|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| May 1995 |
|
|
|
26 May 1995 |
|
Appeal dismissed: payments made, lack of mens rea and insufficient proof of employer–employee relationship warranted acquittal of the respondent.
Criminal law – acquittal – appeal against acquittal – adequacy of prosecution evidence. Labour/Employment law – alleged failure to pay wages – payment in instalments and prosecution’s burden of proof. Occupational accidents – duty to notify Labour Officer – requirement of mens rea for conviction. Evidentiary law – insufficiency of interested witness testimony to establish employer–employee relationship. Criminal procedure – doctrine of autrefois convict considered but not determinative.
|
26 May 1995 |
|
The appeal was dismissed: payments exceeded claimed wages and lack of mens rea defeated the failure-to-notify charge.
Criminal law – mens rea — failure to notify accidents — liability requires knowledge or dishonest intent. Employment law – unpaid wages — payments made by instalments and unchallenged payments defeat prosecution claim. Labour/occupational accidents – duty to notify — depends on existence of employer’s obligation and knowledge of that duty. Evidence – informal employment relationships — difficulty proving terms and legal obligations where no written contract exists. Procedure – erroneous reference to autrefois convict noted but not decisive.
|
26 May 1995 |
|
Respondent proved entitlement to 14 cattle; forgery and res judicata allegations unproven; appeal dismissed with costs.
Property law – recovery of chattels – ownership and entitlement proved on balance of probabilities; Evidence – document authenticity – forgery allegation not proved; Res judicata – earlier suit not shown to be substantially the same nor finally adjudicated; Appellate review – trial magistrate’s credibility findings entitled to deference.
|
26 May 1995 |
|
Opportunity to engage counsel must be afforded; keys may be house‑breaking instruments and related sentences should ordinarily run concurrently.
Criminal law — right to counsel — waiver and opportunity to engage advocate; Burglary and theft — circumstantial and direct evidence; Possession of keys as house‑breaking instruments — question of fact; Sentencing — concurrent vs consecutive terms and reduction for excessiveness.
|
26 May 1995 |
|
A respondent faced with an ex parte Primary Court judgment must apply to that court to set it aside, not appeal to the District Court.
Civil procedure – Ex parte judgment – Proper remedy is an application to the court that gave the ex parte decision to set it aside – Appeal to higher court inappropriate – Law of limitation applies.
|
26 May 1995 |
|
Appeal challenges sufficiency of circumstantial evidence and absence of possession in a shop theft where a night watchman also had access.
Criminal law – Theft and shop‑breaking – sufficiency of circumstantial evidence; possession of stolen property as evidentiary factor; alternative suspects (night watchman) and reasonable doubt.
|
25 May 1995 |
|
Acknowledgement of filed notice, not fee payment, fixes appeal timeliness; earlier probate not shown to be res judicata.
Probate — res judicata — earlier probate file missing and earlier magistrate deceased — res judicata not proved; Appeal timeliness — 30‑day period runs from receipt and acknowledgment of notice of intention to appeal by the court, not from later payment of fees or formal admission.
|
25 May 1995 |
|
Binding‑over powers require strict statutory procedure and a hearing; noncompliance renders proceedings null and void.
Criminal procedure — Part III CPA — binding‑over for keeping the peace; mandatory procedural requirements (s.74, s.75, s.76, s.79, s.210, s.195) — right to be heard and to cross‑examine. Scope — preventive justice aimed at habitual or likely offenders, not isolated civil disputes. Failure to furnish proposed order when arrested and failure to allow sworn representation/cross‑examination — fatal irregularities vitiating proceedings.
|
24 May 1995 |
|
Revision dismissed as an abuse of process and time‑barred where an extant notice of appeal remained and required order copy was absent.
Civil procedure — Revision v. appeal — Revision incompetent and abusive where notice of appeal remains extant; procedural requirement to attach certified copy of order challenged; time‑bar under Limitation Act (60 days).
|
24 May 1995 |
|
Taxation cannot be set aside by a different magistrate; taxed costs upheld, purchaser protected, respondent ordered to pay shortfall.
Civil procedure – execution and sale of attached property; taxation of costs – jurisdiction to set aside taxation; proper remedies (appeal/review) against taxation; validity of public auction sale; protection of innocent purchaser; accounting of sale proceeds and broker's fees; decree-holder's right to outstanding balance.
|
23 May 1995 |
|
Reported
Administrative Law - Decision-making by public authorities - Whether there is a duty to give reasons for decisions reached - Section 26 of the Security of Employment Act 1964 Common Law - Application of common law in Tanzania - Power of the High Court to modify the common law applicable in Tanzania - Section 2(2) of the Judicature and Application of Laws Ordinance, Cap 453
Administrative Law - Exclusion of the jurisdiction of the courts by finality clauses- Statute providing that the Minister’s decision shall be final and conclusive - Effect thereof- Section 27(1) (a) of the Security of Employment Act 1964 |
22 May 1995 |
|
Reported
A decision-maker must give reasons in important matters; failure to do so renders the decision a nullity and permits certiorari.
Administrative law — duty to give reasons — common law modified to require reasons in matters affecting liberty, livelihood, reputation or proprietary/pecuniary interests; failure to give reasons renders decision a nullity — "final and conclusive" does not oust judicial review — mandamus may be directed to delegator despite delegation.
|
22 May 1995 |
|
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentences increased to five years for causing grievous harm resulting in permanent deafness.
Criminal law – Offence of causing grievous harm – Eyewitness and medical evidence establishing permanent sensorineural hearing loss – Appeal: conviction upheld; custodial sentences enhanced for unprovoked severe assault.
|
19 May 1995 |
|
Application granted to decide validity of land encumbrance and possible ownership by adverse possession; each party to bear own costs.
Land law – Validity of encumbrance – Whether an encumbrance is valid under Act No 22 of 1992. Land law – Adverse possession – Whether continuous occupation since 1974 for over 12 years confers ownership. Procedure – Allowing application to be argued in absentia where respondent unable to technically argue legal points. Appeal – Significant unresolved legal questions suitable for determination by the Court of Appeal.
|
18 May 1995 |
|
Eyewitness and medical evidence upheld a defilement conviction; alibi rejected and statutory 20‑year sentence affirmed.
Criminal law — Defilement: proof by eyewitness and medical (PF3) evidence; Identification: accused known to witnesses and offence in daylight; Victim's non‑attendance not fatal where corroboration exists; Alibi: failure to give particulars and to displace prosecution evidence; Sentence: statutory minimum under s.136(4) Penal Code.
|
18 May 1995 |
|
Appellate court finds district magistrate erred by failing to consider additional estate assets and by treating administration as mere distribution.
Estate administration – appointment of administrator – whether court properly assessed evidence of additional assets – administration not limited to distribution of property; debts and liabilities also relevant.
|
18 May 1995 |
|
The appellant's cattle-theft conviction was quashed for unreliable identification evidence and defective trial record.
Criminal law – Appeal – Cattle theft – Identification of stolen property by mark – Inadequate and inconsistent evidence on number and identity of cattle – Defective/unclear trial record – Conviction unsafe; quashed.
|
17 May 1995 |
|
|
17 May 1995 |
|
Appeal against rape conviction and five-year sentence dismissed; trial credibility and corroborative medical evidence upheld.
Criminal law – Rape – Sufficiency of evidence and corroboration – Medical and third‑party reports corroborating complainant’s account – Credibility findings of trial court upheld – Sentence review – five years imprisonment not manifestly excessive.
|
17 May 1995 |
|
Appeal against conviction for sexual assault of an epileptic girl dismissed; credible testimony and medical corroboration upheld.
Criminal law – Sexual offence – Conviction supported by complainant's credible testimony corroborated by PF3 medical report and medical examination of accused. Evidence – Corroboration and credibility – Complainant's disability (epilepsy) and inability to raise alarm considered when assessing failure to protest. Sentencing – Five years' imprisonment not manifestly excessive.
|
17 May 1995 |
|
Conflating distinct causes of action and trying a defendant for another's assault renders proceedings null and void.
Civil procedure – misjoinder/multiplicity of causes of action – where distinct wrongful acts by different persons give rise to separate causes of action, they must be brought in separate suits; trial court proceeding contrary to the plaint and trying a defendant for another's act is a nullity.
|
16 May 1995 |
|
Evidence of inheritance-motive and an immediate quarrel led court to reduce a lethal axe attack from murder to manslaughter.
Criminal law – Homicide: distinction between murder and manslaughter; malice aforethought versus heat-of-passion provocation; admissibility of customary-law motive (inheritance) as relevant to mens rea; assessment of eyewitness and medical evidence.
|
15 May 1995 |
|
Reported
A will lacking the statutory witnesses under local customary law is void and the estate must be administered as intestate.
Probate and administration — validity of wills — attestation requirements for literate persons under Local Customary Law (Declaration) Order 1963 GN 436/63 (Third Schedule, Rules 5 & 19) — failure to have required witnesses (including a relative) renders a will void — intestacy and administration of estate — appellate review of lower court errors.
|
14 May 1995 |
|
A will lacking the statutory two witnesses (one a relative) is invalid; estate must be administered as intestate.
Succession — Formal validity of wills — Local Customary Law (Declaration) (No.4) Order 1963 G.N.436/63 Third Schedule — literate person's will must be attested, besides wife/wives, by at least two persons one a relative — will attested only by wife and single witness invalid; administrator's non-dispute cannot cure formal defect; estate to be administered as intestate.
|
14 May 1995 |
Probate and Administration - Wills - Attestation of wills - Will G drawn by a literate person - When valid - Local Customary Law (Declaration) (No 4) Order 1963, GN 436 of 1963 Rules 5 and 19. |
14 May 1995 |
|
Lower courts denied interested parties a fair hearing by failing to follow procedural rules when converting an administration application to an ordinary suit.
Civil procedure – administration of estates – primary court treating administration application as ordinary suit – obligation to observe rules of procedure and natural justice; Right to fair hearing – necessity to summon interested parties, permit cross‑examination and receive witness evidence; Procedural irregularity – failure to afford fair hearing renders proceedings nullity and requires retrial.
|
11 May 1995 |
|
Where a dispute is essentially about land ownership, it should be resolved by civil proceedings rather than by a criminal charge.
Criminal procedure – trial court’s duty to decide the charge laid before it – failure to address criminal charge when evidence deals with ownership.* Criminal law – forcible entry (s.85 Penal Code) – requirement that prosecution prove offence.* Civil v criminal jurisdiction – disputes over competing land ownership should ordinarily be resolved by civil proceedings.* Appellate remedy – remittal to trial court with directions is preferable to declaring proceedings null and void where error is procedural.
|
10 May 1995 |
|
|
10 May 1995 |
|
Repeated suits by related parties over the same land amount to abuse of process; appeal dismissed and costs awarded.
Civil procedure – land dispute – multiplicity of suits – repeated litigation by relatives over same land – res judicata/abuse of process. Enforcement procedure – alleged disobedience of court orders should be addressed to the court that made the order, not by commencing fresh suits in other courts. Costs – unsuccessful appellant ordered to pay costs of respondent.
|
10 May 1995 |
|
Reported
Civil Practice and Procedure - Locus standi - Law. governing locus standi - Scope of locus standi in public and private interest litigation
Civil Practice and Procedure — Law applicable - Applied common law - Power of the High Court to modify common law to suit local conditions - Section 2(2) of the Judicature and Application of Laws Ordinance, Cap 453 Civil Practice and Procedure - Representative suits - Law and procedure in representative suits - Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966
Administrative Law - Public Rights - Enforcement of public rights -Whether a private individual may assert public rights by civil action
Constitutional Law - Judicial control of the executive - Management of public funds by the executive - Whether the executive is subject to judicial superintendance in the management of public funds |
9 May 1995 |
|
Joinder of related theft counts was lawful and delay did not vitiate prosecution; trial convictions, fines and restitution were reinstated.
Criminal law – joinder of counts – Part permitting joinder where offences form part of a series of the same or similar character – two theft counts properly joined and tried together. Criminal procedure – delay in prosecution – unexplained delay may be excused where complainant previously confessed and promised restitution; delay alone does not vitiate conviction. Criminal appeals – appellate court erred in quashing convictions for reasons of joinder and matrimonial context where evidence supported trial conviction. Remedies – reinstatement of conviction, fines and order for restitution; enforcement measures preserved.
|
9 May 1995 |
|
The applicant failed to prove exclusive ownership of goods; acquittals of the respondents were upheld.
Criminal law – Theft and possession of suspected stolen goods – Identification of property – requirement to prove ownership or exclusive right to goods beyond reasonable doubt; storage location not determinative; hearsay insufficient to implicate co-accused.
|
9 May 1995 |
|
The applicant’s claim for bridewealth refund dismissed where he deserted the spouse and marriage lasted 23 years with seven children.
Family law – bridewealth – claim for refund – effect of long subsisting marriage and issue – desertion and failure to maintain as bars to refund.
|
9 May 1995 |
|
Representative suit challenging party property and state subventions struck out for lack of locus standi and non‑justiciability.
Civil procedure – locus standi – representative suits – mandatory compliance with Order 1 r.8; failure to obtain permission and give notice fatal. Public law – enforcement of public rights – generally for Attorney‑General; private litigant must show special damage. Justiciability – management of public funds and state subventions ordinarily within executive/Parliamentary remit, not for private judicial review. Striking out plaint – s.95 Civil Procedure Code – incompetence, abuse of process.
|
9 May 1995 |
|
Repayment does not absolve the applicant of conviction for obtaining money by false pretences; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretences – Representation of ownership/existence of goods – Repayment/restitution after offence – Restitution does not negate criminal liability – Sufficiency of evidence to support conviction.
|
9 May 1995 |
|
|
8 May 1995 |
|
Appellate court affirms conviction based on credible identification and corroborating evidence of possession of stolen cattle.
Criminal law – cattle theft/possession of stolen property – identification of property and ownership – credibility of prosecution witnesses – appellate deference to trial court findings.
|
8 May 1995 |
|
Convictions quashed where audit irregularities and a duplicitous charge sheet meant guilt was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – stealing by servant; falsification and forgery – reliability of audit reports and documentary evidence – unsigned report and audit in accused’s absence – duplicity in charge sheet – benefit of the doubt; convictions quashed.
|
8 May 1995 |
|
Appellate court upheld convictions for conspiracy, forgery and theft on handwriting, possession and confessions, but acquitted the minor attendant.
Criminal law – Conspiracy to commit felony – proof by circumstantial evidence, possession of forged documents and cautioned statements. Forgery – evidential value of handwriting expert opinion and possession of forged invoices. Theft – large‑scale diversion of fuel over multiple occasions. Participation and mens rea – limited role of subordinate attendant (turnboy) insufficient to establish knowledge and conspiracy.
|
8 May 1995 |
|
A defective charge under the Economic and Organized Crimes Act deprived the trial court of jurisdiction; conviction void and accused discharged.
Criminal procedure — Defective statement of offence — Jurisdiction — Offences under Economic and Organized Crimes Act require prosecutor’s consent and certification — Defective charge renders trial/conviction null and void — Prosecutorial negligence — Double conviction/double jeopardy issues — Discharge pending lawful recharging.
|
6 May 1995 |
|
A defective, jurisdiction-denying charge voids conviction; the applicant discharged pending lawful proceedings.
Criminal law – Jurisdiction – Requirement of DPP consent or Zonal State Attorney’s certificate under Economic and Organized Crimes Act for District Court trial – defective charge vitiates proceedings. Criminal procedure – Invalid charge – conviction and sentence rendered null and void where jurisdictional prerequisites absent. Human rights/procedure – Discharge pending lawful proceedings where accused has been imprisoned under void conviction. Double jeopardy – Allegation of double conviction for same transaction to be investigated. Police informers – Informer status relevant to propriety of prosecution and disclosure by police.
|
6 May 1995 |
|
An accused has a statutory right to demand re‑summoning of witnesses when a successor magistrate takes over a partly heard trial.
Criminal procedure – Successor magistrate taking over a partly heard trial – s.214 Criminal Procedure Act – accused’s right to demand re‑summoning and re‑hearing of witnesses heard by predecessor – court must inform accused of right – successor must study record and avoid injustice – practical difficulties/costs do not defeat accused’s statutory right.
|
5 May 1995 |
|
|
5 May 1995 |
|
Discovery of spouse’s alleged adultery constituted mitigating provocation; accused convicted and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment.
Criminal law – Homicide – Stabbing during nocturnal confrontation – Post‑mortem confirming death by stab wounds; Mitigation – Provocation arising from alleged spousal adultery and heat of passion as a sentencing consideration; Sentence – Lenient custodial term imposed in view of circumstances.
|
3 May 1995 |
|
Accused who stabbed a man during a sudden nocturnal fight convicted and sentenced to three years, provocation mitigated sentence.
Criminal law – Homicide – Stabbing during nocturnal confrontation – Post-mortem evidence – Provocation and sudden fight (heat of passion) as mitigating factors – Sentence of three years imprisonment.
|
3 May 1995 |
|
Appeal dismissed: conviction unsafe due to uncorroborated witness evidence and appeal improperly framed as factual complaints rather than points of law.
Criminal law – conviction for common assault – sufficiency and corroboration of evidence – section 127(1) Evidence Act (1967). Appeals – competency and scope – second appeal must raise points of law; factual complaints and criticisms of trial judge are inappropriate grounds. Witness evidence – failure of eyewitness corroboration renders conviction unsafe.
|
2 May 1995 |
|
|
2 May 1995 |
|
Refund of bridewealth on divorce is not automatic; appellant failed to prove respondent was estate administrator, appeal dismissed.
Customary law – bridewealth/dowry – refund on divorce – not automatic; entitlement depends on subsequent marriages and payments. Burden of proof – claimant must prove respondent’s appointment as estate administrator by clan. Civil appeals – appellate court rightly allowed appeal where primary court lacked necessary findings and proof.
|
2 May 1995 |
| April 1995 |
|
|
Injuries during robbery are evidential to the robbery; identification by known victims upheld convictions; sentence reduced to 15 years.
Criminal law – robbery with violence – injuries inflicted during robbery are evidential and cannot form a separate grievous-harm count; identification evidence – caution required but reliable where victims previously knew accused and had adequate opportunity to observe; alibi – afterthoughts are weak; appellate reduction of illegal sentence to 15 years.
|
28 April 1995 |