|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| March 1995 |
|
|
Conviction for an economic offence was quashed where statutory consent to prosecute was lacking; retrial refused as not in interests of justice.
Criminal law – Economic crimes – Requirement of Director of Public Prosecutions’ consent under section 56(1) before commencing trial – Failure to comply renders proceedings a nullity – Quashing conviction and setting aside sentence – Discretion to order retrial assessed against interests of justice and time served.
|
17 March 1995 |
|
Bail applications for alleged heroin possession dismissed because statute bars bail and any constitutional challenge must be raised formally.
Criminal procedure – Bail – Offences under Dangerous Drugs Ordinance included in non-bailable list by amendment to s.35(3) of Economic and Organised Crime Control Act (Act 27/1991). Constitutional law – Challenge to statute – Requirement to follow formal procedure and give notice before seeking declaration of unconstitutionality. Court’s jurisdiction – Court bound to apply existing statutory law and cannot decide constitutionality informally during bail proceedings.
|
17 March 1995 |
|
Presumption of legitimacy for children born during marriage upheld; maintenance award of TShs 4,000/= affirmed and appeal dismissed.
Family law – legitimacy – presumption that children born in wedlock belong to the husband – burden to rebut presumption. Family law – maintenance – assessment of reasonable maintenance in light of cost of living and payer’s means. Family law – variation of custody/maintenance – ability to apply under Marriage Act for variation on material change.
|
16 March 1995 |
|
A child born in wedlock is presumptively the husband’s child; paternity denial on the given facts failed and maintenance order upheld.
Family law – legitimacy – presumption of legitimacy for a child born in wedlock – paternity denial – insufficiency of proof based on alleged refusal of sexual intercourse; Maintenance – quantum – reasonableness in context of living costs and ability to pay; Variation – parties may seek variation of custody or maintenance under Law of Marriage Act No.5/71 upon material change of circumstances.
|
16 March 1995 |
|
A decree holder may not use leave to appeal to compel payment; enforcement must proceed by execution (attachment of goods).
Civil procedure – appeals – leave to appeal not a mechanism for enforcing payment of a money judgment. Enforcement – decree holder should apply for execution (e.g., attachment of debtor's goods) where judgment debtor refuses to pay. Competency – application seeking appellate relief to compel payment is incompetent and struck out.
|
15 March 1995 |
|
Appellants' robbery convictions reduced to assault causing actual bodily harm where evidence of robbery was insufficient and confession unreliable.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – sufficiency of evidence – where no independent witness or reliable documentary confession, robbery not proved beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal procedure – substitution of conviction – power under section 366 to substitute a lesser offence where evidence does not sustain original conviction. Evidence – reliability of complainant’s testimony and village documents – self‑serving testimony and unsigned village letters are unsafe as sole proof. Defences – community complaint/colourable right and honest belief – failure of trial court to properly consider defence may undermine robbery conviction.
|
15 March 1995 |
|
Application to set aside an ex‑parte judgment dismissed as time‑barred due to delay and failure to seek extension.
Civil procedure — setting aside ex‑parte judgment — application time‑barred — applicant aware of fixation and failed to act promptly or seek extension of time — preliminary objection upheld.
|
14 March 1995 |
|
Long, uninterrupted possession for many years can give prescriptive title and bar a late inheritance claim under the twelve‑year limitation.
Property law — Prescription/possession — Long, uninterrupted and undisturbed possession since 1952–1953 held to confer prescriptive title; Limitation of Proceedings Rules (12 years) — delay in asserting title fatal to claim; insufficiency of evidence of allocation/inheritance to rebut possession.
|
14 March 1995 |
|
A trial where accused swapped places and impersonated each other, and the magistrate failed to control proceedings, renders the conviction unsafe.
Criminal procedure – trial fairness – accused swapping places in dock and impersonating each other; trial magistrate’s failure to control proceedings; farcical trial rendering conviction unsafe; appellate refusal to decide appeal on merits where trial process tainted.
|
13 March 1995 |
|
|
11 March 1995 |
|
An appellate court will not disturb concurrent credibility findings unless manifestly unreasonable; respondent proved land ownership.
Land law – ownership of ancestral/occupied land – proof by long use and supporting eyewitness testimony. Evidence – oral testimony and witness credibility – appellate restraint on disturbing concurrent findings of fact. Civil procedure – standard of review on appeal where lower courts have made credibility findings based on witnesses' evidence.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Appellate court will not disturb concurrent credibility-based findings of fact; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – ownership by occupation – evidence of long possession and clearing; Civil procedure – appeal – concurrent findings on credibility and oral testimony not to be disturbed absent manifest unreasonableness; Burden of proof – competing inheritance claim versus continuous occupation.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and inconsistent explanations upheld theft conviction; appellate court specified compensation and default remedies.
Criminal law – Theft/fraudulent conversion – Circumstantial evidence – sufficiency to exclude reasonable hypothesis of innocence; Criminal procedure – First appeal – inadmissibility of fresh evidence without order for additional evidence; Compensation orders – requirement to specify sum and remedies for non-payment; Alternative counts – appropriateness to pleaded facts.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Plaintiff awarded damages against the driver; vehicle owner not liable absent proof of employment or authority.
Motor-vehicle accident – personal injury – causation and damages; agency/employment – proved employment with third party, not owner; vicarious liability – no imputed liability absent authority or agency; implied authority – not inferred without evidence; criminal conviction for careless driving admissible on causation.
|
10 March 1995 |
|
Reported
Assessors need not give written opinions; inherited property improved or jointly acquired during marriage is divisible under s.114(3).
Family law — division of matrimonial property — assessors' procedure under GN No 2 of 1988 — assessors' views may be consulted and incorporated in signed judgment (no separate written opinions required); Law of Marriage Act s.114(3) — inherited personal property liable for distribution if substantially improved or jointly acquired during marriage (including by bride-price or purchases from joint funds).
|
9 March 1995 |
|
Oral payment of Shs.300 was insufficient to prove sale of village land; ownership remained with the respondent.
Land disputes – alleged sale of village land for Shs.300 – oral payment insufficient to prove sale without reliable/written evidence – payments for land improvement distinct from purchase – credibility findings on site inspection upheld on appeal.
|
9 March 1995 |
|
Reported
Family Law - Divorce - Division of the matrimonial assets - Basis upon which division to be effected - Section 114(3) of the Law of Marriage Act No.5 of 1971. |
9 March 1995 |
|
Assessors’ opinions need not be written pre-judgment; inherited livestock can be divisible if improved or jointly acquired.
Civil procedure – role of assessors in primary court trials – consultation by magistrate and inclusion of assessors’ views in the judgment; no requirement for separate written opinions. Family law – division of matrimonial property – inherited or personal property may be divisible if substantially improved during marriage, purchased with joint funds, or acquired jointly (e.g. bride-price). Evidence – spouse’s contribution to upkeep and acquisition of livestock constitutes ground for share in matrimonial assets.
|
9 March 1995 |
|
|
8 March 1995 |
|
|
8 March 1995 |
|
Appellant's conviction quashed where evidence showed only post-theft association and assistance, not participation in the theft.
Criminal law – sufficiency of evidence – conviction unsafe where evidence only shows post-offence association and assistance, not participation in theft. Criminal procedure – reliance on co-accused’s defence evidence – whether such evidence can ground conviction. Aiding and abetting – temporal disconnect: facilitation of a later transaction does not prove participation in prior theft.
|
8 March 1995 |
|
The appellants’ cattle-theft convictions were affirmed on credible eyewitness, identification and linking evidence, and appeals dismissed.
Criminal law – Theft of livestock – Evidence and identification – Eyewitness testimony, recovery of meat and skin at accused’s premises, and confession – Credibility findings by trial court – Appellate interference limited absent misdirection.
|
8 March 1995 |
|
Recent possession of a stolen cow and lack of corroboration for the purchase defence justified upholding the theft conviction.
Criminal law – theft of cattle – doctrine of recent possession – possession of recently stolen animal at abattoir as evidence of theft; defence of purchase from co‑accused requires independent corroboration; accused’s silence when co‑accused denies involvement weakens defence.
|
8 March 1995 |
Administrative Law - Prerogative orders - Ad-interim injunctive Orders pending hearing application for leave - Whether the court may grant an ad-interim injunctive order before granting leave to apply for prerogative orders. Administrative Law - Injunctive orders against the Government — Whether the High Court has power to grant injunctive orders against the Government, its ministers or officials - Section 11 of the Government Proceedings Act 1967. |
7 March 1995 |
|
Conviction quashed where evidence showed surrender under threat and no proof of conspiracy or voluntary participation.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – sufficiency of evidence to prove theft and conspiracy. Criminal law – Duress/coercion – effect on culpability and reliability of statements. Evidence – credibility of accused’s testimony and failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Youth of accused – relevance to assessment of intent and voluntariness of actions.
|
7 March 1995 |
|
Issuance of talak and non‑maintenance rendered the marriage irretrievably broken; appeal dismissed with costs.
Family law – Divorce – Irretrievable/irreparable breakdown of marriage – Effect of issuance of Islamic talak – Failure to provide maintenance as ground supporting divorce – Court’s inability to order return to matrimonial home (s.140 Law of Marriage Act).
|
7 March 1995 |
|
Mens rea (intention or recklessness), not strict liability, is required for arson and setting fire to crops; convictions quashed.
Criminal law – arson and setting fire to crops (Penal Code s 319(a), s 321(a)) – "wilfully and unlawfully" imports mens rea – intention or recklessness required – not strict liability; lawful burning that becomes dangerous may attract liability if actor is reckless; burden of proof remains on prosecution.
|
6 March 1995 |
|
Armed-robbery conviction quashed for lack of proof of arms; substituted with robbery with violence and sentence reduced to fifteen years.
Criminal law – Robbery and armed robbery – Insufficiency of evidence to prove use of arms; identification problems; doctrine of recent possession; prohibition on convicting for a more serious offence than charged; sentence reduction for excessive punishment.
|
6 March 1995 |
|
Failure to serve mandatory statutory notice on a local government authority renders the suit improperly before the court.
Local government law – requirement to serve written notice of intention to commence suit on a local government authority – statutory one-month notice mandatory – absence of proof of notice fatal to suit – trial court erred in hearing matter without proof of service – judgment set aside.
|
1 March 1995 |
| February 1995 |
|
|
|
28 February 1995 |
|
Appellate court affirms no-case ruling where prosecution evidence was materially contradictory and firearm identification unproven.
Criminal law – Submission of no case to answer – court entitled to rule where prosecution evidence is manifestly unreliable or materially contradictory. Evidence – Identification of weapon – necessity of adequate identification procedures and corroboration when firearm alleged. Appeal – appellate court to affirm trial credibility findings unless unsupportable. Criminal procedure – charge particulars must conform to evidence; prosecution bound by particulars. Curable clerical errors – heading errors do not vitiate decision where substance unaffected.
|
28 February 1995 |
|
Prosecution failed to prove a prima facie case of threatening with a gun due to material contradictions and poor identification.
Criminal law – Threatening violence – Whether prosecution proved a prima facie case to require defence to be called – Material contradictions and insufficient identification of weapon. Evidence – Identification of objects and witnesses’ ability to identify a firearm under challenging circumstances. Appellate review – Deference to trial court credibility findings unless irrational. Criminal procedure – Need to align charge particulars with evidence; amendment where variance exists.
|
28 February 1995 |
|
|
28 February 1995 |
|
|
28 February 1995 |
|
|
28 February 1995 |
|
Where civil judgments resolved ownership, criminal charge for obtaining property by false pretences was unjustified and conviction quashed.
Criminal law – obtaining goods by false pretences – effect of prior civil judgments on criminal liability; delay in prosecution; claim of right and conditional discharge.
|
27 February 1995 |
|
A defendant cannot be guilty of obtaining money by false pretences where the payor knowingly paid to trap him.
Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretences – Element of deception at time of parting with money; Evidence – Primary documentary proof required for documentary transactions; hearsay inadmissible absent Evidence Act s.67 exception; Entrapment/trap – where payor knowingly pays to effect arrest there is no operative deception; conviction may be substituted for attempt (Penal Code s.302; Interpretation Act s.51).
|
24 February 1995 |
Evidence - Admissibility - Unstamped document - Issue of admissibility of unstamped document raised on appeal- Whether proper. |
24 February 1995 |
|
Convictions quashed where prosecution failed to call a key witness and evidence was inconsistent and inadequate.
Criminal law – housebreaking and theft – insufficiency and inconsistency of evidence – failure to call key witness in whose house stolen goods were found – no proof of breaking – benefit of doubt – convictions quashed.
|
24 February 1995 |
|
A High Court as second appellate court may re‑examine evidence afresh and was justified in refusing a certificate and leave to appeal.
Civil procedure – Appeals from primary courts – Role of High Court as second appellate court – entitlement to examine whole evidence afresh and to make independent findings of fact and law. Procedure – Certificate and leave to appeal – requirements for points of law worthy of consideration by the Court of Appeal.
|
24 February 1995 |
|
Evidence of adultery (flagrante delicto and confession) upheld; appeal dismissed and each party to bear own costs.
Family law – Adultery – Proof by flagrante delicto and confession – damages for adultery – customary/community settlement (ten‑cell leader) – assessment of credibility on appeal.
|
24 February 1995 |
|
Applicant's defamation claim failed for lack of proof of publication and substantiation of alleged damages.
Defamation – requirement of proof of publication to identifiable third parties; failure to call witnesses of publication fatal to claim. Evidence – damages and loss must be proved; unsupported assertions of harassment and farm loss insufficient. Judicial findings – trial judgments containing references not on record or extraneous material are unreliable on appeal.
|
23 February 1995 |
|
Individual village members lacked standing to sue for company property; company, not individuals, must bring such claims.
Company law; locus standi – shareholders' capacity to sue – Articles of Association defining shareholders as villages, not individuals; representative/derivative actions – requirement of company co-plaintiff or court leave; exception for derivative suits alleging fraud; property of company belongs to the company and only it may sue.
|
23 February 1995 |
Customary Law — Brideprice - Refund of — Principles governing refund - Customary Law Declaration Order GN No 279 of 1963. |
22 February 1995 |
|
Appellate court upheld robbery conviction, finding eyewitness identification credible and dismissing the appeal.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Eyewitness identification – Whether identification was properly evaluated by trial court – Circumstances supporting recognition (known person, sufficient light, proximity during struggle) – Appeal dismissed.
|
22 February 1995 |
|
Appeal dismissed: land found in Mwiringo village and village allocation to respondent lawful absent malice or dispossession.
Land law – village land allocation; jurisdiction of village authority to allocate land; factual determination of land location; limits on allocation: no malice, no unlawful dispossession; appeal dismissed with costs.
|
22 February 1995 |
|
Insufficient and uncorroborated evidence of assault could not prove causation of death; accused had no case to answer and were acquitted.
Criminal law — murder charge — sufficiency of evidence to call accused to answer — causation of death — uncorroborated accomplice evidence — necessity for independent corroboration.
|
21 February 1995 |
|
|
20 February 1995 |
|
Night-time identification and unexplained arrest delay can render convictions unsafe if prosecution fails to exclude reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – identification evidence – recognition at night – reliability and opportunity to observe. Criminal procedure – effect of delay between offence and arrest on safety of identification and conviction. Standard of proof – beyond reasonable doubt – sufficiency of evidence to support conviction.
|
20 February 1995 |
|
Conviction for unlawful possession of heroin upheld on credible police and chemist evidence; sentence challenged as excessive.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of dangerous drugs – sufficiency of evidence to prove possession; search and seizure based on informer tip conducted in daylight before police detectives; forensic analysis identifying heroin hydrochloride. Sentencing – whether a fifteen-year term is excessive and merits reduction.
|
20 February 1995 |