|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| October 1995 |
|
|
Appellate court refuses to disturb concurrent factual findings on whether a livestock transaction was a korni hire or an exchange.
Civil procedure — appellate review of concurrent findings of fact — appellate court will not disturb credibility findings supported by evidence. Customary transactions — korni/kodi (hire/loan-on-calf) v. outright exchange — factual determination for trial court based on witness evidence.
|
31 October 1995 |
|
Respondent proved ownership of inherited cattle; district court rightly ordered restoration and late appeal was properly entertained.
Property/dispute – ownership of cattle – evidence of inheritance and possession determines ownership over alleged clan/grandfather title. Customary law – where facts show individual inheritance and possession, tribal customs need not be invoked. Civil procedure – extension of time to file appeal – delay excused where record unavailability justified late filing. Remedies – restoration of property and costs.
|
31 October 1995 |
|
Appeal dismissed: robbery conviction and 15‑year sentence upheld; separate threat conviction properly subsumed in robbery.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – factors: broad daylight, close contact, contemporaneous description and seizure of victim’s property – reliability of identification. Criminal procedure – multiple convictions and omnibus sentence – irregularity not necessarily causing failure of justice. Sentencing – minimum/mandatory sentences – 15 years upheld as within statutory ambit.
|
31 October 1995 |
|
Convictions upheld; procedural and sentencing errors were curable and did not occasion a miscarriage of justice, appeals dismissed.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – Conviction supported by identifying evidence found at scene and arrest at scene. Criminal procedure – Judgment must state offence and section (s.312(2)) – omission curable if no miscarriage of justice (s.388). Sentencing – Omnibus sentence/ failure to allocate separate sentences curable where no prejudice. Appeal – Discretion to order retrial restrained where irregularity did not occasion failure of justice and appellants have largely served sentences.
|
31 October 1995 |
|
Appellants cannot overturn an unchallenged estate inventory based on late, dubious rent receipts; appeal dismissed with costs.
Probate and administration — inventory of estate — challenge to administrator’s inventory after participating in trial; evidentiary weight of late-obtained rent receipts in proving existence of estate property.
|
30 October 1995 |
|
Appeal dismissed: conviction for cattle theft upheld on strong evidence; five-year sentence and compensation affirmed.
Criminal law – Theft – Appellant caught in the act (slaughtering stolen cattle) – physical exhibits (meat, viscera, skins) corroborating prosecution case – conviction upheld; sentence of five years and Shs 20,000 compensation not excessive.
|
30 October 1995 |
|
A parent's custody right is paramount and cannot be withheld by a grandparent pending payment of alleged expenses.
Family law – Custody – Parental right to custody – Welfare of the child paramount – Grandparent cannot withhold custody pending payment – Monetary reimbursement claims are separate civil actions.
|
27 October 1995 |
|
Serious ill‑health and arguable grounds of appeal can constitute "reasonable cause" for bail pending appeal under section 368.
Criminal procedure – Bail pending appeal – section 368(1) – "reasonable cause" – flexible standard – includes serious ill‑health and lack of medical treatment. Bail pending appeal – prospects of success/arguable grounds – risk of sentence being served before appeal heard may justify bail. Balancing liberty, public safety and public resources when considering bail pending appeal.
|
27 October 1995 |
|
Applicant granted bail pending appeal where serious illness and arguable inconsistencies in prosecution created reasonable cause.
Criminal procedure – Bail pending appeal under s.368 Criminal Procedure Act – requirement of "reasonable cause" to be recorded in writing – serious illness and inadequate treatment in custody can amount to reasonable cause – prospects of success need not be overwhelming; arguable grounds plus other circumstances may suffice – assessment of factual inconsistencies in prosecution case relevant to grant of bail.
|
27 October 1995 |
|
Appellant failed to prove title; respondent's village-allocation claim preferred and appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – ownership of unregistered land – proof of title – village allocation as basis of title – assessment of witness credibility – appellate review of factual findings.
|
27 October 1995 |
|
Appeal against convictions dismissed; second-count sentence increased to statutory 15 years plus 12 strokes; sentences concurrent.
Criminal law – Armed robbery and unlawful possession of firearm – Credibility of eyewitnesses to disarmament – Sentencing – appellate variation of illegal sentence to statutory penalty including corporal punishment – concurrent sentences.
|
26 October 1995 |
|
Appellant abandoned land; respondent's occupation lawful; only compensation for trees awarded; appeal dismissed.
Land law – dispute over ownership – abandonment/animus revertendi – absence of intent to retain possession after transfer – occupation by another lawful; remedy limited to compensation for unexhausted improvements (trees).
|
26 October 1995 |
|
An appellate court must not overturn credibility-based findings; respondent lacked locus to claim maintenance for the daughter.
Civil procedure – appeal – appellate interference with trial court factual findings dependent on credibility; Locus standi – father’s right to sue for maintenance of adult daughter; Family law – Law of Marriage Act 1971 – entitlement to maintenance lies with wife; Proof – absence of power of attorney/administrator appointment undermines authority to sue.
|
26 October 1995 |
|
Insufficient identification and lack of corroboration meant the prosecution failed to prove cattle theft beyond reasonable doubt; acquittal upheld.
Cattle theft – identification of stolen animal; sufficiency and corroboration of identification evidence; possession as evidence of theft; requirement to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; weight of extra‑judicial statements.
|
25 October 1995 |
|
Appellate court upheld theft conviction, reduced five‑year sentence to two years, and increased compensation to Shs.409,000.
Criminal law – Theft – Credibility of defence of robbery – Appellate review of trial credibility findings; Sentence – Excessiveness of custodial sentence where stolen property is private commercial property; Compensation – Variation of compensation order to reflect actual value of stolen goods including missing empty crates.
|
24 October 1995 |
|
Appeal against theft conviction dismissed; sentence reduced to two years and compensation increased to Shs.409,000.
Criminal law – Theft – Credibility findings – Trial magistrate’s evaluation of defence robbery story upheld; conviction affirmed. Sentencing – Excessive sentence reduced where Minimum Sentences Act inapplicable. Restitution – Compensation increased to reflect proven value of stolen goods.
|
24 October 1995 |
|
An Islamic marriage can be judicially dissolved where a conciliation board certifies failure to reconcile and subsequent acts show irreparable breakdown.
Family law – Islamic marriage – effect of Conciliation Board certificate of failure to reconcile – subsequent act dissolving marriage – court’s power to find irreparable breakdown and grant divorce.
|
24 October 1995 |
|
Appeal against convictions for death and injury by dangerous driving dismissed; trial court's credibility findings and sentences upheld.
Criminal law – Road traffic offences – Causing death and bodily injury by dangerous driving; credibility assessment of eyewitnesses versus accused’s mechanical-failure defence; appellate interference with findings of fact and sentence.
|
23 October 1995 |
|
A criminal court may not order compensation against an uncharged, unconvicted third party or determine ownership in criminal proceedings.
Criminal law — Compensation orders — Trial court cannot order compensation against a person not charged or convicted; ownership is a civil matter; natural justice requires hearing before imposing liability on absent third party.
|
23 October 1995 |
|
Conviction for defilement upheld; sentence quashed for reliance on later amendment and replaced with lawful penalty.
Criminal law – Defilement – Identification and credibility of child complainant – Alibi – Sentencing – Non‑retrospectivity of penal amendments (Interpretation of Laws Act s.49) – Substitution of illegal sentence.
|
20 October 1995 |
|
Whether credible oral evidence established appellant's ownership of a disputed access strip; appellate court restored primary court finding.
Land dispute — ownership of narrow access strip — credibility of vendor’s oral evidence — appellate review of primary court findings — absence at appeal hearing where date fixed by consent — copied documents versus corroborative oral testimony.
|
20 October 1995 |
|
Amendment to statute makes dangerous-drugs offences non-bailable; court has no discretion to grant bail.
Criminal law – Bail – Dangerous Drugs Ordinance – Classification as economic offence by amendment to Economic and Organized Crime Control Act – Section 35(3)(e) prohibits grant of bail; mandatory bar to bail. Prior magistrate’s bail decision not binding.
|
18 October 1995 |
|
Delay to file appeal not excused where copy of judgment was obtainable within the limitation period and illness was unproven.
Civil procedure – Limitation of appeals – Time requisite for obtaining copy of decree – only reasonable time excluded; illness unsupported by evidence does not excuse delay; appellant’s failure to obtain copy when available disentitles extension.
|
17 October 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed: trial errors and insufficient, unreliable evidence made the theft convictions unsafe.
Criminal law — Appeal — Alleged judicial bias and recusal — Late application to disqualify trial magistrate — Impeachment of witness under s.164 Evidence Act — Sufficiency and identification of evidence for stealing offence — Proper recording and use of locus in quo visits.
|
13 October 1995 |
|
Court allowed ex parte hearing and found municipal council liable for unremitted employee payroll deductions.
Civil procedure – ex parte hearing – defendant’s failure to file statement of defence or enter appearance – Order VIII r.14 Civil Procedure Code. Employment deductions – employer’s statutory deductions from salaries – alleged failure to remit to pension, insurance and housing agencies. Evidence – oral testimony of employees – proof on a balance of probabilities.
|
12 October 1995 |
|
Appellants’ convictions for robbery quashed because identification was unreliable and evidence was tainted by alleged torture.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – reliability undermined by poor lighting and inconsistent witness accounts; trial court’s reliance on untrustworthy witness – appellate intervention – evidence tainted by alleged torture (Sungusungu) – unsafe convictions quashed.
|
12 October 1995 |
|
A party cannot evade res judicata by instituting fresh proceedings after a Ward Tribunal’s decision; such subsequent proceedings are void.
Civil procedure – res judicata – re‑litigation of same subject matter – subsequent Primary Court and District Court proceedings declared null and void. Ward Tribunals Act (Act No. 7 of 1985) – quorum and composition requirements – non‑compliance noted. Jurisdiction – Ward Tribunal’s competence to decide serious possession/recovery claims versus minor customary disputes (Part III Schedule). Finality of appeals – limits on superior courts’ ability to regularise tribunal decisions under Act No. 7/1985.
|
11 October 1995 |
|
Ward Tribunal lacked jurisdiction over land possession dispute; appeals beyond Primary Court were incompetent and proceedings were quashed.
Jurisdiction of Ward Tribunals – limits under Act No. 7/1985; Land disputes involving possession not justiciable in Ward Tribunal; Competence of appeals – section 20(3) Act No. 7/1985 limits appeals to points of law; Proceedings from a tribunal without jurisdiction are null and void and liable to be quashed; Proper forum for land disputes – Primary Court or Land Tribunal under Act No. 22/1992.
|
11 October 1995 |
|
Reported
Whether appellants were juveniles, making the Minimum Sentences Act inapplicable and requiring sentence reduction.
Criminal law – Conspiracy and robbery with violence – sufficiency of evidence for conviction; Juvenile status and age assessment on appeal – admissibility of additional evidence; Minimum Sentences Act 1972 inapplicable to juveniles; illegal sentence exceeding statutory maximum; substitution of sentences on appeal.
|
10 October 1995 |
Criminal Practice and Procedure - Sentence - Sentencing Juveniles - Ascertainment of age of juveniles. |
10 October 1995 |
|
Appellate court upheld robbery conviction based on reliable visual identification and properly rejected an un-notified alibi.
Criminal law – Robbery – Visual identification by a single witness – need to eliminate mistaken identity and seek corroborative factors. Criminal procedure – Alibi – requirement to give notice/particulars under s.194(4) Criminal Procedure Act and consequences of failure. Sentence – statutory minimum under Act No.10/89 upheld.
|
9 October 1995 |
|
Failure to take pleas renders the trial a nullity, requiring quashing and a retrial.
Criminal procedure — failure to take pleas — trial conducted without pleas is a nullity; Remedy — quashing of proceedings and order for retrial; Jurisdiction — DPP certificate under s.12(3) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act does not cure failure to take pleas.
|
9 October 1995 |
|
Use of different assessors for plaintiff and defence rendered the trial irregular and warranted quashing and retrial.
Civil procedure – trial with assessors – assessors must hear the whole case – different sets of assessors for plaintiff and defence vitiate proceedings – remedy: quash proceedings and allow retrial; costs to abide outcome.
|
6 October 1995 |
|
|
6 October 1995 |
|
Appeal against acquittal dismissed where trial court’s credibility findings and benefit of doubt were properly applied.
Criminal law – Theft by public servant – Appeal against acquittal – sufficiency of evidence and proof beyond reasonable doubt. Credibility findings – trial court as best judge of witness credibility; appellate restraint. Hostile witness – failure to apply to declare witness hostile does not itself invalidate acquittal where credibility remains in doubt.
|
4 October 1995 |
|
Conviction quashed where incarceration, witness contradictions and omissions created reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – conviction for retaining stolen property – standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. Alibi and documentary proof – committal warrant showing incarceration during alleged offence undermining prosecution case. Witness credibility – contradictions as to location of recovered items and failure to record alleged admission. Failure to call available witnesses – impact on safety of conviction.
|
4 October 1995 |
|
Conviction for theft quashed where prosecution failed to prove exclusive possession of keys and raised reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – theft – identification and possession – exclusive possession of keys – burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt; Evidentiary requirement – production of original documents/hand-over certificates; Credibility of eyewitness testimony – inspection of scene by trial court.
|
2 October 1995 |
|
|
1 October 1995 |