|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| September 1996 |
|
|
Acquittal upheld where inconsistent, unreliable prosecution evidence created reasonable doubt.
* Criminal law – Appeal against acquittal – evaluation of witness credibility; inconsistent dates and identification (serial numbers) undermining prosecution case; reasonable doubt and acquittal upheld.
|
30 September 1996 |
|
Vague, poorly-drafted regulatory charges that fail to specify which provisions were breached render convictions and sentences unsafe.
Criminal procedure — Pleadings — Vague/poorly-drafted charge sheet — Necessity to specify which regulation(s) breached when multiple provisions cited; particulars must correspond to statute; conviction and sentence set aside for defective charge and excessiveness of sentence.
|
30 September 1996 |
|
Whether the appellant acquired title by adverse possession when her mother lived on church land as an invitee.
Land law – title disputes – invitee vs owner – an invitee cannot acquire title by adverse possession; adverse possession requires proof of exclusive, continuous and adverse possession; credibility of oral witnesses determinative in competing historical accounts; remedy for improvements on land belonging to another (removal or compensation).
|
27 September 1996 |
|
Invitee status does not establish adverse possession; appellant cannot inherit church land but may remove or be compensated for building materials.
Land law – ownership dispute – purchase by church and invitation to occupy; adverse possession – invitee status and requirements for acquiring title; credibility of witnesses; remedy limited to removal or valuation of building materials (value assessed as of date of deceased's death).
|
27 September 1996 |
|
Invitee status defeats claim of title by adverse possession; church's purchase upheld and appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law — adverse possession — an invitee cannot acquire title by mere long occupation; credibility of witnesses and proof of purchase determine ownership; remedy limited to removal or valuation of building materials.
|
27 September 1996 |
|
Conviction for receiving stolen property quashed for lack of possession evidence; juvenile's mandatory five-year sentence set aside and reduced.
* Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – conviction requires proof of actual or constructive possession or receipt; recovery at third party's premises insufficient without linkage to accused. * Evidence – sufficiency – links between accused and recovered stolen goods must be established. * Sentencing – Minimum Sentence Act, 1971 – does not apply to juveniles (persons under apparent age of 18); mandatory minimums wrongly applied must be revised.
|
27 September 1996 |
|
Application for leave to sue in District Court dismissed as misconceived; respondent, not applicant, should have applied.
Civil procedure — Section 63 Magistrates Courts Act 1984 — Leave to file suit in District Court — Proper party to apply for leave — Misconceived application — Costs where applicant misled by judicial officer.
|
27 September 1996 |
|
Appellate court increased wife's share of matrimonial property to Shs.2,000,000 as prior awards were manifestly inadequate.
* Family law – division of matrimonial property – adequacy of award on divorce – appellate increase of award where prior sums are manifestly inadequate; factors: value of property, duration of marriage, and number of children.
|
26 September 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed: concurrent findings and doctrine of recent possession supported conviction for theft.
Criminal law – Theft – Recent possession – Possession of stolen animals shortly after theft – Appeal court’s review of concurrent findings – Sufficiency of accused’s explanation to rebut inference of guilt.
|
25 September 1996 |
|
The appellant's appeal against donkey-theft conviction dismissed; recent possession and concurrent factual findings upheld.
Criminal law – Theft of cattle (donkeys) – Recent possession doctrine – Concurrent findings of fact – Appellate interference with factual findings.
|
25 September 1996 |
|
The applicant’s land claim was dismissed after trial credibility findings and a limitation bar were upheld on appeal.
* Land law – dispute over title to village land; evidence of village allocation as proof of title/possession.
* Civil procedure – appellate review of trial court credibility findings; deference to Primary Court's findings on fact.
* Limitation – claimant’s cause of action time-barred where substantial years elapsed between alleged gift (1981) and suit (1995).
|
25 September 1996 |
|
Court upheld trial court’s credibility findings and village allocation; applicant’s land claim was without merit and potentially time-barred.
Land dispute — title v. permission — allocation by village authorities (1976) upheld against claim of temporary gift (1981); credibility of evidence; limitation/ prescription (14 years) as a bar to claim.
|
25 September 1996 |
|
Application to extend time for filing appeal dismissed for failure to show good cause; applicant ordered to pay costs.
Extension of time to appeal – requirement to show "good cause" – inaction or sitting on rights is not excusable – costs awarded to respondent.
|
23 September 1996 |
|
Court refused adjournment of election petition, finding respondent’s reasons inadequate and allowed trial to proceed; application dismissed with costs.
Election petition — adjournment — late engagement of counsel — adequacy of reasons for adjournment; Right to fair hearing — necessity to secure counsel within reasonable time; Parliamentary privilege — committee sittings do not equal full parliamentary sittings for exemption from court process; Contempt/libel — unfounded allegations against judge may constitute offence; Civil Procedure — Order IX rule 11 — trial may proceed in absence of absent/unrepresented party.
|
20 September 1996 |
|
Unlawful unilateral set-off by bank where borrower had cleared loan; bank must repay wrongfully deducted funds with interest.
Banking law – Loan repayments – Construction of bank accounts and statements; internal 'loan' account as bank records; set-off – unilateral set-off against customer’s private account; wrongful debit and recovery – damages and interest; evidence – credibility of bank statements and actual deposits.
|
20 September 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed: municipal allocation of a low-density plot lawful; subdivision impermissible and unchallenged ex parte judgment binding.
Municipal land allocation – lawfulness of allocation after survey; Low-density residential plots – impermissibility of subdivision altering plot character; Effect of unchallenged ex parte judgment – binds defendant and limits later challenges; Remedies – compensation and demolition for encroachment; Appellate review – deference to trial findings on allocation and planning status.
|
20 September 1996 |
|
Primary Court’s failure to deliver a joint judgment vitiated the decision; District Court appeal quashed and appeal allowed on merits.
Primary Courts — Requirement for a joint judgment of the court under Rule 3 of the Magistrate Courts (Primary Courts) (Judgement of Court) Rules, 1987; Role of assessors — must participate in a collective decision not merely advise; Procedural irregularity — improper judgment vitiates trial court's decision; Appeal — appellate court cannot confirm or vary where originating judgment is null; Property law — sale of house includes the plot (quicquid plantator solo, solo cedit).
|
20 September 1996 |
|
A Primary Court judgment is void where the presiding magistrate substitutes his personal opinion for the required collective judgment with assessors.
* Civil procedure – Primary Courts – Requirement that the judgment of a Primary Court be a joint exercise of the members of the court (presiding magistrate and assessors) under Rule 3.
* Magistrates – Duty to consult assessors and not substitute a personal opinion for the court’s judgment; sub‑rule 5 – prohibition on summing up in lieu of consultation.
* Irregularity – Failure to deliver proper judgment renders Primary Court decision null and void.
* Appeals – District Court cannot lawfully confirm, vary or reverse where there is no proper trial court judgment.
* Property law – Sale of house with land; quicquid plantatur solo solo cedit (what is affixed to the soil belongs to the soil) relevant to respondent’s lack of cause of action.
|
20 September 1996 |
|
Appellate court restored Primary Court's TSh 2,000 award for crop damage by respondent's cattle and quashed the District Court decision.
Civil damages – nuisance/trespass by animals – destruction of crops by neighbour’s cattle – assessment of compensation – appellate review of Primary Court award.
|
20 September 1996 |
|
Appellate court restores Primary Court award for crop damage; absence of valuation evidence did not justify quashing award.
Civil procedure — Appeal — Review of factual findings on crop damage by neighbour’s cattle — Absence of expert valuation not necessarily fatal to Primary Court award; appellate court should not lightly disturb factual assessments.
|
20 September 1996 |
|
Long, peaceful possession since Operation Vijiji protects a claimant from dispossession despite competing allocation claims.
Land law — conflicting oral allocation evidence — Operation Vijiji allocation — long undisturbed possession — protection against dispossession — appellate confirmation of possessory rights.
|
20 September 1996 |
|
A purported representative must prove lawful authority to represent a deceased; failure renders the application incompetent.
Administration of estate — Locus standi — Representation of deceased — Proof of authority required before instituting or continuing proceedings on behalf of a deceased — Application incompetent if representation not established — Costs to unsuccessful applicant.
|
19 September 1996 |
|
Conviction for receiving stolen property overturned where mere knowledge of luggage in the house did not prove receipt or possession.
Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – Proof required that accused received or had control/possession – Mere knowledge that luggage was stored in accused’s house insufficient – Conviction unsafe where tribunal misdirected in evaluating evidence.
|
17 September 1996 |
|
Taxation reduced an excessive Shs.6,000,000 brief fee to Shs.100,000 and cut unreasonable travel costs; bill taxed to Shs.233,800.
Advocates’ costs — Taxation of bill of costs — Instruction (brief) fees — Factors: work, difficulty and importance — Amount in dispute only one factor — Reasonableness of travel claims — Private versus public transport — Compliance with Advocates’ Remuneration Fees (Govt. Notice).
|
13 September 1996 |
|
High Court cannot set aside a trial‑court sale it did not order; application dismissed as incompetent.
Civil procedure — jurisdiction and competence — Application to set aside attachment and sale — Order 21 Rules 57 & 88 and Section 44(1)(b) MCA 1984 — High Court lacks power to nullify sale ordered by trial court — Abuse of process where subsequent lower‑court applications fail to disclose pending High Court proceedings — Enlargement of time must be supported by affidavit.
|
13 September 1996 |
|
Appellate court refused to quash acquittal or allow fresh witnesses after trial; acquittal upheld and no costs awarded.
Criminal law – Acquittal – Whether appellate court may order retrial to permit calling additional witnesses omitted at trial – Improper to reopen evidence after acquittal to plug prosecution’s weaknesses – Doubt benefits the accused – Vexatious successive prosecutions.
|
13 September 1996 |
|
Execution of ministerial labour award without notice was unlawful; additional monetary garnishee exceeded the Minister's order and is quashed.
Labour law – Enforcement of Minister's labour award as a decree; Civil Procedure – Order 21 Rule 20 notice to show cause where execution is after one year; Natural justice – right to be heard before execution; Limits on Labour Officer's power to alter or add monetary relief absent Minister's order; Garnishee and execution procedure.
|
13 September 1996 |
|
Reported
Civil Practice and Procedure - Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments - Jurisdiction of court where provisions of Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance, Cap 8 of the Revised Laws inapplicable - Common law applicable — Under common law, enforcement must be sought by bringing an action on the debt. |
13 September 1996 |
|
Reported
Court sets aside registration, attachment and sale because foreign judgment enforcement proceeded under an inapplicable ordinance instead of action on the debt.
Foreign judgments – Applicability of Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance – Common law enforcement of foreign judgments via doctrine of obligation – Requirement to sue on foreign judgment as debt rather than direct execution – Invalidity of attachment/sale where enforcement proceedings are legally defective – Protection of purchaser by Rule 76 Order 21 limited to curing auction-mode irregularities.
|
13 September 1996 |
|
Conviction for sexual offence quashed where complainant's uncorroborated testimony was materially contradicted.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Need for corroboration and assessment of credibility in sexual offence cases – Material contradictions between complainant and other witness evidence may render prosecution case unsustainable.
|
12 September 1996 |
|
Concurrent factual findings that respondent lawfully bought and possessed the shamba at a 1968 auction were upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.
Property law – ownership by purchase at court-sanctioned auction; Civil procedure – appellate interference with concurrent findings of fact; Evidence – cross-examination and site inspection supporting factual findings; Procedural irregularity – failure to explain assessors’ duties not ipso facto fatal; Capacity to sue – need for authority to represent deceased or other owners.
|
12 September 1996 |
|
Unregistered sale agreements of land are inoperative and unenforceable; respondent had locus to sue and appeal allowed with costs.
* Land law – compulsory registration – s.8(1)(d) & s.9 Registration of Documents Ordinance (Cap.117) – effect of non-registration: unregistered document inoperative and unenforceable though not void. * Locus standi – principal/agent and family arrangement – purchaser’s spouse may confer standing. * Non-joinder – subsequent purchaser who is mere trespasser not necessary party. * Adverse possession – mere silence over improvements does not establish adverse possession.
|
12 September 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed: lower court rightly set aside dismissal for want of prosecution upon sufficient cause shown.
Civil procedure – Dismissal for want of prosecution – Order IX Rule 9 CPC – Setting aside dismissal – Sufficient cause for non-appearance – Court clerk misidentification and absence of counsel’s substitute – appellate review of magistrate’s factual findings.
|
11 September 1996 |
|
Appeal allowed where magistrate misapplied test for setting aside ex parte judgment and failed to consider material affidavits.
Civil procedure – setting aside ex parte judgment – discretionary test: sufficient cause and bona fide intention to defend – court must consider affidavits and material dates, not unduly rely on case history – misdirection and failure to exercise discretion warrants allowing appeal.
|
11 September 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed where evidence established misappropriation by agent and defence failed to raise reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Stealing by agent (s.273(b) Penal Code) – Proof of misappropriation of entrusted property – Credibility and insufficiency of defence witness evidence – Appeal against conviction and conditional discharge sentence.
|
10 September 1996 |
|
|
10 September 1996 |
|
Defendant’s failure to supply contracted huller constituted breach; plaintiff awarded general damages and taxed costs.
Contract law — Sale of goods/machinery — Written contract as primary memorial; non-delivery of contracted huller constitutes breach. Damages — Special damages must be pleaded, particularised and proved; otherwise only general damages awarded. Limitation — cause of action may run from breakdown of negotiations, not contract date. Evidence — admissions by defendant’s witness supported non-supply finding.
|
10 September 1996 |
|
The appellant must refund the respondent's vehicle-hire costs incurred after the appellant breached a supply contract, with interest.
* Contract law – breach of contract – failure to deliver agreed goods (bananas) – liability to repay costs incurred as a consequence of breach.
* Damages/remedies – recovery of expenses incurred to obtain police assistance due to contractual breach.
* Interest – award of interest on refunded amount from specific date until payment.
|
10 September 1996 |
|
Appellant must refund expenses incurred from respondent due to contract breach, with interest; appeal dismissed.
* Contract law – breach of contract – liability to reimburse expenses incurred to secure police assistance and transport due to breach – award of interest on refunded sum.
|
10 September 1996 |
|
|
10 September 1996 |
|
|
10 September 1996 |
|
A succeeding magistrate may properly continue trial without recalling witnesses where records are intact; possession of stolen timber upheld conviction.
Criminal law – Theft of timber – Successor magistrate continuing trial after original magistrate’s death – No obligation to recall witnesses where record intact and no factual controversy – Possession of complainant’s timber as corroboration – Ownership defence by permit insufficient to raise reasonable doubt.
|
7 September 1996 |
|
An appellant may not increase a money judgment after it has been executed; review must be sought before execution.
Civil procedure – execution of judgment – payment in satisfaction – finality of judgment; remedy for dissatisfaction with quantum is review before execution; appellate relief not available to increase an executed award; valuation orders and revisional powers of the District Court.
|
6 September 1996 |
|
Appeal dismissed for lack of proper parties and for raising a new ownership claim only on appeal.
Land law – ownership dispute; locus standi – claimant must be proper party; joinder of real parties necessary; inadmissibility of new claims on appeal; Magistrates Courts Act s.33(2) – permission to sue for another; Civil Procedure Code not generally applicable to Primary Courts.
|
6 September 1996 |
|
Primary court judgment invalid where magistrate improperly treated assessors as advisers; resulting judgments quashed; appellant may sue village government anew.
Magistrates (Primary Courts) (Judgement of Court) Rules (G.N. No.2 of 1988) — Rule 3 — requirement that judgment be a joint exercise of presiding magistrate and assessors; invalidity of judgment where magistrate treats assessors as mere advisers by summing up then seeking opinions and delivering own decision; remedy — nullification and quashing of primary and appellate decisions; wrong defendant — village government v. individual sued in personal capacity.
|
6 September 1996 |
|
Primary court’s failure to decide jointly with assessors renders its judgment void; appeal quashed; suit named wrong defendant.
Primary Courts — Judgement of Court Rules (G.N. No. 2 of 1988) — Rule 3 — assessors must jointly decide with presiding magistrate; failure to do so renders judgment void. Appeals — appellate court cannot uphold or vary where trial court produced no lawful judgment. Proper party — suits against village government must name the correct corporate/official entity, not the chairman personally.
|
6 September 1996 |
|
|
6 September 1996 |
|
Interlocutory restraint order quashed because the Regional Housing Tribunal was improperly constituted, rendering its order ultra vires.
* Rent Restriction Act – s.11 composition of Regional Housing Tribunal – requirement of chairman plus two lay members – jurisdictional defect where Tribunal sat with chairman and only one lay member.
* Civil procedure – interlocutory order – ultra vires and null where issued by improperly constituted tribunal.
* Right to work – interlocutory restraint affecting business quashed where tribunal lacked statutory authority.
* Choice of remedies – respondent entitled to pursue civil suit despite existing criminal conviction, but must proceed before properly constituted forum.
|
4 September 1996 |
|
Reported
Criminal law - Defilement - Elements of offence - Requirement of penetration
Criminal law - Attempted defilement - Sentence - Appellant having committed a beastly act in attempting to defile a two year old girl |
4 September 1996 |
|
Reported
Conviction for defilement substituted with attempted defilement where medical evidence showed no penetration; sentence reduced and corporal punishment retained.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Defilement (s 136(1)) – Proof of penetration – medical evidence (PF3) and absence of injury; attempted defilement (s 136(2)) established where penetration not proved. * Sentencing – statutory minimum for defilement (Act 19 of 1992) – appellate substitution of conviction and reduction of sentence. * Appeal – power to quash conviction and substitute conviction and sentence.
|
4 September 1996 |