Results.
50 judgments found.
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
April 2004
The applicant failed to show sufficient cause to extend time to lodge appeals after withdrawing defective notices.
Civil procedure
— Extension of time to appeal — Sufficient cause
— Notice of appeal — Non-compliance renders appeal defective
— Joinder of applications — Permissible where parties and facts are the same
30 April 2004
A mortgagee cannot execute against mortgaged property where the mortgagor was not joined in the suit.
Civil procedure — Joinder — Requirement to join persons with interest in mortgaged property before execution against that property — Order XXXII, Rule 1 CPC
Land law — mortgage enforcement — Third‑party mortgagor’s rights — lender may pursue contractual remedies
30 April 2004
Appellate court quashed convictions where re-opening of prosecution, misapplied recent-possession doctrine, and evidential doubts rendered verdict unsafe.
Criminal law — Admissibility — cautioned statement unsigned and admitted without stated reasons creates doubt
Criminal procedure — re-opening prosecution case after substitution of charge
— improper
— recall of witnesses
Evidence
— conspiracy and robbery — conviction unsafe where based on suspicion and doubtful testimony
— recent possession doctrine — not applicable to documents evidencing property purchase
30 April 2004
Convictions quashed for insufficient evidence and procedural errors in reopening the prosecution case and admitting evidence.
Criminal law — Armed robbery and conspiracy — sufficiency of evidence — Proof beyond reasonable doubt
Criminal procedure — re-opening prosecution case after substitution of charge — Substitution of charges and recalling witnesses — Limits on calling new prosecution witnesses
Evidence — prosecution reliance on recent possession and cautioned statement (confession) — Inapplicability of recent possession to documentary purchase evidence — Cautioned statement unsigned, doubtful admissibility and weight
30 April 2004
Whether a relative may represent a party in Primary Court property-division proceedings without court permission under s33(2).
Civil procedure
— Court inspection of property — Unauthorised suo motu visit — Need for record of reasons
— Procedural irregularity — Effect of lack of statutory authority on validity of Primary Court proceedings
Family law — Division of matrimonial property — Representation by relative — Requirement of court permission under Magistrates' Court Act s 33(2)
30 April 2004
Appeal allowed: seizure justified; compounding valid; awards for missing cash and general damages set aside.
Customs law — Customs/revenue law
— assessment of damages
— compounding
— evidential burden for cash on board
— finality of compounding orders
— presumption of ownership of registered vehicle rebuttable
— seizure and impounding of vehicle carrying suspected uncustomed kerosene
30 April 2004
Appeal allowed: conviction overturned for insufficient evidence, misapplied recent-possession doctrine, and procedural errors.
Criminal procedure
— admissibility of cautioned statements — signature and clear judicial reasoning required
— Doctrine of recent possession — inapplicable to documents evidencing land purchase
— Evidence — credibility of witnesses and mere suspicion insufficient for conviction
— re-opening prosecution case after substitution of charge — improper to call a previously uncalled witness
30 April 2004
The court held that a strike-out of a notice or application is not automatically a bar to reinstitution; the respondent’s preliminary objection was dismissed.
Civil procedure
— Abuse of process — allegation that reinstituting struck-out proceedings is abusive
— Court of Appeal Rules (Rule 77(1)) and Limitation Act — interplay with applications for extension of time and filing out of time
— preliminary objection — treating and deciding objections on threshold grounds before dealing with merits
— Strike out — whether such strike-out permanently bars reinstitution
30 April 2004
Striking out a notice or leave application does not automatically bar re‑instituting proceedings; objection dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure — preliminary objection — whether prior striking out of notice of appeal and dismissal of leave application precludes re‑institution
— no absolute legal bar
— re‑institution not inherently an abuse of process
30 April 2004
Court dismissed challenge to university discontinuation, finding regulations discretionary and supporting affidavits defective under Cap 12.
Administrative law
— Applicability of regulations — Examination regulations — Semester system: repeats and carry‑forwards are discretionary under prospectus/regulations
— judicial review of academic decisions — Review of university discontinuation decisions — Court will not interfere absent clear illegality or procedural unfairness
Civil procedure — Affidavit formalities — compliance with statutory jurat format required for validity — Notaries and Commissioners for Oaths Ordinance (Cap. 12) s.8
30 April 2004
Whether the plaintiff's negligence claim for failure to renew a security bond discloses a cause of action and is maintainable.
Civil procedure
— maintainability — Privity and successor liability under vesting of assets and liabilities — NBC (Re‑organisation and Vesting of Assets and Liabilities) Act No. 23 of 1997 s 10(1)(a)
— preliminary objection — Whether plaint discloses a cause of action — Particulars of negligence required
29 April 2004
An appellant must first challenge a refusal of leave to appeal out of time; the High Court cannot decide merits until that refusal is set aside.
Civil procedure — Appeal out of time — High Court not competent to hear merits where leave to appeal out of time was refused by lower court
29 April 2004
High Court must first address challenge to District Court's refusal of leave to appeal out of time before hearing merits.
Civil procedure — Appeal out of time
29 April 2004
Section 59 protection does not apply where a mortgage preceded spouses' occupation; appeal allowed with costs.
Civil procedure — Costs
Family law — Matrimonial property
29 April 2004
Suit struck out for failing to plead when the cause of action arose, breaching mandatory pleading and limitation requirements.
Civil procedure — Pleading requirements
Land law
— deemed/native right of occupancy vs grant of formal right
— Planning area declarations do not automatically render prior occupiers trespassers
29 April 2004
Appeal filed after 30 days without leave was incompetent and dismissed under Magistrate Court Act s.25(4)(b).
Civil procedure
— Appeals — Time limit for appeals from district court to High Court — Requirement to file within 30 days under Magistrate Court Act s 25(4)(b)
— Procedural compliance — Omissions render an appeal incompetent — Appeal filed outside prescribed period without leave is incompetent and subject to dismissal
29 April 2004
Appellate court will not overturn credibility-based, concurrent factual findings absent misapprehension or miscarriage of justice.
Civil procedure — Appeal — concurrent findings of fact — interference only for misapprehension, miscarriage of justice, or legal error
Evidence — credibility assessments and locus in quo visits afford trial court superior position
Land disputes — Land dispute — sketch plan and witness testimony as probative evidence
28 April 2004
28 April 2004
An appeal filed beyond the 30-day limit without leave of the High Court is time-barred and is dismissed.
Civil procedure — Appeals — Time limit for appealing from a district court exercising appellate/revisional jurisdiction — Appeal filed out of time and without leave is time-barred and dismissed
28 April 2004
Mortgage security includes interest and related charges; stamp duty does not limit guarantors' liability; instalment relief denied.
Land law — Mortgage law — interpretation of mortgage clause
— Court’s discretion on instalments requires sufficient reason and proposed payment plan (O.XX r.11 CPC)
— security covers principal, interest, commissions and costs
28 April 2004
The appellant's appeal was dismissed for being filed 34 days after the decision, beyond the 30‑day statutory limit without leave.
Civil procedure — Appeals — Time limit for appeals from district court to High Court
27 April 2004
Conviction for causing death by careless driving quashed; licence cancellation invalid for failure to afford opportunity under s.27.
Road traffic law
— Appeal — causing death by careless driving — sufficiency and credibility of evidence (eyewitness vs investigating officer/skid marks)
— Road traffic act s.27 — cancellation/disqualification of driving licence
27 April 2004
Prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the two accused participated in the fatal burning; they were acquitted.
Criminal law — Murder — circumstantial evidence
— acquittal where linkage to fatal act not proved
— common intention
— need to prove beyond reasonable doubt
— presence at earlier assault insufficient to establish guilt for subsequent killing
27 April 2004
An appeal from a district court on primary court matters filed after 30 days without leave is time-barred and dismissed.
Civil procedure — Appeals — Primary court origin — Applicable law GN 312/1964
27 April 2004
Proceedings were declared null where a power of attorney was limited to a different, independent cause number and did not authorize the suit.
Civil procedure — Competence of suit — Power of attorney limited to a specific cause number — Whether authority under power extends to a separately filed District Court case — Proceedings prosecuted by one lacking authority are a nullity
24 April 2004
Conviction for rape of an under‑ten child upheld; illegal 30‑year term substituted with mandatory life imprisonment.
Criminal law — Rape
— medical PF.3 evidentiary weight despite non‑attendance of medical officer if not challenged
— penetration (even slight) sufficient
Criminal law — sentencing — Mandatory life imprisonment for rape of a girl under ten
Evidence
— family witnesses and corroboration — corroboration good practice but not mandatory absent collusion
— voir dire of child witnesses — omission affects status of testimony but may be cured by external corroboration
24 April 2004
23 April 2004
Conviction quashed where prosecution relied on uncorroborated co-accused evidence and failed to prove theft or breaking.
Criminal law — Theft and shopbreaking — sufficiency of evidence — inadmissibility of co-accused’s evidence as sole corroboration — conviction quashed for lack of proof
21 April 2004
Court taxed the bill of costs, disallowing unsupported items and awarding Tshs.65,050 after reductions.
Civil procedure — Taxation of costs — reductions for unsupported travel, attendance and secretarial fees — adoption of amounts shown in court record — ex parte taxation where respondent absent
20 April 2004
Administrator convicted of stealing where insurance funds paid to estate were not properly accounted for; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law
— Sentence — custodial sentence not manifestly excessive given proven dishonest conduct
— Stealing by servant/administrator — misappropriation of estate funds paid by insurer held in trust — duty to account for and apply funds to beneficiaries
Evidence — Burden of proof
— accused’s unsupported assertions and unproduced receipts do not discharge obligation to account
— prosecution may prove dishonesty by circumstantial and testimonial evidence
20 April 2004
Reported
Arbitration — Parties agree to submit matter to arbitration — Whether court bound to refer matter to arbitration in case of dispute -Whether submission of a suit to arbitration can be taken and decided as a preliminary objection
Civil practice and procedure — Written submissions — Annexures attached to written submissions — Whether documents constituting evidence of facts may be attached to written submissions
Contract law — Privity of contract — Action is based on trust deed — Whether plaintiff can sue on trust deed to which he is not a party — Whether trust
Labour law — Suit instituted by a trade union branch of TUICO which is not a legal entity — Whether union branch has locus standi — Whether union branch can represent dead, retrenched or retired members
20 April 2004
Whether the suit is barred by a prior suit and whether it should be transferred to the District Court of Nzega.
Civil procedure
— Civil Procedure Code s.8 — Stay/striking out where matter is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit — Requirement to show identical subject matter
— section 21 Civil Procedure Code — Transfer of suit to subordinate court competent to try it — Magistrates' Courts Act (Act No. 25 of 2002) pecuniary jurisdiction of District Courts
20 April 2004
Malicious prosecution established; damages reduced from shs.10,000,000/= to shs.5,000,000/=; other grounds dismissed.
Civil procedure
— Ex parte judgment
— Procedural law — distinction of Cosmas Construction on notice of judgment and extension of time
Damages — general damages compensatory not punitive — appellate interference where amount excessive or wrong principle applied
Tort — Civil torts — malicious prosecution — elements: initiation of prosecution, termination in favour of plaintiff, absence of reasonable and honest belief
19 April 2004
An appeal filed beyond the 30‑day statutory period without leave is time‑barred and dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure
— Appeal time limits
— Leave to file out of time
— remedy — Time‑barred appeals are dismissed with costs
19 April 2004
An appeal filed after the 30‑day statutory period without leave is time‑barred and must be dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure
— Appeals — Time limit for appeals from district courts exercising appellate or revisional jurisdiction
— Procedural competency — appeal time‑barred and liable to be dismissed
19 April 2004
Out‑of‑time appeal dismissed where appellant gave no reason for delay despite procedural errors in lower courts.
Civil procedure
— Appellate review
— execution by attachment — objection proceedings — need to hear evidence and determine locus standi before dismissing objections on ground of delay
Limitation law — Limitation — appeals to High Court — time bar
15 April 2004
Convictions for corruption quashed because witness contradictions and lack of supporting documentary evidence made the verdict unsafe.
Criminal law
— Corruption by agent — conviction based on oral testimony — credibility and internal contradictions of prosecution witnesses
— documentary exhibit not tendered — convictions unsafe
Evidence — Assessment of credibility — appellate interference where trial findings are unsupported by record
15 April 2004
The applicant's land claim was time‑barred and estopped after gifting the area and prolonged village occupation.
Land law — ownership and possession — occupation and inter vivos gift as basis for title
Limitation law — Limitation — Recovery of land — applicable period 12 years under customary law rules and Limitation Act
Civil procedure — Res judicata — prior final judgment by competent court bars subsequent suit on same or substantially same issues between same parties or their privies
15 April 2004
Reported
Court confirms respondent as sole administratrix, quashes trial court’s joint appointment and improper asset-surrender order.
Appellate practice — Appellate review — District/High Court confirmation of appointment and quashing of irregular orders
Civil procedure
— Primary court’s power — invalidity of ordering administrators to surrender estate assets to court for distribution
— Probate/administration — Appointment of administrator — fitness and qualifications of administrator — duty to collect, safeguard, account and distribute estate assets
14 April 2004
Appellants’ convictions for forgery and uttering false documents upheld; absence of NEC witness not fatal to prosecution.
Criminal law — Admissibility of witness absence (National Examination Council)
— Educational professionals’ liability when certifying examination documents
— not necessarily fatal
Criminal law — Evidence
— Burden of proof as to lawful examination candidacy
— Documentary and circumstantial evidence
Criminal law — Forgery and uttering false documents — Proof beyond reasonable doubt
7 April 2004
7 April 2004
7 April 2004
Court upheld Tshs.120,000 award for unexhausted improvements and dismissed the appeal with costs.
Civil procedure — Appeal determined in absence of parties — Determination under s.35 Magistrates' Courts Act, 1984
Land law — Compensation for unexhausted improvements — Entitlement to compensation for labour and money expended
Civil procedure — Assessment of quantum — Whether Tshs. 120,000 for improvements was excessive
7 April 2004
Appellant convicted for stealing public funds; circumstantial evidence supported conviction and six-year sentence; compensation ordered.
Civil procedure — Procedure — Alleged irregular handing-over of safe keys and reliability of testimony on duplicate keys
Criminal law — Sentence — Six-year custodial sentence
Criminal law — Theft by public servant
— Circumstantial evidence and custodial responsibility of cashier
— sufficiency of proof beyond reasonable doubt
Evidence — Opportunity of others and non-joinder of suspects — does not automatically create reasonable doubt when accused offers no plausible exculpatory explanation
6 April 2004
Wrongful joinder does not automatically vitiate proceedings, and borrowing from others does not alone defeat liability to a lender.
Civil procedure
— Evidence — separate borrowings — borrowing from others does not automatically negate liability to another lender
— Misjoinder — wrongful joinder of defendants does not necessarily vitiate proceedings or constitute a miscarriage of justice
5 April 2004
Appeal dismissed where earlier civil marriage presumed monogamous and objection procedure raised registrar competence and evidentiary issues.
Family law
— competence to forward objections where no notice of intention registered
— evidentiary threshold for showing hardship or notorious character to block intended marriage
— Marriage law
— validity concerns where intended marriage to be officiated by unlicensed person
5 April 2004
Conviction based on weak circumstantial evidence and unchallenged alibi was quashed; sentence and compensation set aside.
Criminal law — Theft — Conviction on circumstantial evidence
Criminal procedure — Alibi — notice and particulars — failure by prosecution to investigate/cross-examine weakens case
Evidence — Credibility — delay in reporting and inconsistencies may render witness testimony unreliable
2 April 2004
Conviction on weak circumstantial evidence and an uncontested alibi was quashed; sentence and compensation set aside.
Criminal law — Circumstantial evidence — requirement that incriminatory facts be incompatible with innocence
Criminal procedure
— Alibi — notice — oblige prosecution to follow up hospital evidence
— Credibility — delay and familial connection may undermine witness reliability
2 April 2004
Conviction based on weak circumstantial evidence and unchallenged alibi was unsafe and was quashed.
Criminal law — alibi
— Credibility of witnesses
— Duty of prosecution to investigate and challenge defence evidence
Criminal law — alibi notice
Criminal law — Circumstantial evidence
2 April 2004
The applicant's stay was dismissed because the appealed order under O.XXI r.57 was not appealable; remedy is a suit under O.XXI r.62.
Civil procedure — Appeals from orders — Appealability of orders — Remedy: suit under Order XXI r.62 CPC
1 April 2004