|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| July 2013 |
|
|
Court dismissed clearing agent's claim for lost cargo for lack of locus standi and no cause of action.
Agency law — locus standi of clearing agent to sue for owner's lost cargo; Cause of action — plaint must disclose actionable claim; Proof of special damages — specific pleading and strict proof required; Procedural objection — late preliminary objection raising factual issues is impermissible; Loss of cargo in defendant's custody (theft) conceded but entitlement depends on claimant's capacity.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
Default judgment awarded TZS 50,000,000; 31% interest disallowed for lack of proof; 7% interest and costs awarded.
Commercial law – ascertainment of uncertain reliefs for execution – default judgment – when decree can be made executable. Interest – burden of proof for claiming commercial interest rate; court discretion to award reasonable pre- and post-judgment interest. Damages – special damages (loss of earnings) must be specifically claimed and strictly proved; general damages require evidential foundation, particularly for medical/psychological claims. Pleadings – parties are bound by their pleadings; abandonment of claims in submissions may be marked accordingly. Costs – costs follow the event.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
High Court has jurisdiction where total claimed damages exceed subordinate courts’ pecuniary limits, despite earlier pre-trial waiver.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction – section 13 Civil Procedure Code – court of lowest grade competent – negligence actions – pecuniary jurisdiction – general damages not per se determinative – estoppel by record at pre-trial conference.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
High Court competent to hear negligence claim; general damages do not determine pecuniary jurisdiction.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction and pecuniary limits (s.13 Civil Procedure Code) – whether High Court competent for negligence claims – general damages do not determine jurisdiction – preliminary objection raised late; estoppel by record and negligence of counsel.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
High Court has jurisdiction where the total monetary claim (including general damages) exceeds lower courts' pecuniary limit.
Civil procedure – Jurisdiction – Section 13 Civil Procedure Code – suit to be instituted in lowest court competent to try it; Jurisdiction – monetary threshold – where total claim (special plus general damages) exceeds lower court pecuniary limits, High Court competent; Damages – general damages do not automatically determine jurisdiction but count towards total claim; Procedure – preliminary objections raised late and after pre-trial representation may be negligent but jurisdictional points may still be considered on merits; Tort – medical negligence forum of trial.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
Child’s unsworn testimony and improper identification rendered rape conviction unsafe; conviction quashed.
Evidence Act s127 (voir dire) — child witness competency; witness through interpreter/translator must be sworn; PF.3 (medical) must be properly admitted to prove penetration; hearsay evidence inadmissible; identification parades unreliable where witness knew suspect; conviction unsafe where identity/penetration not proved.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
Conviction unsafe where investigator absent, weapons unproduced, witnesses contradictory and defence (alibi) not considered.
Criminal law – Evidence – adverse inference where essential investigating officer not called – effect on prosecution case; Evidence – non-production of alleged weapons (s.61–62 Evidence Act) reduces weight of oral testimony; Credibility – material contradictions between prosecution witnesses and need for neighbour/corroborative evidence; Criminal procedure – failure to consider defence/alibi is serious misdirection warranting interference on second appeal.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
Rape conviction quashed where victim did not testify and prosecution relied on inadmissible hearsay without complying with s34B.
Criminal law – Rape: victim’s testimony as best evidence; hearsay evidence by third parties inadmissible to prove rape. Evidence Act, s.34B – statement of unavailable witness admissible only upon strict compliance with s.34B(2) requirements. Conviction unsafe where essential witness (victim) did not testify and statutory route for admitting prior statement was not satisfied.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
Extension of time granted where prompt reliance on unavailable legal aid amounted to sufficient cause for delay.
Labour Court — Extension of time — Rule 56(1) Labour Court Rules — Good cause required — Promptness and absence of dilatory conduct — Reliance on legal aid unavailable due to holiday — Distinguishable from counsel negligence cases.
|
31 July 2013 |
|
Appellant's grievous-harm conviction upheld based on corroborated eyewitness evidence, medical report, and uncancelled cautioned statement.
Criminal law – grievous harm – sufficiency of evidence – eyewitness identification and medical report as corroboration. Criminal procedure – cautioned statement – admissibility and weight where defendant does not repudiate it. Evidence – appellate deference to trial court’s credibility findings. Sentencing – exercise of discretion; first offender and leniency vis-à-vis statutory maximum.
|
30 July 2013 |
|
Wrong citation of enabling provision and defective jurat render revision application incompetent, but limited extension granted.
Labour law – Revision of CMA award – Effect of wrong or non-citation of enabling statutory provision – Incompetence and striking out; Civil procedure – Affidavit formalities – Jurat must show name of attesting officer; Discretionary relief – Limited extension of time despite striking out (Labour Court Rules 55,56).
|
30 July 2013 |
|
CMA award of unfair dismissal upheld where employer failed to produce conclusive CCTV/scanner evidence and breached disciplinary procedure.
Labour law – unfair dismissal – sufficiency and assessment of evidence (photographs, seized items, eyewitness testimony) – requirement for corroborative CCTV/scanner evidence; Disciplinary procedure – Employment and Labour Relations (Code of Good Practice) GN.42 of 2007 – significance of employee's signature on hearing outcome; Judicial review – whether CMA exercised jurisdiction with material irregularities.
|
30 July 2013 |
|
Conviction for unlawful firearm and ammunition possession upheld; sentences ordered concurrent and backdated to prior custody.
Criminal law – unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition; evidence – recovery of magazine and matching to previously exhibited pistol; sentencing – concurrent versus consecutive sentences; backdating sentence to account for time in custody.
|
29 July 2013 |
|
Appellant's conviction quashed for unsafe night identification and improperly admitted PF3; appeal allowed and sentence set aside.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Reliance on visual identification at night – Waziri Amani factors (time, distance, lighting, prior knowledge) – identification evidence must be 'water tight'. Evidence – Possession of stolen property – absence of evidence of possession is significant. Criminal procedure – Alibi must be formally raised in trial (s.194(4) CPA) or cannot be relied on ground of appeal. Evidence – Medical report (PF3) admissibility – must be tendered by its author and accused informed under s.240(3) CPA; otherwise expunged. Appellate procedure – Appeal against a non-party improper; failure to hear parties may be cured under s.37(2) Magistrates' Courts Act if no miscarriage of justice.
|
29 July 2013 |
|
Conviction based on unreliable night identification and improperly tendered medical report was quashed; sentence set aside.
Criminal law – Identification evidence at night – Requirements for reliable visual identification (Waziri Amani criteria). Evidence – Admissibility of PF3/medical report – compliance with section 240(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act and tendering by author. Criminal procedure – Appellate irregularities (appeal against non‑party; judging without hearing) and cure under section 37(2) Magistrates' Courts Act. Criminal procedure – Alibi must be raised in accordance with section 194(4) CPA.
|
29 July 2013 |
|
Electronic bank statement printouts inadmissible without certificates proving custody, ordinary course and computer-system authenticity.
Evidence — Admissibility of electronic bank records under Sections 78 & 79 Law of Evidence Act; Bankers' books — requirement to prove entries made in ordinary course and custody/control; Authentication — necessity of certificate by bank accountant/manager and certificate by person in charge of computer system describing safeguards, audit trail and integrity; Amendments to Evidence Act — do not substitute required certification in civil banking evidence; Electronic evidence — must be shown unaltered and accurately derived from source data.
|
28 July 2013 |
|
Bank statement printouts are inadmissible without certificates proving their origin, custody and computer-system integrity.
Admissibility of electronic bank records — Sections 78 & 79 Law of Evidence Act — bankers' books requirements — necessity of certification by bank accountant/manager and computer-system custodian — scope of 2006/2007 amendments — authentication and integrity of computer printouts.
|
28 July 2013 |
|
An appeal filed by memorandum instead of the mandatory petition under s.38(2) is incompetent and struck out.
Land Disputes Act s38(2) – appeals to High Court (Land Division) must be by petition filed in the District Land and Housing Tribunal – appeal filed by memorandum incompetent – appeal struck out; no costs awarded to respondent (appellant a layperson).
|
27 July 2013 |
|
An equivocal plea without facts read to the accused vitiates conviction; release ordered where sentence largely served.
Criminal procedure – Plea of guilty – requirement to put facts to accused – equivocal plea vitiates conviction – where plea equivocal court should record not guilty and hear evidence; Remedy – retrial vs release where sentence largely served; statutory references s.366(1)(a)(i) and s.170(2)(a)(ii) CPA.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
Conviction for armed robbery quashed due to contradictions and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law — armed robbery; sufficiency of evidence and identification; recent possession doctrine; contradictions in witness statements; compliance with s.312 Criminal Procedure Act; burden of proof.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
Failure to conduct and record a proper voir dire plus hearsay and contradictory medical evidence led to quashing of conviction.
Criminal law – Evidence of children of tender years – non‑compliance with section 127(2) Evidence Act/voir dire requirements – mere statement insufficient; evidence discounted. Hearsay evidence and failure to tender/call material witnesses or medical PF3s – lack of corroboration. Contradictions in PF3 dates and testimony – reasonable doubt – conviction quashed.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
A payer’s cheque with a supporting payment voucher can establish discharge of an alleged contractual balance despite the payee's contrary claim.
Contract law – construction contract – payment dispute; cheque and supporting payment voucher as evidence – payer’s description of payment controls allocation; recipient cannot recharacterize payments; documentary and testimonial proof can establish discharge of contractual debt.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
Leave application struck out for wrong statutory citation and failure to attach the required High Court order.
Appellate procedure – leave to appeal to Court of Appeal – correct statutory citation (Appellate Jurisdiction Act Cap 141) and correct subsection (s.5(2)(c)) required. Civil procedure – competence of application – mandatory attachment of High Court order under Rule 49(3), Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. Failure to cite correct provision or to attach required documents renders leave application incompetent and liable to be struck out.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
Leave to appeal struck out for incorrect statutory citation and failure to attach the mandatory High Court order.
Appellate procedure – leave to appeal to Court of Appeal – proper citation of statute and subsection (Appellate Jurisdiction Act Cap 141 R.E.2002 s.5(2)(c)). Civil procedure – competence of application – court not properly moved where wrong statute cited. Court of Appeal Rules (Rule 49(3)) – mandatory requirement to attach copy of High Court order to leave application. Procedural compliance – failure to comply with mandatory filing requirements renders application incompetent and liable to be struck out with costs.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
Court revised CMA award, increased unfair-termination compensation to 12 months, suspended repayment order, denied reinstatement.
Labour law – unfair termination – revision of CMA award – adequacy of compensation – repayment orders for alleged overpayments – reinstatement impracticable after payment of terminal benefits – preliminary objection dismissed for want of prosecution – ex parte determination.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
Court found substantive misconduct but nullified CMA proceedings due to procedural irregularity and lack of condonation.
Employment law – unfair dismissal – substantive versus procedural fairness – employee operated competing company without employer consent; termination substantively fair but procedural defects. Civil proceedings vs labour arbitration – timing, referral and condonation requirements – CMA proceedings nullified for lack of condonation. Statutory terminal benefits – employer obligations under ELRA supersede internal staff regulations.
|
26 July 2013 |
|
Leave to appeal granted on whether specific damages were pleaded/proved and whether additional evidence was lawfully relied on without recorded reasons.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal – whether specific damages were pleaded and strictly proved; admissibility and reliance on additional evidence on appeal – Order XXXIX rules 27(1) and 27(2) Civil Procedure Code; appellate jurisdiction – s.5(1)(c) Appellate Jurisdiction Act; approach to leave where legal point is arguable.
|
25 July 2013 |
|
Night-time identification and missing key witnesses rendered the prosecution’s case insufficient to sustain conviction.
Criminal law – Identification at night – visual identification requirements (observation period, distance, light, prior acquaintance, obstructions, discrepancies); voice identification insufficient without corroboration; failure to call material witnesses and tender key exhibits weakens prosecution case; conviction unsafe where proof beyond reasonable doubt not established.
|
24 July 2013 |
|
Rape conviction overturned for unsafe evidence: inconsistent witnesses and inconclusive medical report.
Criminal law – Rape – Proof beyond reasonable doubt; witness credibility and contradictions; risk of collusion where witnesses are related/neighbours; inconclusive medical (PF3) evidence; benefit of doubt; unsafe conviction.
|
22 July 2013 |
|
Whether a Resident Magistrate in 2007 could act as a justice of the peace to validly record a confession and what minimum safeguards are required.
• Criminal procedure – admissibility of extra‑judicial/confessional statements – whether judicial officer who recorded statement was empowered as a justice of the peace (Magistrates' Courts Act ss.51,52,57,58). • Statutory interpretation – Resident/Primary/ District Court magistrates and appointment/assignment as justices of the peace. • Evidence – no single prescribed form for recorded confessions but minimum procedural safeguards and record‑keeping required to establish voluntariness.
|
22 July 2013 |
|
Registrar’s receipt of an arbitral award constitutes filing and it is enforceable as a decree unless timely challenged.
Arbitration Act – filing of arbitral award – Registrar’s receipt constitutes filing – defective notice to parties – enforcement as decree unless timely challenged – Civil Procedure Code non-applicability to awards filed under Arbitration Act.
|
21 July 2013 |
|
Police breached custodial duty by leaving a ligature point and failing to supervise; plaintiff awarded general damages.
Police duty of care – custodial safety – obligation to remove ligature points and to adequately supervise detainees. Suicide in custody – liability where omission affords opportunity to commit suicide. Proof of special damages – strict proof required by receipts/evidence. Damages for shock and loss of service awarded to relative of detainee who dies in custody.
|
18 July 2013 |
|
Applicant granted extension to seek review of amended decree due to failed rectification attempts and sufficient cause.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Law of Limitation Act s.14(1) – sufficient/ reasonable cause required – delay excused where prior rectification attempts and court errors prevented timely review application. Decree and judgment – rectification of decree – decree must tally with court’s judgment; remedy may be rectification or review where rectification is ineffectual. Functus officio – striking out rectification application and direction to apply for review may justify extension of time.
|
18 July 2013 |
|
Extension of time granted where court's failure to effect ordered rectification and prior attempts constituted sufficient cause.
Limitation Act s.14(1) — extension of time — sufficient or reasonable cause shown by repeated attempts to rectify defective decree; rectification versus review; effect of functus officio ruling on available remedies.
|
18 July 2013 |
|
Conviction for cattle theft upheld where co-accused testimony and consistent evidence supported guilt; sale agreement not defective.
Criminal law – cattle theft – reliance on co-accused testimony; necessity of corroboration; assessment of witness consistency; validity of sale agreement as evidence.
|
18 July 2013 |
|
Appeal dismissed: co-accused evidence credible, sale agreement valid, conviction and five-year sentence for cattle theft upheld.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – Reliance on co-accused’s evidence – When warning and corroboration are not required; Evidence – Consistency of ocular and investigative testimony; Contract/evidence – Validity and evidentiary value of a sale agreement in theft prosecution.
|
18 July 2013 |
|
Appellate court upheld conviction and five-year sentence, finding co-accused testimony and sale agreement credible and consistent.
Criminal law – Cattle theft – Reliance on co-accused evidence and need for corroboration or warning – Assessment of inconsistencies in witness testimony – Admissibility and effect of a written sale agreement.
|
18 July 2013 |
|
Appeals to the District Land Tribunal must be filed within 45 days of the decision; delay for copy preparation is not excluded.
Land Disputes Courts Act – appeals to District Land and Housing Tribunal – mandatory 45‑day filing period from date of decision; time for preparation/delivery of copies not excluded; Court of Appeal rule exclusions distinguishable; extension of time requires formal application showing good cause.
|
17 July 2013 |
|
Failure to determine a child's competence under s.127(2) required quashing the applicant's conviction and ordering a retrial.
Criminal law – Rape of a minor – Evidence of a child prosecutrix – Requirement under s.127(2) to conduct and record voir dire to determine competence – Failure to do so undermines uncorroborated testimony. Corroboration – PF3 and caution statement may be corroborative but do not substitute for mandatory procedural safeguards. Remedy – Where material procedural omission affects the safety of conviction, retrial ordered before different magistrate.
|
17 July 2013 |
|
Whether dying declarations and circumstantial evidence constituted a prima facie case requiring the accused to answer murder charges.
Criminal law – No case to answer – Bhatt test for prima facie case; Evidence – Dying declarations and requirement (and degree) of corroboration; Circumstantial evidence – possession of victim's property, failure to answer alarm, flight on arrest as corroborative indicators; Elements of murder – non‑natural death, causation and intent.
|
17 July 2013 |
|
Reported
Whether a university is a public corporation requiring the Attorney General to be joined in certiorari proceedings.
Judicial review — preliminary objections — affidavit admissibility under Order 19 r.3(1) CPC; exhaustion of alternative remedies — internal appeal unavailable where decision by University Council; Law Reform Act s.18(1),(3) — requirement to summon Attorney General where university is a public corporation under Interpretation of Laws Act/Universities Act.
|
16 July 2013 |
|
Court ordered joinder of the Attorney‑General for certiorari against a public university, dismissing other preliminary objections.
Judicial review – preliminary objections – affidavit content (factual vs. legal) – exhaustion of internal remedies where decision made by University Council – public university as "Government" under s.18(1) Cap 310 requiring Attorney‑General joinder.
|
16 July 2013 |
|
Conviction for cutting trees upheld; two‑year sentence illegal and reduced to twelve months under s.170 CPA.
Criminal law – Malicious damage to property – Identification and direct evidence – Eye-witnesses who personally saw accused commit the act constitute admissible direct evidence (s.62(1)(a) Evidence Act). Criminal procedure – Appeal – New grounds of ownership raised at appeal are inadmissible if not pleaded at trial. Sentencing – Limits of subordinate courts under s.170 Criminal Procedure Act – imprisonment exceeding 12 months requires transmission and confirmation by High Court; illegal sentence to be quashed and substituted.
|
15 July 2013 |
|
Suit under Order XXI Rule 62 dismissed as premature; plaintiff must first seek relief from the executing court with leave.
Limitation law – Law of Limitation Act s.6(b) and Item 5 Part I First Schedule; Order XXI Rule 57 and Rule 62 – objection proceedings and suits following attachment/execution; premature filing vs time‑barred suits; res judicata – striking out for delay not a decision on merits; remedy – apply to executing court for leave/extension of time.
|
15 July 2013 |
|
Plaintiff's land suit dismissed as prematurely filed; must first pursue objection proceedings under Order XXI in executing court.
Land law – procedural jurisdiction – executing court's objection proceedings under Order XXI Rule 57/62; Limitation – Law of Limitation Act s.6(b) and Item 5 Part I First Schedule (two-year period); Res judicata – requirement of a substantive adjudication on the merits; Procedural defects – cure of name/identity defects.
|
15 July 2013 |
|
Failure to cite section 91(1) ELRA together with Labour Court Rules renders a revision application incompetent and struck out.
Labour law – Revision of CMA award – Competence of application – Requirement to cite section 91(1) ELRA together with Labour Court Rules (Rule 28(1), Rule 24). Civil procedure – Preliminary objection – Incomplete or wrong citation of enabling provisions renders application incompetent and liable to be struck out. Procedural law – Omission of proper citation is substantive, not merely technical; court may grant limited leave to refile.
|
12 July 2013 |
|
One appeal dismissed as time-barred; another dismissed after confirming second probate was void but affirming tribunal’s finding that respondent owned the land.
Limitation law – Law of Limitation Act (Cap. 89 R.E. 2002) s.3 – time-barred proceedings must be dismissed; Procedure – striking out vs dismissal; Probate law – dual letters of administration over same deceased invalid; Locus standi – irregular administrators lack capacity to distribute estate; Land law – weight of village allocation and witness evidence in ownership disputes.
|
12 July 2013 |
|
A refiled labour application was struck out as time‑barred for failure to obtain court leave or extension after an earlier striking out.
Labour law – time limits – refiling after striking out – leave or extension required to refile; Limitation Act ousted by labour statute (Employment and Labour Relations Act s91(1)). Civil procedure – preliminary objection – striking out for being time‑barred; court need not examine other objections once time bar sustained.
|
12 July 2013 |
|
The applicant failed to prove malicious prosecution or reputational damage; appeal dismissed.
Tort — Malicious prosecution: requirement to prove prosecution, favourable termination, absence of reasonable/probable cause, malice and damage; burden of proof on claimant; evidence must be marshalled to prove reputational and financial loss; appellate review of trial court factual findings and alleged bias.
|
12 July 2013 |
|
Court quashed conviction and ordered release where trial record was lost and a retrial would cause injustice.
Criminal procedure – lost trial record – remedy where original record lost – discretion to order retrial only where interests of justice require and retrial would not cause injustice – quashing conviction and ordering release where retrial would be prejudicial.
|
12 July 2013 |