|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1995 |
|
|
Corroborated identification plus recent possession of stolen goods can sustain a robbery conviction despite weak direct ID.
* Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – corroboration by circumstantial evidence (footprints and recent possession of stolen goods) – appellate review of safety of conviction
|
29 December 1995 |
|
The appellants' challenge to identification failed because footprints and recovered stolen items proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – robbery with violence; identification evidence – reliability of eyewitness identification; circumstantial evidence – footprints and recent possession of stolen property; sufficiency of evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; appeal against conviction.
|
29 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed in part: prior probate proceedings treated as res judicata, but house sale declared void and reverted to identified heirs.
* Probate and administration – title to estate property – validity of sale of estate asset – whether sale procured fraudulently and whether heirs properly notified. * Res judicata – effect of prior probate and administration proceedings on later challenges. * Appointment of administrator – locus to challenge estate disposition.
|
29 December 1995 |
|
Court set aside dismissal and ordered merits hearing, favoring substantive justice despite deficient lay affidavits and counsel confusion.
Administrative law – setting aside dismissal for non-compliance – extension of time under s.14(1) Limitation Act – lay affidavits, hearsay and absence of medical proof – courts favoring substantive justice over technicalities when representation confusion exists.
|
27 December 1995 |
|
Reported
Contract - Implied terms of contract - Sale Agreement not stating time for payment to he made - Reasonable time is implied
Contract - Delay in performance of contract - Inordinate delay in making payment - Payee may rescind contract |
22 December 1995 |
|
Reported
Unreasonable two‑year delay in paying balance entitled seller to rescind the sale contract.
Contract law – sale of immovable property – delay in performance – whether prolonged delay (over two years) constitutes frustrating and unreasonable delay permitting rescission; time not originally of the essence may become so where lateness causes frustration; seller entitled to refuse part-payment after prolonged delay; absence of seller/agent does not excuse buyer's non-payment.
|
22 December 1995 |
|
Applicant’s unexplained and dilatory delay in lodging appeals amounted to no sufficient cause; appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure — extension of time to appeal — applicant’s duty to act with diligence; administrative obstacle (court staff/refusal) must be specifically pleaded and evidenced; unexplained delay and failure to name responsible persons undermines claim of sufficient cause; an appeal filed out of time will be dismissed with costs.
|
22 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed and remitted for inquiry into an alleged prior proceeding and for additional witness evidence to fill material gaps.
* Civil procedure – second appeal – remittal for further fact-finding where appellate record shows material gaps; * Res judicata – necessity to determine nature of prior proceedings before applying bar; * Evidence – weight of village elders' testimony and need to call additional witnesses/visit locus in quo; * Limitation – relevance of earlier proceeding date to when cause of action arose.
|
20 December 1995 |
|
Compensation orders in criminal cases cannot be made following an acquittal; complainant must seek civil remedy.
Criminal procedure – Compensation orders – Whether compensation may be ordered after acquittal – Statutory power to order compensation arises only upon conviction; civil remedy available after acquittal.
|
20 December 1995 |
|
Night-time group attack made identification unreliable; convictions quashed and appellants released.
Criminal law — Identification evidence — Night-time group attack — Reliability of visual identification — Benefit of doubt — Convictions quashed.
|
20 December 1995 |
|
Refusal to recall witnesses while accused lacked counsel breached fair-trial rights; retrial ordered.
* Criminal procedure – Right to legal representation – Trial conducted while accused unable to instruct counsel – Discretion under section 147(4) Evidence Act must protect right to counsel; refusal to recall witnesses where accused lacked opportunity to consult counsel can vitiate fairness – Retrial ordered.
|
20 December 1995 |
|
First appellate court wrongly summarily dismissed appeal; sale without required authority consent is void as against the authority but creates a licensee.
* Civil procedure – appellate review – first appeal as rehearing – District Court erred by summary dismissal; only High Court may summarily dismiss under Magistrates’ Courts Act. * Evidence – credibility and preponderance – assessment of conflicting witness accounts on title. * Land law – Arusha Native Authority (Consolidation) Order 1959, Order 14 – required written consent for sale; absence of consent renders transfer void as against authority. * Effect of void transfer – sale may be valid inter partes but purchaser treated as licensee; termination requires compensation/refund.
|
20 December 1995 |
|
An appeal is improper where the appellant fails to first apply to set aside the ex parte judgment in the court that entered it.
Civil procedure – Ex parte judgment – Proper remedy to challenge ex parte decree is application to court which passed it to set it aside (Order IX Rule 13) – Distinction between setting aside (service/default issues) and appeal (merits) – Appeal dismissed for failure to follow correct procedure.
|
14 December 1995 |
|
A Primary Court decision lacking a formal, rule-compliant judgment is null and must be remitted for proper judgment.
Primary Courts — Judgment formalities — Assessors’ opinions do not substitute for a court judgment — Mandatory rules require presiding magistrate to consult assessors and record a judgment signed by court members — Failure to comply renders decision null and remittal required.
|
14 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed for insufficient evidence and identification failures; one conviction upheld, other convictions quashed and sentence set aside.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – appellate review of credibility findings – where trial magistrate observed witnesses, appellate court will not readily disturb credibility assessments; failure to prove custody/loss of property and absence of corroborating audit/documentary proof may render convictions unsustainable; identity and linkage to financial instruments (cheques) must be proved beyond reasonable doubt.
|
13 December 1995 |
|
Appellate court quashed convictions and set aside sentences where convictions rested on uncorroborated co‑accused evidence and recent possession was not proved.
Criminal law – Theft and receiving stolen property – Sufficiency of evidence – Recent possession doctrine – Reliance on co‑accused’s testimony and need for corroboration – Procedural irregularity: substitution of charge and accused’s rights – Sentencing: excess/irregularity and setting aside of sentences.
|
13 December 1995 |
|
Conviction for motorcycle theft upheld; omission to tender registration card not fatal and related sentences ordered to run concurrently.
* Criminal law – Theft of motor vehicle – Identification of recovered vehicle components in court – Failure to formally admit registration card – omission not fatal under s.388 Criminal Procedure Act. * Evidence – Accused leading police to recovered property as corroboration of possession and guilt. * Sentencing – Related offences committed within days; concurrent sentences appropriate rather than consecutive.
|
13 December 1995 |
|
Applicant’s request to set aside ex parte judgment denied where counsel’s lack of reasonable diligence, despite a captional error, caused non-appearance.
Civil procedure – Application to set aside ex parte judgment – Service and notice – Chamber summons bearing wrong judge’s name – Reassignment of judge – Duty of counsel to make reasonable enquiries – Lack of diligence defeats application to set aside ex parte judgment.
|
13 December 1995 |
|
A misnamed chamber summons did not excuse counsel's failure to appear; application to set aside ex parte judgment dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure — setting aside ex parte judgment — misnamed chamber summons — duty of counsel to consult court file and weekly cause list — lack of diligence — discretion to set aside refused — costs awarded.
|
13 December 1995 |
|
Applicant's challenge to respondent's appointment as administrator for alleged fraud failed; application dismissed with costs.
* Probate and Administration – revocation of administrator’s appointment – allegation of fraud; * Requirement to file inventory within six months of appointment; * Validity of consent – consent of persons entitled to inherit from the deceased vs consent of relatives of a prior administrator; * Judicial review of probate appointments and sufficiency of proof to set aside appointment.
|
13 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed and conviction quashed because the evidence was insufficient and the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the doubt.
* Criminal law – Burglary/stealing/receiving stolen property – sufficiency of evidence and circumstantial inference – whether inference of guilt was safe.
* Criminal law – Servant accused of theft – whether failure to hand over takings and scene evidence establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
* Evidence – possession of stolen property by co-accused and tampered lock – availability of reasonable doubt and benefit to accused.
|
12 December 1995 |
|
Execution quashed; auction purchasers keep title; respondent ordered to refund net Tshs.5,102,166 with 7% interest.
Execution law – nullity for want of jurisdiction – quashing of execution proceedings; Auction sales – purchaser’s title under quashed execution; Valuation – money’s worth assessed at commencement date of suit; Interest – decretal sum bears court interest from judgment date; Set-off – refund ordered after accounting for auction proceeds and decretal liability.
|
12 December 1995 |
|
A bank's ongoing refusal to allow account operation is a continuing wrong and not barred by limitation.
Limitation Act — continuing wrong doctrine; accrual of cause of action; bank–customer duty to permit account operation; when refusal to operate an account constitutes a continuing wrong.
|
12 December 1995 |
|
First and third appellants acquitted for unreliable identification; second upheld on recent possession but sentence reduced.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – reliability of eyewitness identification and station identification parade; recent possession doctrine – proof of possession of recently stolen property as evidence of guilt; evidential requirement for proving use of firearm – absence of cartridge/ballistic evidence; sentencing – reduction of excessive custodial term and corporal punishment.
|
12 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed: theft convictions quashed due to contradictory, insufficient evidence; appellant ordered released.
Criminal law – Theft/stealing by agent – sufficiency of evidence; contradictions between witness testimony and exhibits; convictions unsafe where prosecution fails to prove dishonest appropriation beyond reasonable doubt; appellate intervention to quash convictions and set aside sentence.
|
11 December 1995 |
|
Appellate court quashed theft convictions because prosecution evidence was contradictory and the appellant’s unchallenged explanation made the convictions unsafe.
Criminal law – Theft by agent – Safety of conviction – contradictions in prosecution evidence and unchallenged explanation that funds were for allowances/house rent – appellate intervention to quash unsafe convictions.
|
11 December 1995 |
|
Reported
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Appeal - Appeal against conviction and sentence upon a plea of guilty — Whether appeal is competent - Section 360 (1) ofthe Criminal Procedure Act 1985
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Pleas - Plea ofguilty - Extra judicial statements tended in court as exhibits without their contents being read out to the accused persons - Accused persons not objecting to tendering them - Whether it amounts to unequivocal admission of the contents of the exhibits
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Pleas - Plea of guilty - Recording of plea of guilty - Three accused persons recorded as collectively having no
objection to the tendering of exhibits - Whether it amounts to admission of the exhibits as evidence against them |
8 December 1995 |
|
|
8 December 1995 |
|
Court revoked administratrix's letters, ordered full accounts and appointed Administrator General over contested estate administration.
* Probate and Administration – Revocation of letters of administration – Applicant beneficiary seeking revocation for alleged mismanagement and encumbrance of estate.
* Civil procedure – Failure to file counter‑affidavit – Court proceeded on applicant's evidence.
* Remedies – Order for exhibition of full inventory and accounts; appointment of Administrator General.
* Costs – No order as to costs.
|
6 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed where prosecution failed to prove housebreaking and theft beyond reasonable doubt and burden was improperly shifted.
* Criminal law – burden of proof – presumption of innocence – accused’s silence cannot be equated with admission; standard: proof beyond reasonable doubt
* Evidence – identification of stolen property – lack of distinctive marks weakens prosecution’s case
* Search and seizure – evidence obtained in accused’s absence may permit alternative explanations for possession
* Offences – housebreaking and stealing – necessity of direct or satisfactorily corroborated evidence to convict
|
6 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction for electricity-related offence quashed due to insufficient and inconclusive prosecution evidence.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – conviction quashed where prosecution evidence is inconclusive; opportunity and suspicion insufficient to substitute proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
5 December 1995 |
|
A primary court judgment lacking assessors' concurrence and signatures is invalid and must be quashed and remitted.
* Criminal procedure – Primary Courts – Role of assessors – Decision of primary court must be a joint act of presiding magistrate and assessors; assessors are not mere advisers and must signify concurrence and sign judgment.
* Procedural irregularity – Absence of assessors' concurrence/signatures renders primary court judgment invalid.
* Remedy – Quash and remit for proper judgment or order retrial de novo only if interests of justice and no prejudice to accused.
|
5 December 1995 |
|
Two accused convicted of murder on voluntary confessions corroborated by recovered exhibits; third acquitted for lack of corroboration.
Criminal law — Murder; admissibility and voluntariness of extrajudicial confessions; rule that a co‑accused’s confession requires independent corroboration; recovery of instruments and property as corroboration; conviction of co-accused where confession corroborated; acquittal where only co-accused statements exist.
|
5 December 1995 |
|
Whether confessions were voluntary and sufficiently corroborated to convict both accused; police procedure and corroboration issues.
Criminal law – admissibility of confessions – voluntariness and police conduct – requirement for independent corroboration where one accused’s confession implicates a co-accused – caution and procedural safeguards when taking extra-judicial statements.
|
5 December 1995 |
|
Co‑accused confessions must be corroborated; independent corroboration supported convictions of two accused, third acquitted.
* Criminal law – admissibility of extrajudicial/confessional statements – voluntariness and procedural safeguards
* Criminal law – co‑accused confessions – requirement of independent corroboration
* Evidence – recovery of exhibits (weapon, clothing, radio) as corroboration of confession and linkage to homicide
* Criminal procedure – effect of irregularities in recording statements on voluntariness assessment
|
5 December 1995 |
|
Appeal against conviction for stealing dismissed: evidence proved guilt, appellant declined to call witnesses, seven-year sentence upheld.
Criminal law – Stealing (s.265 Penal Code) – Sufficiency of evidence and corroboration; Right to call defence witnesses – opportunity given versus voluntary waiver; Circumstantial evidence (flight/absconding) corroborating guilt; Sentence – statutory seven-year term upheld.
|
5 December 1995 |
|
Conviction under possession-of-stolen-property quashed where evidence failed to establish reasonable suspicion.
Criminal law – Possession of property suspected to be stolen – Section 312(1) – Requirement of reasonable suspicion that property is stolen or unlawfully acquired – Indicators (concealment, provenance, conduct) – Accused’s duty to give a reasonably true account – Failure to call corroborating witness not necessarily fatal – Appellate intervention where trial magistrate misapplies test.
|
4 December 1995 |
|
District Court conviction based solely on assessors' opinions, without mandatory judicial reasoning, was quashed and acquittal restored.
Criminal procedure – Appeal from acquittal – District Court reversed trial acquittal without proper judicial reasoning – Presiding magistrate adopted assessors' opinions without mandatory consultation – Contravention of Magistrate's Courts (Primary Courts) (Judgment of Court) Rules, 1987 (G.N. No. 2 of 1988) – Conviction and sentence quashed; acquittal restored.
|
4 December 1995 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution relied on uncorroborated evidence, unexplained reporting delay and failed to call material witness.
Criminal law – shop-breaking and stealing – sufficiency of evidence – reliance on single uncorroborated witness – unexplained delay in reporting – failure to call material witness – conviction unsafe.
|
4 December 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed where conviction rested on weak, uncorroborated and contradictory evidence with unexplained reporting delay.
Criminal law - circumstantial evidence and corroboration; delay in reporting offences; reliability of witness statements; duty to procure attendance of key witnesses; presumption of innocence and benefit of reasonable doubt.
|
4 December 1995 |
|
Conviction quashed where uncorroborated circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses made the verdict unsafe.
Criminal law – conviction based on circumstantial evidence – requirement for direct evidence or adequate corroboration; Credibility of witnesses – alleged accomplices or co-arrestees whose accounts are uncorroborated are suspect; Safety of conviction – appellate court may quash conviction where circumstantial case is riddled with doubt.
|
1 December 1995 |
|
Guilty plea held unequivocal; judicial confession sufficed to identify bhang; five-year term substituted with fine or 12 months.
* Criminal law – Plea of guilty – When plea is unequivocal and accused understands the charge – judicial confession as proof of identity of seized narcotic.
* Criminal law – Sentencing – statutory limits and availability of fine option – substitution of sentence on appeal.
|
1 December 1995 |
|
Second appeal dismissed where lower courts correctly ordered delivery of the specifically identified purchased cow and calves.
Civil appeal – sale of movable property – specific performance/delivery of identified cow and calves – correction of misrecorded parties – appeal dismissed as devoid of substance.
|
1 December 1995 |
|
Appellants’ conspiracy and accessory convictions quashed for lack of corroboration and proof; one theft conviction and eight-year sentence confirmed.
* Criminal law – Conspiracy – Requirement of corroboration for confession and agreement to conspire – insufficiency of uncorroborated admissions.
* Criminal law – Accessory after the fact – element of knowledge and assistance must be established.
* Evidence – sufficiency and presence at scene; recovery of stolen property as corroboration.
* Criminal procedure – compliance with preliminary hearing requirements and informing accused intending to raise alibi.
* Exhibits – improper custody order quashed; return of vehicle ordered.
* Sentencing – confirmation of sentence under s170(1) CPA where required.
|
1 December 1995 |
|
Some forgery and theft convictions quashed for insufficient evidence; others upheld on account-holder testimony and documentary exhibits.
Criminal law – Forgery and stealing by servant – Evidential sufficiency – failure to call account holders as witnesses – necessity of handwriting expert – bank/post custodian’s duty to verify passbooks, photographs and signatures – appeal partly allowing quashing of some counts and upholding others.
|
1 December 1995 |
|
An appeal against an order setting aside an ex parte judgment is not permissible under sections 74–75 of the C.P.C., 1966.
* Civil procedure – Appealability – Order setting aside ex parte judgment – Whether such an order is appealable under sections 74 and 75 of the C.P.C., 1966 – Held: no appeal lies against an order setting aside an ex parte judgment.
|
1 December 1995 |
| November 1995 |
|
|
Primary Court’s failure to produce a collective, signed judgment breached rule 3 and required quashing and remittal for proper judgment or rehearing.
• Civil procedure – Primary Courts – Requirement for a proper, signed judgment by the court – Compliance with Magistrate's Courts (Primary Courts) (Judgement of Court) Rules, 1987 (rule 3).
• Role of assessors – assessors must be consulted and judgments signed by all court members; magistrate must not substitute his own opinion for a court judgment.
• Appeals – appellate court cannot lawfully decide an appeal where there is no proper judgment from the trial court; remedy is to set aside and remit for proper judgment or rehearing.
|
30 November 1995 |
|
Ex parte judgment and subsequent attachment set aside because alleged corporate liabilities had been discharged and proceedings were procedurally defective.
Civil procedure – review and setting aside of ex parte judgment – validity of execution/attachment where alleged corporate liabilities had been discharged before relevant date – requirement of proper parties and regular endorsement of judgment.
|
29 November 1995 |
|
Occupation by a deceased occupant does not confer title; the respondent, as heir, inherited land acquired by her father.
* Land law – ownership v. occupation – occupation by a deceased occupant does not establish title; proof of original acquisition is determinative. * Succession – individually acquired land forms part of deceased’s estate and passes to heirs. * Clan land – distinction between clan-held land and individually acquired plots relevant to inheritance claims.
|
29 November 1995 |
|
Reliable visual identification and inconsistent alibi upheld conviction for armed robbery; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law Armed robbery; visual identification at identification parade; assessment of credibility; alibi; effect of attempted flight on inference of guilt.
|
29 November 1995 |