestead, appeal dismissed.
Land law — Property law
— assessment of oral evidence and trespass allegation
— long absence of claimant
— ownership and possession of homestead
— proof of title by allocation and occupation
22 May 1992
District Court unlawfully enhanced sentence without hearing appellant; enhancement quashed and original sentence restored.
Criminal law — Criminal appeal — enhancement of sentence on appeal
22 May 1992
22 May 1992
Eye‑witness identification and a voluntary confession established malice aforethought; accused convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
Criminal law
— Confession admissibility — voluntariness
— malice aforethought — malice aforethought may be inferred from force of blow
— Murder: identification and credibility of eyewitnesses — Credibility of eyewitnesses
22 May 1992
Applicant not notified of hearing received judgment copy late; court allowed leave to appeal out of time and permitted appeal to proceed.
Criminal procedure — Leave to appeal out of time — appellant not notified of District Court hearing — copy of judgment received late
— fairness and duty to ensure service of notice of hearing
— not time-barred
21 May 1992
A village allocation is invalid where the land is already in another's lawful possession, so the appeal is dismissed.
Administrative law — Administrative procedure — allocation committees
Land law — Village land allocation — validity of allocation where land is in prior possession of another — possession and document of sale (Exh A) defeat subsequent allocation
20 May 1992
20 May 1992
20 May 1992
Weak identification and failure to prove recovered property's identity led to quashing of convictions.
Criminal law
— Circumstantial evidence/flight — not determinative where reasonable doubt remains
— identification evidence — insufficient where identification
— Proof of identity/ownership of recovered property — requires prior description or distinctive marks given before viewing
20 May 1992
Second appeal dismissed; respondent’s ownership of the disputed land upheld on corroborated witness evidence.
Civil procedure — Evidence — weight of independent allocation witnesses and allocation-chair corroborating long possession
Civil procedure — Property
— ownership established by continuous possession and official allocation records
— Procedural complaints about calling and recording witnesses dismissed for lack of prejudice
Civil procedure — second appeal — scope limited to points of law but appellate review may refuse to disturb concurrent findings of fact supported by evidence
19 May 1992
Reported
In public prosecutions only the Director of Public Prosecutions may appeal an acquittal; the complainant lacks that right.
Criminal procedure
— Appeal against acquittal in public prosecution — Only D.P.P. may appeal to High Court
— complainant lacks personal right to appeal — Different position for Primary Court origins — Civil remedy an alternative
19 May 1992
Appellant's ownership of house upheld; appellate court rejected respondent's time‑bar and tenancy defence.
Appellate practice — Appeal procedure — appellate re‑evaluation of evidence — Appellate intervention where lower court misappreciated evidence
Land law — ownership dispute — occupation as invitee versus ownership — Whether cohabitant's continued occupation after separation amounted to tenancy or adverse claim
Limitation law — Limitation — Possession and adverse enjoyment of land — Whether prolonged occupation barred owner's claim
19 May 1992
Reported
An appellate court may not substitute a conviction for an acquittal without first giving the accused an opportunity to be heard.
Appellate practice — Appellate procedure
— incurable procedural irregularity
— mandatory requirement
— proceedings nullity
— rehearing de novo
— substitution of conviction for acquittal
19 May 1992
Reported
Criminal law — Criminal practice and procedure — Natural Justice — The Right to be heard — Person acquitted by trial court is convicted by appellate court without being heard — Whether proper
19 May 1992
19 May 1992
Criminal law — Criminal practice and procedure — Appeals- Right to appeal
19 May 1992
Appeal dismissed; convictions and five-year sentences for cattle theft upheld based on confession and reliable identification.
Criminal law
— Cattle theft — sufficiency of evidence (confession/admission and witness testimony) — presence at scene as corroboration
— Visual identification — night-time identification — reliability tested by prior acquaintance, available lighting, reflective surfaces and conduct of accused
19 May 1992
Circumstantial evidence and dishonest explanations established the appellant's guilt for theft and shopbreaking; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law — Theft and shopbreaking — circumstantial evidence — credibility of witnesses — unexplained absence and dishonest explanations
19 May 1992
19 May 1992
Appellate court quashed Rusimba domicile finding, holding respondent domiciled in Tanga; s.130 non‑referral not fatal.
Civil procedure — appellate review of factual findings — Place of domicile — Appellate court may overturn trial finding where evidence supports contrary conclusion
Conflict of laws — Domicile — Domicile of origin and domicile of choice — Evidence of residence and intention required to establish domicile of choice
Employment law — Employment Ordinance — referral to labour officer not mandatory — Failure to refer not fatal to court's jurisdiction
19 May 1992
Application for extension of time to appeal dismissed for unexplained delay, non‑compliance with statutory requirements, and lack of prospects of success.
Criminal procedure — Appeal out of time
18 May 1992