|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1998 |
|
|
Statutory vesting under bank reorganisation law transferred vehicle ownership and defeated execution, affidavit defect cured by supplementary oath.
Property law; statutory vesting of bank assets under reorganisation statute — effect on vehicle ownership and execution; Road Traffic Act notification; curability of defective affidavit under Oaths Act; nature of banking business versus residual liabilities (guarantees).
|
31 December 1998 |
|
Loss and unauthenticated records plus procedural breaches require trial de novo; lower proceedings declared nullity.
Civil procedure – Loss of court record — loss of record necessitates trial de novo; Magistrates' Courts (Primary Courts) Rule 3 — improper recording of assessors' opinions renders proceedings nullity; Ex parte District Court judgment unsupported by record cannot stand.
|
30 December 1998 |
|
Loss of original records and Rule 3 breaches nullified lower judgments; retrial ordered before the District Court.
Civil procedure – Lost or misplaced original court records – reliance on unauthenticated copies – retrial required. Magistrates’ Court practice – Rule 3 (Primary Courts) – improper recording of assessors’ opinions – proceedings rendered nullity. Revision/ex parte judgments – allegations of denial of hearing – need for proper record to adjudicate. Jurisdiction – reopening matter de novo and leave to commence in District Court under Magistrates’ Courts Act.
|
30 December 1998 |
|
Lost original records and a Primary Court’s breach of assessor‑consultation rules required a trial de novo in the District Court.
Civil procedure – loss of original record – missing/unverified copies – retrial required. Primary Courts – Rule 3 (Judgment of Court) – requirement as to consultation with assessors and recording of decision – breach renders judgment a nullity. Revision/ex parte judgments – fundamental procedural irregularities may warrant de novo trial. Magistrates’ Courts Act – discretionary power to direct fresh proceedings in another court.
|
30 December 1998 |
|
Loss and unauthenticated records plus violation of assessor‑recording rules rendered lower courts' decisions null, necessitating retrial.
Civil procedure — lost or misplaced court records — unauthenticated copies insufficient — loss of record may require retrial; Primary Courts — Rule 3 (assessors' consultation and recording) breach renders judgment nullity; revisional/ex parte orders — necessity of authentic record; High Court discretion under Magistrates' Courts Act to allow trial to commence in another court.
|
30 December 1998 |
|
Leave to appeal refused where applicants, as company officers, had no arguable grounds against order to convene AGMs.
Companies Ordinance – duty to hold annual general meetings; leave to appeal – not automatic and requires arguable grounds; impleading – officers who default in convening AGMs may be liable under s.112; appellate leave – refusal where proposed grounds lack merit.
|
29 December 1998 |
|
Taxation may be sought by an advocate or client, but a large instruction fee award was set aside for lack of salary evidence.
Advocates – taxation of costs – Rule 9 of Advocates’ Remuneration and Taxation Rules to be read purposively to allow advocate or client to apply – s.62 Advocates Ordinance supports applications by either party – advocate–client relationship where an employee subsequently enrolled as advocate – taxation not automatic but discretionary – instruction fees require evidence of salary/remuneration – arbitrary award set aside.
|
28 December 1998 |
|
Plea upheld despite discrepancy in gun count; sentence reduced for mitigation, licence-fees ordered and immediate release granted.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of firearm – plea of guilty – discrepancy between charge and facts – whether plea equivocal; Sentencing – mitigation where firearm defective, inherited and licence expired – reduction of sentence and imposition of fine and licence-fee arrears.
|
26 December 1998 |
|
Leave to appeal refused: ownership dispute over matrimonial assets is factual, not a point of law.
Family law – Matrimonial proceedings – Ownership of matrimonial assets – Whether ownership dispute may be determined in divorce petition – Distinction between questions of fact and points of law for appellate review.* Appellate procedure – Leave to appeal and certificate of points of law – factual disputes not cognizable as points of law before the Court of Appeal.
|
24 December 1998 |
|
The court granted the applicant an extension of time to institute appeal after a summary rejection, with time running from this ruling.
• Civil procedure – extension of time to appeal – extension granted where applicant delayed by late notice of summary rejection, illness and need for legal aid. • Civil procedure – summary rejection – procedural nature of summary rejection may justify extension as parties are not invited to proceedings and may learn of orders late.
|
21 December 1998 |
|
Applicant's delay due to sickness and need for legal assistance justified an extension of time to take appellate steps, time to run from ruling.
Extension of time – application to file notice of appeal and to seek leave to appeal – whether sickness and need for legal assistance constitute sufficient cause – summary rejection of appeal – when statutory period for appellate steps begins to run.
|
21 December 1998 |
|
Court granted extension of time to file appellate steps after summary rejection, accepting delay due to late notice, illness and legal aid.
Extension of time – application to file notice and leave to appeal to Court of Appeal – delay explained by late knowledge of summary rejection, illness and need for legal aid – procedural effect of summary rejection orders on limitation periods – indulgence granted.
|
21 December 1998 |
|
Failure to comply with mandatory Rule 3 on assessors’ consultation vitiated the primary court’s judgment and required a rehearing.
Magistrates' Courts (Primary Courts) — Judgment procedure — Rule 3 — Assessors’ consultations and magistrate’s recording/signature — Failure to comply apparent on the face of record — Irregularity vitiating primary court judgment — Remittal for rehearing.
|
21 December 1998 |
|
High Court upholds lower courts: appellant failed to prove purchase of deceased’s house; appeal dismissed.
Property dispute; testamentary succession – ownership claim over deceased’s house; validity and effect of beneficiaries’ consensus to sell and apply proceeds to debts; deference to concurrent findings and Assessors’ opinions.
|
21 December 1998 |
|
Bail pending appeal granted where appeal showed overwhelming chances of success and no fraud or false pretence was found.
Criminal procedure – Bail pending appeal – s.368(1)(a)(i) – requirement of ‘overwhelming chances of success’; Equivocal plea – effect on assessment of appeal prospects; Absence of fraud or false pretence as factor supporting bail; Conditions to ensure attendance (bond, surety, surrender of travel documents, regional travel restriction).
|
21 December 1998 |
|
Whether s.9(3) C.A.P. 390 bars an administrator's proprietary/partnership claim — court held it does not.
Limitation of actions – C.A.P. 390 s.9(3) – six‑month limitation for torts surviving against the estate of a deceased person – scope and applicability. Nature of claim – distinction between tortious claims (conversion/trespass) and proprietary/partnership claims by an administrator/heir. Preliminary objections – when characterization of claim as tortious may be rejected as far‑fetched.
|
16 December 1998 |
|
The Attorney General may represent an autonomous statutory department within a ministry; preliminary objections dismissed and amendment of defence allowed.
Constitutional/administrative law – Status of autonomous departments – An autonomous department established by statute within a ministry remains a government department for purposes of legal representation. Civil procedure – Locus standi of the Attorney General – AG may represent non-corporate statutory departments within ministries. Civil procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Courts should allow amendments to pleadings in the interests of justice where no prejudice results. Employment law (evidential) – Conflicting administrative communications create factual confusion but do not alter statutory legal status.
|
16 December 1998 |
(From the District Court of Arusha at Arusha in Criminal Case No. 67 of 1997) c Criminal Practice and Procedure -Preliminary hearing -Admission of a retracted Cautioned Statement and other disputed items as exhibits during preliminary hearing — Whether procedure was proper - Section 192 of the Criminal Procedure Act. |
14 December 1998 |
|
Application for extension and leave to appeal dismissed for unexplained delay and lack of arguable point.
Civil procedure – application for extension of time to apply for leave to appeal – requirement to show sufficient cause for delay; leave to appeal – necessity to show arguable point of law or merit; credibility of affidavit – inconsistencies undermining applicant’s case.
|
14 December 1998 |
|
Application to file notice of appeal out of time dismissed for late filing, non‑service and inordinate delay.
Appeal procedure – notice of appeal – timeliness and service – leave to file notice of appeal out of time – requirement to show good cause and promptness – inordinate delay and abuse of process – costs on dismissal.
|
13 December 1998 |
|
An oral sale evidenced by payment and improvements suffices to transfer ownership; the applicant failed to prove ownership.
Property dispute – sale of wells – oral agreement – lack of written contract – burden of proof on plaintiff – balance of probabilities – improvements and consideration as evidence of ownership.
|
11 December 1998 |
|
Tribunal’s stop order caused crop loss but claimant failed to strictly prove special damages, so only nominal damages awarded.
Land dispute – Tribunal’s interim stop order – Effect on crops – Special damages must be strictly proved – Burden of proof for quantum – Appellate review of findings of fact and damages.
|
11 December 1998 |
|
Appellant failed to prove abusive language; trial court properly acquitted respondents under section 31(1).
Criminal law – offence of using abusive language (Penal Code s.89(1)(a)) – no case to answer – Primary Courts Criminal Procedure Code s.31(1) – credibility of witnesses and appellate interference with trial court findings.
|
11 December 1998 |
|
Amendment refused without hearing violated right to be heard; evidence established partnership and malicious prosecution, judgment for appellant.
Civil procedure — amendment of pleadings — right to be heard — dismissal of application without hearing unlawful; Partnership law — existence of partnership shown by agreement, profit sharing and conduct; Malicious prosecution — lack of reasonable and probable cause and presence of spite/malice justified damages; Evidence — business registration and witnesses substantiated joint venture and joint use/ownership of assets.
|
10 December 1998 |
|
Continuous occupation and abandonment, not an unproven reconciliation-board award, determined ownership of the disputed land.
Land law – continuous and long occupation as basis for ownership; Abandonment of land and failure to enforce awards; Reconciliation board determinations not res judicata absent proof; Burden to prove title/inheritance.
|
10 December 1998 |
|
Appeal dismissed: appellate court upholds convictions based on credible eyewitness and defers to trial court’s factual findings.
Criminal law – Burglary and theft – sufficiency of evidence – credibility of eyewitness – appellate deference to trial court’s findings of fact and demeanour.
|
9 December 1998 |
|
Appellate court quashed award on unfiled counterclaim and held borrower liable for Shs.5,946,625.85 with specified interest rates.
Civil procedure – counterclaim – defence pleading alleging over-deduction not a counterclaim; unfiled counterclaim attracts no judgment. Contract/loan – cash loan distinct from earlier crop sale receipts; pre-dating receipt does not discharge later loan. Agency/primary society – remittance by primary society is separate obligation; shortfall does not extinguish borrower’s debt to lender. Interest – where commercial rate not proved court may estimate; applied 10% p.a. (1/1/96–17/6/97) then 7% p.a. thereafter.
|
8 December 1998 |
|
Where ownership of property is contested, civil proceedings for declaration of title, not criminal prosecution, are the proper remedy.
Criminal law – Stealing by agent (s.273 Penal Code) – Appropriateness of criminal prosecution where title to property is disputed. Civil procedure – Disputed ownership – Remedy is civil action for declaration of title and damages, not criminal prosecution. Costs – In such criminal matters where prosecution is inappropriate, no order for costs; parties to bear their own costs.
|
8 December 1998 |
|
Criminal appeal dismissed; applicant must pursue a civil suit to determine ownership against the respondent.
Criminal law – Stealing by agent (s.273 Penal Code); Property dispute – title vs. criminal prosecution; Civil remedy required to determine ownership before criminal charges; Attendance and service on appeal.
|
8 December 1998 |
|
Additional evidence on appeal admissible only if necessary for judgment; clan minutes excluded and application denied.
Civil procedure — Appeal — Additional evidence under Order XXXIX Rule 1(b) — Admissibility requires necessity to enable appellate court to pronounce judgment or other substantial cause; not to cure weaknesses by introducing fresh evidence — Clan meeting minutes held unnecessary and excluded.
|
7 December 1998 |
|
|
4 December 1998 |
|
Court: internal party appeals do not oust court jurisdiction; trustees lack locus for non‑proprietary disputes.
Political parties – internal dispute resolution v. court jurisdiction – internal remedies do not oust High Court jurisdiction; Political Parties Act s.17 – trustees limited to proprietary/business matters and lack locus for non-proprietary disputes; procedural law – late filing of submissions may be granted retrospective leave; defective pleadings (improper signatory, omnibus verification) are curable by amendment.
|
4 December 1998 |
|
Absence of proof of lawful VDC reallocation and no abandonment by the owner — appeal dismissed; title affirmed for respondent.
Land law — village council/VDC reallocation — requirement of animus revertendi and non‑abandonment — evidentiary proof (minutes, proper constitution of VDC) — possession and title — putative father/son property rights.
|
4 December 1998 |
|
Appeal dismissed: village reallocation unlawful where owner did not abandon land and VDC reallocation lacked proof.
Land law – allocation by village committee – whether owner abandoned land – reallocation without proof of proper committee constitution or animus revertendi unlawful – possession and title disputes.
|
4 December 1998 |
|
Long, continuous possession and acts of ownership since 1974 established adverse possession, so the appellant’s claim failed and appeal dismissed.
Adverse possession – continuous and exclusive possession demonstrated by clearing, cultivation, planting of trees and burial – such acts may satisfy the requirements for adverse possession and defeat a title claim.
|
4 December 1998 |
|
Appellate interference with damages is unwarranted absent error; police report was made in aid of justice, appeal dismissed.
Defamation – assessment of damages – appellate restraint on disturbing quantum of damages – interference only where lower court acted on wrong principle or plainly erred. Privilege – reports to police – communications made in aid of justice may mitigate or negate defamation claims.
|
3 December 1998 |
|
Where trespass allegations turn on disputed land ownership, the court should advise the applicant to pursue a civil suit; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Trespass – Where alleged trespass turns on ownership of land, ownership is a civil issue; courts should advise complainant/applicant to institute civil proceedings to determine ownership before criminal condemnation (see Kibwano Mohamed v. R [1980] T.L.R. 312).
|
3 December 1998 |
|
The appellant's employment claim cannot be struck out for lack of written contract; oral contract existence is a triable issue.
Employment law – oral contracts of service – Employment Ordinance s.2 recognizes oral contracts – preliminary objections – striking out inappropriate where existence of employment is disputed and requires evidence – factual issues must be tried, not decided summarily.
|
2 December 1998 |
|
Applicant's conviction based on circumstantial suspicion was insufficient; appeal allowed and conviction quashed.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Sufficiency to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt – Suspicion and probability insufficient for conviction – Conviction quashed where evidence did not establish guilt to criminal standard.
|
2 December 1998 |
|
Weak identification and a plausible purchase explanation led to robbery conviction being set aside; convicted for receiving and released.
Criminal law – recent possession – possession of recently stolen property raises rebuttable presumption of dishonest acquisition. Criminal law – receiving stolen property – section 311(1) substitution where theft/robbery not proved beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – identification – weak identification and reasonable explanation entitle accused to benefit of doubt. Sentence – time served may result in immediate release.
|
2 December 1998 |
|
Failure to file a court‑ordered reply led to suit being struck out; separate suit withdrawn with costs to the first defendant.
Civil procedure – compliance with court deadlines – failure to file court‑granted reply – ex parte hearing of preliminary objections – striking out of suit. Civil procedure – withdrawal of action – costs awarded to first defendant; second defendant may pursue costs separately.
|
2 December 1998 |
|
Recent possession and credible identification upheld conviction for cattle theft; unsupported alibi and lack of permit failed to raise doubt.
Criminal law – Theft of cattle – Identification by owner and eyewitnesses – Recent possession doctrine – Failure to produce movement permit – Alibi not raising reasonable doubt.
|
2 December 1998 |
|
Section 22(2) Land Ordinance ousts High Court jurisdiction over right-of-occupancy disputes; District Court must hear them.
Land Ordinance (Cap 113) s.22(2) – ouster of High Court jurisdiction for rights under right of occupancy; District Court forum; Civil Procedure Code s.13 procedural rule; pecuniary value does not override statutory forum; presidential transfer exception.
|
1 December 1998 |
|
High Court suit challenging a mortgage auction struck out as same matter pending in a lower competent court.
Civil procedure – res sub judice and abuse of process – identical causes of action pending in lower competent court – striking out proceedings in higher court.* Civil procedure – joinder of parties – purchaser at auction – allegation of collusion in plaint precludes dismissal at preliminary stage.* Mortgage and foreclosure – guarantor’s challenge to sale of mortgaged property – reliefs in concurrent proceedings.
|
1 December 1998 |
|
HAT misapplied Rule 43 by deciding new grounds without hearing parties; High Court corrected sums and upheld tenant’s awards.
• Administrative law – Appeals procedure – HAT’s powers under Rule 43 – Limits on deciding new grounds without hearing affected parties; • Contract/tenancy – recoupment of rehabilitation costs from retained portion of rent; • Remedy – correction of arithmetic error and award of three months' rent as compensation; • Costs – award where tenant substantially succeeds.
|
1 December 1998 |
|
Whether an appeals tribunal may alter a decree beyond grounds of appeal without hearing affected parties and correct monetary awards.
Appeals — Housing Appeals Tribunal — Rule 43 powers — limits on rectifying trial decrees without hearing parties; Rule 4 — party entitled to opportunity to contest grounds not in memorandum of appeal; Lease — rehabilitation costs recoupment; calculation of refundable balance; clause on three months’ occupation without rent — compensation where landlord prevents occupation; costs awarded to successful party.
|
1 December 1998 |
|
Change of corporate name or privatisation does not automatically absolve successor of predecessor’s debts; defective verification is curable.
• Civil procedure – preliminary objections – defective verification clause – curable procedural irregularity; amendment ordered.
• Corporate/privatisation law – successor liability – change of name/privatisation does not automatically extinguish predecessor’s liabilities; purchaser‑from‑official‑receiver protection must be properly pleaded and proved.
• Insurance law – statutory provisions like Cap.169 s.10(2) constitute special defences for insurers and need not be pleaded by plaintiff.
• Third‑party procedure – third‑party notice must disclose cause of action; substantive sufficiency prevails over formal omissions.
• Capacity to sue – claim of unsoundness requires adjudication or inquiry and proof, not mere assertion in preliminary objections.
|
1 December 1998 |
|
Court dismissed most preliminary objections, ordering amendment of a defective verification clause and referring the case for mediation.
Civil procedure — preliminary objections — verification of plaint — defective verification curable by amendment. Transfer of businesses — liability for predecessor debts — acquisition from official receiver/PSRC and protection under Transfer of Businesses Ordinance (Cap.39). Insurance law — s.10(2) Cap.169 — notice requirement is a special defence for insurers, not a plaintiff’s pleading obligation. Third‑party proceedings — third‑party notice must disclose cause of action — O.1 r.15 compliance in substance. Capacity to sue — allegations of unsoundness require specific application and proof under procedural rules.
|
1 December 1998 |
|
Application for leave to appeal dismissed as time-barred; statutory custody and maintenance award upheld; one-head-of-cattle payment ordered.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal – application time-barred and lacking credible explanation for delay. Family law – custody and maintenance – application of Marriage Act s.125(3) regarding custody of children under five. Restitution/dowry – recipient of dowry refund liable to meet maintenance obligations; compensatory award properly assessed.
|
1 December 1998 |
| November 1998 |
|
|
The applicant's recent, hidden possession of stolen items supported his conviction for robbery with violence; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – recent possession – presumption that recent possession of stolen property requires explanation; lapse of time and nature of goods material to 'recency'. Evidence – hidden recovery and owner identification strengthen inference of guilty knowledge. Criminal procedure – improper to charge receiving/retaining where primary theft/robbery conviction sustains liability. Appeal – appellate court upheld conviction and sentence where recent possession and corroborating evidence existed.
|
30 November 1998 |