|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| June 2003 |
|
|
A spouse has a protectable interest in the matrimonial home under s.59(1) even if legal title is in the other spouse.
Family law – Matrimonial property – Protection of matrimonial home – s.59(1) Law of Marriage Act 1971 – Spouse’s protectable interest (caveat) even where legal title is in other spouse – Attachment of matrimonial property.
|
30 June 2003 |
|
Where no lawful marriage is proved and a prior marriage subsists, a divorce petition and property division claim cannot succeed.
Family law – marriage validity – cohabitation (concubinage) insufficient to prove marriage; s.160 Law of Marriage Act inapplicable to convert concubinage into marriage; prior subsisting marriage renders subsequent union void and may attract s.152(1) offence; divorce petition untenable without proven valid marriage.
|
30 June 2003 |
|
The court acquitted the second appellant for gang rape but convicted the first appellant of simple rape, reducing his sentence.
Criminal law – Rape – Proof of participation in gang rape; identification and missing witnesses; weight of victim's testimony and medical evidence (PF3/Exh P1); substitution of convictions and sentencing where co-accused acquitted.
|
30 June 2003 |
|
Victim’s reliable identification of her brother established rape; reasonable doubt as to co-accused led to acquittal and reduced sentence.
Criminal law – Rape – Identification at night – prolonged encounter with a known victim reduces risk of misidentification; identification parade unnecessary. Criminal law – Evidence – Victim credibility and medical PF3 corroboration – prior mental illness does not automatically negate credibility. Criminal law – Acquittal of co-accused may require substitution of convictions and sentences where proof of joint participation fails. Procedural – Failure to trace key witness can weaken prosecution case.
|
30 June 2003 |
|
Appellant’s claim for large demolition costs failed for lack of documentary proof; appeal to increase award dismissed.
Civil procedure – burden of proof – claimant must substantiate monetary claim with receipts or documentary evidence; appellate interference with factual award requires sufficient evidential basis; quantification of demolition/building costs.
|
30 June 2003 |
|
Conviction based on inadequate single-witness identification (no description or lighting detail) is unsafe and was set aside.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Conviction based on single-witness identification – Necessity to apply cautionary rules and consider lighting, distance, duration and prior acquaintance – Failure to describe accused or lighting renders identification evidence unsafe.
|
30 June 2003 |
|
Appeal dismissed as identification, rape and robbery proven; second appellant partially relieved because medical report established minority.
Criminal law – Identification – Daytime offence and acquaintance between complainants and accused reduce risk of misidentification; Rape – corroboration by witness and PF3 medical report can establish non‑consensual intercourse; Robbery with violence – conviction may stand on credible complainant testimony even if recovered items lack special marks; Alibi – statutory notice and direct assertion by accused required to be effective; Sentencing – minority established by medical report warrants adjustment and may justify release where time served suffices.
|
30 June 2003 |
|
|
30 June 2003 |
|
Non-payment of rent justified lawful execution of decree; plaintiff's losses were self-inflicted, suit dismissed.
Lease law – non-payment of rent as fundamental breach – execution of court decree – lawful closure of premises – losses caused by the lessee’s breach not actionable against lessor.
|
27 June 2003 |
|
Lessee's non-payment of rent justified lawful execution and closures; claimed losses were self-inflicted and claim dismissed.
Lease obligations — non-payment of rent — execution of court decree — lawful possession and closures — causation of damages; oral set-off agreements versus enforceable court orders.
|
27 June 2003 |
|
An assault/damages counterclaim failed for lack of evidence and unproved special damages; appeal dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – counterclaim for assault and damages – insufficiency of evidence; special damages require strict proof; effect of failure to appeal prior acquittal; absent eyewitness testimony undermines proof.
|
27 June 2003 |
|
A year’s inaction after filing a timely Notice of Appeal rendered a later extension application frivolous and it was struck out with costs.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Application for extension struck out as frivolous and vexatious where applicant filed Notice timely but failed to prosecute appeal for one year; credibility of poverty excuse rejected.
|
25 June 2003 |
|
Court granted a limited stay of execution to protect disputed ancestral land pending determination of an appeal.
Civil procedure – stay of execution pending appeal – substance over form where wrong procedural provision used; Order XXXIX Rule 5 and Order XXI Rule 24 applied. Requirements for stay – arguable appeal, risk of irreparable loss, balance of convenience. Land disputes – protection of ancestral burial ground, mosque and house; limited preservation measures (harvest/tend existing crops).
|
24 June 2003 |
|
Interim stay granted to maintain status quo and prevent dissipation of estate assets pending revocation proceedings.
Probate and administration – Interim relief – Stay of execution pending revocation application; maintenance of status quo to prevent dissipation of estate assets. Interim procedure – Court should not decide contested factual allegations at interlocutory stage; preserve assets until substantive hearing. Costs – No order as to costs for interlocutory application of this nature.
|
24 June 2003 |
|
Dispute over mining joint venture: denial of overseers and agreed 40% share found fundamental breach; appeal dismissed.
Contract – mining joint venture – fundamental terms – right to station overseers and agreed profit share; breach and termination; jurisdiction of Resident Magistrate’s Court; assessment of witness credibility; injunction as remedy to protect access to mining plot.
|
24 June 2003 |
|
Court restrained survey/entry: prior withdrawal order did not determine ownership, and execution against a non‑party was improper.
Land law – intended forcible entry and survey – reliance on prior High Court order recording withdrawal of suit – withdrawal with liberty to refile does not determine ownership – cannot execute against a non‑party – ownership dispute to be decided in proper proceedings.
|
24 June 2003 |
|
Court stayed execution pending appeal to prevent irreparable loss to applicant's interest in disputed matrimonial property.
Stay of execution – Order XXXIX Rule 5 CPC – applicant must show irreparable loss and arguable appeal – matrimonial property – risk of transfer or alienation – discretionary relief; question whether divorce could properly be granted where separation was pleaded.
|
24 June 2003 |
|
The applicant's appeal succeeds; the respondent convicted for entering the main road without giving way, causing an avoidable collision.
Road traffic — Duty to stop and give way when entering a main road from a minor road — Credibility of eyewitnesses versus appellant's denial — Appeal against acquittal — Reversal where acquittal unsupportable on evidence.
|
24 June 2003 |
|
Appellate court allowed DPP's appeal, finding respondent failed to stop and give way before entering major road; acquittal set aside and respondent convicted.
Criminal law – Road Traffic – Reckless/dangerous driving – Duty to stop and give way when turning from a minor into a major road – Evaluation of eyewitness evidence including allegedly intoxicated witness – Appeal against acquittal and reappraisal of credibility.
|
24 June 2003 |
|
|
24 June 2003 |
|
A revision against an interlocutory interim order is incompetent; the aggrieved party must apply to the trial court.
Civil revision — interlocutory/interim orders — competence of revision or appeal — s.42(1) Magistrates' Courts Act (as amended) bars appeals/revisions from interlocutory orders — proper remedy is application to trial court for inter partes hearing or review — ex parte interim orders.
|
24 June 2003 |
|
|
24 June 2003 |
|
Municipal demolition entitles plaintiff to proven goods' loss; asset and business loss claims were unproven and dismissed.
Municipal liability for demolition — award for loss of goods where demolition causes destruction of shop contents; evidence: inventory and photographs Proof of damages — claimant bears burden to particularise and prove values claimed Failure to prove assets/building or loss of business — such claims must be substantiated with evidence of what assets existed and method of valuation Pre‑litigation demand/notice — relevance of compliance with Local Government (Urban Authorities) procedures before suing
|
23 June 2003 |
|
Appeal dismissed as time‑barred for failure to file petition within 45 days and no proof of institutional delay.
Criminal procedure — s.361(b) C.P.A. — time limit for petition of appeal (45 days) — computation from date copy of judgment furnished — delay allegedly caused by prison authorities must be proved — appeal dismissed as time-barred.
|
23 June 2003 |
|
|
23 June 2003 |
|
Reported
Adoption - Adoption order - Effect of the adoption order on the relationship between infant and parent.
Adoption - Purpose of adoption - Purpose of adoption must be to promote the welfare of the child better than the existing arrangement. |
23 June 2003 |
|
|
23 June 2003 |
|
Court quashed conviction and compensation where malicious-damage charge was improperly substituted for housebreaking and theft.
Criminal law – malicious damage to property – mens rea – honest belief that property is one's own negates malice Criminal procedure – substitution of offences – section 305 Criminal Procedure Act – limits on convicting uncharged offences Ultra vires act – trial court improperly substituting malicious damage for housebreaking and theft Compensation – incompetent where conviction for theft not secured
|
20 June 2003 |
|
|
20 June 2003 |
|
Respondent’s long uninterrupted occupation gave rise to prescriptive rights; appellant’s land claim and appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – possession and title – doctrine of adverse possession/prescriptive right – long uninterrupted occupation can confer protective rights against prior claimants. Evidence – failure to call key witness and proof of boundaries – gaps in plaintiff’s case undermine claim to land. Civil procedure – competency/time-bar of appeal – objections to lateness should be raised at the appellate stage where first heard; failure to do so precludes raising it later. Proof of title – ancestral ownership alone does not transfer title to successor absent probative evidence of inheritance or administration.
|
20 June 2003 |
|
Primary and appellate judgments were quashed where courts relied on unproven facts and failed to elicit customary-law evidence; matter remitted for rehearing.
Evidence – Improper inclusion of material facts not supported by evidence; Appellate procedure – inadmissible additional evidence on appeal and requirement to comply with s.21(1)(a) MCA before admitting extra-record material; Customary law – disputes over clan land and inheritance (including in polygamous families) require evidence from local leaders/elders to establish norms; Remedy – quashing of flawed lower court judgments and remitting for rehearing before a different magistrate with new assessors.
|
20 June 2003 |
|
The court quashed irregular lower judgments and ordered a fresh hearing to determine clan-land inheritance under customary law.
Civil procedure – Appeal – irregular admission of extra-record/unsworn material on appeal – appellate power to receive further evidence and requirement for compliance with statutory procedure. Customary law – clan land and inheritance – necessity for trial court to investigate and apply local customary norms (including polygamous marriage rules) when determining land ownership. Remedies – quashing of irregular appellate proceedings and ordering of rehearing by a different magistrate with new assessors to take additional evidence.
|
20 June 2003 |
|
Vested decree may be executed by successor; arrest of directors deferred pending statutorily required notice to show cause.
Civil procedure – Execution of decree vested by Government Notice No. 87/2001 r.5 – successor entitled to execute prior decree. Civil procedure – Execution by arrest/detention of directors – Order XXI r.20(a) requires notice to show cause where decree is over one year old. Civil procedure – Ex parte proceeding after substituted service.
|
20 June 2003 |
|
|
18 June 2003 |
|
A plaint that fails to plead essential facts showing inducement and misidentifies parties discloses no cause of action and is rejected.
Civil procedure – Order VII r.11(e) CPC – Pleading — failure to disclose cause of action; inadequate identification of parties; inducement to breach (tort) — plaint rejected for failure to plead essential facts.
|
18 June 2003 |
|
|
18 June 2003 |
|
Applicant failed to show good cause to extend time to give notice of appeal; presence of counsel negated distance excuse.
Criminal procedure – Extension of time to appeal – Section 361 CPA – Notice of intention to appeal within ten days – Good cause requirement – Presence of counsel negating distance excuse – Vague/omissive affidavit undermining application.
|
18 June 2003 |
|
Applicant failed to show entitlement to interim injunction against purchaser who bought farm at auction and remains in occupation.
Civil procedure — Interim injunction — requirement of prima facie right, irreparable injury and balance of convenience; Auction sale — validity and effect of sale by auction on purchaser’s rights; Mortgagee execution — sale by auction to secure loan; Pending appeal — limited effect on grant of interlocutory relief where applicant failed to establish requisite grounds.
|
13 June 2003 |
|
Application to set aside dismissal for want of prosecution dismissed for lack of authority and no sufficient cause.
Civil procedure – application to set aside dismissal for want of prosecution – sufficiency of affidavits – authority of firm’s officer to represent – illness of advocate as cause for non-prosecution – frivolous and vexatious applications – costs.
|
12 June 2003 |
|
Application to set aside dismissal for want of prosecution dismissed for lack of good cause and inadequate proof of authority.
Civil procedure – application to set aside dismissal for want of prosecution – necessity to show good cause – adequacy of affidavits disclosing authority and relationship to litigant – failure to prosecute – frivolous and vexatious application – costs awarded.
|
12 June 2003 |
|
Application to set aside appeal dismissal dismissed for lack of credible affidavits, proof of authority, and good cause.
Civil procedure – setting aside dismissal for want of prosecution; adequacy of affidavits and proof of authority to represent a firm; sufficiency of illness as "good cause"; failure of deponents to appear at hearing undermines application.
|
12 June 2003 |
|
Domestic contributions to building a matrimonial house justify compensation; appellate exclusion of the house from division was quashed.
Family law – matrimonial property – division of matrimonial home – unpaid domestic contributions and ‘sweat equity’ may attract compensation. Evidence – ownership of land – requirement of concrete proof (receipts/documents) and assessment of credibility where interested witnesses conflict with neutral witnesses. Equity – where ownership/funding is not conclusively proved, contributions by spouse should be compensated.
|
12 June 2003 |
|
|
12 June 2003 |
|
Unpaid domestic contributions to building a matrimonial house can justify compensation or share despite disputed title to the plot.
Family law – division of matrimonial property; ownership of land v. contributions to improvement; entitlement to compensation for unpaid domestic labour; appellate review of witness credibility and factual findings.
|
12 June 2003 |
|
|
10 June 2003 |
|
Disputed ownership of a probate house must be determined by suit under Probate Rules; administrator’s appointment was valid.
Probate law – Objections to inclusion of property in estate – Where a claimant alleges lifetime transfer, objection proceedings under Rule 59(6) of the Probate Rules, 1963, must be numbered and tried as a suit to determine ownership and possession. Probate administration – Validity of appointment – Proper nomination, grant application and publication sustain administrator’s appointment despite objection.
|
10 June 2003 |
|
Appeal allowed: convictions quashed for unsafe identification evidence; sentences set aside and fines refundable.
Criminal law — Intimidation (s.89(2)(b) Penal Code) — Identification and proof beyond reasonable doubt — Eyewitness evidence, hearsay and speculative testimony — Competency of appeal — late notice under s.361(a) Cr.P.A. — Unsafe conviction — Quashing of conviction and setting aside sentence.
|
10 June 2003 |
|
Convictions quashed where prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that appellants threw stones; sentences set aside.
Criminal law – Intimidation (stones thrown at house) – Whether prosecution proved identity of perpetrators beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – Circumstantial and speculative testimony – necessity for cogent evidence identifying accused. Burden of proof – Prosecution obligation; reasonable doubt must benefit accused. Sentence – Convictions quashed; consequential setting aside of fines and imprisonment orders; refund of fines paid.
|
10 June 2003 |
|
Appellants' convictions quashed where a key out-of-court statement was admitted in breach of the Evidence Act and remaining evidence was unsafe.
Evidence Act s34B(2) — admissibility of out-of-court statements; requirement to serve copy and afford opportunity to object; reliability of night-time identification; accomplice/undeclared witness caution; sufficiency of prosecution evidence for conviction.
|
10 June 2003 |
|
|
10 June 2003 |