|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1999 |
|
|
Whether accepting severance allowance bars enforcement of a ministerial reinstatement order under the Security of Employment Act.
* Employment law – Security of Employment Act s.40A – reinstatement orders by Conciliation Board and Minister – enforceability when employer refuses to reinstate.
* Distinction between severance allowance (Severance Allowance Act Cap.487) and statutory compensation (Security of Employment Act Cap.574) – effect of acceptance on right to reinstatement.
* Remedy for non‑compliance with ministerial reinstatement order – statutory compensation under s.35 and twelve months’ wages.
|
31 December 1999 |
|
Sentencing without a recorded conviction and judgment is unlawful and renders proceedings a nullity; retrial denied on justice grounds.
Criminal procedure – Judgment and conviction – Requirement under sections 311 and 312 Criminal Procedure Act to record conviction and deliver judgment before sentencing; sentencing without recorded conviction unlawful; fundamental procedural irregularity renders proceedings a nullity; retrial discretionary where interests of justice considered.
|
30 December 1999 |
|
Use of a dangerous weapon and credible identification upheld an armed robbery conviction; appeal dismissed.
* Criminal law – Armed robbery – use of dangerous/offensive weapon (muzzle-loading gun) elevates ordinary robbery to armed robbery under amended statute. * Criminal evidence – Identification – prolonged encounter and recovery of stolen property support reliable identification. * Criminal procedure – Accused standing mute and failure to pursue available remedies do not automatically vitiate conviction; refusal to transfer trial not shown to cause miscarriage of justice.
|
29 December 1999 |
Civil Practice and Procedure - Status Quo — Order to maintain status quo - Whether the order has moreforce in terms ofduration than would a normal temporary injunction - Order XXXVII, rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Act 1966. |
28 December 1999 |
|
Owner’s title affirmed; occupant was an invitee and not owner, but entitled to compensation for improvements.
Land law – ownership – payment to occupant does not ipso facto transfer title; occupancy as invitee does not confer ownership; compensation for unexhausted improvements to avoid unjust enrichment; appellate review – interference with trial court credibility findings only where misdirection evident.
|
24 December 1999 |
|
Appellant’s conviction for cattle theft upheld where credible evidence placed him selling the stolen cattle.
Criminal law – Theft of livestock – Evidence of buyer and identification at police station – Acquittal of co-accused does not automatically defeat conviction of accomplice – Appeal dismissed where prosecution evidence credible.
|
23 December 1999 |
|
A conviction based solely on a co-accused's uncorroborated naming is unsafe and must be quashed.
Criminal law – Theft – Conviction based on co-accused’s extra‑judicial statement; Corroboration by recovery of stolen property; Law of Evidence Act 1967 s.33(1) – caution against convictions solely on uncorroborated naming by co-accused; Appeal – quashing unsafe convictions.
|
23 December 1999 |
|
Omission of assessors’ signatures on a primary court judgment is a fatal irregularity, voiding proceedings and requiring retrial.
* Primary Courts – Judgment formalities – assessors must be consulted and all members must sign the decision (Magistrates’ Courts (Primary Courts) (Judgment of Court) Rules, 1984 r.3); omission is a fatal irregularity rendering proceedings void ab initio. * Remedy – quash judgment and orders; retrial before a different magistrate. * Costs – none ordered where neither party caused irregularity.
|
22 December 1999 |
|
A late photocopy of an alleged will lacking the deceased's thumbprint was held not genuine; review dismissed and estate distributed under intestacy.
Inheritance — Alleged will produced as photocopy — Absence of right thumbprint and inconsistent signature held to indicate forgery — Photocopy not sufficient to displace intestacy; court may admit late review in discretion to consider deceased's intentions; administrators appointed, minors' shares held in trust, creditors to be paid.
|
22 December 1999 |
|
Court admitted late review, rejected photocopied will as inauthentic, appointed administrators and ordered court‑guided distribution of estate.
Wills and succession – authentication of a purported will – photocopy versus thumb‑printed original; review – discretion to admit out‑of‑time review to determine validity of alleged last will; estate administration – appointment of joint administrators and court‑ordered distribution; protection of minors’ shares; settlement of estate debts prior to distribution.
|
22 December 1999 |
|
Appellate review finds appellant's occupation and witness evidence support ownership; dispossession not sufficiently proved.
Land dispute — ownership and occupation — sufficiency of oral evidence (PW2, PW3) — whether appellant sued correct party — appellate review of factual findings and misdirection.
|
20 December 1999 |
|
An assignee who has not received property by endorsement of bills of lading lacks locus standi to sue on them.
Bills of lading – Assignment – Endorsement required to transfer property and right to sue – Assignee without endorsement has no locus standi; foreign plaintiff – security for costs procedural under Order XLIII; choice‑of‑law/forum clause does not automatically oust local jurisdiction.
|
20 December 1999 |
Civil Practice and Procedure - Pleadings - Plaint - Amendment of plaint - Application for leave to amend plaint - When such application may be made |
20 December 1999 |
|
Res judicata barred the term loan claim; unpaid overdrafts proved, and excessive retention of seized tractor gave defendant compensatory judgment.
Banking law — loan and overdraft facilities — res judicata as to foreclosed term loan; proof required for claims and bank records; lawful seizure of security but excessive detention may breach lien and give rise to damages; set-off between competing judgments; assessment of damages for detained collateral.
|
20 December 1999 |
|
Applicant's defamation claim failed: tribunal publication and a vague plaint disclosed no cause of action.
* Pleadings — sufficiency — statement of claim must disclose a cause of action; vagueness justifies rejection.
* Defamation — publication in judicial proceedings — statements made to or in tribunals are not actionable as defamation.
* Remedies — wrongful tribunal proceedings may attract malicious prosecution but not necessarily defamation.
|
17 December 1999 |
|
Applicant’s defamation claim based on a tribunal complaint disclosed no cause of action; statements in judicial proceedings are privileged.
* Civil procedure – pleadings – plaint must disclose a cause of action; vague or incoherent statements liable to rejection. * Defamation – statements made in judicial or quasi‑judicial proceedings are privileged; not actionable as defamation. * Remedy – where complaint to tribunal gives rise to wrong legal claim, malicious prosecution (if properly pleaded) may be the appropriate cause of action.
|
17 December 1999 |
|
Government termination of negotiated provisional tender without hearing and with inconsistent reasons was quashed; re‑floated tender set aside.
* Administrative law – judicial review – procurement decisions by public bodies – amenability to review where no concluded contract exists. * Procedural fairness – right to be heard – denial of hearing before termination of provisional award. * Legitimate expectation – protection where applicant relied on provisional award and negotiations. * Bias and abuse of discretion – re‑floated tender designed to exclude previous provisional awardee. * Remedies – certiorari, prohibition and mandamus granted.
|
17 December 1999 |
|
Conviction for robbery quashed due to unreliable nighttime identification and unproven ownership of alleged exhibit.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Nighttime, brief and chaotic encounter: requirements for reliable identification; Insufficient proof of ownership of exhibit (cap) as corroboration; Failure to prove identity frustrates conviction for robbery with violence.
|
17 December 1999 |
Administrative Law - Judicial review - Procedure - Preliminary Objection not raised at the hearing of the application for leave to apply for prerogative orders - Whether the objection may be raised subsequently against the application for the orders. Judicial Review - Acts amenable to judicial review — Complaint arising from contract - Relationship between applicant and respondent being contractual — Whether acts arising from that relationship are amenable to judicial review. Natural Justice - Right to be heard - Tender awarded to applicant and then the award process is unilaterally terminated - Whether applicant was entitled to a hearing before termination. Natural Justice - rule against bias - Deputy Minister stating in Parliament that tender was improperly awarded to applicant and a fresh tender will be floated to award it to another person in a more transparent manner - Whether the statement creates bias against the applicant in the fresh tender process. |
17 December 1999 |
|
Failure to refer matrimonial dispute to Conciliation Board renders resulting divorce incompetent; revisional jurisdiction requires diligence.
Matrimonial law – requirement to refer disputes to Conciliation Board – failure renders divorce incompetent; Revision and inherent jurisdiction – not strictly time‑barred but subject to diligence and absence of laches; Division of matrimonial property – must comply with statutory provisions, court must effect a judicial and practicable division.
|
16 December 1999 |
|
|
16 December 1999 |
|
Appeal dismissed: permanent stream and physical markers, supported by locus inspection and admissions, establish the boundary and show encroachment.
* Land law – boundary dispute – whether a permanent watercourse or a shifting stream determines the boundary – role of physical markers (coconut palm) and locus in quo inspection in boundary determination.
|
15 December 1999 |
|
Court rejects alleged will, finds deceased intestate and directs detailed statutory distribution and receivership.
Probate and administration – alleged will found inadmissible for lack of authenticity and proper attestation – deceased held to have died intestate; appointment of administrators refused where family disputes and neutrality concerns exist; court-directed distribution of estate assets, appointment of receivers and guardians, and orders for payment of dependants and capped advocates' costs.
|
15 December 1999 |
|
Remitting a disciplinary matter for rehearing is not a definitive success and does not automatically attract costs.
Administrative law – certiorari – remittal to disciplinary board for rehearing – whether remittal constitutes success attracting costs; Procedural law – correctness of drawn orders vis-à-vis delivered rulings; Costs – discretionary award when matter remitted; Ultra vires – disciplinary punishment declared ultra vires.
|
12 December 1999 |
|
Militiaman’s lawful authority to execute a summons defeats applicant’s claims for malicious prosecution, defamation, assault and loss.
Civil liability – malicious prosecution – ingredients: prosecution by defendant, favourable termination, absence of reasonable/probable cause, malice – absence of (c) and (d) fatal to claim; Arrests – militiaman’s power to execute court-issued summons/warrant; Evidence – need for medical proof to substantiate assault claims; Recovery of property – alleged seizure must be corroborated and reported.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
|
10 December 1999 |
|
The respondent was entitled to reimbursement for her child’s medical expenses despite lacking prior written permission.
Employment law – employer-funded medical treatment – entitlement of employee and family – Personnel Service Manual – requirement for prior permission and sick sheet – referral by hospital – retrenchment effective date – proof of quantum by receipts.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Court allowed contested instruction fees in a costs bill, finding them reasonable given the high value of property and taxed at Tshs.5,032,600.
Costs — Taxation of bill of costs — Instruction fees — Reasonableness of percentage-based fees relative to property value — Liquidator’s entitlement to engage private counsel — Proof of receipt not fatal to claim.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Decree holder’s instruction fees upheld as reasonable; bill of costs taxed at Tshs.5,032,600.
Taxation of costs – instruction fees – reasonableness assessed by reference to value of property – liquidator’s retention of private counsel – absence of co‑operative consent and receipt not fatal to taxing costs.
|
10 December 1999 |
Civil Practice and Procedure - Application for temporary injunction - Order ' 37, rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code 1966. Trade Mark - Infringement of trademark both parties manufacturing or dealing in similarly branded items from different counties - Sections 31 and 32 of the Trade and Service Marks Act 1986. |
10 December 1999 |
|
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Appellate court reinstated trial finding that respondent's cattle destroyed the crop, despite a witness's retraction, due to corroborative evidence.
Civil liability for damage by animals — sufficiency of corroborative evidence despite witness retraction — weight of confession and agricultural officer's report — appellate interference with trial findings.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Court reinstated Primary Court finding that respondent liable for cassava damage by his cattle, despite witness retraction.
Civil liability for damage caused by animals – evaluation of evidence where a witness retracts previous statements – corroboration by confession and agricultural officer’s report – appellate review of conflicting factual findings.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Certiorari was premature; the proper remedy is revision under section 44, so the application was struck out with costs.
Certiorari – prematurity of remedy – challenges to District Court judicial functions must ordinarily be pursued by revision under section 44 of the Magistrates' Courts Act; application struck out with costs and leave to file revision.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Certiorari deemed premature; court struck it out and permitted filing of a revision under section 14 with costs.
Judicial review — Certiorari — Prematurity of certiorari where impugned act involves judicial function — Revision under section 14 Magistrates' Courts Act as proper remedy — Right to be heard in revision — Procedural orders on costs and commencement of time for filing revision.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Respondent failed to prove ownership of cattle; appeal allowed and suit dismissed.
Civil procedure – ownership dispute over cattle – burden of proof on balance of probabilities; credibility assessment; inconsistent findings by lower courts; simultaneous setting aside of concurrent decisions.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Appeal allowed: respondent failed to prove ownership of the cattle; suit dismissed and costs awarded to the appellant.
Evidence — ownership and succession: whether claimant proved property and indebtedness on balance of probabilities; Credibility — appellate scrutiny of concurrent findings and internal consistency; Succession — liability of heir depends on proved ownership of deceased’s assets.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Whether respondent proved ownership of cattle claimed from the appellant; appeal dismissed for lack of proof.
Civil procedure — ownership of chattels — succession/heir disputes — credibility of witness — balance of probabilities — appellate interference with concurrent findings where contradictions exist.
|
10 December 1999 |
|
Whether the respondent employees’ terminal benefits are payable by the appellant who was not party to their employment contracts.
Employment law – identity of employer – terminal benefits – whether new administration taking over without proper handover is liable for employment contracts entered into by prior owner; effect of unregistered institution and improper transfer on enforceability of employment contracts.
|
8 December 1999 |
|
Whether a court may acquit under s.230 when the prosecution has not closed its case.
* Criminal procedure – non-appearance of complainant/public prosecutor – appropriate remedy under s.222 Criminal Procedure Act 1985 – dismissal for want of prosecution.
* Criminal procedure – no case to answer – s.230 requires prosecution to have closed its case before court evaluates prima facie case.
* Appellate review – misapplication of statutory provisions warrants quashing of acquittal and ordering continuation of trial.
* Accused rights – requirement to address accused’s rights under s.214 when trial continues; administrative directions to expedite record.
|
8 December 1999 |
|
Court held acquittal under s.230 improper where prosecutor’s absence required action under s.222, not prima facie evaluation.
Criminal procedure – Complainant/prosecutor non‑appearance – s.222 Criminal Procedure Act (dismissal for want of prosecution) distinguished from s.230 (no case to answer) – Prima facie assessment requires prosecution to have closed its case – Trial resumption and order to proceed before another magistrate.
|
8 December 1999 |
|
Prosecutor's non-appearance justified dismissal and acquittal under s.222; mis-citation of s.230 was an error but acquittal stood.
Criminal procedure — dismissal for want of prosecution — prosecutor's non-appearance — court entitled to dismiss and acquit under s.222; misapplication of s.230 — prima facie case requirement — prosecution duty to call witnesses.
|
8 December 1999 |
|
Sale of mortgaged property without compliance with Order 32 procedures is void; mortgagee must follow Order 32.
* Mortgage law – Foreclosure and sale – Requirement to follow Order 32 (Civil Procedure Code) including preliminary and final decrees and six‑month redemption period; failure to comply renders sale void. * Civil procedure – Jurisdictional/procedural compliance – absence of foreclosure/application under Order 32 makes proceedings a nullity. * Costs – innocent bystanders not liable; mortgagee bears appeal costs.
|
8 December 1999 |
|
Res judicata inapplicable where prior proceedings differ; respondent, an invitee, failed to acquire ownership by adverse possession.
* Civil procedure – res judicata – prior proceedings involving different parties or subject matter do not bar subsequent civil claims between different parties. * Property law – temporary licence/invitee – permission to maintain a cattle pen does not transfer ownership. * Property law – adverse possession – requirement of uninterrupted possession for statutory period and absence of owner’s protest. * Remedies – unlawful occupant not entitled to compensation for structures erected without title; court may order removal or demolition.
|
8 December 1999 |
|
Res judicata inapplicable where prior cases involved different parties and issues; respondent failed to acquire ownership by adverse possession.
Land law – res judicata – prior ward tribunal and related cases on cattle pen/water fouling do not bar fresh suit on plot ownership; adverse possession – temporary permission/invitational use not sufficient; remedies – removal of structures and no compensation where occupant acted despite warnings.
|
8 December 1999 |
|
Applicant's challenge succeeds: out-of-time referral to Conciliation Board rendered Board and Ministerial decisions null and void.
Labour law – limitation – statutory 14-day referral period to Conciliation Board – time-bar jurisdictional and mandatory; procedural fairness – failure of Board to decide preliminary jurisdictional point renders subsequent proceedings nullity; certiorari to quash administrative and ministerial decisions.
|
7 December 1999 |
|
The court dismissed the appellant’s identity challenge, upheld burglary and rape convictions, and adjusted the rape sentence to 30 years.
Criminal appeal – identification evidence – late-night incidents; koroboi/torch lighting; child eyewitness credibility; defective charge particulars not necessarily prejudicial; sentence adjustment to statutory minimum for rape.
|
7 December 1999 |
|
Conviction quashed where prosecution evidence was uncorroborated and likely culprits were neither called nor charged.
* Criminal law – Theft by public servant – whether prosecution proved offence beyond reasonable doubt – credibility and corroboration of interested witnesses required.
* Criminal procedure – Failure to call or charge persons likely present at the alleged theft – impact on safety of conviction.
* Appeal – Unsafe conviction – quashing of conviction and setting aside sentence and compensation order.
|
6 December 1999 |
|
Conviction for theft quashed for being based on uncorroborated and unreliable prosecution evidence; appellant discharged.
* Criminal law – Theft by public servant – Insufficiency of evidence and requirement for independent corroboration where witnesses are interested parties. * Evidentiary law – Non‑production/non‑charging of persons allegedly in possession of stolen funds undermines prosecution case and credibility.
|
6 December 1999 |