High Court of Tanzania

This is the second level in the Judiciary justice delivery hierarchy. It has both appellate and original powers on civil and criminal matters. It also hears appeals from the Courts of Resident Magistrate, the District Courts, and the District Land and Housing Tribunals in exercise of their original, appellate and/or revisional jurisdiction. The High Court is divided into Zones and specialized Divisions. 

Physical address
24 Kivukoni Road, P O Box: S.L.P. 9004
709 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 709 judgments found.

709 judgments
December 2011
DLHT's failure to state issues and reasons renders its judgment a nullity and warrants a rehearing.
  • Land law — Land appeals — Procedural requirements for appeals from District Land and Housing Tribunal to High Court — Regulation 20(1)(a)–(d) GN. No. 174/2003; Cap. 216 ss. 43(1)(b), (2)
29 December 2011
A preliminary objection based on disputed service of notice of appeal was improper and was dismissed; each party to bear own costs.
  • Civil procedure — cannot resolve factual disputes requiring evidence
    • — Mukisa Biscuits principle applied
    • — stay of execution
  • Civil procedure — preliminary objection
29 December 2011
Landing contractor liable for negligent custody of container; plaintiff awarded customs-based refund, general damages, interest and costs.
  • Commercial law
    • — carriage/container custody — landing contractor’s duty of care for containers and contents
    • — negligence for pilferage in defendant’s custody Evidence — valuation of lost goods — admissibility of pro forma invoice vs. reliance on customs release/declaration Remedies — award of pecuniary compensation based on customs-declared value, general damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and costs
29 December 2011
29 December 2011
Misjoinder upheld for distinct transactions; advocate’s unsigned plaint curable and defendant may be substituted.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Proper parties — Suit against wrong defendants — Whether suing the managing director instead of the company is fatal
    • — Pleadings — Signing and verification of plaint — Omission of advocate’s signature curable (Order VI r 14)
    • — Joinder of parties — Whether joinder raises common questions of law or fact — Misjoinder where claims arise from distinct transactions (Order I r 1; Order I r 9)
29 December 2011
An arbitration clause does not oust court jurisdiction where a defendant has taken steps in court instead of timely seeking a stay.
  • Arbitration — Arbitration clause — effect on court jurisdiction
29 December 2011
Petition for letters of administration granted where statutory publication, absence of caveat and documentary requirements were satisfied.
  • Civil procedure — Probate and administration — Grant of letters of administration — Intestacy
23 December 2011
Court granted applicant extension to lodge notice and apply for leave to appeal due to counsel's bereavement and illness.
  • Civil procedure — Extension of time to appeal — whether lack of notice of judgment and subsequent illness constitute sufficient cause — Appellate Jurisdiction Act s 11(1), Law of Limitation Act s 14(1)
23 December 2011
22 December 2011
Revision dismissed: most impugned acts time‑barred and successor magistrate's discretion to continue trial not revisable.
  • Civil procedure — Revision — Whether revision lies against interlocutory orders — Civil Procedure Code s 75
  • Limitation law — 60‑day period for revision — Application of item 21, Part III, First Schedule to the Law of Limitation Act — Law of Limitation Act s 3 and Schedule Part III item 21
  • Trial procedure — change of magistrate during trial — Whether successor magistrate may start trial de novo or continue proceedings — Order XVII r 10 CPC
20 December 2011
Expiry of a Speed Track does not automatically extinguish a suit; court may amend scheduling orders in the interests of justice.
  • Civil procedure — Order VIIIA
    • — court may depart from/amend scheduling order in the interests of justice
    • — expiry of Speed Track does not automatically terminate suit
    • — Speed Track allocation and computation
    • — striking out is not the necessary remedy for expired Speed Track
    • — such relief need not be constrained by Law of Limitation
20 December 2011
Appeal allowed: unsafe identification and improperly admitted/unsupported exhibits rendered conviction unsafe.
  • Criminal law — identification evidence
  • Criminal procedure — Burden of proof
  • Evidence
    • — Caution statement — right to comment and complaints of coercion before admission
    • — Exhibits — admissibility and connexion of recovered weapon and documents
19 December 2011
Reported
Appeal allowed: conviction quashed for unreliable identification and unlawfully admitted exhibits and caution statement.
  • Criminal law — Visual identification — night-time identification — Sufficiency of observation and parade identification
  • Criminal procedure — admissibility of cautioned statement — Accused's right to be heard before admission of documents and caution statements
  • Evidence — Identification of exhibits — Proper linkage of recovered firearm to accused
19 December 2011
Insufficient night identification and improperly admitted exhibits and caution statement rendered conviction unsafe.
  • Criminal law — identification evidence — visual identification and identification parade
  • Criminal procedure
    • — admissibility of cautioned statements — trial‑within‑a‑trial, voluntariness and requirement to give reasons before admission — Criminal Procedure Act ss 50 & 51
    • — Admissibility of exhibits — Proof of provenance and chain of custody
19 December 2011
An application for leave to appeal filed after unwarrantable delay is incompetent; appeal struck out with costs.
  • Civil procedure — application for leave to appeal out of time — timeliness and competence
19 December 2011
District Land Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to treat a Ward Tribunal criminal trespass as a land appeal; proceedings quashed.
  • Civil procedure — nullity of proceedings where no valid appeal exists
  • Jurisdiction — District Land and Housing Tribunal — whether it may entertain a land appeal originating from a Ward Tribunal criminal trespass matter — jurisdictional limits and proper characterization of proceedings
  • Land law — referral to Village Land Council for ownership determination versus criminal trespass proceedings
19 December 2011
Allegations of judicial bias unsupported; refusal to address court is abuse—recusal denied and application dismissed with costs.
  • Civil procedure — Abuse of process
    • — court may invoke inherent powers
    • — refusal to address the court to have a compromise (Deed) registered may be an abuse
  • Civil procedure — Judicial recusal
    • — mere apprehension without evidence insufficient (Rugaimukamu; Registered Trustees; Mwita Chacha)
    • — standards for disqualification: need evidence of close relationship, personal bias or financial interest
19 December 2011
Appeal dismissed: employee's unauthorised sale/lending of employer's cement proved beyond reasonable doubt, defence uncorroborated.
  • Criminal law — Stealing by servant — Entrustment of employer's property and unauthorized disposal
  • Evidence
    • — Criminal burden of proof — Credibility assessment and appellate deference to trial court's findings
    • — duty to call witnesses — Failure to call material witness (present at scene)
16 December 2011
Application to set aside dismissal for non-appearance dismissed as lacking sufficient cause and rendered futile; High Court lacked jurisdiction to stay execution.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Order IX Rule 9(1) & s95 CPC — setting aside dismissal for non-appearance — sufficient cause
    • — Remedy for judgment alleged obtained by fraud — appeal/revision versus fresh suit
    • — Stay of execution — jurisdiction after Court of Appeal determination
16 December 2011
Revocation of letters of administration without hearing violated natural justice and was declared a nullity.
  • Probate law — Revocation of administrator — Revocation of letters of administration without hearing — Natural justice: requirement to afford opportunity to be heard
  • Civil procedure — Omission renders judgment a nullity — Decision made without hearing — Quashing and restoration of administrator
16 December 2011
Revocation of the applicant's letters of administration without hearing violated natural justice and was declared a nullity.
  • Administrative law — Right to be heard (audi alteram partem) — Failure to consider party's defence renders decision a nullity
  • Probate law — Revocation of letters of administration — requirement of summons and right to be heard — Natural justice
16 December 2011
The court held all biological children are heirs regardless of legitimacy and ordered sale with equal distribution including two ex-wives.
  • Probate law
    • — Administration — court orders sale of disputed property and equal distribution of proceeds
    • — Contributions by former spouses — not a basis for exclusive inheritance rights
    • — Probate — Intestate succession — entitlement of all biological children irrespective of legitimacy or type of parental marriage
    • — Rent collected — to be paid to deceased's children only
16 December 2011
Drug trafficking is an unbailable offence; charge was sufficient and bail application dismissed.
  • Criminal procedure — Bail
    • — certificate of value not an ingredient of trafficking offence
    • — Illicit drug trafficking excluded from grant of bail by statute
    • — sufficiency of charge
16 December 2011
Conviction quashed for armed robbery due to unreliable identification, procedural breach over PF3, and unrebutted alibi.
  • Criminal law
    • — Defence of alibi — no burden to prove, but ineffective against watertight prosecution case
    • — identification evidence — Recognition by witnesses
  • Evidential weight of medical (PF3) and witness testimony — Medical evidence (PF3) — Admissibility and mandatory compliance with CPA s240(3)
16 December 2011
Second defendant struck out for misjoinder after first defendant’s despecification removed the receiver role.
  • Civil procedure — Joinder of parties — Official Receiver as proper party — Government Notice despecifying corporation
16 December 2011
Despecification of a parastatal removes the basis for joining the Parastatal Sector Reform Commission as its receiver.
  • Civil procedure — Joinder of parties — Official Receiver as proper party — Despecification removes legal basis to join Parastatal Sector Reform Commission as receiver — GN No. 272 of 2005
16 December 2011
Trial Magistrate’s demand that the applicant prove beyond the balance of probabilities was a miscarriage of justice; retrial ordered.
  • Civil procedure
    • — requiring a higher standard is misdirection and a miscarriage of justice — Quashing of impugned decision and order for retrial de novo — Costs: each party to bear own costs
    • — Standard of proof — Balance of probabilities is the applicable standard in civil matters
16 December 2011
Court reduced excessive instruction and attendance fees and taxed the bill of costs at Tzs. 8,115,000/=.
  • Civil procedure — Taxation of costs — instruction fees — factors: suit value, subject matter, complexity, time, research, parties' conduct
  • Legal profession — Advocates’ remuneration — GN 515/91 scales outdated — taxing master may adjust awards to achieve fair compensation
  • Tax law — Taxation — attendance, ADR and disbursements — reduction where excessive or where adjournments caused by judgment debtor
16 December 2011
Clerical error in date on grant not forgery; Primary Court's letters of administration restored.
  • Probate law — Administration of estates — Validity of grant of Letters of Administration — Clerical error distinguished from forgery — Citation/publication requirement
16 December 2011
Appeal struck out because the attached decree bore a different date than the judgment, breaching Order XX r.7.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Appeal requirements — Formal defects in memorandum of appeal — Endorsement and certification issues
    • — Decree — XX, Rule 7 CPC requires decree to bear date of pronouncement of judgment — Order XX r.7 CPC
15 December 2011
Vague medical certification did not establish good cause to extend time for filing an appeal.
  • Civil procedure — extension of time — enlargement to file application for leave to appeal — discretionary exercise guided by length and reason for delay, existence of arguable appeal and prejudice (Mbogo). Ignorance of law/procedure is not good cause for extension
15 December 2011
Statutory prohibition of bail for money laundering is constitutional; PCCB lawfully investigated and prosecuted related offences.
  • Constitutional law
    • — Bail
    • — Separation of powers — judicial discretion and statutory bar on bail
  • Criminal procedure
    • — Anti‑corruption enforcement — PCCA powers, DPP supervisory control, NPSA s.22 and GN No.169/2008 authorising PCCB officers to prosecute offences discovered during corruption probes
    • — High Court powers
15 December 2011
Court upholds non‑bailability for money‑laundering charges and confirms PCCB’s authority to prosecute offences arising in corruption investigations.
  • Constitutional law — Bail
    • — money laundering non-bailable
    • — proportionality and Oakes-type justification
  • Constitutional law — PCCB mandate
    • — PCCB not liable
    • — power to investigate/prosecute offences discovered in corruption probes under DPP supervision
  • Constitutional law — Separation of powers — legislature may prescribe non-bailable offences without usurping judicial function
15 December 2011
The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding the Revision Panel validly ordered execution and functus officio/res judicata did not apply.
  • Civil procedure — Adequacy of reasons
    • — Order certainty and enforceability
    • — Panel’s consideration of grounds
  • Civil procedure — functus officio and res judicata — requirements not met
15 December 2011
Applicant withdrew an urgent application for injunction and stay; court marked it withdrawn and awarded costs to respondent.
  • Civil procedure — interim relief — Temporary injunction and stay of execution — application overtaken by events may be properly withdrawn
  • Civil procedure — Withdrawal/abandonment of proceedings
    • — costs may be awarded
    • — Court may mark application withdrawn where applicant files notice and withdrawal is unopposed
14 December 2011
A time-barred appeal lacking proper grounds may be summarily dismissed under section 28(3) of the Magistrates' Court Act.
  • Criminal law — Magistrates' court act s.28(3)
    • — distinction between explanations and grounds of appeal
    • — summary dismissal of appeals
    • — time‑barred appeals
14 December 2011
Convictions for trespass and malicious damage arising from a land dispute were quashed; land disputes should first be determined by Land Court/Tribunal.
  • Criminal law — Trespass and malicious damage arising from land dispute
    • — defective trial record may render convictions unsafe
    • — Where dispute is essentially about land, it should ordinarily be determined by a Land Court/Tribunal before criminal prosecution
13 December 2011
Conflicting duplicate Ward Tribunal judgments vitiated the record, so proceedings were nullified and a retrial ordered.
  • Land law — conflicting tribunal records — nullification of proceedings where lower tribunal issues two different awards on same cause of action Remedy — setting aside tainted records and ordering retrial before a differently constituted tribunal panel
13 December 2011
Application to restore a time‑barred suit dismissed: inherent jurisdiction cannot override statutory limitation.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Inherent jurisdiction — Application to reopen proceedings — Whether section 95 CPC can be invoked to evade statutory limitation
    • — limitation — applications — Item 21, Part III Schedule, Law of Limitation Act — 60 days
    • — functus officio — A judge may not re‑determine issues already decided by another judge of the same court — Whether a different judge can restore a suit struck out by an earlier judge
13 December 2011
Basic Rights petition challenging repealed employment law was time‑barred, procedurally defective, and dismissed.
  • Administrative law
    • — Constitutional and administrative law — Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act petitions are civil suits for limitation purposes — six‑year limitation applies
    • — Public corporations in receivership — leave of court and joinder of official receiver required
  • Civil procedure
    • — Effect of repeal — court cannot declare provisions of a repealed statute unconstitutional or revive dead law
    • — Government proceedings
    • — Joinder — Attorney General is a proper party in constitutional challenges to statutory provisions
13 December 2011
A constitutional petition challenging a repealed employment law was time‑barred, overtaken by events, and dismissed with costs.
  • Constitutional law — Constitutional petitions
    • — limitation period
    • — requirement of leave to sue specified public corporations under receivership
    • — statutory notice to sue the Government
    • — whether such petitions are suits for limitation purposes
13 December 2011
Under Islamic succession, a surviving wife with children is entitled to one‑eighth of the estate; executor must satisfy that share.
  • Probate law — Probate — Islamic succession — Applicability of Quranic shares where deceased professed Islam — Surah An‑Nisa (4:12) entitlement of surviving wife to one‑eighth where deceased left children
  • Probate law — Probate remedy
    • — executor ordered to evaluate estate and satisfy Quranic kithumni share
    • — transfer of property of equivalent value permitted
  • Succession law — Testamentary capacity and limits — Muslim testator cannot dispose by will more than one‑third of estate after debts and legacies
12 December 2011
Wife entitled to one‑eighth under Islamic succession; executor ordered to evaluate estate and satisfy that share.
  • Probate law
    • — Muslim succession — Wife's kithumni (one‑eighth) where deceased left children — Evaluation and satisfaction of share by executor
    • — Wills — Will and exceptions (Section 55; Rule 33(1); Section 65) — Objector's right to statutory/religious share
12 December 2011
Repeated applications to set aside an ex parte judgment were abuse of process; the proper remedy was appeal.
  • Civil procedure
    • — abuse of court process — repetition of applications previously decided
    • — Execution — execution from a short judgment valid unless set aside by a superior court
    • — Locus — objection to locus in a separate, unrelated suit is irrelevant when respondent later acquires locus
    • — Res judicata — Functus officio — once matter decided trial court has no jurisdiction to re-determine it
    • — Right to be heard — available remedies are appeal, not repetitive applications
12 December 2011
Court grants extension to lodge appeal where court-made procedural defects and important land ownership issues show sufficient cause.
  • Civil procedure
    • — Decrees and judgments — unsigned decree and inconsistent dates — consequences and attribution of fault
    • — extension of time — Application under Section 11 Appellate Jurisdiction Act — Granting enlargement where procedural defects caused by the court prevented timely appeal
12 December 2011
Extension of time granted where court-caused decree defects and important land-ownership issues constituted good cause.
  • Appellate practice — Appellate procedure — Extension of time
    • — Court may grant enlargement where earlier appeal struck out due to court’s procedural defects (unsigned/incorrectly dated decree)
    • — substantive importance of issues (land ownership) can constitute good cause
12 December 2011
Court orders executor to value estate and pay the applicant one-eighth under Islamic inheritance law.
  • Probate and administration; Islamic succession law; entitlement of surviving wife to kithumni (1/8) where deceased left children; adequacy of testamentary provisions; executor ordered to value estate and satisfy one-eighth share (cash or equivalent property).
12 December 2011
Conviction quashed where absent‑witness statement was improperly admitted and victim's evidence left reasonable doubt.
  • Appellate practice — Appellate review of trial court's evaluation of evidence and credibility — Benefit of doubt and quashing of unsafe convictions
  • Criminal law — sexual offences against a child — credibility of child witness under section 127 Evidence Act — Evidence Act s.127
  • Evidence — admissibility of extra‑judicial statements — Admissibility of out‑of‑court written statements under section 34B (cumulative conditions) — Evidence Act s.34B
8 December 2011
Extension of time to appeal Ward Tribunal decisions must be sought under s20(2) Land Disputes Courts Act, not Cap 89.
  • Civil procedure — Competence — applications/appeals based on wrong statute are incompetent and liable to be dismissed
  • Land law — appeals from Ward Tribunals — extension of time — correct provision
  • Limitation law
    • — applies to District Tribunal and High Court in original jurisdiction
    • — Limitation
7 December 2011
Appeal allowed: adultery allegations unsupported by direct or sufficient circumstantial evidence and spouse's testimony was necessary.
  • Family law — adultery — direct (flagrante delicto) versus circumstantial evidence
    • — adequacy of circumstantial proof
    • — appellate review of concurrent findings where evidence demonstrably inadequate
6 December 2011