|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| October 2004 |
|
|
Reported
Civil Practice and Procedure - Bill of Costs - Judge orders bill of costs to be presented before a Taxing Officer for taxation - Taxing officer refuses to Conduct taxation of the bill of costs - Whether proper
Civil Practice and Procedure - Bill of Costs — Instruction fees — Whether or not an advocate has been instructed to be determined during taxation
|
5 October 2004 |
|
An order joining additional parties granted while a preliminary objection was pending was vacated as a curable procedural error.
Civil procedure — Joinder of parties — Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Notice of preliminary objection — Procedural irregularity — Inadvertent grant of joinder while objection pending — Order vacated to afford hearing.
|
5 October 2004 |
|
Interim application struck out for procedural and jurat defects, but leave granted to refile within 14 days.
Civil procedure — interim relief — proper provision for interim/ex parte orders — Order XXXVII Rules 1–3 and section 95 (inherent jurisdiction). Civil procedure — mode of application — requirement for Chamber Summons under Order XLII Rule 2 (and related proviso to Order XLIII Rule 2)
Affidavits — jurat formalities — identification before Commissioner for Oaths; defect and curability
Remedy — striking out defective application with leave to refile; no order as to costs
|
5 October 2004 |
|
Court allowed amendment after scheduling order where additional claims arose from same agreement and no bad faith was shown.
Civil procedure — Amendment of pleadings after scheduling/mediation stage — Order 8A, Rule 4 CPC permits departure where necessary in the interests of justice; pleadings may be amended if claims arise from same agreement and no bad faith shown; arbitration objection not determinable on amendment application; costs consequences for departing from scheduling order.
|
5 October 2004 |
|
Conviction for obtaining money by false pretences quashed where funds were advanced under a contract to supply timber.
Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretences – elements and proof required – distinction between fraud and unpaid contractual debt. Civil v criminal remedy – breach of contract/restitution as appropriate remedy for failure to supply goods. Evidence evaluation – trial and first appellate courts’ duty to properly assess documentary and oral evidence (Exhibit A). Improper use of criminal prosecution to recover commercial debts
|
4 October 2004 |
|
Court excluded the accused’s confession as not voluntary and ordered nolle prosequi for lack of credible evidence.
Criminal evidence — Confession; voluntariness; burden on prosecution under s27(2) to prove voluntariness — admissibility
Evidence — Procedural non‑compliance (certificate/signature) not necessarily fatal but relevant to voluntariness. Medical evidence (PF3) indicating injuries — raises inference of coercion/torture if unexplained by prosecution
Criminal Procedure — State may enter nolle prosequi under s91(1) where admissible evidence is insufficient to sustain prosecution
|
3 October 2004 |
|
|
1 October 2004 |
| September 2004 |
|
|
Absence of an eye‑witness does not preclude a case to answer; circumstantial evidence may ground conviction if it proves all elements beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Absence of eye‑witness does not automatically negate a case to answer – All essential elements must be established before conviction on circumstantial evidence. Criminal law – Malicious damage – Valuation not always prerequisite to charging if other elements are proved. Criminal procedure – Submission of no case to answer – Court must assess sufficiency of circumstantial evidence before acquittal
|
29 September 2004 |
|
Equivocal plea did not establish grievous harm; conviction substituted to unlawful wounding and appellant immediately discharged.
Criminal law – Plea of guilty – Equivocal plea – Plea must establish all elements of charged offence – Grievous harm requires proof of specific injurious elements; absence of medical or factual evidence precludes conviction – Appropriate substitution to unlawful wounding – Sentence manifestly excessive and reduced.
|
27 September 2004 |
|
Application for injunction restraining sale of vessel struck out for wrong procedure and failure to show risk of removal.
Commercial law – interim injunction over a vessel – wrong procedural foundation; attachment before judgment (Order 36 CPC) applies where defendant intends to dispose/remove property to obstruct execution; ship plying in ordinary business does not constitute removal/disposal for attachment; application struck out and earlier interim injunction released.
|
24 September 2004 |
|
Wrong citation of the substantive procedural provision renders an interim-Relief application incompetent; vessel’s normal sailing did not justify attachment.
Civil procedure – Interim relief – Distinction between Order 37 (temporary injunction) and Order 36 (attachment before judgment). Civil procedure – Competency of applications – Wrong citation of substantive provision is fatal; section 68 supplementary only. Attachment before judgment – Requirement to prove intent to dispose or remove property to obstruct execution. Interim injunction – Normal commercial movement of a vessel does not, without more, establish risk of removal to defeat execution
|
24 September 2004 |
|
Failure to hold mandatory pre-trial conference and mediation vitiated subsequent proceedings; court quashed orders and directed restart from earlier date.
Civil procedure – pre-trial conference and mediation – mandatory nature of pre-trial/mediation procedures; failure to conduct them vitiates subsequent proceedings – Order XXII r.4 (joinder of legal representative) and Limitation Act period for substitution of deceased party; remedial order to quash and restart from pre-defect stage.
|
23 September 2004 |
|
|
21 September 2004 |
|
Conviction based on colour-only identification and flight was unsafe; appeal allowed and conviction quashed.
Criminal law – Theft – Identification of stolen property – Identification by colour or vague marks is weak and insufficient to establish ownership; conviction unsafe
Evidence – Flight and recovery of property – Running away and possession of parts insufficient alone to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Procedure – Duty to call corroborative witnesses (police) – failure weakens prosecution case; benefit of doubt to accused
|
20 September 2004 |
|
Possession shortly after theft plus corroborated caution statements sustain convictions for receiving stolen property.
Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – possession shortly after theft and exclusive control of premises as evidence of knowledge; corroboration of caution statements; accomplice evidence – need for warning but corroboration may suffice.
|
17 September 2004 |
|
Failure to deposit disputed sales tax under s.47(5) bars a High Court suit under s.55 until the precondition is met.
Tax law – Sales Tax Act – applicability of s.47(2) and s.47(5) deposit requirement to High Court proceedings under s.55(3) where Appeals Tribunal not established; competence of suit; procedural precondition to hearing.
|
14 September 2004 |
|
Attachment of PEDP-funded school accounts stayed pending appeal provided deposit or security is furnished.
Attachment before judgment – Order 39 Rule 5 CPC – stay pending appeal conditional on security – public interest and irreparable harm where accounts hold PEDP school construction funds.
|
14 September 2004 |
|
A land-ownership dispute is civil, not criminal; trespass conviction quashed and fine ordered restituted.
Criminal law – trespass – where dispute centres on title/ownership of land, the issue is civil not criminal – criminal conviction inappropriate.* Prosecution conduct – Republic may decline to support conviction where matter is civil in nature.* Restitution – fine to be refunded where conviction quashed.
|
13 September 2004 |
|
Appeal allowed: conviction quashed for insufficient evidence and improper admission of statutory statement and unestablished victim competency.
Criminal law – Unnatural offence – Conviction based on insufficient evidence; Evidence Act – competency of witness (s127) and procedure for non‑verbal evidence (s128); admissibility of extrajudicial statements (s34B(2)) – statutory conditions and necessity of maker or recorder’s testimony; medical PF3 as corroborative but insufficient where core testimony and formalities lacking.
|
13 September 2004 |
|
Identification evidence sufficiently established guilt; conviction upheld, but caning reduced to statutory twelve strokes.
Criminal law – armed robbery – identification evidence – adequacy of observation, lighting, prior acquaintance, and independent witness corroboration
Evidence – alleged interested witnesses – requirement for corroboration where complainants are related or have interest. Criminal procedure – alibi defence – incompatibility with positive identification
Sentence – corporal punishment – statutory limit of twelve strokes
|
13 September 2004 |
|
Temporary injunction to restrain trademark use denied for lack of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable harm.
Trade mark law – temporary injunction – requirements for interim relief: prima facie case with probability of success; balance of convenience; irreparable harm – passing off allegations – merits cannot be decided at interlocutory stage – Trade and Service Mark Act 1986 s.31 – injunctions in trademark disputes to be granted sparingly.
|
10 September 2004 |
|
|
10 September 2004 |
|
Taxing Master erred by applying Schedule XI instead of Schedule IX; perusal fees are separate and taxation remitted for correction.
Advocates' fees – GN 515/1991 – Rule 40 and Schedules – omission of Schedule IX construed as lapsus; Schedule IX (fees for contentious proceedings) applies to instruction fees; perusal is a separate taxable item; liquidated vs unliquidated claims; taxing officer’s discretion must be judicially exercised; remittal for taxation with directions.
|
10 September 2004 |
|
Schedule IX governs advocates' instruction fees in contentious matters; perusal fees are separate and Taxing Master erred in applying Schedule XI.
Advocates Remuneration — GN 515/1991 — Rule 40 — omission of Schedule IX (lapsus calami) — Schedule IX applicable to instruction fees in contentious proceedings; Perusal fees—distinct taxable item; Liquidated vs unliquidated claims — ascertainment for Schedule IX; Taxing Master discretion — must be reasoned; High Court review — intervene only for error of principle; VAT — proof of registration required.
|
10 September 2004 |
|
Court stayed proceedings and referred the contract dispute to arbitration despite petition filed before appearance.
Arbitration clause – stay of court proceedings – timing of petition for stay (before appearance) – scope of arbitration clause – readiness and willingness to arbitrate; exercise of judicial discretion to refer disputes to arbitration.
|
10 September 2004 |
|
A suit against a specified parastatal without statutory leave is incompetent and is struck out with costs.
Public/Parastatal corporations – statutory requirement for leave to sue specified corporations – failure to obtain leave renders suit incompetent; Civil procedure – preliminary objections – procedural non-compliance and deemed concession – striking out suit with costs.
|
10 September 2004 |
|
|
10 September 2004 |
|
Temporary injunction refused where applicant admitted default and debenture authorised receiver appointment.
Commercial law – Temporary injunction – Application refused where applicant admitted default; contractual debenture and credit facility permitted appointment of receiver; Giella criteria (serious triable issue, likelihood of success, irreparable harm, balance of convenience) not satisfied.
|
9 September 2004 |
|
A debtor who mortgages her residential house waives statutory protection and cannot prevent attachment and sale on default.
Civil Procedure Code s48(i)(e) – protection of residential house – waiver by voluntary mortgage; consent settlement enforcing security; estoppel against judgment debtor; execution by attachment and sale.
|
9 September 2004 |
|
|
9 September 2004 |
|
The applicants' suit was barred by res judicata because the same cause of action had been finally decided previously.
Res judicata – Section 9 Civil Procedure Code – former suit adjudicated same cause of action – parties claiming under same title – omitted relief arising from same cause of action – court may raise res judicata suo motu; also preliminary objections on cause of action, misjoinder and particulars.
|
8 September 2004 |
|
The plaintiff lacked standing to challenge tax remissions based on sale agreements to which it was not a party.
Locus standi; privity of contract; capacity of an association to sue on contracts of member companies; misjoinder of causes of action; tax remissions for importation of industrial/refined sugar; requirement to annex relied-upon agreements to pleadings.
|
8 September 2004 |
|
Preliminary objections (jurisdiction, non-joinder, cause of action) dismissed; suit proceeds despite road-reserve complications.
Civil procedure – Preliminary objections – requirements of Mukisa Biscuit test – objection must raise a pure point of law to dispose of suit
Jurisdiction – Pecuniary jurisdiction – court not ousted by informal valuation; registered valuer’s report required; plaint’s claimed amount important
Joinder – Non-joinder of Government/TANROADS not automatically fatal where plaintiff has no complaint against third party; efficacy of injunction may be affected by third-party actions (demolition notice)
Relief – Inconsistencies in plaint as to damages, declaratory relief and specific performance considered but not determinative at preliminary stage
|
8 September 2004 |
|
Court refuses release of ill judgment debtor, directs statutory insolvency remedies and enforces payment obligations.
Civil procedure – imprisonment of judgment debtor – Section 47(3)(b) and Section 95 CPC – serious illness – examination as to means – enforcement of decretal sums – insolvency/commercial death remedies under Companies Ordinance and Bankruptcy Act – protection of commercial community.
|
7 September 2004 |
|
Whether an impugned magistrate's ruling is interlocutory or final determines availability of revision; court found it final.
Civil procedure – Revision – whether revisional remedy barred where impugned ruling is interlocutory or finally determines the suit. Pecuniary jurisdiction – effect of waiver and admission on whether judgment finally determines action
Execution – competency of challenge to attachment and rights of third parties to object
Evidence – when affidavit paragraphs should be struck out for alleged irregularity
|
6 September 2004 |
|
Defendant’s failure to pay customs duty within seven days under a security bond constituted breach, entitling the surety to indemnity and enforcement.
Customs/security bonds – Conditional bond to secure payment of customs duties – obligation to pay within seven days of Commissioner’s determination – default by taxpayer gives surety right of indemnity. Accrual of cause of action – demand and expiry of contractual period trigger enforceability even if recovery occurs after formal bond expiry
Enforcement – Third Party/Commissioner lawfully enforces/encashes bond through bank agency notice
Remedies – recovery of bond sum, commercial interest, post‑judgment interest and costs
|
3 September 2004 |
|
|
3 September 2004 |
|
Court held corporate guarantor executed guarantee and attempted mortgage; title disappearance due to guarantor fraud and bank negligence.
Banking law – loan facility – corporate guarantee and mortgage – execution and registration – disappearance of title deed – fraud by guarantor and negligence by bank – equitable mortgage principles – indemnity for loss due to third party non‑repayment.
|
2 September 2004 |
|
Revision dismissed where delay was unexplained and requisite court records had been destroyed by fire.
Revisional jurisdiction – Magistrates' Courts Act s.22 – requirement of existing record for revision – delay and laches – destruction of court records by fire – impracticability of revision where records absent.
|
2 September 2004 |
|
Convictions quashed where unlawful search, inadequate investigation and failure to secure defence witnesses rendered trial unfair.
Criminal law – Burglary and stealing – Lawful search and seizure – Search allegedly without search order and independent witnesses – Fair trial – Trial court’s duty to assist accused in securing defence witnesses – Inadequate investigation – Conviction unsafe – Appeal allowed.
|
1 September 2004 |
|
Appeal dismissed as time-barred; limitation runs from day after supply of judgment copy; no discretion under s.3(1).
Limitation of actions – Appeals – statutory appeal period 90 days (First Schedule, Part II, para.1); computation of time – time runs from day after party is furnished with copy of judgment (s.19(2)); exclusion of court-closed days (s.19(6)) does not revive an already expired period; section 3(1) Law of Limitation Act mandates dismissal of time-barred proceedings.
|
1 September 2004 |
|
|
1 September 2004 |
| August 2004 |
|
|
|
31 August 2004 |
|
High Court held executing-court Order XXI r.9 determinations are appealable and granted interim restraint on execution pending appeal.
Civil Procedure – Execution of administrative/ministerial decision as decree (Security of Employment Act s27(1)(c)) – Order XXI r.9 – Whether such executing-court orders are appellable (s70(1)); Estoppel by matter of record – effect of interlocutory/technical dismissal; Order XXXIX r.5(3)(b) – delay in applying for stay of execution; Interim relief – s68(e) CPC.
|
30 August 2004 |
|
Order executing a ministerial decision is appealable; interlocutory dismissal does not estop stay application; no unreasonable delay.
Civil procedure — execution of ministerial/board decisions deemed decrees (Security of Employment Act s27(1)(c)) — Order XXI r9 execution orders can be treated as decrees under ss3,36,38 CPC and are appealable under s70(1) CPC; estoppel by record not available where prior ruling was interlocutory/incompetency-based; reasonableness of delay under Order XXXIX r5(3)(b) assessed on facts.
|
30 August 2004 |
|
|
30 August 2004 |
|
Eyewitness identification corroborated by voluntary cautioned statements supports conviction, but a co-accused’s confession alone cannot safely convict others.
Criminal law – Murder – Eyewitness identification and identification parade; Evidence – Admissibility and weight of cautioned/confessional statements; Evidence Act s.33(2) – co-accused confession requires independent corroboration; Trial-within-a-trial – voluntariness of police statements; Alibi – evaluation against eyewitness and confessional evidence.
|
27 August 2004 |
|
Uncorroborated prosecution evidence and failure to call a key witness undermined the convictions against the appellants.
Criminal law – burden of proof; credibility and corroboration of prosecution witnesses; joint charge and common intention; failure to call important witness; defence evidence raising reasonable doubt – convictions quashed.
|
25 August 2004 |
|
An appeal filed after the 30‑day limit without statutory leave is time‑barred and dismissed.
Civil procedure – Appeals – Time limit for appeals – Appeal filed beyond 30 days without leave – Requirement of leave under s.25(1)(b) Magistrates' Courts Act 1984 – Time‑barred appeals – Dismissal.
|
24 August 2004 |
|
Prior suit withdrawn without leave precluded reinstitution; present action held res judicata and dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – Res judicata – Suit previously withdrawn with costs but without leave to refile – Subsequent fresh suit precluded under section 9 and section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code and Order XXIII. Civil procedure – Withdrawal of suit – Requirement of express leave to reinstitute to avoid bar on fresh proceedings
Limitation – Time-bar objection raised but not determined as preliminary objections were dispositive
Jurisdiction – Question raised whether customary/deemed occupancy matters lie within Village Land Councils/Ward Tribunals or High Court (not decided)
|
24 August 2004 |