|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| January 1995 |
|
|
Whether identification and factual sufficiency supported an armed-robbery conviction, and whether misdirected reasoning required quashing a false-pretences conviction.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Contradictory eyewitness statements – Appeal court will not interfere where contemporaneous eyewitnesses overwhelmingly support trial court’s findings. Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Armed attack and exchange of fire – sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction. Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretences – Requirement of proof of active participation or concerted action – conviction unsafe where evidence points to sole responsibility of co-accused. Criminal procedure – Appellate review – Misapplication of facts or reasoning by trial magistrate can lead to quashing of conviction.
|
31 January 1995 |
|
Reported
Under the relevant customary law, lack of reasonable and probable cause, not malice, establishes malicious prosecution; appeal dismissed.
Customary law – malicious prosecution – ingredients to be determined from trial court record; under Wagogo/Wanubi customary law malice is not required, absence of reasonable and probable cause suffices; appellate courts must take judicial notice of trial court findings under s 37(3)(a) Magistrate's Court Act.
|
31 January 1995 |
|
Appellate court affirmed malicious prosecution finding for lack of reasonable and probable cause and upheld damages.
Malicious prosecution – ingredients – burden of proof; reasonable and probable cause – insistence on arrest despite contradictory evidence; customary law – ingredients to be ascertained from trial court record; appellate duty to take judicial notice under s37(3)(a) Magistrates' Court Act; damages – appellate restraint on interfering with reasonable awards.
|
31 January 1995 |
Tort- Malicious prosecution - Whether the ingredients of a tort in common law is the same as in customary law. Customary law - Tort - Malicious Prosecution - Ingredients of the tort |
31 January 1995 |
|
|
30 January 1995 |
|
|
27 January 1995 |
|
Appellant failed to prove ownership; courts correctly found respondents owned the disputed land.
Land dispute – proof of title – burden on balance of probabilities – weight of village conciliation council findings and independent witness evidence – interested witnesses and credibility – appellate interference with factual findings.
|
25 January 1995 |
|
Appellant failed to prove title; respondents established ownership by inheritance, independent evidence and village conciliation.
Land law – ownership by inheritance – proof on balance of probabilities; evidentiary weight of interested relatives versus independent witnesses; relevance of prior judgment where identity of the land is uncertain; village conciliation evidence as proof of local demarcation and title.
|
25 January 1995 |
|
Convictions for assault upheld; medical report admissible without calling doctor when unobjected, custodial sentences for four substituted with fines.
Criminal law – assault causing actual bodily harm; admissibility of medical reports under Criminal Procedure law where maker not called; requirement to object or call maker; no general rule requiring corroboration of injured witness; appellate interference where custodial sentence is manifestly excessive – substitution by fine or shorter term.
|
20 January 1995 |
|
Conviction for obtaining cattle by false pretences quashed where prosecution failed to prove dishonest taking beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – theft / obtaining property by false pretences – requirement to prove dishonest intention and unlawful taking beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – assessment of credibility and weight of competing accounts; insufficiency of prosecution evidence. Appeal – prosecution’s failure to support conviction and appellate intervention to quash unsafe conviction.
|
18 January 1995 |
|
Appellate court set aside a suspended sentence for corruption, prioritizing deterrence and public interest and imposing immediate custodial punishment.
Criminal law – Corruption – Offer of bribe to induce forbearance of prosecution – Sentencing for economic offences under s.59, Economic and Organized Crime Control Act – Need for suitably deterrent punishment and consideration of public interest vs personal mitigation.
|
18 January 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction for possession/receiving a stolen alternator quashed for want of sufficient, non‑conclusive evidence.
Criminal law – Receiving/possession of stolen property – sufficiency of evidence – circumstantial evidence must be watertight to support conviction. Evidence – accused’s account and intoxication – reasonable doubt where prosecution fails to corroborate material facts. Appeal – Crown declining to support conviction due to insufficient evidence – appellate court acceptance and quashing of conviction.
|
18 January 1995 |
|
Reported
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Charge of murder - How withdrawn - Sections 91(1) and 98fa) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1985. |
18 January 1995 |
|
Possession of property found at night near a recent burglary supported conviction for suspected stolen property; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Possession of suspected stolen property – Section 312(b) Penal Code; circumstantial evidence and identification; credibility findings; statutory minimum sentence.
|
17 January 1995 |
|
|
13 January 1995 |
|
Appellant’s conviction for stealing and slaughtering livestock upheld on credible eyewitness and physical evidence; five-year sentence confirmed.
Criminal law – Theft of livestock – Eyewitness identification and physical evidence (carcass) – Proof beyond reasonable doubt – Tracking evidence – Sentence of five years (minimum) – Appeal dismissed.
|
10 January 1995 |
|
An employee dismissed from service is not entitled to employer-paid subsistence or transport payments after dismissal without legal basis or proof.
Employment law – dismissal – entitlement to subsistence allowance and transport after dismissal – no authority for employer to pay subsistence or refund transport to an ex-employee; proof of expenses – necessity of receipts/vouchers.
|
5 January 1995 |
|
Failure by successor magistrate to inform accused of right to recall witnesses under s214(2)(a) renders the trial a nullity.
Criminal procedure – taking over of trial by another magistrate – section 214(2)(a) Criminal Procedure Act – duty to inform accused of right to have witnesses re‑summoned and re‑heard – failure to comply deprives court of jurisdiction – proceedings rendered nullity – convictions quashed; retrial discretionary.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Interim injunction application dismissed as incompetent against Commissioner for Lands; intertwined respondent interests precluded relief.
Civil procedure — interlocutory relief — temporary injunctions — competency of application against the Commissioner for Lands — preliminary objections sustained — intertwined interests of respondents — application dismissed with costs.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Appellate court erred in overturning trial credibility findings; contentious possession prevents prescription.
Land law – title dispute – credibility of witnesses – appellate interference with trial judge's credibility findings only where misdirection or unreasonableness shown. Prescription – acquisition of land by long possession – requires possession 'as of right' and is defeated by continuous, unmistakable protests (contentious possession = trespass).
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Acquittal upheld where prosecution failed to prove tax evasion in Tanzania; foreign tax issues irrelevant.
Criminal appeal — tax offences — failure to pay taxes and fraudulent evasion — sufficiency of evidence to prove domestic tax evasion — relevance of alleged foreign (Uganda) non‑payment — documentary evidence and forgery affecting prosecution case — entitlement to refund on proof of exportation.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Robbery convictions upheld; first appellant's 30‑year sentence reduced to 15 years for unproved prior conviction.
Criminal law – Robbery – Evidence and credibility of complainant and court orderlies; offences committed while in police custody; effect of police presence on liability; admissibility and weight of recovery of stolen property; absence of PF3 and missing witnesses not necessarily fatal; alibi notice; sentencing – proof of prior convictions and parity between co‑accused.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Long separation and children’s best interests justify divorce and custody; matrimonial appeals follow a special procedure.
Family law – divorce – irretrievable breakdown – prolonged separation (nine years) and party’s refusal to resume cohabitation as evidence; Child custody – best interests principle – child interviews, children's expressed wishes, parents’ income and accommodation; Procedure – matrimonial appeals governed by Law of Marriage Act s.80 and Rule 37; Civil Procedure Code technicalities (O.39 R.1) inapplicable; Procedural fairness – magistrate’s duty to hear parties and interview children.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Conviction for receiving stolen property quashed where prosecution failed to prove identity, possession, or knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – Proof of identity of stolen items – Possession and knowledge – Mere suspicion insufficient – Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed: inconsistent evidence and improper exhibit procedure defeated store‑breaking conviction; recent possession insufficient without reasonable explanation.
Criminal law – store‑breaking and stealing – sufficiency of evidence; application and limits of doctrine of recent possession; admissibility and formal tendering of exhibits; appellate intervention where trial findings inconsistent or unsupported by evidence.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
|
1 January 1995 |
|
An issued right of occupancy supersedes a mere council offer; offer issued while prior title subsisted is invalid.
Land law – title priority – right of occupancy v. offer of land; Validity of offers issued while prior title subsists; Evidence – duty to call administrative witnesses; Procedural irregularity – court's sua sponte order for production of presidential command.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Appellate court holds quashing trial proceedings for non‑inspection of land was excessive; long occupation may establish customary proprietary rights.
Civil procedure — appeal — quashing of trial proceedings for failure to visit locus in quo — remedy of quashment versus remittal; Land law — customary tenure — long occupation and cultivation as evidence of proprietary rights; possession/occupation under statutory definition.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Cohabitation of two years raises a rebuttable presumption of marriage; domestic quarrels alone do not rebut it.
Family law – cohabitation – presumption of marriage after two years’ cohabitation – presumption is rebuttable but not automatically defeated by domestic quarrels. Evidentiary burden – to rebut presumption, proof that no marriage ceremony recognized under the Law of Marriage took place (or lack of capacity) is required. Precedent – Francis Leo v Paschal Sigan confined to cases involving incapacity to marry.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
A justified private arrest can become false imprisonment if suspects are detained elsewhere without prompt delivery to police; torture and joint tortfeasor liability upheld.
Criminal procedure – private arrest and People’s Militia powers – lawfulness of arrest; Civil wrongs – false imprisonment – constructive and actual detention; Evidence – PF3 medical reports and witness testimony proving torture; Tort – joint tortfeasors and liability for acts of torture; Remedies – damages for unlawful detention and torture.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Workers' contractual claims against a non-performing asset transferred to LART must be filed with the LART Tribunal.
Loans and Advances Realisation Trust Act – non-performing assets – exclusive jurisdiction of LART Tribunal under section 19(1) – employees' contractual/vested interests – proper forum to raise claims arising from receivership.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Appellate court allowed withdrawal and condemned trial court's erroneous dual sentencing and misuse of statutory provisions.
Criminal law — sentencing: improper simultaneous imposition of imprisonment and conditional discharge; suspension of sentence must follow Criminal Procedure Act provisions rather than section 25(7) Penal Code — appellate procedure: withdrawal of appeal; compensation order with alternative distress remedy.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
The appellants' conviction, based on uncorroborated circumstantial evidence and inconsistencies, was quashed and acquittal ordered.
Criminal law – circumstantial evidence – requirement for corroboration and caution; inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and reasonable doubt; safety of conviction; charge characterization (factory breaking and stealing).
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Long, uninterrupted occupation and development can confer title by prescription; failure to pay filing fees does not strip jurisdiction if appeal otherwise timely.
Civil procedure – appeal timing and court fees – non‑payment of filing fees does not automatically deprive court of jurisdiction; appeal may be entertained if otherwise in time. Land law – Operation Vijiji allocations and title – long, continuous occupation and cultivation may give title by prescription. Appellate review – reluctance to disturb concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding occupation and ownership.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Division of matrimonial assets before a court pronounces and grants a divorce decree is improper; lower courts' decisions quashed.
Family law – Divorce – Only a court may dissolve a marriage; court must pronounce dissolution and grant decree before dividing matrimonial assets – Law of Marriage Act 1971, ss.108, 110. Confirmation of out-of-court talaq insufficient for divorce or ancillary relief. Division of matrimonial property prior to decree of divorce is improper. Appeal – appellate court erred in confirming Primary Court’s division of assets.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
|
1 January 1995 |
|
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Chamber application for injunction defective for lack of pending suit and non‑compliance with statutory 30‑day notice.
Civil procedure – interlocutory applications – Order 37(1) requires a pending suit; interlocutory relief cannot be sought without a registered suit. Statutory notice – section 87(a) of Act No.11/1977 – actions against the corporation require 30‑day notice to General Manager; contract to supply meals to passengers falls within corporation’s public functions.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Union Parliament validly amended constitution; Articles of Union are amendable and petition dismissed with costs.
Constitutional law – Amendment procedure (Article 98(1)(a) v. 98(1)(b)) – Acts and schedules – Acts of Union (Cap.557) part of List One – Amendability of Articles of Union – Doctrine of fundamental change of circumstances inapplicable – Special Constitutional Court referral requires demonstrable dispute between Union and Zanzibar governments.
|
1 January 1995 |
Constitutional Law – Constitutional Procedure - Legality of Constitutional Amendments |
1 January 1995 |
|
Court allowed filing in the Resident Magistrate’s Court but refused representative-suit leave and interim injunction as premature.
Civil procedure – leave to institute proceedings in proper court; representative (group) suits – application for representative status must be made in the competent trial court; interlocutory injunction – refusal as premature where substantive suit not yet before competent court.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution’s circumstantial evidence failed to prove dangerous driving beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Road Traffic Act – dangerous/reckless driving causing death – whether prosecution proved act or omission constituting dangerous driving beyond reasonable doubt; reliance on circumstantial evidence and absence of eyewitness evidence. Criminal procedure – defective or unsupported charge – benefit of doubt where prosecution fails to prove essential elements. Administrative consequence – cancellation/disqualification of driving licence – requirement to consider "special reasons" and proper procedure before ordering cancellation.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Convictions quashed because plea was not an unequivocal, element-by-element admission; imprisonment set aside and licence disqualification reduced.
Road Traffic offences – plea of guilty – requirements of section 228 CPA – necessity to state substance and obtain element-by-element admission – conviction unsafe if plea not unequivocal; sentencing – imprisonment set aside; disqualification from holding driving licence reduced.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Acquittal upheld where prosecution failed to prove elements and causal responsibility for public authority loss.
Criminal law – occasioning loss to a specified authority – elements and causation; burden of proof; material contradictions in prosecution evidence; alibi notice requirements; sufficiency of prosecution case.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Appellate court affirms robbery conviction; confession admissible, victim need not be corroborated, 30-year sentence upheld.
Criminal law – Robbery – conviction affirmed where complainant's credible account, alarm response and identification supported verdict. Criminal procedure – Admissibility of confession – no trial-within-a-trial required where accused raised no timely objection; confession admissible. Evidence – Corroboration – victim's uncorroborated testimony may suffice under s.143 Evidence Act. Evidence – Medical report – properly admitted when tendered by prosecuting witness and showed injuries. Sentence – Use of a dangerous weapon justified minimum custodial sentence of 30 years.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Circumstantial evidence can sustain a dangerous-driving manslaughter conviction; statutory minimum sentence and licence disqualification must be imposed.
Road Traffic — causing death by dangerous driving — circumstantial evidence sufficient to convict absent eyewitness — dangerous driving standard for learner-driver — failure to report accident within statutory period — statutory minimum sentence and mandatory licence cancellation/disqualification.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Circumstantial evidence upheld conviction for causing death by dangerous driving; statutory minimum sentence mandatory.
Road Traffic – causing death by dangerous driving – circumstantial evidence sufficient to convict absent eyewitnesses. Road Traffic – duty to report accidents – failure to report within statutory time constitutes offence. Sentencing – statutory minimum for causing death by dangerous driving – mandatory cancellation and disqualification of licence.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Two appellants' burglary convictions upheld on traced recoveries; houseboy's conviction quashed for insufficient evidence.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – proof beyond reasonable doubt – recovery of stolen property traced to accused as corroborative evidence. Criminal law – Evidence – accomplice/buyer of stolen goods – corroboration and reliability. Criminal law – Omission by employee (failure to release guard dogs) does not necessarily establish complicity in burglary. Criminal procedure – Sentence – minimum sentence considerations and confirmation in view of value of stolen property.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Appellate court correctly upheld respondent’s ownership based on auction purchase and over 30 years’ uninterrupted possession.
Land law – ownership – proof of purchase at public auction and long uninterrupted possession support title. Civil procedure – appeal – appellate court may quash Primary Court judgment where evidence supports contrary finding. Agency – representation by power of attorney – defective form may be noted but does not automatically vitiate appellate review or final outcome.
|
1 January 1995 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution failed to prove who forged bank rubber stamp and s69 Evidence Act was inapplicable.
Criminal law – Forgery – Rubber stamp impressions – Applicability of section 69 Evidence Act to stamp impressions; expert evidence limitations. Evidence – Proof of identity – Expert comparison of impressions cannot alone identify the forger; need for direct/probative evidence. Criminal procedure – Burden of proof – Conviction unsafe where prosecution fails to prove identity of perpetrator beyond reasonable doubt. Theft by public officer – Acquittal where link between accused and misappropriation is unproven.
|
1 January 1995 |