|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| March 1995 |
|
|
First and third appellants not liable for acting on instruction; second appellant liable for unlawful self-help cattle seizure.
Civil procedure; liability for self-help seizure – volunteers who execute seizure at another’s instruction not automatically liable; unlawful self-help where prior judicial attachment exists; failure to take seized property to agreed tribunal undermines claim.
|
28 March 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed where trial judgment lacked reasons and identification evidence was insufficient to prove guilt.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Visual and voice identification where witnesses are roused at night – Necessity for trial judgment to state points for determination and give reasons – Insufficiency of identification evidence makes conviction unsafe.
|
28 March 1995 |
|
|
27 March 1995 |
|
Appeal allowed where an improperly tendered out‑of‑court statement left no evidence linking recovered property to the accused.
Evidence — admissibility of extra‑judicial statements — statutory requirements (service of copy and opportunity to object) — failure to comply renders statement inadmissible; Identification of stolen property — insufficient evidence to link property to alleged owner or accused — conviction unsafe.
|
26 March 1995 |
|
Contradictory, delayed eyewitness evidence rendered conviction unsafe; the accused were acquitted.
Criminal law – Murder – Reliance on eyewitness evidence – Material contradictions and delay in reporting undermine credibility – Motive insufficient to prove participation – Alibi and reasonable doubt.
|
24 March 1995 |
|
The accused were acquitted because contradictory, delayed and potentially biased eyewitness evidence failed to prove murder beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – murder – burden of proof – credibility of eyewitnesses – contradictions and delay in reporting undermining prosecution case – alibi and potential witness bias raising reasonable doubt.
|
24 March 1995 |
|
Reported
Family Law - Adoption - One potential adoptive parent a foreign national residing in the Republic - Requirements for valid adoption in such circumstances - Section 3(2) of the Adoption Ordinance, Cap.335.
Customary Law - Marriage by customary Sukurna law - Whether such constituting valid marriage for the purposes of adoption - Section 43 of the Law of Marriage, 1971. |
23 March 1995 |
|
Leave granted to file suit in the Resident Magistrate's Court; representative suit status and injunction refused as premature.
Magistrate's Court practice – leave under s.61 to institute proceedings in Resident Magistrate's Court; representative (group) suits – appropriate court to determine representative status; interlocutory relief – injunction refused as premature pending institution of substantive suit.
|
23 March 1995 |
|
Reported
Civil Practice and Procedure - Representative spits - Application for leave to file such a suit- Before which court such application should be brought. |
23 March 1995 |
|
An uncorroborated accomplice's testimony cannot safely sustain the applicant's conviction for burglary and stealing.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – Accomplice evidence – Requirement for corroboration – Failure to call alleged eyewitness undermines credibility – Unsafe conviction.
|
22 March 1995 |
|
Sentence exceeding statutory maximum for a misdemeanour set aside; appellant released after serving more than the two-year maximum.
Criminal law – Concealing birth of a child (s218 Penal Code) – Misdemeanour – Applicable maximum punishment where no specific penalty provided (s35 Penal Code) – Sentence exceeding statutory maximum unlawful – Appellate power to set aside sentence and order release where time served exceeds lawful maximum.
|
22 March 1995 |
|
Ex parte newspaper defamation trials held without required assessors are void and warrant a de novo inter partes hearing.
Newspapers Act (s.57) – assessors required in newspaper defamation trials – participation required even in ex parte hearings (Rugaimukamu v Murusuri & Editor of Mfanyakazi Newspaper). Civil procedure – ex parte proceedings – consequences of omission of mandatory assessors – nullity of judgment and decree. Extension of time – refusal where underlying proceeding is a nullity – appellate intervention and grant of relief. Non‑appearance – where caused by confusion, order to proceed ex parte may be unjustified.
|
21 March 1995 |
|
Court upheld the applicant’s revocation of a will and entered judgment after the respondent failed to appear.
Wills – revocability during testator’s life; Civil procedure – ex parte judgment where served defendant deliberately defaults; Property – challenge to respondent’s registration of title and conduct regarding sale.
|
21 March 1995 |
|
Appeal against conviction and nine-year sentence for property offences dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
Criminal law – proof of offence – identification and documentary evidence; confession – voluntariness and failure to challenge at trial; sentencing – proportionality and non-interference on appeal.
|
19 March 1995 |
|
|
18 March 1995 |
|
|
17 March 1995 |
|
Appellate court quashed an unjustified acquittal and convicted respondent of cattle theft based on confessions and recovered evidence.
Criminal law – cattle theft – sufficiency of evidence – confessions to villagers and cautioned statement – appellate power to quash acquittal and enter conviction – ex parte hearing where accused absents.
|
17 March 1995 |
|
Conviction for an economic offence was quashed where statutory consent to prosecute was lacking; retrial refused as not in interests of justice.
Criminal law – Economic crimes – Requirement of Director of Public Prosecutions’ consent under section 56(1) before commencing trial – Failure to comply renders proceedings a nullity – Quashing conviction and setting aside sentence – Discretion to order retrial assessed against interests of justice and time served.
|
17 March 1995 |
|
Bail applications for alleged heroin possession dismissed because statute bars bail and any constitutional challenge must be raised formally.
Criminal procedure – Bail – Offences under Dangerous Drugs Ordinance included in non-bailable list by amendment to s.35(3) of Economic and Organised Crime Control Act (Act 27/1991). Constitutional law – Challenge to statute – Requirement to follow formal procedure and give notice before seeking declaration of unconstitutionality. Court’s jurisdiction – Court bound to apply existing statutory law and cannot decide constitutionality informally during bail proceedings.
|
17 March 1995 |
|
Presumption of legitimacy for children born during marriage upheld; maintenance award of TShs 4,000/= affirmed and appeal dismissed.
Family law – legitimacy – presumption that children born in wedlock belong to the husband – burden to rebut presumption. Family law – maintenance – assessment of reasonable maintenance in light of cost of living and payer’s means. Family law – variation of custody/maintenance – ability to apply under Marriage Act for variation on material change.
|
16 March 1995 |
|
A child born in wedlock is presumptively the husband’s child; paternity denial on the given facts failed and maintenance order upheld.
Family law – legitimacy – presumption of legitimacy for a child born in wedlock – paternity denial – insufficiency of proof based on alleged refusal of sexual intercourse; Maintenance – quantum – reasonableness in context of living costs and ability to pay; Variation – parties may seek variation of custody or maintenance under Law of Marriage Act No.5/71 upon material change of circumstances.
|
16 March 1995 |
|
A decree holder may not use leave to appeal to compel payment; enforcement must proceed by execution (attachment of goods).
Civil procedure – appeals – leave to appeal not a mechanism for enforcing payment of a money judgment. Enforcement – decree holder should apply for execution (e.g., attachment of debtor's goods) where judgment debtor refuses to pay. Competency – application seeking appellate relief to compel payment is incompetent and struck out.
|
15 March 1995 |
|
Appellants' robbery convictions reduced to assault causing actual bodily harm where evidence of robbery was insufficient and confession unreliable.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – sufficiency of evidence – where no independent witness or reliable documentary confession, robbery not proved beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal procedure – substitution of conviction – power under section 366 to substitute a lesser offence where evidence does not sustain original conviction. Evidence – reliability of complainant’s testimony and village documents – self‑serving testimony and unsigned village letters are unsafe as sole proof. Defences – community complaint/colourable right and honest belief – failure of trial court to properly consider defence may undermine robbery conviction.
|
15 March 1995 |
|
Application to set aside an ex‑parte judgment dismissed as time‑barred due to delay and failure to seek extension.
Civil procedure — setting aside ex‑parte judgment — application time‑barred — applicant aware of fixation and failed to act promptly or seek extension of time — preliminary objection upheld.
|
14 March 1995 |
|
Long, uninterrupted possession for many years can give prescriptive title and bar a late inheritance claim under the twelve‑year limitation.
Property law — Prescription/possession — Long, uninterrupted and undisturbed possession since 1952–1953 held to confer prescriptive title; Limitation of Proceedings Rules (12 years) — delay in asserting title fatal to claim; insufficiency of evidence of allocation/inheritance to rebut possession.
|
14 March 1995 |
|
A trial where accused swapped places and impersonated each other, and the magistrate failed to control proceedings, renders the conviction unsafe.
Criminal procedure – trial fairness – accused swapping places in dock and impersonating each other; trial magistrate’s failure to control proceedings; farcical trial rendering conviction unsafe; appellate refusal to decide appeal on merits where trial process tainted.
|
13 March 1995 |
|
|
11 March 1995 |
|
An appellate court will not disturb concurrent credibility findings unless manifestly unreasonable; respondent proved land ownership.
Land law – ownership of ancestral/occupied land – proof by long use and supporting eyewitness testimony. Evidence – oral testimony and witness credibility – appellate restraint on disturbing concurrent findings of fact. Civil procedure – standard of review on appeal where lower courts have made credibility findings based on witnesses' evidence.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Appellate court will not disturb concurrent credibility-based findings of fact; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – ownership by occupation – evidence of long possession and clearing; Civil procedure – appeal – concurrent findings on credibility and oral testimony not to be disturbed absent manifest unreasonableness; Burden of proof – competing inheritance claim versus continuous occupation.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and inconsistent explanations upheld theft conviction; appellate court specified compensation and default remedies.
Criminal law – Theft/fraudulent conversion – Circumstantial evidence – sufficiency to exclude reasonable hypothesis of innocence; Criminal procedure – First appeal – inadmissibility of fresh evidence without order for additional evidence; Compensation orders – requirement to specify sum and remedies for non-payment; Alternative counts – appropriateness to pleaded facts.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Plaintiff awarded damages against the driver; vehicle owner not liable absent proof of employment or authority.
Motor-vehicle accident – personal injury – causation and damages; agency/employment – proved employment with third party, not owner; vicarious liability – no imputed liability absent authority or agency; implied authority – not inferred without evidence; criminal conviction for careless driving admissible on causation.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Reported
Assessors need not give written opinions; inherited property improved or jointly acquired during marriage is divisible under s.114(3).
Family law — division of matrimonial property — assessors' procedure under GN No 2 of 1988 — assessors' views may be consulted and incorporated in signed judgment (no separate written opinions required); Law of Marriage Act s.114(3) — inherited personal property liable for distribution if substantially improved or jointly acquired during marriage (including by bride-price or purchases from joint funds).
|
9 March 1995 |
|
Oral payment of Shs.300 was insufficient to prove sale of village land; ownership remained with the respondent.
Land disputes – alleged sale of village land for Shs.300 – oral payment insufficient to prove sale without reliable/written evidence – payments for land improvement distinct from purchase – credibility findings on site inspection upheld on appeal.
|
9 March 1995 |
|
Reported
Family Law - Divorce - Division of the matrimonial assets - Basis upon which division to be effected - Section 114(3) of the Law of Marriage Act No.5 of 1971. |
9 March 1995 |
|
Assessors’ opinions need not be written pre-judgment; inherited livestock can be divisible if improved or jointly acquired.
Civil procedure – role of assessors in primary court trials – consultation by magistrate and inclusion of assessors’ views in the judgment; no requirement for separate written opinions. Family law – division of matrimonial property – inherited or personal property may be divisible if substantially improved during marriage, purchased with joint funds, or acquired jointly (e.g. bride-price). Evidence – spouse’s contribution to upkeep and acquisition of livestock constitutes ground for share in matrimonial assets.
|
9 March 1995 |
|
|
8 March 1995 |
|
|
8 March 1995 |
|
Appellant's conviction quashed where evidence showed only post-theft association and assistance, not participation in the theft.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – conviction unsafe where evidence only shows post-offence association and assistance, not participation in theft. Criminal procedure – reliance on co-accused’s defence evidence – whether such evidence can ground conviction. Aiding and abetting – temporal disconnect: facilitation of a later transaction does not prove participation in prior theft.
|
8 March 1995 |
|
The appellants’ cattle-theft convictions were affirmed on credible eyewitness, identification and linking evidence, and appeals dismissed.
Criminal law – Theft of livestock – Evidence and identification – Eyewitness testimony, recovery of meat and skin at accused’s premises, and confession – Credibility findings by trial court – Appellate interference limited absent misdirection.
|
8 March 1995 |
|
Recent possession of a stolen cow and lack of corroboration for the purchase defence justified upholding the theft conviction.
Criminal law – theft of cattle – doctrine of recent possession – possession of recently stolen animal at abattoir as evidence of theft; defence of purchase from co‑accused requires independent corroboration; accused’s silence when co‑accused denies involvement weakens defence.
|
8 March 1995 |
Administrative Law - Prerogative orders - Ad-interim injunctive Orders pending hearing application for leave - Whether the court may grant an ad-interim injunctive order before granting leave to apply for prerogative orders. Administrative Law - Injunctive orders against the Government — Whether the High Court has power to grant injunctive orders against the Government, its ministers or officials - Section 11 of the Government Proceedings Act 1967. |
7 March 1995 |
|
Conviction quashed where evidence showed surrender under threat and no proof of conspiracy or voluntary participation.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – sufficiency of evidence to prove theft and conspiracy. Criminal law – Duress/coercion – effect on culpability and reliability of statements. Evidence – credibility of accused’s testimony and failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Youth of accused – relevance to assessment of intent and voluntariness of actions.
|
7 March 1995 |
|
Issuance of talak and non‑maintenance rendered the marriage irretrievably broken; appeal dismissed with costs.
Family law – Divorce – Irretrievable/irreparable breakdown of marriage – Effect of issuance of Islamic talak – Failure to provide maintenance as ground supporting divorce – Court’s inability to order return to matrimonial home (s.140 Law of Marriage Act).
|
7 March 1995 |
|
Mens rea (intention or recklessness), not strict liability, is required for arson and setting fire to crops; convictions quashed.
Criminal law – arson and setting fire to crops (Penal Code s 319(a), s 321(a)) – "wilfully and unlawfully" imports mens rea – intention or recklessness required – not strict liability; lawful burning that becomes dangerous may attract liability if actor is reckless; burden of proof remains on prosecution.
|
6 March 1995 |
|
Armed-robbery conviction quashed for lack of proof of arms; substituted with robbery with violence and sentence reduced to fifteen years.
Criminal law – Robbery and armed robbery – Insufficiency of evidence to prove use of arms; identification problems; doctrine of recent possession; prohibition on convicting for a more serious offence than charged; sentence reduction for excessive punishment.
|
6 March 1995 |
|
Failure to serve mandatory statutory notice on a local government authority renders the suit improperly before the court.
Local government law – requirement to serve written notice of intention to commence suit on a local government authority – statutory one-month notice mandatory – absence of proof of notice fatal to suit – trial court erred in hearing matter without proof of service – judgment set aside.
|
1 March 1995 |