Results.
74 judgments found.
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
April 2005
Interim injunctions affecting a non‑party are inappropriate; defective jurat in affidavit justified striking it out.
Civil procedure — interim relief — temporary injunctions preserve status quo and should not determine substantive rights
Civil procedure — Joinder/non‑party protection
— National Bank of Commerce v Dar‑es‑Salaam Education and Office Stationery
— temporary orders should not be granted where they would adversely affect a non‑party (Ministry) not joined in proceedings. Authority referred: D.B. Shapriya Ltd
Evidence — Evidence and procedure — Affidavit jurat
29 April 2005
Reported
Civil practice and procedure
— Appeals from decisions of Resident Magistrate Court — Whether appeal lies from ex-parte judgement
— Jurisdiction of courts to entertain suits — Objection to pecuniary jurisdiction — Stage at which the objection may be taken
— Lodging of Pleadings — Time Prescribed for lodging — written statement of defense — Application for extension of time to file written statement of defence not made before the expiry of the period prescribed for lodging written statement of defence — Whether the application is competent
29 April 2005
Cautioned statements and corroboration upheld convictions; restitution reduced for lack of proof of value.
Criminal law
— Evidence — Admissibility of cautioned statements — Law of Evidence Act ss 31 and 33
— sentencing — order for restitution — Valuation of stolen goods: reduction where valuation lacks evidential proof
Criminal procedure — trial-within-a-trial — Requirement only where assessors sit
29 April 2005
Trial court misdirected by convicting of grievous harm without proof and admitting child evidence without required voir dire.
Criminal law — Offences against the person — Grievous harm — Necessity to prove elements
Criminal procedure — conviction for a graver offence than charged — illegality of substituting/convicting for more serious offence
Evidence — Child witness — compliance with section 127(2) (promise to tell truth) and voir dire requirements
29 April 2005
Ex parte default judgment entered after the defendant's absence was set aside for denial of fair hearing and remitted for inter partes trial.
Civil procedure — Ex parte judgment
— miscarriage of justice
— procedural fairness
— setting aside ex parte judgment and remittal for inter partes hearing
— sufficiency of cause for non-appearance
Employment law
28 April 2005
Ex parte judgment and its ex parte enhancement set aside for denying the defendant an opportunity to be heard.
Civil procedure
— Ex parte judgment — Setting aside for lack of opportunity to be heard
— Remittal — file returned for rehearing before another magistrate
— Review of ex parte judgment — Discretion of court
28 April 2005
28 April 2005
Second appeal dismissed; concurrent credibility findings and conviction for burglary/theft based on recent possession upheld.
Criminal law — Burglary and stealing — proof by recent possession and identification of recovered property — Appeal against concurrent findings of fact — Appellate deference to trial court credibility findings
27 April 2005
Court struck out a suo motu revision as unnecessary where the complaint sought information, not review, and prior revision sufficed.
Administrative law — Administrative remedies — role of District Registrar in responding to procedural inquiries about files called to High Court
Civil procedure — suo motu revivals — court-initiated miscellaneous revision unnecessary where complainant’s letter did not seek review
25 April 2005
Appeal incompetent for lack of statutory notice, but the court reduced the five-year sentence to three years.
Criminal law — sentencing — Supervisory powers
Criminal procedure — Notice of Intention to Appeal
Prison law — Prison authorities’ duty — Prepare and lodge appeal notice for incarcerated appellants
25 April 2005
Appeal dismissed for lack of statutory notice; court reduced an excessive sentence under supervisory powers.
Criminal law — Sentencing discretion — Appellate interference where sentence is manifestly excessive, based on wrong principle, or where material mitigation is overlooked
Criminal procedure — Notice of Intention to Appeal — compliance with section 361(1)(a) CPA mandatory for appeals from trial court findings or sentences — prisoner giving notice to officer in charge satisfies statutory requirement and is not time‑barred
25 April 2005
Appeal dismissed for failure to file statutory notice; court reduced sentence on supervisory review.
Appellate practice — Appellate supervisory powers — substitution/reduction of sentence
Criminal procedure — Statutory notice of intention to appeal
25 April 2005
Appeal dismissed for absence of statutory notice; court nonetheless reduced the excessive sentence under supervisory powers.
Appellate practice — Appellate jurisdiction
Criminal law — sentencing — appellate reduction of excessive sentence
Criminal procedure — Appeal competence
Prison law — Prisoners — Duty of prison authorities to prepare and file appeal notice for incarcerated appellants
25 April 2005
PF3 need not be contested by calling its author; credible testimony plus PF3 can prove rape beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law
— medical evidence — PF3 admissibility and section 240(3) CPA
— Rape — proof of penetration
— sentencing — Statutory minimum
— Standard of proof — credibility and corroboration
25 April 2005
High Court quashed garnishee/execution for amount exceeding and contrary to an already satisfied decree, declaring it illegal.
Civil procedure — Revision
— Execution to non‑parties
— Finality of decree and execution
— Garnishee issued for amount exceeding decree
— Limits on altering judgments
— High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction to call for and examine subordinate court records
— Illegality and nullity of improper garnishee/execution orders
25 April 2005
Court quashed garnishee and execution order for a non‑existent decree, holding the subordinate court lacked power to vary the final decree.
Civil procedure
— court may not vary substantive relief except under s.96 CPC for clerical/arithmetic errors — Execution of non‑existent decree is illegal — Payment to non‑party (stranger) and suspicious dealings justify quashing and costs
— Revision of subordinate court proceedings — Execution of decree — Garnishee orders — Finality of decree
25 April 2005
Appeal dismissed for lack of statutory notice; court reduced an excessive five-year sentence to three years.
Criminal procedure — Appeal competency — duty of prison authorities to lodge notice for incarcerated appellants — supervisory powers to vary excessive sentence
25 April 2005
Court struck out a suo motu revision opened from an informational letter, holding it an improper forum instead of registrar administration.
Administrative law — Administrative practice — Role of District Registrar in responding to administrative queries about file transfer — not a matter for revision if no complaint of proceedings or orders is made
Civil procedure
— Procedural propriety — Existing revision proceedings may render further suo motu actions unnecessary
— Suo motu revision — Opening a revision on the court’s own motion where correspondence merely seeks information — when such action is inappropriate
25 April 2005
A first appellate court must review Primary Court evidence and give reasons; Primary Court credibility findings were upheld.
Land law — ownership dispute over plot — evidential weight of oral testimony and possession — first appeal duty to review Primary Court evidence and state reasons — credibility assessments and balance of probabilities
25 April 2005
25 April 2005
Matrimonial home found to have been built during marriage; respondent entitled to one-third of its value, appellate increase to one-half unjustified.
Evidence — appellate variation of award — need to give reasons when altering lower court’s assessment
Family law
— Law of marriage act 1971 — shares to reflect parties’ respective contributions
— Matrimonial property — determination of share in house built during marriage — contributions both financial and non-financial considered
25 April 2005
Financial contribution before marriage can justify a larger share of the matrimonial home under s.114; appellate variation requires reasons.
Appellate practice — Appellate review
— unexplained uplift is reviewable
— variation of monetary award requires stated reasons
Family law — Matrimonial property — house built during marriage — qualifies as matrimonial home subject to division under section 114 Law of Marriage Act, 1971
25 April 2005
Land Division has exclusive jurisdiction over statutory-value land disputes; suit struck out for being filed in the wrong registry.
Land law — Jurisdiction
— Court
— exclusive vesting of land dispute jurisdiction under s.167 Land Act
24 April 2005
Land Division has exclusive jurisdiction over high-value land disputes; suit in general registry is incompetent.
Land law — Jurisdiction
— Exclusive jurisdiction of High Court
— incompetence of suit filed in general registry
— preliminary objections on jurisdiction may be raised at any time
— value thresholds for original jurisdiction
24 April 2005
Registry communication is administrative and not appealable; applications to appeal out of time are dismissed.
Criminal procedure — Notice of Intention to Appeal
— applications to file notice and petition out of time dismissed
— order striking off appeal under s379(a) is appealable
— registry letter from District Registrar is administrative, not an appealable High Court decision
— remedy against registrar’s acts is by reference to the High Court
20 April 2005
Applicant's medical conditions and prison conditions justified bail pending appeal; court avoided prejudging appeal merits.
Criminal procedure — Bail pending appeal — Medical illness as sufficient cause — Prison conditions impeding control of hypertension and diabetes — Conditions of bail (amount, sureties, passport surrender, monthly reporting)
19 April 2005
Applicant’s medical conditions and inadequate prison conditions justified bail pending appeal; court refused to pre-judge appeal merits.
Civil procedure — Procedural law
Criminal law — Bail conditions — monetary bail, approval of sureties, surrender of passport, periodic reporting to District Registrar
Criminal procedure — Bail pending appeal — medical condition as sufficient cause — prison conditions and diet affecting control of diabetes and hypertension
19 April 2005
Representative lacked standing and documentary evidence was insufficient to link the respondent to alleged misappropriation.
Civil procedure — Representative suits — requirement of express mandate/consent by those to be represented
Contract law — Document alteration — Effect of struck-out names and subsequent insertions on probative value
Evidence — evaluation of documentary and oral evidence — Necessity of corroborative documentary and oral evidence linking defendant to custody of funds
19 April 2005
Appellate court restored the Primary Court's factual findings, rejecting late evidence and reversing the District Court's upset of the trial judgment.
Civil procedure
— Civil appeal — findings of fact and credibility — appellate court should not disturb trial court's factual findings made after locus in quo inspection
— contract for goods (bricks) — payment advances and inconsistent conduct undermining claim
— Fresh evidence on appeal — Ladd
19 April 2005
Applicant’s medical conditions and prison conditions justified bail pending appeal; court declined the 'overwhelming chances' test.
Criminal procedure — Bail pending appeal
— conditions of bail (amount, sureties, passport surrender, monthly reporting)
— prison conditions and inadequate diet/medical care as relevant factors
— Whether serious medical conditions justify bail pending appeal
19 April 2005
Convictions for rape and impregnating a schoolgirl upheld, but custodial sentences unlawful for a juvenile and substituted for immediate release.
Criminal law
— Rape — conviction after unequivocal plea of guilty — plea precludes appeal against conviction where facts support offence
— sentencing — juveniles
Family law — Children and young persons act — section 22(2) prohibits imprisonment of young persons (12–<16) unless no other method suitable. Illegal custodial sentences set aside and substituted to permit immediate release
19 April 2005
Court: out-of-time stay should not have been allowed; vacate order lawful as house belonged to another estate.
Civil procedure — Probate and administration — Appointment of administrators
— extension of time and competence to entertain out-of-time applications
— whether an administrator of one deceased can administer property of another deceased by virtue of consanguinity
Civil procedure — Relief — revocation of letters of administration available in primary court if appointment procured by fraud
Civil procedure — Stay of execution — validity where property belongs to a different estate
18 April 2005
Procedural error in allowing an out‑of‑time application found, but eviction upheld based on proper estate ownership.
Civil procedure — extension of time — application for leave to file out of time — Stay of execution
Probate law — Administration of estates — Scope of administrator's authority — Administrator of one estate does not automatically administer another estate
18 April 2005
Technical irregularity in late filing; nevertheless respondent lawfully administers separate estate and is entitled to possession of the house.
Civil procedure
— Possession/disputed property — entitlement follows lawful letters of administration
— Probate and administration — Appointment of administrators — separate estates — administrator of one deceased does not ipso facto administer estate of another relative
18 April 2005
Court found an out-of-time application wrongly allowed, but upheld respondent's administration and eviction order.
Civil procedure — extension of time — an out-of-time application
Civil procedure — Probate and administration — separate estates
— administrator of one estate cannot administer property of another
— kinship alone insufficient to confer administration rights
Civil procedure — Relief — improper procedural allowance does not automatically negate a substantive right to possession
Land law — Possession/disputed property — Primary Court appointment of administrator confers entitlement to administer and possess estate property unless successfully challenged
18 April 2005
Second suit stayed as sub judice because its issues are directly and substantially the same as an earlier pending suit.
Civil procedure — Civil procedure code s.8 — subjudice doctrine
— amendment of pleadings is discretionary and not the only remedy
— stay of proceedings where matters directly and substantially in issue in earlier pending suit
18 April 2005
A second suit duplicating matters in an earlier pending suit is subjudice and should be stayed pending determination of the earlier suit.
Civil procedure — Subjudice doctrine
18 April 2005
High Court may review its own appellate orders, but review refused where no mistake apparent on the record.
Civil procedure — failure renders judgment a nullity
Civil procedure — Interlocutory appellate orders generally not appealable
Civil procedure — Order XLII r.1-(1)(b) CPC — Does not preclude review of appellate orders where sufficient reason exists
Civil procedure — Order XX r.4 CPC
Civil procedure — Review
— High Court's power to review its own orders made in appellate jurisdiction — Existence of lower court judgment not determinative
18 April 2005
High Court may review its appellate orders despite void lower-court judgments, but review requires an error apparent on the record.
Civil procedure — Judgment review — High Court power to review its own appellate orders
18 April 2005
Late-filed stay-of-execution application was technically irregular, but the eviction order was upheld because the property belonged to a different estate.
Civil procedure — Ownership of estate property — identity of deceased owner
— Administrator of one estate does not automatically administer another related estate
— validity of administrator's appointment
Civil procedure — Probate and administration — stay of execution — late filing of application without leave — technical irregularity
18 April 2005
15 April 2005
Accused convicted of manslaughter for domestic‑violence strangulation; drunkenness rejected as sufficient excuse; sentenced to 20 years.
Criminal law — homicide — Manslaughter — Acceptance of plea and conviction on accused's own plea and factual admission
Criminal law — sentencing
— domestic violence as aggravating factor
— intoxication not a full mitigation
Evidence — Post‑mortem and sketch plan — Suffocation due to strangulation supporting unlawful killing
15 April 2005
Temporary injunction in trade mark dispute denied for lack of evidentiary showing of prima facie case and irreparable harm.
Civil procedure — interlocutory relief — trade mark disputes generally unsuitable for injunctions absent evidentiary proof
15 April 2005
Ex‑parte judgment entered without proof of service and misapplication of procedure was unlawful; matter quashed and remitted.
Civil procedure
— Civil revision — High Court’s revisional jurisdiction under Magistrates' Courts' Act to correct jurisdictional error, illegality or material irregularity — Quashing of orders and remittal for inter partes hearing
— Ex parte judgment — Requirement that summons be duly served before entry of ex parte judgment in subordinate court — Incorrect reliance on High Court provision (Order IX r.6(1)(a)(i)) instead of Order IX r.6(1)(a)(ii)(B)
— jurisdiction — wrong or inapplicable citation of statutory provision — Effect on validity of judgment
14 April 2005
Ex parte judgment entered without proof of service and misapplication of CPC was invalid; matter remitted for inter partes trial.
Civil procedure — Ex parte judgment — Requirement of proof of service of summons before entering judgment in default — Misapplication of Order IX r.6(1)(a)(i) (High Court provision) instead of Order IX r.6(1)(a)(ii)(B) — Procedural irregularity — Quashing of judgment and remittal for inter partes trial
14 April 2005
Ex‑parte judgment entered without proof of service was illegal; matter remitted for inter partes retrial.
Civil procedure — Civil procedure code — Order IX r.6 — Ex parte judgment
— improper application of High Court sub‑rule
— procedural irregularity in fixing hearing
— quashing of tainted orders and remission for inter partes retrial
— Requirement of proof of service of summons before entering judgment in subordinate courts
14 April 2005
Ex parte judgment entered without proof of service and under the wrong rule was quashed and remitted for retrial.
Civil procedure
— Ex parte judgment — Requirement of proof of service of summons before entering judgment in default — Misapplication of Order IX r.6(1)(a)(i) (High Court provision) instead of Order IX r.6(1)(a)(ii)(B)
— Misapplication of procedure — Incorrect application of High Court sub‑rule by a lower court
— Revision and remittal — Setting aside/striking-out order and remitting for rehearing before a different Chairperson
14 April 2005
Application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed for failure to show sufficient cause and disclose intended grounds.
Civil procedure — Extension of time to file appeal — factors to consider: prospects of success, reasons for delay, supporting affidavit particulars, and reasonable and sufficient cause
14 April 2005
A conviction based solely on a child’s in‑court evidence given openly, without required in‑camera procedure or recorded credibility findings, is unsafe.
Criminal law — sexual offences — Evidence of child complainant — mandatory in-camera hearing — non-compliance renders proceedings a nullity
Evidence — corroboration — conviction on uncorroborated evidence of child of tender years permitted only if court records reasons and is satisfied child is telling truth
14 April 2005
Rape conviction quashed where mandatory in‑camera procedure and statutory safeguards for child witnesses were not followed.
Criminal law
— Evidence in sexual offences — Reception of evidence in camera — Criminal Procedure Act s 24(3)
— Evidence of child of tender years — Conviction on sole testimony — Evidence Act s 127(7)
— corroboration — Hearsay cannot corroborate complainant — Complaint and second‑hand evidence insufficient as corroboration
14 April 2005